Hi Piotr, Harbs,
Today I hope to create another bead that adjusts the padding of a container
according to the scrollbar width, when a scrollbar appears. That was the
use-case that motivated this.
I think it’s ok to initialize the member to NaN. It will be assigned a number
when the bead is
If you call it 0.10.0, I think it’s pretty clear.
> On Nov 12, 2017, at 11:46 PM, Idylog - Nicolas Granon
> wrote:
>
> In developer's eyes, "0.10" is "lower" than "0.9".
>
> You'd better number it as "0.91".
>
> Nicolas Granon
>
>
>
>> -Message d'origine-
>> De : Harbs [mailto:harb
In developer's eyes, "0.10" is "lower" than "0.9".
You'd better number it as "0.91".
Nicolas Granon
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Harbs [mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com]
> Envoyé : dimanche 12 novembre 2017 10:15
> À : dev@royale.apache.org
> Objet : Re: Publishing royale to npm
>
> We’ve
Ok. Just thought that by adding this line there is document.body.appendChild
(outerDiv); that there is something more happen. The undefined for Number
is acceptable for you at the beginning ? Just asking I don't see anything
wrong here. :)
Thanks, Piotr
2017-11-12 20:20 GMT+01:00 Harbs :
> I thi
I think the only thing the bead does is calculates what the width of a
scrollbar will be *if it’s visible*.
The actual logic of setting the width of a component must be set separately.
> On Nov 12, 2017, at 6:24 PM, Piotr Zarzycki wrote:
>
> Hi Yishay,
>
> I like that bead. Just quick questi
I'm sorry! CARLOS I meant :)
2017-11-12 20:04 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki :
> Another thing is: "Apache Royale Jenkings Job Status" - This status
> showing the state of Maven build which is hosted on builds.apache.org.
> Since we are using Alex's machine for producing ditribution package for
> devel
Another thing is: "Apache Royale Jenkings Job Status" - This status showing
the state of Maven build which is hosted on builds.apache.org. Since we are
using Alex's machine for producing ditribution package for developers we
should not have it this link on the website.
Maven is able to build distr
Hi Carlos,
Here you go links to Royale. I see proper names. Royale [1] JS Only [2]. I
did just quick look and when I came to the website I started to search this
information that Nightly is not for production. After w while I have found
this red rectangle. I think font size could be a bit bigger t
Hi,
here's the download page for you to review.
http://royale.codeoscopic.com/download/
Some things to mention:
* As we already don't have release binaries, the first section could be
consider under construction
* For nightly builds I use the links posted by Alex in October. I think
those links
Hi Yishay,
I like that bead. Just quick question. This class resolves some problems
with scroll bar for whole document. Am I thinking correctly? Can we have
such problems for scrollbars in nested elements where scrollbar appears ?
Thanks, Piotr
On Sun, Nov 12, 2017, 16:19 wrote:
> This is an a
Why can’t you change the style value?
It’s a bit odd that the css produced includes each corner separately.
border-radius: 3px should do the same thing.
By default, css is not bound unless you use BindableCSSStyles. You can also
handle the value changes manually, but the value needs to be propag
Hi,
what's the way to change borderRadius in a button dynamically?
I can use:
and this generated
border-top-left-radius: 3px;
border-top-right-radius: 3px;
border-bottom-right-radius: 3px;
border-bottom-left-radius: 3px;
If I use a change handler with a slider or textinput I can
Okok, I thought we'll plan to go from 0.9 to 1.0, so in that case I see it
normal
Thanks Om
2017-11-12 10:14 GMT+01:00 Harbs :
> We’ve fixed a lot of things since 0.8.
>
> 0.9 does not need to jump to 1.0. We can have 0.10 (and 0.11…)
>
> I’d really like to streamline the release process so it’s
Hi,
I'm trying to make some work on RoyaleThemes example and want to use
sliders to change values quickly (width, height, borderRadius,...)
But I'm stuck with the basic Slider component since the thumb is flickering
due to some quick change position while moving. As well the initial
position show
We’ve fixed a lot of things since 0.8.
0.9 does not need to jump to 1.0. We can have 0.10 (and 0.11…)
I’d really like to streamline the release process so it’s painless enough to
release every couple/few weeks.
Harbs
> On Nov 12, 2017, at 10:35 AM, Carlos Rovira wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> about ver
Hi,
about version number, I'll feel more happy with 0.8 than 0.9
My point is that we are getting a first release of Royale and is the same
that FlexJS 0.8 but with some new fixes and little things.
As well I can see many things to do to reach 1.0, and would be great to
have still an intermediate r
16 matches
Mail list logo
