Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

Hi Om, I ran the install. I don't think the package.json is the one from the released source artifact, so I think we might need to call this a nightly. But it does seem to work! Thanks for figuring something out so folks don't have to use URLs. One question though: Is having folks use

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

IMO, we need to list the source package first. Apache is about source. This is why I still think about a marketing site and domain that is more like the other JS frameworks out there. Here is the FlexJS 0.8.0 Download page in case it helps: http://flex.apache.org/download-flexjs.html My 2

Re: system requirements for Royale

Good questions. I don't know for sure about the JDK. Do you have a JDK or just a JRE? If you just have a JRE, does Royale compile your code? I've always had JDKs on my system so it would be better if someone who never had a JDK on their system tried it. I checked the Adobe docs and don't see

Re: YouTube channel

Hi - No further word. I think that we should proceed with an Apache-Royale channel. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 25, 2018, at 4:58 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Hi - > > The current set of channels is related mostly to Apachecon and is owned by > press@.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 1:11 PM, Piotr Zarzycki wrote: > Om, > > Does that install our release or Nightly ? > The release version, i.e. 0.9.0. > > > 2018-01-29 22:09 GMT+01:00 OmPrakash Muppirala : > > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 1:06 PM, Andrew

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

If you post that text to the website, make sure the links are not broken by and that "_" characters have not been inserted. On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 5:11 PM, Piotr Zarzycki wrote: > Om, > > Does that install our release or Nightly ? > > > 2018-01-29 22:09 GMT+01:00

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

Om, Does that install our release or Nightly ? 2018-01-29 22:09 GMT+01:00 OmPrakash Muppirala : > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 1:06 PM, Andrew Wetmore > wrote: > > > What about text like this for the download page on the website? > > === > > > > The

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 1:06 PM, Andrew Wetmore wrote: > What about text like this for the download page on the website? > === > > The current version of Apache Royale is 0.9.0, released in January, 2018. > It is beta-quality. This means that Royale may not work entirely as

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

What about text like this for the download page on the website? === The current version of Apache Royale is 0.9.0, released in January, 2018. It is beta-quality. This means that Royale may not work entirely as you or we want it to, and that certain “standard” components or functions are not yet

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

On 1/29/18, 10:43 AM, "Andrew Wetmore" wrote: >I as a reader would want to see a summary of what is in the release, where >and how to get it, and what to do with it once I have it. The same >information would go into the appropriate pages in the help docs. I can do >a

system requirements for Royale

In the README I, um, read: Royale requires Java SDK 1.7 or greater to be installed on your computer. Is that true even if you are using the compiled binaries and not building Royale? For the help docs, are there any other system requirements, if we are presuming a modern Mac or PC machine? Does

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

In the "release" section we are interested into the binary package only. User have to download it and use in the choosen IDE. That is all. 2018-01-29 19:43 GMT+01:00 Andrew Wetmore : > I as a reader would want to see a summary of what is in the release, where > and how to

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

I as a reader would want to see a summary of what is in the release, where and how to get it, and what to do with it once I have it. The same information would go into the appropriate pages in the help docs. I can do a rough cut based on what I see in the README files, unless somebody with more

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

Carlos, I'm not sure what to write in the "Release" section here [1]. Maybe Andrew could suggest something. I know only that in that section should landed installation through npm. Take a look into above announce. Mac and Windows version. [1] http://royale.apache.org/download/ Thanks, Piotr

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

I have noticed that many times in Alex's emails, but have never bother with that, cause I was just copy whole things. Yep we could use some short versions. Thanks for pointing that. Piotr 2018-01-29 12:51 GMT+01:00 Andrew Wetmore : > I see what the problem is: Because the

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

I see what the problem is: Because the URLs are long the announcement, which has hard returns instead of line wrapping, inserts a "_" character at the line break: http://mirror.dsrg.utoronto.ca/apache/royale/0.9.0/binaries/apache-royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip With the "_" removed the download works

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

What do you see when you go to that link [1] ? Can you post the screenshot. - Make it through nabble [2] cause mailing list is stripping out images. [1] http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.0/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.0-bin-js.zip [2]

Re: Publishing to and installing from NPM

Gah, the installation commands should be: npm install @apache-royale/royale-js -g npm install @apache-royale/royale-js-swf -g Thanks, Om On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 2:41 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > The Apache Royale NPM packages are distributed under the Apache-Royale

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

*http://mirror.dsrg.utoronto.ca/apache/royale/0.9.0/binaries/apache-royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip* *http://apache.forsale.plus/royale/0.9.0/binaries/apache-royale-0._9.0-bin-js.zip*

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

Hi Andrew, To me they are working. Which one you did try ? Thanks, Piotr 2018-01-29 11:36 GMT+01:00 Andrew Wetmore : > Hi: > > None of the mirror sites seem to have the downloadable binary zip. How long > does it take to propagate? > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 5:37 AM,

Publishing to and installing from NPM

The Apache Royale NPM packages are distributed under the Apache-Royale NPM organization: https://www.npmjs.com/org/apache-royale There are two packages available: 1. @apache-royale/royale-js [ https://www.npmjs.com/package/@apache-royale/royale-js] 2. @apache-royale/royale-js-swf [

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

Hi: None of the mirror sites seem to have the downloadable binary zip. How long does it take to propagate? On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 5:37 AM, Carlos Rovira wrote: > Hi Piotr, could you give in this thread all the info about the update and > I'll do it as soon as I can? >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

On the other hand I will wait for you, because we need to update website first with information about download. 2018-01-29 9:52 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki : > No problem! I will do it! > > Thanks for the info! > Piotr > > 2018-01-29 9:42 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

No problem! I will do it! Thanks for the info! Piotr 2018-01-29 9:42 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira : > Hi Piotr, > > I'm off right now so could you do it for me? > > If not I could make this night or tomorrow > > thanks > > 2018-01-29 8:59 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki

Re: Royale Doc Table-of-Contents UX (was Re: Royale Documentation Page Layout Proposal)

OK, so to be clear, you are proposing replacing Jekyll with Gitbook. It looked to me that Gitbook doesn't have as smooth a publishing mechanism. I'll go with whatever the majority wants to do, but I really just want to focus on content instead of debating the merits of alternatives to Gitbook.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

Hi Piotr, I'm off right now so could you do it for me? If not I could make this night or tomorrow thanks 2018-01-29 8:59 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki : > Hi Alex, > > Thanks for the announce. I just respond because it's not seen on the nabble > Dev list. Due to send to

Re: Royale Doc Table-of-Contents UX (was Re: Royale Documentation Page Layout Proposal)

On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 11:56 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > I'm still confused. I think we agreed to use GH Pages. AFAICT, GH Pages > uses Jekyll and Markdown. Jekyll is a general purpose static website generator. Gitbook is built specifically for documentation. >

Re: Royale Documentation Page Layout Proposal

AFAICT, a theme is a set of templates and styles. We already have a template and some styles. Carlos has proposed some tweaks to the template. I asked him to make one adjustment to his suggestions. If Carlos can provide the red graphic that goes along the top and the white logo, I will adjust

Re: Royale Doc Table-of-Contents UX (was Re: Royale Documentation Page Layout Proposal)

Yes we are agreed to use GH pages. I'm glad that is working with google, but let's move forward with Jekyll. We have auto publications once we push it. It is very convenient! Thanks, Piotr 2018-01-29 8:56 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui : > I'm still confused. I think we agreed

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

Hi Alex, Thanks for the announce. I just respond because it's not seen on the nabble Dev list. Due to send to multiple lists. Happy to finally have that release! :) Carlos will you announce on Twitter and Facebook ? Piotr 2018-01-29 8:48 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui : > The Apache

Re: Royale Doc Table-of-Contents UX (was Re: Royale Documentation Page Layout Proposal)

I'm still confused. I think we agreed to use GH Pages. AFAICT, GH Pages uses Jekyll and Markdown. Jekyll expects a certain layout like templates in a _layout folder. I have put a template in there. I don't understand using a different production system that doesn't use Jekyll and its way of