Hi Piotr,
I could not understand this explanation. Might be better to show actual
code. For example in #3, there is a cssClass variable that I don't know
about. Also you mention at the bottom setting something as empty, but I'm
not sure what that is.
However, IMO, this code should be in utility
Here is how I'm thinking to resolve that issue. I would take Harb's
proposition and add to UIBase addClassName() and removeClassName(). Next I
would add internal field _internalClassName:String.
addClassName(value):
1) Will check if provided class name exits in _className and in
_internalClassNam
On 2/27/18, 11:18 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>Gotcha.
>
>I’m not 100% convinced that it’s going to ultimately be easier like this,
>but it might be interesting to have a migration set and see how useful it
>actually is.
Yeah, I can't guarantee it will be better, but having recently survived a
huge sea
Gotcha.
I’m not 100% convinced that it’s going to ultimately be easier like this, but
it might be interesting to have a migration set and see how useful it actually
is.
> On Feb 27, 2018, at 9:13 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> If we put trace statements in the API stubs, the user could get some
>
If we put trace statements in the API stubs, the user could get some
output that tells what is missing. Or scan the JS for some jsdoc key we
leave in the code. But if it compiles, the user will know also what is
missing because the App will not look right or operate correctly.
Harbs, back when y
What would be the results for Alina if you will have that swc ? She simply
will be able to launch application without the error - That's the idea ?
2018-02-27 19:38 GMT+01:00 Harbs :
> Maybe. Not sure.
>
> How does the client know what needs to be implemented and how do they go
> about implementi
Maybe. Not sure.
How does the client know what needs to be implemented and how do they go about
implementing that?
> On Feb 27, 2018, at 8:32 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> Hmm, maybe I'm not understanding you. If we decide to create a SWC with a
> spark.components.Button and Alina needs 12 APIs a
Hmm, maybe I'm not understanding you. If we decide to create a SWC with a
spark.components.Button and Alina needs 12 APIs and we only have time
right now to implement 6 of them, how would you handle the missing 6?
I would just implement those APIs but they wouldn't do anything. They
would contai
If things are no-op or to-dos wouldn’t “stubs” or “dummy” classes be better?
What’s the advantage of having partially functional SWCs? It seems to me like
it would mask the issues?
Harbs
> On Feb 27, 2018, at 7:48 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On the users list, Alina has provided the AP
Hi,
On the users list, Alina has provided the API report for the main portion
of her application. We are still waiting to get a report on her SWC
library. She might have a pile of modules to report on as well.
Based just on the main application, and her saying that she has 500 MXML
files to por
Hi Jason,
Actually, I didn't know that. I'm not a compiler guy. Someone else wrote
the key pieces. I could see that way back, a compiler might have written
out intermediate information for the next step, like having a separate
linker that links the object files. But I don't think I've seen (or
Alex:
As you probably know, compilers in the old days were implemented in a
series of stages as separate processes due to memory size limitations.
The output from the previous stage was fed to the next stage as
compilation proceeded until object files were produced.
Maybe it makes sense for t
Ok Alex,
many thanks
2018-02-27 6:36 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :
> I took care of it.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 2/26/18, 11:51 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
> wrote:
>
> >Hi Just notified in the thread in nextgenas issues
> >Could you post here the names of files to fix? I could ta
I think I have analyzed everything and have some implementation
proposition. I will try to provide it later today.
Thanks, Piotr
2018-02-27 13:35 GMT+01:00 Harbs :
> ExpandableSearch broke too.
>
> > On Feb 25, 2018, at 6:15 PM, Piotr Zarzycki
> wrote:
> >
> > Harbs,
> >
> > If you are using so
ExpandableSearch broke too.
> On Feb 25, 2018, at 6:15 PM, Piotr Zarzycki wrote:
>
> Harbs,
>
> If you are using something more than MDL Dialog in your application it
> would be great to get feedback whether I didn't break for you anything. :)
15 matches
Mail list logo
