Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3

2018-09-11 Thread Alex Harui
Speaking of upgrading, I think you will need to use the latest maven or somehow 
get Maven to use version 1.10.0 of the Maven SCM Plugin.

I have most recently tweaked the Ant scripts to generate the required file 
extension on the SHA hashes.  Assuming those changes work, we should be good to 
go.

Good luck,
-Alex

On 9/11/18, 12:28 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

In case of upgrading anything I really suggest to leave it for the next
release. If you upgrade something you have to take care of upgrading
maven's pom as well.

Piotr

On Tue, Sep 11, 2018, 8:54 PM Alex Harui  wrote:

> I am still trying to fix the Maven build of the examples.  Harb's change
> seems satisfactory for at least now.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 9/11/18, 11:47 AM, "Harbs"  wrote:
>
> It should be good to go now unless Alex or someone else has 
objections…
>
> > On Sep 11, 2018, at 8:55 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > No problem. Thank you! If I start anything with release that would 
be
> > tomorrow morning or evening my time.
> >
> > Piotr
> >
> > wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 19:54 Harbs  napisał(a):
> >
> >> I’m going to spend a few minutes now to see if I can resolve this
> simply.
> >> If not, I’ll revert.
> >>
> >> Harbs
> >>
> >>> On Sep 11, 2018, at 8:50 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Harbs,
> >>>
> >>> It would be great if you could do that. You could bring back
> changes
> >> again
> >>> after release and discuss whatever needed.
> >>> I think we are using following version from 20170626.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Piotr
> >>>
> >>> wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 19:39 Harbs  napisał(a):
> >>>
>  I can revert the changes if that’s what folks want. We’re going
> to have
>  trace calls output if I do that, but we can resolve that for the
> next
>  release.
> 
>  I’m going to see if a different version of the closure compiler
> plays
>  better. The latest version throws a NoSuchMethod error on
> 
> com.google.javascript.jscomp.CompilerOptions.setInlineLocalFunctions.
> 
>  Anyone know which version we’re using now?
> 
> > On Sep 11, 2018, at 9:09 AM, Carlos Rovira <
> carlosrov...@apache.org>
>  wrote:
> >
> > I think is better move that changes to a branch and release.
> > thanks
> >
> > El lun., 10 sept. 2018 a las 20:59, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >
> >> Harbs,
> >>
> >> Can you comment on that ? Any chance to move that changes to
> branch ?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Piotr
> >>
> >> pon., 10 wrz 2018 o 20:54 Alex Harui 
> >> napisał(a):
> >>
> >>> Yes.  I think we are using the wrong annotation for variable
> number
> >> of
> >>> parameters.
> >>>
> >>> -Alex
> >>>
> >>> On 9/10/18, 11:49 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>  Alex,
> >>>
> >>>  What trace hack are you referring to ? This is related what
> Harbs
> >>> commits ?
> >>>
> >>>  Thanks,
> >>>  Piotr
> >>>
> >>>  pon., 10 wrz 2018 o 20:47 Alex Harui 
 >
> >>> napisał(a):
> >>>
>  FWIW, I am not in favor of releasing with the current trace
> hack in
> >>> the
>  compiler.  But if other's are ok with it, I'm not going to
> make a
> >>> big deal
>  out of it, I'll just abstain from voting.
> 
>  -Alex
> 
>  On 9/10/18, 1:15 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> 
>   Hi,
> 
>   I have prepared today all stuff which is needed for making 
RC
> >>> branch. I
>   will check whether everything is working tomorrow. In the
> other
> >>> words
>   probably tomorrow I will push RC1 branch.
> 
>   Thanks,
>   Piotr
> 
>   sob., 8 wrz 2018 o 18:55 Piotr Zarzycki <
> >>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>   napisał(a):
> 

Jenkins build is back to normal : royale-asjs #1308

2018-09-11 Thread apacheroyaleci
See 




Build failed in Jenkins: royale-typedefs #690

2018-09-11 Thread apacheroyaleci
See 


--
Started by timer
Building on master in workspace 

 > git.exe rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree # timeout=10
Fetching changes from the remote Git repository
 > git.exe config remote.origin.url 
 > https://github.com/apache/royale-typedefs.git # timeout=10
Fetching upstream changes from https://github.com/apache/royale-typedefs.git
 > git.exe --version # timeout=10
 > git.exe fetch --tags --progress 
 > https://github.com/apache/royale-typedefs.git 
 > +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
 > git.exe rev-parse "refs/remotes/origin/develop^{commit}" # timeout=10
 > git.exe rev-parse "refs/remotes/origin/origin/develop^{commit}" # timeout=10
Checking out Revision 48633af46db88ce091a409f9e0284f7f8c9d0f15 
(refs/remotes/origin/develop)
 > git.exe config core.sparsecheckout # timeout=10
 > git.exe checkout -f 48633af46db88ce091a409f9e0284f7f8c9d0f15
Commit message: "don't need patch step here either, assuming what we get from 
royale-extras is valid"
 > git.exe rev-list --no-walk 48633af46db88ce091a409f9e0284f7f8c9d0f15 # 
 > timeout=10
[royale-typedefs] $ cmd.exe /C "C:\apache\apache-ant-1.9.9\bin\ant.bat main && 
exit %%ERRORLEVEL%%"
Buildfile: 


main:

download:
 [echo] 

[mkdir] Created dir: 


BUILD FAILED
:54:
 The following error occurred while executing this line:
:86:
 src 
'
 doesn't exist.

Total time: 0 seconds
Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xmx512m
Build step 'Invoke Ant' marked build as failure


Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs #1307

2018-09-11 Thread apacheroyaleci
See 


--
[...truncated 1.04 MB...]
clean:

check-for-tests:

clean-tests:

clean:

check-for-tests:

clean-tests:

clean:

check-for-tests:

clean-tests:

clean:

check-for-tests:

clean-tests:

clean:

thirdparty-downloads:

prepare:
[mkdir] Created dir: 

[mkdir] Created dir: 


check-playerglobal:

fake-playerglobal:

check-airglobal:

fake-airglobal:

compile:

Language:

clean:

check-for-tests:

clean-tests:

check-compiler-home:

check-transpiler-home:

check-compiler:

compile:
 [echo] Compiling libs/Language.swc
 [echo] ROYALE_HOME: 

 [echo] ROYALE_SWF_COMPILER_HOME: 

 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME: 

 [java] args:
 [java] 
+royalelib=
 [java] +playerglobal.version=11.7
 [java] +env.AIR_HOME=C:\adobe\air\4.0\AdobeAIRSDK
 [java] -compiler.strict-xml=true
 [java] -compiler.targets=SWF,JSRoyale
 [java] 
-output=
 [java] 
-load-config=
 [java] 
-js-load-config=
 [java] 
-js-load-config+=
 [java] target:SWF
 [java] target:JSRoyale
 [java] COMPC
 [java] Loading configuration: 

 [java] 
 [java] 3045 bytes written to 

 in 1.403 seconds
 [java] COMPCJSCRoyale
 [java] Copy library.swf
 [java] Compiling file: Namespace
 [java] Writing file: js\out\Namespace.js
 [java] Compiling file: org.apache.royale.language.string.search
 [java] Writing file: js\out\org\apache\royale\language\string\search.js
 [java] Compiling file: org.apache.royale.utils.Language
 [java] Found ignorable: goog.bind
 [java] Found ignorable: goog.global
 [java] Writing file: js\out\org\apache\royale\utils\Language.js
 [java] Compiling file: org.apache.royale.language.string.match
 [java] Writing file: js\out\org\apache\royale\language\string\match.js
 [java] Compiling file: LanguageClasses
 [java] Writing file: js\out\LanguageClasses.js
 [java] Compiling file: QName
 [java] Writing file: js\out\QName.js
 [java] 4.2612297 seconds
 [java] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xmx512m

compile-js:
   [delete] Deleting: 


clean:

check-compiler-home:

check-transpiler-home:

check-compiler:

compile:
 [echo] Cross-compiling LanguageJS.swc
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME: 

[mkdir] Created dir: 

 [java] args:
 [java] 
+royalelib=
 [java] -compiler.strict-xml=true
 [java] -compiler.targets=SWF,JSRoyale
 [java] 
-output=
 [java] 
-load-config=
 [java] 
-load-config+=
 [java] target:SWF
 [java] target:JSRoyale
 [java] COMPC
 [java] Loading configuration: 

 [java] Loading configuration: 

Jenkins build is back to normal : royale-asjs #1306

2018-09-11 Thread apacheroyaleci
See 




Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs #1305

2018-09-11 Thread apacheroyaleci
See 


Changes:

[carlosrovira] - fix dropdownlist arrow to reposition correctly on size changes 
- make

[carlosrovira] update all jewel themes

[carlosrovira] remove default select arrow on IE

--
[...truncated 315.81 KB...]

get-from-cache-if-needed:
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

fail-if-not-found:
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

download-dependency-jar:
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

check-cache:

download-jar:
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

get-if-not-cached:
  [get] Getting: 
https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/google/guava/guava/20.0/guava-20.0.jar
  [get] To: C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\lib\guava.jar
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

double-check-file:
 [echo] Need file: ${still_no_file}

get-from-cache-if-needed:
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

fail-if-not-found:
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

check-sum:
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

put-in-cache:
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

copy-if-cached:
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

download-dependency-zip:
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

check-dependency:

download-dependency:
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx

echo-project-jar:
  [get] Getting: http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
  [get] To: C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\lib\flex-tool-api-LICENSE.txt
   

Jenkins build is back to normal : royale-asjs_jsonly #1509

2018-09-11 Thread apacheroyaleci
See 




Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

2018-09-11 Thread Josh Tynjala
Yeah, it makes sense to use JSRoyale with js-config.xml to exclude parts of the 
framework referenced in royale-config.xml. Unexpected changes to js-config.xml 
in the future could possibly cause some surprises, but if that's probably not a 
huge risk. This would be a decent exception to the rule.

- Josh

On 2018/09/11 17:47:41, Alex Harui  wrote: 
> FWIW, I think the framework swcs are built using the config Piotr is using 
> since want JSRoyale output, but we don't want to assume SWC dependencies 
> specified in royale-config (because we are building the SWCs in those 
> dependencies).
> 
> However, you are correct for most SWCs that application developers will be 
> building.
> 
> Of course, I could be wrong...
> -Alex
> 
> On 9/11/18, 10:21 AM, "Josh Tynjala"  wrote:
> 
> Hey Piotr,
> 
> There's something a little strange in your compiler options that you 
> should probably fix:
> 
> You're specifying JSRoyale and js-config.xml together, but these two 
> aren't necessarily compatible. Here's what you have in your compiler options:
> 
> -compiler.targets=SWF,JSRoyale
> -load-config=d:\royale_nightly_js_swf\frameworks\js-config.xml
> 
> However, it should either be this:
> 
> -compiler.targets=SWF,JSRoyale
> -load-config=d:\royale_nightly_js_swf\frameworks\royale-config.xml
> 
> or maybe this (depending on if you want Royale components or pure JS):
> 
> -compiler.targets=SWF,JS
> -load-config=d:\royale_nightly_js_swf\frameworks\js-config.xml
> 
> Basically, you use JSRoyale with royale-config.xml, or you use JS with 
> js-config.xml. The JSRoyale and JS targets produce very similar output, but 
> it's best not to assume that they're exactly the same in all cases.
> 
> (As a side note, it's worth mentioning that there's also the JSNode 
> target that's meant to work with node-config.xml. JSNode also produces 
> different output than JSRoyale or JS because it generates code for Node.js)
> 
> One last thing. In order to use -compiler.targets=SWF,JS to build a SWC, 
> you'll need my compiler changes from yesterday. For some reason, that was 
> throwing an exception, while -compiler.targets=SWF,JSRoyale did not. I 
> suspect that this may be why you were using JSRoyale instead of JS, but now 
> JS should work too!
> 
> - Josh
> 
> On 2018/09/11 09:45:52, Piotr Zarzycki  wrote: 
> > Hi Guys,
> > 
> > I'm having difficulties with using created Royale SWC in some project. I
> > have two projects. (I've uploaded them on onedrive so you can try it
> > yourself).
> > 
> > Using SWF version of prepared swc I'm able to build project with
> > compiler.targets=SWF. Unfortunately using JS version of that SWC I'm not
> > able to build project with it. [1]
> > 
> > 1. Library itself [2] - It contains configurations 
> compile-swf-config.xml
> > and compile-js-config.xml. Folder "bin" has swc JS and SWF version.
> > 
> > 2. Consumer of library [3] - This one is configured with Moonshine and
> > VSCode.
> > 
> > I'm building JS and SWF version of SWC using following command lines [4]
> > 
> > Does anyone is seeing what could be wrong ? Those command lines [4] are
> > based on how Royale is building swcs Basic, Jewel etc.
> > 
> > [1] 
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FtvhY=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5a8dfde09c3a43c1dc5708d6180b0bf9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722833090144497=8wNnZdcsKAwMUSPkEMln4lIYant36T0FNpCwbjhxE7w%3D=0
> > [2] 
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F1drv.ms%2Fu%2Fs!ApVpLyjpHDC2hZwM9OY5sNinrirEvQ=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5a8dfde09c3a43c1dc5708d6180b0bf9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722833090144497=p9FuFZl3Q69unFF%2F%2BWvoiQ1%2BgFgmKK432O8yfpSxHeI%3D=0
> > [3] 
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F1drv.ms%2Fu%2Fs!ApVpLyjpHDC2hZwNgXaX_G_qZip39g=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5a8dfde09c3a43c1dc5708d6180b0bf9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722833090144497=j8eS3h60ZTJ%2Bdq5hmI1Fa1aLoZ6FJfYFXJzyasns054%3D=0
> > [4] 
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FOtDR=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5a8dfde09c3a43c1dc5708d6180b0bf9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722833090144497=m7b68csRqLF0nnRHOemiNmryFekbHgUGgLFTNkSxZUQ%3D=0
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > -- 
> > 
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> > 
> > Patreon: 
> *https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5a8dfde09c3a43c1dc5708d6180b0bf9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722833090144497=ua2LEaq3tv5oEmOvalMBlT4q8CPJRUysSv5Bocy39QM%3D=0
> > 
> 

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_jsonly #1508

2018-09-11 Thread apacheroyaleci
swc.properties>

clean:
   [delete] Deleting directory 
<http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/ws/frameworks/js/libs>

package-clean:
   [delete] Deleting directory 
<http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/ws/out>

clean-temp:
   [delete] Deleting directory 
<http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/ws/temp/royale-asjs>

checkintests-clean:

mxtests-clean:

clean:
   [delete] Deleting: 
<http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/ws/royale-sdk-description.xml>
   [delete] Deleting directory 
<http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/ws/js/libs>
   [delete] Deleting directory 
<http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/ws/temp>
 [echo] ROYALE_HOME = 
<http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/ws/>
 [echo] royalelib = 
<http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/ws/frameworks>
 [echo] doc_output = 
<http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/ws/asdoc-output>
 [echo] compiler.source-path = 
<http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/ws/frameworks/projects/*/src/main/royale>

clean:

super-clean:
   [delete] Deleting directory 
<http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/ws/mustella/tests/basicTests/bin>
   [delete] Deleting directory 
<http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/ws/frameworks/locale>
   [delete] Deleting directory 
<http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/ws/frameworks/mx>
   [delete] Deleting directory 
<http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/ws/frameworks/rsls>
   [delete] Deleting directory 
<http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/ws/frameworks/themes/Halo>
   [delete] Deleting directory 
<http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/ws/frameworks/themes/Spark>
   [delete] Deleting: 
<http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/ws/frameworks/airmobile-config.xml>
   [delete] Deleting: 
<http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/ws/frameworks/macfonts.ser>
   [delete] Deleting: 
<http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/ws/frameworks/winfonts.ser>
   [delete] Deleting: 
<http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/ws/frameworks/localfonts.ser>
   [delete] Deleting: 
<http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/ws/frameworks/mxml-manifest.xml>
   [delete] Deleting: 
<http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/ws/frameworks/spark-manifest.xml>
   [delete] Deleting: 
<http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/ws/ide/flashbuilder/flashbuilder-config.xml>

create-description:
 [echo] build.number is 20180911

js-output-royale-description:

swf-js-output-royale-description:

create-config:

playerglobal-setswfversion:

create-config:
 [copy] Copying 1 file to 
<http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/ws/frameworks>

tweak-for-jsonly:

playerglobal-setswfversion:

create-config:
 [copy] Copying 1 file to 
<http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/ws/frameworks>

tweak-for-jsonly:

playerglobal-setswfversion:

create-config:
 [copy] Copying 1 file to 
<http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/ws/frameworks>

tweak-for-jsonly:

playerglobal-setswfversion:

create-config:
 [copy] Copying 1 file to 
<http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/ws/frameworks>

tweak-for-jsonly:

playerglobal-setswfversion:

create-config:
 [copy] Copying 1 file to 
<http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/ws/frameworks>

tweak-for-jsonly:

playerglobal-setswfversion:

create-config:
 [copy] Copying 1 file to 
<http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/ws/frameworks>

tweak-for-jsonly:

playerglobal-setswfversion:

create-config:
 [copy] Copying 1 file to 
<http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/ws/frameworks>

tweak-for-jsonly:

playerglobal-setswfversion:

create-config:
 [copy] Copying 1 file to 
<http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/ws/frameworks>

tweak-for-jsonly:
[mkdir] Created dir: 
<h

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs #1304

2018-09-11 Thread apacheroyaleci
See 


Changes:

[carlosrovira] jewel textinput examples

[carlosrovira] resize example button

[aharui] fix maven examples

--
[...truncated 513.75 KB...]
[javac] String mainFileName = new 
File(TestAdapterFactory.getTestAdapter().getUnitTestBaseDir(),
[javac]^
[javac]   symbol:   variable TestAdapterFactory
[javac]   location: class TestBase
[javac] C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\test\java\org\apache\royale\compiler\internal\test\TestBase.java:628:
 error: cannot find symbol
[javac] new 
File(TestAdapterFactory.getTestAdapter().getTempDir()));
[javac]  ^
[javac]   symbol:   variable TestAdapterFactory
[javac]   location: class TestBase
[javac] C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\test\java\org\apache\royale\compiler\internal\test\TestBase.java:721:
 error: cannot find symbol
[javac] File testFile = new 
File(TestAdapterFactory.getTestAdapter().getUnitTestBaseDir(),
[javac]  ^
[javac]   symbol:   variable TestAdapterFactory
[javac]   location: class TestBase
[javac] C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\test\java\org\apache\royale\compiler\internal\test\TestBase.java:731:
 error: cannot find symbol
[javac] File testFile = new 
File(TestAdapterFactory.getTestAdapter().getUnitTestBaseDir(),
[javac]  ^
[javac]   symbol:   variable TestAdapterFactory
[javac]   location: class TestBase
[javac] C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\test\java\org\apache\royale\compiler\internal\test\TestBase.java:821:
 error: cannot find symbol
[javac] File projectFolder = new 
File(TestAdapterFactory.getTestAdapter().getUnitTestBaseDir(), 
projectFolderPath);
[javac]   ^
[javac]   symbol:   variable TestAdapterFactory
[javac]   location: class TestBase
[javac] C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\test\java\org\apache\royale\compiler\internal\test\ASTestBase.java:54:
 error: cannot find symbol
[javac] testAdapter = TestAdapterFactory.getTestAdapter();
[javac]   ^
[javac]   symbol:   variable TestAdapterFactory
[javac]   location: class ASTestBase
[javac] C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\test\java\org\apache\royale\compiler\internal\test\AMDTestBase.java:62:
 error: cannot find symbol
[javac] projectPath = new 
File(TestAdapterFactory.getTestAdapter().getUnitTestBaseDir(),
[javac]^
[javac]   symbol:   variable TestAdapterFactory
[javac]   location: class AMDTestBase
[javac] C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\test\java\org\apache\royale\compiler\internal\codegen\js\goog\TestGoogProject.java:66:
 error: cannot find symbol
[javac] sourcePaths.add(new 
File(TestAdapterFactory.getTestAdapter().getUnitTestBaseDir(),
[javac]  ^
[javac]   symbol:   variable TestAdapterFactory
[javac]   location: class TestGoogProject
[javac] C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\test\java\org\apache\royale\compiler\internal\codegen\js\goog\TestGoogProject.java:95:
 error: cannot find symbol
[javac] String expectedFilePath = new 
File(TestAdapterFactory.getTestAdapter().getUnitTestBaseDir(),
[javac]^
[javac]   symbol:   variable TestAdapterFactory
[javac]   location: class TestGoogProject
[javac] C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\test\java\org\apache\royale\compiler\internal\codegen\js\goog\TestGoogProject.java:116:
 error: cannot find symbol
[javac] File projectFolder = new 
File(TestAdapterFactory.getTestAdapter().getUnitTestBaseDir(), 
projectFolderPath);
[javac]   ^
[javac]   symbol:   variable TestAdapterFactory
[javac]   location: class TestGoogProject
[javac] C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx\src\test\java\org\apache\royale\compiler\internal\codegen\js\royale\TestRoyaleAccessors.java:39:
 warning: [cast] redundant cast to RoyaleJSProject
[javac] ((RoyaleJSProject)project).config = new 
JSGoogConfiguration();
[javac]  ^
[javac] C:\Program Files 

Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

2018-09-11 Thread Alex Harui
Jewel will probably need JSRoyale

On 9/11/18, 1:31 PM, "Carlos Rovira"  wrote:

That's oool Josh!, I'll try to try "JS" instead of "JSRoyale", that seems
more correct.

thanks! :)

El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 19:21, Josh Tynjala ()
escribió:

> Hey Piotr,
>
> There's something a little strange in your compiler options that you
> should probably fix:
>
> You're specifying JSRoyale and js-config.xml together, but these two
> aren't necessarily compatible. Here's what you have in your compiler
> options:
>
> -compiler.targets=SWF,JSRoyale
> -load-config=d:\royale_nightly_js_swf\frameworks\js-config.xml
>
> However, it should either be this:
>
> -compiler.targets=SWF,JSRoyale
> -load-config=d:\royale_nightly_js_swf\frameworks\royale-config.xml
>
> or maybe this (depending on if you want Royale components or pure JS):
>
> -compiler.targets=SWF,JS
> -load-config=d:\royale_nightly_js_swf\frameworks\js-config.xml
>
> Basically, you use JSRoyale with royale-config.xml, or you use JS with
> js-config.xml. The JSRoyale and JS targets produce very similar output, 
but
> it's best not to assume that they're exactly the same in all cases.
>
> (As a side note, it's worth mentioning that there's also the JSNode target
> that's meant to work with node-config.xml. JSNode also produces different
> output than JSRoyale or JS because it generates code for Node.js)
>
> One last thing. In order to use -compiler.targets=SWF,JS to build a SWC,
> you'll need my compiler changes from yesterday. For some reason, that was
> throwing an exception, while -compiler.targets=SWF,JSRoyale did not. I
> suspect that this may be why you were using JSRoyale instead of JS, but 
now
> JS should work too!
>
> - Josh
>
> On 2018/09/11 09:45:52, Piotr Zarzycki  wrote:
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > I'm having difficulties with using created Royale SWC in some project. I
> > have two projects. (I've uploaded them on onedrive so you can try it
> > yourself).
> >
> > Using SWF version of prepared swc I'm able to build project with
> > compiler.targets=SWF. Unfortunately using JS version of that SWC I'm not
> > able to build project with it. [1]
> >
> > 1. Library itself [2] - It contains configurations 
compile-swf-config.xml
> > and compile-js-config.xml. Folder "bin" has swc JS and SWF version.
> >
> > 2. Consumer of library [3] - This one is configured with Moonshine and
> > VSCode.
> >
> > I'm building JS and SWF version of SWC using following command lines [4]
> >
> > Does anyone is seeing what could be wrong ? Those command lines [4] are
> > based on how Royale is building swcs Basic, Jewel etc.
> >
> > [1] 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FtvhYdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C0269d62e776e46cc08d618259024%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722946940896698sdata=B2094%2FbUr5UagOsLyev0GvyGNfG9mOGHTAcHwoAXofo%3Dreserved=0
> > [2] 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F1drv.ms%2Fu%2Fs!ApVpLyjpHDC2hZwM9OY5sNinrirEvQdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C0269d62e776e46cc08d618259024%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722946940906702sdata=di98xHqUTNgQpS1fO7BQXzIRWIyx2OGBCVJl93mh5IQ%3Dreserved=0
> > [3] 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F1drv.ms%2Fu%2Fs!ApVpLyjpHDC2hZwNgXaX_G_qZip39gdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C0269d62e776e46cc08d618259024%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722946940906702sdata=BK35o1j4c4gLQFQ1fU0VBXJzL22D5VKG13SKTPEHDdQ%3Dreserved=0
> > [4] 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FOtDRdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C0269d62e776e46cc08d618259024%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722946940906702sdata=tLE%2B2741ffC30d3Nz7MW%2BjjNhyicr%2B38%2BcVH155On4E%3Dreserved=0
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> > Patreon: 
*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C0269d62e776e46cc08d618259024%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722946940906702sdata=i8vsvL1leBKljSGLnJ7RF7%2FzBsAjRd5HrNV1HG51ntw%3Dreserved=0
> > 
*
> >
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira


Re: [royale-asjs] branch develop updated: fix maven examples

2018-09-11 Thread Harbs
I once spent time on this and things started unraveling pretty quickly.

This was a very long time ago, so it might be easier now…

> On Sep 11, 2018, at 11:29 PM, Carlos Rovira  wrote:
> 
> Ok I undertand now.
> 
> It seems it will be right to change it, but maybe other things has priority
> 
> thanks
> 
> El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 22:23, Alex Harui ()
> escribió:
> 
>> I'm pretty sure this has been discussed before.  In SWF, MouseEvent does
>> not subclass org.apache.royale.events.Event since MouseEvent subclasses
>> flash.events.MouseEvent.  Nobody is really happy about it, but that's the
>> way it is right now.  Volunteers are welcome to try to change it.
>> 
>> -Alex
>> 
>> On 9/11/18, 1:18 PM, "Carlos Rovira"  wrote:
>> 
>>Hi Alex,
>> 
>>so this was incorrect? we can't use Event instead of MouseEvent, or is
>> just
>>to improve the actual code?
>>thanks!
>> 
>>El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 22:05,  escribió:
>> 
>>> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>>> 
>>> aharui pushed a commit to branch develop
>>> in repository
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgitbox.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fasf%2Froyale-asjs.gitdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C22d5029a52ff43e1179e08d61823ccbd%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722939372313398sdata=%2B89SaOGpAMqKOj%2F21QIslYwu3zNQU8rbDBVUZevaMdw%3Dreserved=0
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/develop by this
>> push:
>>> new 64a0795  fix maven examples
>>> 64a0795 is described below
>>> 
>>> commit 64a0795f6ddd71a0c7c2a8449c3b316fa3ea62b3
>>> Author: Alex Harui 
>>> AuthorDate: Tue Sep 11 13:05:31 2018 -0700
>>> 
>>>fix maven examples
>>> ---
>>> .../royale/BE0004_Adding_an_item_to_a_Jewel_List.mxml   |  4 +++-
>>> .../src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/jewel/CheckBox.as | 17
>>> +
>>> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>> 
>>> diff --git
>>> 
>> a/examples/blog/BE0004_Adding_an_item_to_a_Jewel_List/src/main/royale/BE0004_Adding_an_item_to_a_Jewel_List.mxml
>>> 
>> b/examples/blog/BE0004_Adding_an_item_to_a_Jewel_List/src/main/royale/BE0004_Adding_an_item_to_a_Jewel_List.mxml
>>> index 8fe8349..f8d451c 100644
>>> ---
>>> 
>> a/examples/blog/BE0004_Adding_an_item_to_a_Jewel_List/src/main/royale/BE0004_Adding_an_item_to_a_Jewel_List.mxml
>>> +++
>>> 
>> b/examples/blog/BE0004_Adding_an_item_to_a_Jewel_List/src/main/royale/BE0004_Adding_an_item_to_a_Jewel_List.mxml
>>> @@ -24,11 +24,13 @@
>>> 
>>> 
>>>
>>> diff --git
>>> 
>> a/frameworks/projects/Jewel/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/jewel/CheckBox.as
>>> 
>> b/frameworks/projects/Jewel/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/jewel/CheckBox.as
>>> index 2380089..e0b310d 100644
>>> ---
>>> 
>> a/frameworks/projects/Jewel/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/jewel/CheckBox.as
>>> +++
>>> 
>> b/frameworks/projects/Jewel/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/jewel/CheckBox.as
>>> @@ -128,6 +128,23 @@ package org.apache.royale.jewel
>>>IToggleButtonModel(model).selected = value;
>>>}
>>> 
>>> +/**
>>> + *  The value associated with the CheckBox.
>>> + *
>>> + *  @langversion 3.0
>>> + *  @playerversion Flash 10.2
>>> + *  @playerversion AIR 2.6
>>> + *  @productversion Royale 0.9
>>> + */
>>> +public function get value():String
>>> +{
>>> +return IToggleButtonModel(model).html;
>>> +}
>>> +public function set value(newValue:String):void
>>> +{
>>> +IToggleButtonModel(model).html = newValue;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>private function
>>> internalMouseHandler(event:org.apache.royale.events.MouseEvent) :
>> void
>>>{
>>>selected = !selected;
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>>--
>>Carlos Rovira
>> 
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosroviradata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C22d5029a52ff43e1179e08d61823ccbd%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722939372313398sdata=tNecYSfwEi5ZVKxo%2FB5vD%2BEjwBtOWbpFKcvJ24i%2Bz4s%3Dreserved=0
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira



Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

2018-09-11 Thread Carlos Rovira
That's oool Josh!, I'll try to try "JS" instead of "JSRoyale", that seems
more correct.

thanks! :)

El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 19:21, Josh Tynjala ()
escribió:

> Hey Piotr,
>
> There's something a little strange in your compiler options that you
> should probably fix:
>
> You're specifying JSRoyale and js-config.xml together, but these two
> aren't necessarily compatible. Here's what you have in your compiler
> options:
>
> -compiler.targets=SWF,JSRoyale
> -load-config=d:\royale_nightly_js_swf\frameworks\js-config.xml
>
> However, it should either be this:
>
> -compiler.targets=SWF,JSRoyale
> -load-config=d:\royale_nightly_js_swf\frameworks\royale-config.xml
>
> or maybe this (depending on if you want Royale components or pure JS):
>
> -compiler.targets=SWF,JS
> -load-config=d:\royale_nightly_js_swf\frameworks\js-config.xml
>
> Basically, you use JSRoyale with royale-config.xml, or you use JS with
> js-config.xml. The JSRoyale and JS targets produce very similar output, but
> it's best not to assume that they're exactly the same in all cases.
>
> (As a side note, it's worth mentioning that there's also the JSNode target
> that's meant to work with node-config.xml. JSNode also produces different
> output than JSRoyale or JS because it generates code for Node.js)
>
> One last thing. In order to use -compiler.targets=SWF,JS to build a SWC,
> you'll need my compiler changes from yesterday. For some reason, that was
> throwing an exception, while -compiler.targets=SWF,JSRoyale did not. I
> suspect that this may be why you were using JSRoyale instead of JS, but now
> JS should work too!
>
> - Josh
>
> On 2018/09/11 09:45:52, Piotr Zarzycki  wrote:
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > I'm having difficulties with using created Royale SWC in some project. I
> > have two projects. (I've uploaded them on onedrive so you can try it
> > yourself).
> >
> > Using SWF version of prepared swc I'm able to build project with
> > compiler.targets=SWF. Unfortunately using JS version of that SWC I'm not
> > able to build project with it. [1]
> >
> > 1. Library itself [2] - It contains configurations compile-swf-config.xml
> > and compile-js-config.xml. Folder "bin" has swc JS and SWF version.
> >
> > 2. Consumer of library [3] - This one is configured with Moonshine and
> > VSCode.
> >
> > I'm building JS and SWF version of SWC using following command lines [4]
> >
> > Does anyone is seeing what could be wrong ? Those command lines [4] are
> > based on how Royale is building swcs Basic, Jewel etc.
> >
> > [1] https://paste.apache.org/tvhY
> > [2] https://1drv.ms/u/s!ApVpLyjpHDC2hZwM9OY5sNinrirEvQ
> > [3] https://1drv.ms/u/s!ApVpLyjpHDC2hZwNgXaX_G_qZip39g
> > [4] https://paste.apache.org/OtDR
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > *
> >
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: [royale-asjs] branch develop updated: fix maven examples

2018-09-11 Thread Carlos Rovira
Ok I undertand now.

It seems it will be right to change it, but maybe other things has priority

thanks

El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 22:23, Alex Harui ()
escribió:

> I'm pretty sure this has been discussed before.  In SWF, MouseEvent does
> not subclass org.apache.royale.events.Event since MouseEvent subclasses
> flash.events.MouseEvent.  Nobody is really happy about it, but that's the
> way it is right now.  Volunteers are welcome to try to change it.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 9/11/18, 1:18 PM, "Carlos Rovira"  wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> so this was incorrect? we can't use Event instead of MouseEvent, or is
> just
> to improve the actual code?
> thanks!
>
> El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 22:05,  escribió:
>
> > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
> >
> > aharui pushed a commit to branch develop
> > in repository
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgitbox.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fasf%2Froyale-asjs.gitdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C22d5029a52ff43e1179e08d61823ccbd%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722939372313398sdata=%2B89SaOGpAMqKOj%2F21QIslYwu3zNQU8rbDBVUZevaMdw%3Dreserved=0
> >
> >
> > The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/develop by this
> push:
> >  new 64a0795  fix maven examples
> > 64a0795 is described below
> >
> > commit 64a0795f6ddd71a0c7c2a8449c3b316fa3ea62b3
> > Author: Alex Harui 
> > AuthorDate: Tue Sep 11 13:05:31 2018 -0700
> >
> > fix maven examples
> > ---
> >  .../royale/BE0004_Adding_an_item_to_a_Jewel_List.mxml   |  4 +++-
> >  .../src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/jewel/CheckBox.as | 17
> > +
> >  2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git
> >
> a/examples/blog/BE0004_Adding_an_item_to_a_Jewel_List/src/main/royale/BE0004_Adding_an_item_to_a_Jewel_List.mxml
> >
> b/examples/blog/BE0004_Adding_an_item_to_a_Jewel_List/src/main/royale/BE0004_Adding_an_item_to_a_Jewel_List.mxml
> > index 8fe8349..f8d451c 100644
> > ---
> >
> a/examples/blog/BE0004_Adding_an_item_to_a_Jewel_List/src/main/royale/BE0004_Adding_an_item_to_a_Jewel_List.mxml
> > +++
> >
> b/examples/blog/BE0004_Adding_an_item_to_a_Jewel_List/src/main/royale/BE0004_Adding_an_item_to_a_Jewel_List.mxml
> > @@ -24,11 +24,13 @@
> >
> >  
> > 
> > diff --git
> >
> a/frameworks/projects/Jewel/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/jewel/CheckBox.as
> >
> b/frameworks/projects/Jewel/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/jewel/CheckBox.as
> > index 2380089..e0b310d 100644
> > ---
> >
> a/frameworks/projects/Jewel/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/jewel/CheckBox.as
> > +++
> >
> b/frameworks/projects/Jewel/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/jewel/CheckBox.as
> > @@ -128,6 +128,23 @@ package org.apache.royale.jewel
> > IToggleButtonModel(model).selected = value;
> > }
> >
> > +/**
> > + *  The value associated with the CheckBox.
> > + *
> > + *  @langversion 3.0
> > + *  @playerversion Flash 10.2
> > + *  @playerversion AIR 2.6
> > + *  @productversion Royale 0.9
> > + */
> > +public function get value():String
> > +{
> > +return IToggleButtonModel(model).html;
> > +}
> > +public function set value(newValue:String):void
> > +{
> > +IToggleButtonModel(model).html = newValue;
> > +}
> > +
> > private function
> > internalMouseHandler(event:org.apache.royale.events.MouseEvent) :
> void
> > {
> > selected = !selected;
> >
> >
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosroviradata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C22d5029a52ff43e1179e08d61823ccbd%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722939372313398sdata=tNecYSfwEi5ZVKxo%2FB5vD%2BEjwBtOWbpFKcvJ24i%2Bz4s%3Dreserved=0
>
>
>

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: [royale-asjs] branch develop updated: fix maven examples

2018-09-11 Thread Alex Harui
I'm pretty sure this has been discussed before.  In SWF, MouseEvent does not 
subclass org.apache.royale.events.Event since MouseEvent subclasses 
flash.events.MouseEvent.  Nobody is really happy about it, but that's the way 
it is right now.  Volunteers are welcome to try to change it.

-Alex

On 9/11/18, 1:18 PM, "Carlos Rovira"  wrote:

Hi Alex,

so this was incorrect? we can't use Event instead of MouseEvent, or is just
to improve the actual code?
thanks!

El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 22:05,  escribió:

> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>
> aharui pushed a commit to branch develop
> in repository 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgitbox.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fasf%2Froyale-asjs.gitdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C22d5029a52ff43e1179e08d61823ccbd%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722939372313398sdata=%2B89SaOGpAMqKOj%2F21QIslYwu3zNQU8rbDBVUZevaMdw%3Dreserved=0
>
>
> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/develop by this push:
>  new 64a0795  fix maven examples
> 64a0795 is described below
>
> commit 64a0795f6ddd71a0c7c2a8449c3b316fa3ea62b3
> Author: Alex Harui 
> AuthorDate: Tue Sep 11 13:05:31 2018 -0700
>
> fix maven examples
> ---
>  .../royale/BE0004_Adding_an_item_to_a_Jewel_List.mxml   |  4 +++-
>  .../src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/jewel/CheckBox.as | 17
> +
>  2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git
> 
a/examples/blog/BE0004_Adding_an_item_to_a_Jewel_List/src/main/royale/BE0004_Adding_an_item_to_a_Jewel_List.mxml
> 
b/examples/blog/BE0004_Adding_an_item_to_a_Jewel_List/src/main/royale/BE0004_Adding_an_item_to_a_Jewel_List.mxml
> index 8fe8349..f8d451c 100644
> ---
> 
a/examples/blog/BE0004_Adding_an_item_to_a_Jewel_List/src/main/royale/BE0004_Adding_an_item_to_a_Jewel_List.mxml
> +++
> 
b/examples/blog/BE0004_Adding_an_item_to_a_Jewel_List/src/main/royale/BE0004_Adding_an_item_to_a_Jewel_List.mxml
> @@ -24,11 +24,13 @@
>
>  
> 
> diff --git
> 
a/frameworks/projects/Jewel/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/jewel/CheckBox.as
> 
b/frameworks/projects/Jewel/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/jewel/CheckBox.as
> index 2380089..e0b310d 100644
> ---
> 
a/frameworks/projects/Jewel/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/jewel/CheckBox.as
> +++
> 
b/frameworks/projects/Jewel/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/jewel/CheckBox.as
> @@ -128,6 +128,23 @@ package org.apache.royale.jewel
> IToggleButtonModel(model).selected = value;
> }
>
> +/**
> + *  The value associated with the CheckBox.
> + *
> + *  @langversion 3.0
> + *  @playerversion Flash 10.2
> + *  @playerversion AIR 2.6
> + *  @productversion Royale 0.9
> + */
> +public function get value():String
> +{
> +return IToggleButtonModel(model).html;
> +}
> +public function set value(newValue:String):void
> +{
> +IToggleButtonModel(model).html = newValue;
> +}
> +
> private function
> internalMouseHandler(event:org.apache.royale.events.MouseEvent) : void
> {
> selected = !selected;
>
>

-- 
Carlos Rovira

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosroviradata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C22d5029a52ff43e1179e08d61823ccbd%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722939372313398sdata=tNecYSfwEi5ZVKxo%2FB5vD%2BEjwBtOWbpFKcvJ24i%2Bz4s%3Dreserved=0




Re: [royale-asjs] branch develop updated: fix maven examples

2018-09-11 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Alex,

so this was incorrect? we can't use Event instead of MouseEvent, or is just
to improve the actual code?
thanks!

El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 22:05,  escribió:

> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>
> aharui pushed a commit to branch develop
> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/royale-asjs.git
>
>
> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/develop by this push:
>  new 64a0795  fix maven examples
> 64a0795 is described below
>
> commit 64a0795f6ddd71a0c7c2a8449c3b316fa3ea62b3
> Author: Alex Harui 
> AuthorDate: Tue Sep 11 13:05:31 2018 -0700
>
> fix maven examples
> ---
>  .../royale/BE0004_Adding_an_item_to_a_Jewel_List.mxml   |  4 +++-
>  .../src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/jewel/CheckBox.as | 17
> +
>  2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git
> a/examples/blog/BE0004_Adding_an_item_to_a_Jewel_List/src/main/royale/BE0004_Adding_an_item_to_a_Jewel_List.mxml
> b/examples/blog/BE0004_Adding_an_item_to_a_Jewel_List/src/main/royale/BE0004_Adding_an_item_to_a_Jewel_List.mxml
> index 8fe8349..f8d451c 100644
> ---
> a/examples/blog/BE0004_Adding_an_item_to_a_Jewel_List/src/main/royale/BE0004_Adding_an_item_to_a_Jewel_List.mxml
> +++
> b/examples/blog/BE0004_Adding_an_item_to_a_Jewel_List/src/main/royale/BE0004_Adding_an_item_to_a_Jewel_List.mxml
> @@ -24,11 +24,13 @@
>
>  
> 
> diff --git
> a/frameworks/projects/Jewel/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/jewel/CheckBox.as
> b/frameworks/projects/Jewel/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/jewel/CheckBox.as
> index 2380089..e0b310d 100644
> ---
> a/frameworks/projects/Jewel/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/jewel/CheckBox.as
> +++
> b/frameworks/projects/Jewel/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/jewel/CheckBox.as
> @@ -128,6 +128,23 @@ package org.apache.royale.jewel
> IToggleButtonModel(model).selected = value;
> }
>
> +/**
> + *  The value associated with the CheckBox.
> + *
> + *  @langversion 3.0
> + *  @playerversion Flash 10.2
> + *  @playerversion AIR 2.6
> + *  @productversion Royale 0.9
> + */
> +public function get value():String
> +{
> +return IToggleButtonModel(model).html;
> +}
> +public function set value(newValue:String):void
> +{
> +IToggleButtonModel(model).html = newValue;
> +}
> +
> private function
> internalMouseHandler(event:org.apache.royale.events.MouseEvent) : void
> {
> selected = !selected;
>
>

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3

2018-09-11 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
In case of upgrading anything I really suggest to leave it for the next
release. If you upgrade something you have to take care of upgrading
maven's pom as well.

Piotr

On Tue, Sep 11, 2018, 8:54 PM Alex Harui  wrote:

> I am still trying to fix the Maven build of the examples.  Harb's change
> seems satisfactory for at least now.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 9/11/18, 11:47 AM, "Harbs"  wrote:
>
> It should be good to go now unless Alex or someone else has objections…
>
> > On Sep 11, 2018, at 8:55 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > No problem. Thank you! If I start anything with release that would be
> > tomorrow morning or evening my time.
> >
> > Piotr
> >
> > wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 19:54 Harbs  napisał(a):
> >
> >> I’m going to spend a few minutes now to see if I can resolve this
> simply.
> >> If not, I’ll revert.
> >>
> >> Harbs
> >>
> >>> On Sep 11, 2018, at 8:50 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Harbs,
> >>>
> >>> It would be great if you could do that. You could bring back
> changes
> >> again
> >>> after release and discuss whatever needed.
> >>> I think we are using following version from 20170626.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Piotr
> >>>
> >>> wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 19:39 Harbs  napisał(a):
> >>>
>  I can revert the changes if that’s what folks want. We’re going
> to have
>  trace calls output if I do that, but we can resolve that for the
> next
>  release.
> 
>  I’m going to see if a different version of the closure compiler
> plays
>  better. The latest version throws a NoSuchMethod error on
> 
> com.google.javascript.jscomp.CompilerOptions.setInlineLocalFunctions.
> 
>  Anyone know which version we’re using now?
> 
> > On Sep 11, 2018, at 9:09 AM, Carlos Rovira <
> carlosrov...@apache.org>
>  wrote:
> >
> > I think is better move that changes to a branch and release.
> > thanks
> >
> > El lun., 10 sept. 2018 a las 20:59, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >
> >> Harbs,
> >>
> >> Can you comment on that ? Any chance to move that changes to
> branch ?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Piotr
> >>
> >> pon., 10 wrz 2018 o 20:54 Alex Harui 
> >> napisał(a):
> >>
> >>> Yes.  I think we are using the wrong annotation for variable
> number
> >> of
> >>> parameters.
> >>>
> >>> -Alex
> >>>
> >>> On 9/10/18, 11:49 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>  Alex,
> >>>
> >>>  What trace hack are you referring to ? This is related what
> Harbs
> >>> commits ?
> >>>
> >>>  Thanks,
> >>>  Piotr
> >>>
> >>>  pon., 10 wrz 2018 o 20:47 Alex Harui  >
> >>> napisał(a):
> >>>
>  FWIW, I am not in favor of releasing with the current trace
> hack in
> >>> the
>  compiler.  But if other's are ok with it, I'm not going to
> make a
> >>> big deal
>  out of it, I'll just abstain from voting.
> 
>  -Alex
> 
>  On 9/10/18, 1:15 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> 
>   Hi,
> 
>   I have prepared today all stuff which is needed for making RC
> >>> branch. I
>   will check whether everything is working tomorrow. In the
> other
> >>> words
>   probably tomorrow I will push RC1 branch.
> 
>   Thanks,
>   Piotr
> 
>   sob., 8 wrz 2018 o 18:55 Piotr Zarzycki <
> >>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>   napisał(a):
> 
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > I see that typedefs build is up and running. Is there
> >> anything
>  important
> > which you would like to add?
> >
> > I wanted to start on Monday playing with release.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 6, 2018, 6:05 PM Piotr Zarzycki <
>  piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Alex,
> >>
> >> Is there anything I need to know before I jump into your
> >>> notes [1]
>  and
> >> start play with develop for release ?
> >>
> >> [1]
> 
> >>>
> >>
> 
> >>
> 

Re: Ace Editor: Should it build/work for SWF?

2018-09-11 Thread Olaf Krueger
 > I 'd love to know for what they use it

Thanks to Yishay the ACE editor was "captured" by Royale.
We want to use the ACE editor within the TryItNow app.
Unfortunately still no free cycles...

However, I've no idea about the current issue here.

@Yishay
Do you have some free cycles in order to help out if needed?

Thanks,
Olaf

 



--
Sent from: http://apache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com/


Jenkins build is back to normal : royale-typedefs #689

2018-09-11 Thread apacheroyaleci
See 




Jenkins build is back to normal : royale-compiler #430

2018-09-11 Thread apacheroyaleci
See 




Re: [royale-asjs] branch develop updated: resize example button

2018-09-11 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi

I make an example where a slider changes size of a button. Then the label
of the button is binding a the width and height of the button. The label in
the button doesn't change
In the other hand, I put as well a label and make the same binding to the
text, and as usual this is changing.
Do you know what could be the problem?

Thanks


El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 21:02,  escribió:

> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>
> carlosrovira pushed a commit to branch develop
> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/royale-asjs.git
>
>
> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/develop by this push:
>  new e1040d3  resize example button
> e1040d3 is described below
>
> commit e1040d377463496607a9c9cac4936e97ea51ba36
> Author: Carlos Rovira 
> AuthorDate: Tue Sep 11 21:02:39 2018 +0200
>
> resize example button
> ---
>  .../src/main/royale/ButtonPlayGround.mxml  | 32
> +++---
>  .../main/royale/org/apache/royale/jewel/Button.as  |  8 +++---
>  2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git
> a/examples/royale/JewelExample/src/main/royale/ButtonPlayGround.mxml
> b/examples/royale/JewelExample/src/main/royale/ButtonPlayGround.mxml
> index e99c23e..b83a67d 100644
> --- a/examples/royale/JewelExample/src/main/royale/ButtonPlayGround.mxml
> +++ b/examples/royale/JewelExample/src/main/royale/ButtonPlayGround.mxml
> @@ -27,6 +27,13 @@ limitations under the License.
>  private function clickHandler(event:MouseEvent):void {
>  button.emphasis = (button.emphasis == Button.PRIMARY) ?
> "" : Button.PRIMARY;
>  }
> +
> +   private function onValueChange(event:Event):void
> +   {
> +   // trace("onValueChange"); // if target
> IE11 you must use this event handler
> +   reizableButton.width = slider_w.value;
> +   reizableButton.height = slider_h.value;
> +   }
> ]]>
> 
>
> @@ -35,8 +42,8 @@ limitations under the License.
>  
>
> 
> --   tabletNumerator="1"
> tabletDenominator="1"
> ++   tabletNumerator="1"
> tabletDenominator="2"
> phoneNumerator="1"
> phoneDenominator="1">
> 
> 
> @@ -53,7 +60,7 @@ limitations under the License.
> 
> 
> 
> -+tabletNumerator="1"
> tabletDenominator="2"
> phoneNumerator="1"
> phoneDenominator="1">
> 
> @@ -81,7 +88,9 @@ limitations under the License.
> 
> 
> 
> -+   
> +   
> +tabletNumerator="1"
> tabletDenominator="2"
> phoneNumerator="1"
> phoneDenominator="1">
> 
> @@ -99,6 +108,21 @@ limitations under the License.
> 
> 
> 
> ++   tabletNumerator="1"
> tabletDenominator="2"
> +   phoneNumerator="1"
> phoneDenominator="1">
> +   
> +   
> +
> +itemsVerticalAlign="itemsSameHeight">
> +text="Resize {slider_w.value}x{slider_h.value}"
> emphasis="{Button.PRIMARY}"/>
> +   
> +   
> +value="96" minimum="10" maximum="350" valueChange="onValueChange(event)"/>
> +value="38" minimum="10" maximum="350" valueChange="onValueChange(event)"/>
> +   
> +   
> +   
> 
>
>  
> diff --git
> a/frameworks/projects/Jewel/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/jewel/Button.as
> b/frameworks/projects/Jewel/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/jewel/Button.as
> index edd9415..88d284c 100644
> ---
> a/frameworks/projects/Jewel/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/jewel/Button.as
> +++
> b/frameworks/projects/Jewel/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/jewel/Button.as
> @@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ package org.apache.royale.jewel
>   */
> public function get text():String
> {
> -return element.innerHTML;
> +return (element as HTMLButtonElement).innerHTML;
> }
>
>  /**
> @@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ package org.apache.royale.jewel
>   */
> 

Re: [royale-asjs] branch develop updated: jewel textinput examples

2018-09-11 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi, in this example I make a text input text binds to other, and this later
to other one. When I change the first, only the second changes, and when
change the second the third one changes.

I expect that changes in first make changes in second and third happens,
and changes in second changes third as actualy happens.

So what it makes me doubt is the changes in first one. Is this the expected?

Thanks!

Carlos



El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 21:01,  escribió:

> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>
> carlosrovira pushed a commit to branch develop
> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/royale-asjs.git
>
>
> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/develop by this push:
>  new b47459c  jewel textinput examples
> b47459c is described below
>
> commit b47459c428c6b1334059df7b955fccc24401c666
> Author: Carlos Rovira 
> AuthorDate: Tue Sep 11 21:01:23 2018 +0200
>
> jewel textinput examples
> ---
>  .../src/main/royale/TextInputPlayGround.mxml   | 34
> --
>  .../supportClasses/textinput/TextInputBase.as  |  5 
>  2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git
> a/examples/royale/JewelExample/src/main/royale/TextInputPlayGround.mxml
> b/examples/royale/JewelExample/src/main/royale/TextInputPlayGround.mxml
> index 53854ad..5c16b91 100644
> --- a/examples/royale/JewelExample/src/main/royale/TextInputPlayGround.mxml
> +++ b/examples/royale/JewelExample/src/main/royale/TextInputPlayGround.mxml
> @@ -22,6 +22,22 @@ limitations under the License.
> xmlns:js="library://ns.apache.org/royale/basic"
> xmlns:html="library://ns.apache.org/royale/html">
>
> +   
> +   
> +   
> +
> 
>  
>  
> @@ -39,14 +55,14 @@ limitations under the License.
>  gap="3"/>
> 
>  emphasis="primary"/>
> -   
> +change="textInputChange(event)"/>
> 
>
> 
> 
>  gap="3"/>
> 
> -   
> +   
> 
>  prompt="With prompt..."/>
> 
> @@ -61,12 +77,24 @@ limitations under the License.
> 
> 
>
> -   
> +   
> 
>  prompt="Disabled with prompt..."/>
> 
> 
> 
> +
> +itemsVerticalAlign="itemsSameHeight">
> +   
> +   
> +prompt="Slider resize..."/>
> +   
> +   
> +   
> +   
> +
> +value="211" minimum="10" maximum="350" valueChange="onValueChange(event)"/>
> +text="textinput.width='{textinput.width}'"/>
> 
> 
>
> diff --git
> a/frameworks/projects/Jewel/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/jewel/supportClasses/textinput/TextInputBase.as
> b/frameworks/projects/Jewel/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/jewel/supportClasses/textinput/TextInputBase.as
> index ad41d99..f3ce7f5 100644
> ---
> a/frameworks/projects/Jewel/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/jewel/supportClasses/textinput/TextInputBase.as
> +++
> b/frameworks/projects/Jewel/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/jewel/supportClasses/textinput/TextInputBase.as
> @@ -146,6 +146,7 @@ package
> org.apache.royale.jewel.supportClasses.textinput
>  }
> }
>
> +COMPILE::SWF
>  private var inSetter:Boolean;
>
>  /**
> @@ -158,8 +159,12 @@ package
> org.apache.royale.jewel.supportClasses.textinput
>  */
> public function textChangeHandler(event:Event):void
> {
> +COMPILE::SWF
> +{
>  if (!inSetter)
>  dispatchEvent(new Event(Event.CHANGE));
> +}
> +dispatchEvent(new Event(Event.CHANGE));
> }
>
>  COMPILE::JS
>
>

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: Ace Editor: Should it build/work for SWF?

2018-09-11 Thread Carlos Rovira
Yes, I remember this, but didn't now that that branch was "try-it-now"
branch
thanks

El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 19:04, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> Carlos,
>
> Yishay was working on separate branch as far as I remember. [1]
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/tree/ace-editor
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 18:50 Carlos Rovira 
> napisał(a):
>
> > Right!, I remember Olaf's effort, but I though Yishay wasn't involved.
> And
> > I don't remember ACE editor was involved.
> > thanks!
> >
> > El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 18:02, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >
> > > I'm surprised that you don't remember :) It suppose to be part of Try
> It
> > > Out [1], but they probably didn't have enough time to finish it.
> > >
> > > [1] https://royale.apache.org/try-it-now/
> > >
> > > wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 18:01 Carlos Rovira 
> > > napisał(a):
> > >
> > > > Interesting, I 'd love to know for what they use it? :)
> > > > Thanks Piotr!
> > > >
> > > > El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 17:44, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > > >
> > > > > Carlos,
> > > > >
> > > > > This is it -> https://ace.c9.io/. I think more information about
> > that
> > > > can
> > > > > provide you Yishay and Olaf. :)
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Piotr
> > > > >
> > > > > wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 17:40 Carlos Rovira 
> > > > > napisał(a):
> > > > >
> > > > > > Sorry to answer, but what is ACE Editor?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > thanks
> > > > > >
> > > > > > El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 17:31, Alex Harui
> > > > ( > > > > > >)
> > > > > > escribió:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I am thinking the answer is no.  Now that errors in SWF compile
> > > > > correctly
> > > > > > > fail builds, we are seeing problems.  I am going to remove SWF
> > > > building
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > > ACE.SWC.  Let me know if you think it should work.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -Alex
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > > >
> > > > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > > > > *
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > >
> > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > > *
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> *
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3

2018-09-11 Thread Alex Harui
I am still trying to fix the Maven build of the examples.  Harb's change seems 
satisfactory for at least now.

-Alex

On 9/11/18, 11:47 AM, "Harbs"  wrote:

It should be good to go now unless Alex or someone else has objections…

> On Sep 11, 2018, at 8:55 PM, Piotr Zarzycki  
wrote:
> 
> No problem. Thank you! If I start anything with release that would be
> tomorrow morning or evening my time.
> 
> Piotr
> 
> wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 19:54 Harbs  napisał(a):
> 
>> I’m going to spend a few minutes now to see if I can resolve this simply.
>> If not, I’ll revert.
>> 
>> Harbs
>> 
>>> On Sep 11, 2018, at 8:50 PM, Piotr Zarzycki 
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Harbs,
>>> 
>>> It would be great if you could do that. You could bring back changes
>> again
>>> after release and discuss whatever needed.
>>> I think we are using following version from 20170626.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Piotr
>>> 
>>> wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 19:39 Harbs  napisał(a):
>>> 
 I can revert the changes if that’s what folks want. We’re going to have
 trace calls output if I do that, but we can resolve that for the next
 release.
 
 I’m going to see if a different version of the closure compiler plays
 better. The latest version throws a NoSuchMethod error on
 com.google.javascript.jscomp.CompilerOptions.setInlineLocalFunctions.
 
 Anyone know which version we’re using now?
 
> On Sep 11, 2018, at 9:09 AM, Carlos Rovira 
 wrote:
> 
> I think is better move that changes to a branch and release.
> thanks
> 
> El lun., 10 sept. 2018 a las 20:59, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> 
>> Harbs,
>> 
>> Can you comment on that ? Any chance to move that changes to branch ?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Piotr
>> 
>> pon., 10 wrz 2018 o 20:54 Alex Harui 
>> napisał(a):
>> 
>>> Yes.  I think we are using the wrong annotation for variable number
>> of
>>> parameters.
>>> 
>>> -Alex
>>> 
>>> On 9/10/18, 11:49 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" 
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>  Alex,
>>> 
>>>  What trace hack are you referring to ? This is related what Harbs
>>> commits ?
>>> 
>>>  Thanks,
>>>  Piotr
>>> 
>>>  pon., 10 wrz 2018 o 20:47 Alex Harui 
>>> napisał(a):
>>> 
 FWIW, I am not in favor of releasing with the current trace hack in
>>> the
 compiler.  But if other's are ok with it, I'm not going to make a
>>> big deal
 out of it, I'll just abstain from voting.
 
 -Alex
 
 On 9/10/18, 1:15 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" 
>>> wrote:
 
  Hi,
 
  I have prepared today all stuff which is needed for making RC
>>> branch. I
  will check whether everything is working tomorrow. In the other
>>> words
  probably tomorrow I will push RC1 branch.
 
  Thanks,
  Piotr
 
  sob., 8 wrz 2018 o 18:55 Piotr Zarzycki <
>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
  napisał(a):
 
> Hi Guys,
> 
> I see that typedefs build is up and running. Is there
>> anything
 important
> which you would like to add?
> 
> I wanted to start on Monday playing with release.
> 
> Thanks,
> Piotr
> 
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018, 6:05 PM Piotr Zarzycki <
 piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Alex,
>> 
>> Is there anything I need to know before I jump into your
>>> notes [1]
 and
>> start play with develop for release ?
>> 
>> [1]
 
>>> 
>> 
 
>> 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notesdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C7415fd3386264174b86a08d618170434%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722884471526901sdata=ftudZZfHm6cV4vdYcgnykW7aePz%2FgxK20G6TDdXv1YU%3Dreserved=0
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Piotr
>> 
>> czw., 6 wrz 2018 o 09:08 Piotr Zarzycki <
>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>> napisał(a):
>> 
>>> Hi Guys,
>>> 
>>> I was trying to check Tour De Flex if it has the same issue
>>> as the
 rest
>>> of MX 

Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3

2018-09-11 Thread Harbs
It should be good to go now unless Alex or someone else has objections…

> On Sep 11, 2018, at 8:55 PM, Piotr Zarzycki  wrote:
> 
> No problem. Thank you! If I start anything with release that would be
> tomorrow morning or evening my time.
> 
> Piotr
> 
> wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 19:54 Harbs  napisał(a):
> 
>> I’m going to spend a few minutes now to see if I can resolve this simply.
>> If not, I’ll revert.
>> 
>> Harbs
>> 
>>> On Sep 11, 2018, at 8:50 PM, Piotr Zarzycki 
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Harbs,
>>> 
>>> It would be great if you could do that. You could bring back changes
>> again
>>> after release and discuss whatever needed.
>>> I think we are using following version from 20170626.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Piotr
>>> 
>>> wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 19:39 Harbs  napisał(a):
>>> 
 I can revert the changes if that’s what folks want. We’re going to have
 trace calls output if I do that, but we can resolve that for the next
 release.
 
 I’m going to see if a different version of the closure compiler plays
 better. The latest version throws a NoSuchMethod error on
 com.google.javascript.jscomp.CompilerOptions.setInlineLocalFunctions.
 
 Anyone know which version we’re using now?
 
> On Sep 11, 2018, at 9:09 AM, Carlos Rovira 
 wrote:
> 
> I think is better move that changes to a branch and release.
> thanks
> 
> El lun., 10 sept. 2018 a las 20:59, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> 
>> Harbs,
>> 
>> Can you comment on that ? Any chance to move that changes to branch ?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Piotr
>> 
>> pon., 10 wrz 2018 o 20:54 Alex Harui 
>> napisał(a):
>> 
>>> Yes.  I think we are using the wrong annotation for variable number
>> of
>>> parameters.
>>> 
>>> -Alex
>>> 
>>> On 9/10/18, 11:49 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" 
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>  Alex,
>>> 
>>>  What trace hack are you referring to ? This is related what Harbs
>>> commits ?
>>> 
>>>  Thanks,
>>>  Piotr
>>> 
>>>  pon., 10 wrz 2018 o 20:47 Alex Harui 
>>> napisał(a):
>>> 
 FWIW, I am not in favor of releasing with the current trace hack in
>>> the
 compiler.  But if other's are ok with it, I'm not going to make a
>>> big deal
 out of it, I'll just abstain from voting.
 
 -Alex
 
 On 9/10/18, 1:15 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" 
>>> wrote:
 
  Hi,
 
  I have prepared today all stuff which is needed for making RC
>>> branch. I
  will check whether everything is working tomorrow. In the other
>>> words
  probably tomorrow I will push RC1 branch.
 
  Thanks,
  Piotr
 
  sob., 8 wrz 2018 o 18:55 Piotr Zarzycki <
>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
  napisał(a):
 
> Hi Guys,
> 
> I see that typedefs build is up and running. Is there
>> anything
 important
> which you would like to add?
> 
> I wanted to start on Monday playing with release.
> 
> Thanks,
> Piotr
> 
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018, 6:05 PM Piotr Zarzycki <
 piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Alex,
>> 
>> Is there anything I need to know before I jump into your
>>> notes [1]
 and
>> start play with develop for release ?
>> 
>> [1]
 
>>> 
>> 
 
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notesdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf8dac71af4ff417b97c008d6174e1dd4%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722021606204100sdata=njV1vRpOrRyftdwcr17NLQpu3jYwS%2FQ7evR90iqEFBo%3Dreserved=0
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Piotr
>> 
>> czw., 6 wrz 2018 o 09:08 Piotr Zarzycki <
>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>> napisał(a):
>> 
>>> Hi Guys,
>>> 
>>> I was trying to check Tour De Flex if it has the same issue
>>> as the
 rest
>>> of MX examples. In order to do that I would like to build
 Framework using
>>> ANT. I got it working couple of days ago, but now it's
>>> constantly
 failing.
>>> Pixel blender is downloaded corrupted. [1] Do you have any
>>> idea
 why it is
>>> happen ?
>>> 
>>> When I reach url directly through the browser I'm able to
>>> download
 good
>>> file.
>>> 
>>> [1]
 
>>> 
>> 
 
>> 

Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3

2018-09-11 Thread Harbs
I was about to do this, but I don’t know where to find the checksum for the new 
file…

If it’s not important, I’ll find other things to do… ;-)

> On Sep 11, 2018, at 9:29 PM, Alex Harui  wrote:
> 
> If you have time, feel free.  I think royale-compiler is just grabbing some 
> simple externs for some simple tests, so not sure how much it matters.
> 
> -Alex
> 
> On 9/11/18, 11:27 AM, "Harbs"  wrote:
> 
>Interestingly, it looks like royale-compiler is downloading v20170626, but 
> royale-asjs is downloading v20170910…
> 
>Should we fix this?
> 
>> On Sep 11, 2018, at 8:50 PM, Piotr Zarzycki  
>> wrote:
>> 
>> I think we are using following version from 20170626.
> 
> 
> 



Re: GOOG::DEBUG

2018-09-11 Thread Harbs
OK. I reverted the rest param.

I’m now outputting rest = rest;if(!goog.DEBUG)return; instead of 
if(!goog.DEBUG)return; if there’s a rest argument.

It’s a bit ugly, but it seems to make the closure compiler happy and gets the 
desired result.

Thanks,
Harbs

> On Sep 10, 2018, at 6:52 AM, Alex Harui  wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 9/8/18, 10:05 AM, "Harbs"  wrote:
> 
>I should have included a full explanation in my email.
> 
>I tried {…*} but I got the same error as with {…}.
> 
>{*} is not technically right as the arguments after the first is not 
> declared, but I tested trace with multiple arguments with the change and the 
> closure compiler did not complain. It’s the closest annotation I could come 
> up with that does not cause the error. (i.e. the first argument is required) 
> I can’t think of any downsides of leaving the rest of the arguments out. Can 
> you think of an issue with it?
> 
> If Closure Compiler did not notice that there were extra arguments, some day 
> they might fix it so it does notice.  We should annotate our code correctly.
> 
>Maybe a better fix is to update the closure compiler? Not sure…
> 
> IIRC, you recently added some code to the compiler to clean out empty CSS 
> selectors in release mode.  I wonder if there is a way to special case trace 
> and rewrite it in a way that Closure Compiler will know to remove it.  Like 
> remove every line of code or every line of code after the rest handling.
> 
>I just wanted to fix the build in the meantime.
> 
> I do not wish to see us release with the wrong annotations.  But feel free to 
> hack the final output code.
> 
>Suggestions?
> 
>Harbs
> 
>> On Sep 7, 2018, at 7:14 PM, Alex Harui  wrote:
>> 
>> The fix does not look right to me.  Here are a link that indicates that 
>> variable number of arguments should be using "...".
>> 
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fgoogle%2Fclosure-compiler%2Fwiki%2FAnnotating-JavaScript-for-the-Closure-Compilerdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C3049de2a8d7c4cfdfd6d08d615ad5849%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636720231590608291sdata=jY1qMvlQPbXRJqTXanp6WLVxi9v5AvP%2BTUF38HiqDA8%3Dreserved=0
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> This link indicates that the annotation for trace should be {...*}
>> 
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstackoverflow.com%2Fquestions%2F25474311%2Fannotating-zero-or-more-parameters-with-any-type-for-google-closure-compilerdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C3049de2a8d7c4cfdfd6d08d615ad5849%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636720231590608291sdata=heE3Aayf8LufbLIJwBJGXXDewL2J%2FquKX6R9wTGHPEg%3Dreserved=0
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> What document led you to believe you could just use {*}, which indicates 
>> only one parameter.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> -Alex
>> 
>> On 9/7/18, 1:55 AM, "Harbs" > > wrote:
>> 
>>   I just committed a fix for this.
>> 
>>   We can discuss further, but at least the build should work…
>> 
>>> On Sep 7, 2018, at 10:55 AM, Carlos Rovira  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Right, I'm seeing as well JewelExample failing on compile
>>> 
>>> thanks
>>> 
>>> El vie., 7 sept. 2018 a las 9:13, Harbs () escribió:
>>> 
 I’m saying that a param defined as {…} confuses the closure compiler when
 you have the rest redefined as an array anywhere but the first line of the
 function. It seems like a bug in the closure compiler.
 
 Changing:
 rest = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments, 0);
 to:
 var rest = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments, 0);
 
 also makes the error go away, but we do get a reassignment warning.
 
 I’m not sure what declaring a @param as {…} actually accomplishes in terms
 of type checking.
 
> On Sep 7, 2018, at 10:02 AM, Alex Harui 
 wrote:
> 
> Are you saying some recent change to the compiler is now generating:
> @param {...} rest
> 
> If so, what changed caused that output?  If not, why did it not fail
 before?
> 
> We should be generating whatever Google says we should generate for rest
 parameters.  Although I did ponder the impact of having Royale's trace not
 take extra parameters.  Then folks would have to 

Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3

2018-09-11 Thread Alex Harui
If you have time, feel free.  I think royale-compiler is just grabbing some 
simple externs for some simple tests, so not sure how much it matters.

-Alex

On 9/11/18, 11:27 AM, "Harbs"  wrote:

Interestingly, it looks like royale-compiler is downloading v20170626, but 
royale-asjs is downloading v20170910…

Should we fix this?

> On Sep 11, 2018, at 8:50 PM, Piotr Zarzycki  
wrote:
> 
> I think we are using following version from 20170626.





Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3

2018-09-11 Thread Harbs
Interestingly, it looks like royale-compiler is downloading v20170626, but 
royale-asjs is downloading v20170910…

Should we fix this?

> On Sep 11, 2018, at 8:50 PM, Piotr Zarzycki  wrote:
> 
> I think we are using following version from 20170626.



Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3

2018-09-11 Thread Harbs
I figured out a solution which should make Alex happy. (i.e. with correct 
annotations) I’ll be committing shortly.

> On Sep 11, 2018, at 8:55 PM, Piotr Zarzycki  wrote:
> 
> No problem. Thank you! If I start anything with release that would be
> tomorrow morning or evening my time.
> 
> Piotr
> 
> wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 19:54 Harbs  napisał(a):
> 
>> I’m going to spend a few minutes now to see if I can resolve this simply.
>> If not, I’ll revert.
>> 
>> Harbs
>> 
>>> On Sep 11, 2018, at 8:50 PM, Piotr Zarzycki 
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Harbs,
>>> 
>>> It would be great if you could do that. You could bring back changes
>> again
>>> after release and discuss whatever needed.
>>> I think we are using following version from 20170626.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Piotr
>>> 
>>> wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 19:39 Harbs  napisał(a):
>>> 
 I can revert the changes if that’s what folks want. We’re going to have
 trace calls output if I do that, but we can resolve that for the next
 release.
 
 I’m going to see if a different version of the closure compiler plays
 better. The latest version throws a NoSuchMethod error on
 com.google.javascript.jscomp.CompilerOptions.setInlineLocalFunctions.
 
 Anyone know which version we’re using now?
 
> On Sep 11, 2018, at 9:09 AM, Carlos Rovira 
 wrote:
> 
> I think is better move that changes to a branch and release.
> thanks
> 
> El lun., 10 sept. 2018 a las 20:59, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> 
>> Harbs,
>> 
>> Can you comment on that ? Any chance to move that changes to branch ?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Piotr
>> 
>> pon., 10 wrz 2018 o 20:54 Alex Harui 
>> napisał(a):
>> 
>>> Yes.  I think we are using the wrong annotation for variable number
>> of
>>> parameters.
>>> 
>>> -Alex
>>> 
>>> On 9/10/18, 11:49 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" 
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>  Alex,
>>> 
>>>  What trace hack are you referring to ? This is related what Harbs
>>> commits ?
>>> 
>>>  Thanks,
>>>  Piotr
>>> 
>>>  pon., 10 wrz 2018 o 20:47 Alex Harui 
>>> napisał(a):
>>> 
 FWIW, I am not in favor of releasing with the current trace hack in
>>> the
 compiler.  But if other's are ok with it, I'm not going to make a
>>> big deal
 out of it, I'll just abstain from voting.
 
 -Alex
 
 On 9/10/18, 1:15 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" 
>>> wrote:
 
  Hi,
 
  I have prepared today all stuff which is needed for making RC
>>> branch. I
  will check whether everything is working tomorrow. In the other
>>> words
  probably tomorrow I will push RC1 branch.
 
  Thanks,
  Piotr
 
  sob., 8 wrz 2018 o 18:55 Piotr Zarzycki <
>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
  napisał(a):
 
> Hi Guys,
> 
> I see that typedefs build is up and running. Is there
>> anything
 important
> which you would like to add?
> 
> I wanted to start on Monday playing with release.
> 
> Thanks,
> Piotr
> 
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018, 6:05 PM Piotr Zarzycki <
 piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Alex,
>> 
>> Is there anything I need to know before I jump into your
>>> notes [1]
 and
>> start play with develop for release ?
>> 
>> [1]
 
>>> 
>> 
 
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notesdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf8dac71af4ff417b97c008d6174e1dd4%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722021606204100sdata=njV1vRpOrRyftdwcr17NLQpu3jYwS%2FQ7evR90iqEFBo%3Dreserved=0
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Piotr
>> 
>> czw., 6 wrz 2018 o 09:08 Piotr Zarzycki <
>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>> napisał(a):
>> 
>>> Hi Guys,
>>> 
>>> I was trying to check Tour De Flex if it has the same issue
>>> as the
 rest
>>> of MX examples. In order to do that I would like to build
 Framework using
>>> ANT. I got it working couple of days ago, but now it's
>>> constantly
 failing.
>>> Pixel blender is downloaded corrupted. [1] Do you have any
>>> idea
 why it is
>>> happen ?
>>> 
>>> When I reach url directly through the browser I'm able to
>>> download
 good
>>> file.
>>> 
>>> [1]
 
>>> 
>> 
 
>> 

Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3

2018-09-11 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
+1 for releasing sooner than later :-)
I plan to make some time to test things out.

Thanks,
Om

On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 10:55 AM Piotr Zarzycki 
wrote:

> No problem. Thank you! If I start anything with release that would be
> tomorrow morning or evening my time.
>
> Piotr
>
> wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 19:54 Harbs  napisał(a):
>
> > I’m going to spend a few minutes now to see if I can resolve this simply.
> > If not, I’ll revert.
> >
> > Harbs
> >
> > > On Sep 11, 2018, at 8:50 PM, Piotr Zarzycki  >
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Harbs,
> > >
> > > It would be great if you could do that. You could bring back changes
> > again
> > > after release and discuss whatever needed.
> > > I think we are using following version from 20170626.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Piotr
> > >
> > > wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 19:39 Harbs  napisał(a):
> > >
> > >> I can revert the changes if that’s what folks want. We’re going to
> have
> > >> trace calls output if I do that, but we can resolve that for the next
> > >> release.
> > >>
> > >> I’m going to see if a different version of the closure compiler plays
> > >> better. The latest version throws a NoSuchMethod error on
> > >> com.google.javascript.jscomp.CompilerOptions.setInlineLocalFunctions.
> > >>
> > >> Anyone know which version we’re using now?
> > >>
> > >>> On Sep 11, 2018, at 9:09 AM, Carlos Rovira 
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> I think is better move that changes to a branch and release.
> > >>> thanks
> > >>>
> > >>> El lun., 10 sept. 2018 a las 20:59, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > >>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > >>>
> >  Harbs,
> > 
> >  Can you comment on that ? Any chance to move that changes to branch
> ?
> > 
> >  Thanks,
> >  Piotr
> > 
> >  pon., 10 wrz 2018 o 20:54 Alex Harui 
> >  napisał(a):
> > 
> > > Yes.  I think we are using the wrong annotation for variable number
> > of
> > > parameters.
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 9/10/18, 11:49 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  >
> >  wrote:
> > >
> > >   Alex,
> > >
> > >   What trace hack are you referring to ? This is related what Harbs
> > > commits ?
> > >
> > >   Thanks,
> > >   Piotr
> > >
> > >   pon., 10 wrz 2018 o 20:47 Alex Harui 
> > > napisał(a):
> > >
> > >> FWIW, I am not in favor of releasing with the current trace hack
> in
> > > the
> > >> compiler.  But if other's are ok with it, I'm not going to make a
> > > big deal
> > >> out of it, I'll just abstain from voting.
> > >>
> > >> -Alex
> > >>
> > >> On 9/10/18, 1:15 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" 
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>   Hi,
> > >>
> > >>   I have prepared today all stuff which is needed for making RC
> > > branch. I
> > >>   will check whether everything is working tomorrow. In the other
> > > words
> > >>   probably tomorrow I will push RC1 branch.
> > >>
> > >>   Thanks,
> > >>   Piotr
> > >>
> > >>   sob., 8 wrz 2018 o 18:55 Piotr Zarzycki <
> > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> > >>   napisał(a):
> > >>
> > >>> Hi Guys,
> > >>>
> > >>> I see that typedefs build is up and running. Is there
> >  anything
> > >> important
> > >>> which you would like to add?
> > >>>
> > >>> I wanted to start on Monday playing with release.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>> Piotr
> > >>>
> > >>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018, 6:05 PM Piotr Zarzycki <
> > >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> >  Hi Alex,
> > 
> >  Is there anything I need to know before I jump into your
> > > notes [1]
> > >> and
> >  start play with develop for release ?
> > 
> >  [1]
> > >>
> > >
> > 
> > >>
> >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notesdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf8dac71af4ff417b97c008d6174e1dd4%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722021606204100sdata=njV1vRpOrRyftdwcr17NLQpu3jYwS%2FQ7evR90iqEFBo%3Dreserved=0
> > 
> >  Thanks,
> >  Piotr
> > 
> >  czw., 6 wrz 2018 o 09:08 Piotr Zarzycki <
> > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> >  napisał(a):
> > 
> > > Hi Guys,
> > >
> > > I was trying to check Tour De Flex if it has the same issue
> > > as the
> > >> rest
> > > of MX examples. In order to do that I would like to build
> > >> Framework using
> > > ANT. I got it working couple of days ago, but now it's
> > > constantly
> > >> failing.
> > > Pixel blender is downloaded corrupted. [1] Do you have any
> > > idea
> > >> why it is
> > > happen ?
> > >
> > > When I reach url directly through the browser I'm able to
> > > download
> > >> good
> > > file.
> > >
> > > 

Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3

2018-09-11 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
No problem. Thank you! If I start anything with release that would be
tomorrow morning or evening my time.

Piotr

wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 19:54 Harbs  napisał(a):

> I’m going to spend a few minutes now to see if I can resolve this simply.
> If not, I’ll revert.
>
> Harbs
>
> > On Sep 11, 2018, at 8:50 PM, Piotr Zarzycki 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Harbs,
> >
> > It would be great if you could do that. You could bring back changes
> again
> > after release and discuss whatever needed.
> > I think we are using following version from 20170626.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr
> >
> > wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 19:39 Harbs  napisał(a):
> >
> >> I can revert the changes if that’s what folks want. We’re going to have
> >> trace calls output if I do that, but we can resolve that for the next
> >> release.
> >>
> >> I’m going to see if a different version of the closure compiler plays
> >> better. The latest version throws a NoSuchMethod error on
> >> com.google.javascript.jscomp.CompilerOptions.setInlineLocalFunctions.
> >>
> >> Anyone know which version we’re using now?
> >>
> >>> On Sep 11, 2018, at 9:09 AM, Carlos Rovira 
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I think is better move that changes to a branch and release.
> >>> thanks
> >>>
> >>> El lun., 10 sept. 2018 a las 20:59, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> >>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >>>
>  Harbs,
> 
>  Can you comment on that ? Any chance to move that changes to branch ?
> 
>  Thanks,
>  Piotr
> 
>  pon., 10 wrz 2018 o 20:54 Alex Harui 
>  napisał(a):
> 
> > Yes.  I think we are using the wrong annotation for variable number
> of
> > parameters.
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 9/10/18, 11:49 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" 
>  wrote:
> >
> >   Alex,
> >
> >   What trace hack are you referring to ? This is related what Harbs
> > commits ?
> >
> >   Thanks,
> >   Piotr
> >
> >   pon., 10 wrz 2018 o 20:47 Alex Harui 
> > napisał(a):
> >
> >> FWIW, I am not in favor of releasing with the current trace hack in
> > the
> >> compiler.  But if other's are ok with it, I'm not going to make a
> > big deal
> >> out of it, I'll just abstain from voting.
> >>
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >> On 9/10/18, 1:15 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" 
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>   Hi,
> >>
> >>   I have prepared today all stuff which is needed for making RC
> > branch. I
> >>   will check whether everything is working tomorrow. In the other
> > words
> >>   probably tomorrow I will push RC1 branch.
> >>
> >>   Thanks,
> >>   Piotr
> >>
> >>   sob., 8 wrz 2018 o 18:55 Piotr Zarzycki <
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> >>   napisał(a):
> >>
> >>> Hi Guys,
> >>>
> >>> I see that typedefs build is up and running. Is there
>  anything
> >> important
> >>> which you would like to add?
> >>>
> >>> I wanted to start on Monday playing with release.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Piotr
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018, 6:05 PM Piotr Zarzycki <
> >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
>  Hi Alex,
> 
>  Is there anything I need to know before I jump into your
> > notes [1]
> >> and
>  start play with develop for release ?
> 
>  [1]
> >>
> >
> 
> >>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notesdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf8dac71af4ff417b97c008d6174e1dd4%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722021606204100sdata=njV1vRpOrRyftdwcr17NLQpu3jYwS%2FQ7evR90iqEFBo%3Dreserved=0
> 
>  Thanks,
>  Piotr
> 
>  czw., 6 wrz 2018 o 09:08 Piotr Zarzycki <
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>  napisał(a):
> 
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > I was trying to check Tour De Flex if it has the same issue
> > as the
> >> rest
> > of MX examples. In order to do that I would like to build
> >> Framework using
> > ANT. I got it working couple of days ago, but now it's
> > constantly
> >> failing.
> > Pixel blender is downloaded corrupted. [1] Do you have any
> > idea
> >> why it is
> > happen ?
> >
> > When I reach url directly through the browser I'm able to
> > download
> >> good
> > file.
> >
> > [1]
> >>
> >
> 
> >>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FLsmzdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf8dac71af4ff417b97c008d6174e1dd4%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722021606204100sdata=VhIxm9udY6XPMpFyBA8mfGuopTYu%2B1HXEhX5cOoUKBU%3Dreserved=0
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr
> >
> > wt., 4 wrz 2018 o 15:57 Piotr Zarzycki <
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> > 

Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3

2018-09-11 Thread Harbs
I’m going to spend a few minutes now to see if I can resolve this simply. If 
not, I’ll revert.

Harbs

> On Sep 11, 2018, at 8:50 PM, Piotr Zarzycki  wrote:
> 
> Hi Harbs,
> 
> It would be great if you could do that. You could bring back changes again
> after release and discuss whatever needed.
> I think we are using following version from 20170626.
> 
> Thanks,
> Piotr
> 
> wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 19:39 Harbs  napisał(a):
> 
>> I can revert the changes if that’s what folks want. We’re going to have
>> trace calls output if I do that, but we can resolve that for the next
>> release.
>> 
>> I’m going to see if a different version of the closure compiler plays
>> better. The latest version throws a NoSuchMethod error on
>> com.google.javascript.jscomp.CompilerOptions.setInlineLocalFunctions.
>> 
>> Anyone know which version we’re using now?
>> 
>>> On Sep 11, 2018, at 9:09 AM, Carlos Rovira 
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I think is better move that changes to a branch and release.
>>> thanks
>>> 
>>> El lun., 10 sept. 2018 a las 20:59, Piotr Zarzycki (<
>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>>> 
 Harbs,
 
 Can you comment on that ? Any chance to move that changes to branch ?
 
 Thanks,
 Piotr
 
 pon., 10 wrz 2018 o 20:54 Alex Harui 
 napisał(a):
 
> Yes.  I think we are using the wrong annotation for variable number of
> parameters.
> 
> -Alex
> 
> On 9/10/18, 11:49 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" 
 wrote:
> 
>   Alex,
> 
>   What trace hack are you referring to ? This is related what Harbs
> commits ?
> 
>   Thanks,
>   Piotr
> 
>   pon., 10 wrz 2018 o 20:47 Alex Harui 
> napisał(a):
> 
>> FWIW, I am not in favor of releasing with the current trace hack in
> the
>> compiler.  But if other's are ok with it, I'm not going to make a
> big deal
>> out of it, I'll just abstain from voting.
>> 
>> -Alex
>> 
>> On 9/10/18, 1:15 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" 
> wrote:
>> 
>>   Hi,
>> 
>>   I have prepared today all stuff which is needed for making RC
> branch. I
>>   will check whether everything is working tomorrow. In the other
> words
>>   probably tomorrow I will push RC1 branch.
>> 
>>   Thanks,
>>   Piotr
>> 
>>   sob., 8 wrz 2018 o 18:55 Piotr Zarzycki <
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>>   napisał(a):
>> 
>>> Hi Guys,
>>> 
>>> I see that typedefs build is up and running. Is there
 anything
>> important
>>> which you would like to add?
>>> 
>>> I wanted to start on Monday playing with release.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Piotr
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018, 6:05 PM Piotr Zarzycki <
>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
 Hi Alex,
 
 Is there anything I need to know before I jump into your
> notes [1]
>> and
 start play with develop for release ?
 
 [1]
>> 
> 
 
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notesdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf8dac71af4ff417b97c008d6174e1dd4%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722021606204100sdata=njV1vRpOrRyftdwcr17NLQpu3jYwS%2FQ7evR90iqEFBo%3Dreserved=0
 
 Thanks,
 Piotr
 
 czw., 6 wrz 2018 o 09:08 Piotr Zarzycki <
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
 napisał(a):
 
> Hi Guys,
> 
> I was trying to check Tour De Flex if it has the same issue
> as the
>> rest
> of MX examples. In order to do that I would like to build
>> Framework using
> ANT. I got it working couple of days ago, but now it's
> constantly
>> failing.
> Pixel blender is downloaded corrupted. [1] Do you have any
> idea
>> why it is
> happen ?
> 
> When I reach url directly through the browser I'm able to
> download
>> good
> file.
> 
> [1]
>> 
> 
 
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FLsmzdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf8dac71af4ff417b97c008d6174e1dd4%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722021606204100sdata=VhIxm9udY6XPMpFyBA8mfGuopTYu%2B1HXEhX5cOoUKBU%3Dreserved=0
> 
> Thanks,
> Piotr
> 
> wt., 4 wrz 2018 o 15:57 Piotr Zarzycki <
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> napisał(a):
> 
>> It looks like main application is using ApplicationLayout,
> but it
>> is
>> not  ILayoutHost type.
>> 
>> wt., 4 wrz 2018 o 15:35 Piotr Zarzycki <
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
>>> 
>> napisał(a):
>> 
>>> It looks like there is a missing Layout for main
> application,
>> because
>>> that function returns null:
>>> 

Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3

2018-09-11 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
Hi Harbs,

It would be great if you could do that. You could bring back changes again
after release and discuss whatever needed.
I think we are using following version from 20170626.

Thanks,
Piotr

wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 19:39 Harbs  napisał(a):

> I can revert the changes if that’s what folks want. We’re going to have
> trace calls output if I do that, but we can resolve that for the next
> release.
>
> I’m going to see if a different version of the closure compiler plays
> better. The latest version throws a NoSuchMethod error on
> com.google.javascript.jscomp.CompilerOptions.setInlineLocalFunctions.
>
> Anyone know which version we’re using now?
>
> > On Sep 11, 2018, at 9:09 AM, Carlos Rovira 
> wrote:
> >
> > I think is better move that changes to a branch and release.
> > thanks
> >
> > El lun., 10 sept. 2018 a las 20:59, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >
> >> Harbs,
> >>
> >> Can you comment on that ? Any chance to move that changes to branch ?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Piotr
> >>
> >> pon., 10 wrz 2018 o 20:54 Alex Harui 
> >> napisał(a):
> >>
> >>> Yes.  I think we are using the wrong annotation for variable number of
> >>> parameters.
> >>>
> >>> -Alex
> >>>
> >>> On 9/10/18, 11:49 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" 
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>Alex,
> >>>
> >>>What trace hack are you referring to ? This is related what Harbs
> >>> commits ?
> >>>
> >>>Thanks,
> >>>Piotr
> >>>
> >>>pon., 10 wrz 2018 o 20:47 Alex Harui 
> >>> napisał(a):
> >>>
>  FWIW, I am not in favor of releasing with the current trace hack in
> >>> the
>  compiler.  But if other's are ok with it, I'm not going to make a
> >>> big deal
>  out of it, I'll just abstain from voting.
> 
>  -Alex
> 
>  On 9/10/18, 1:15 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" 
> >>> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I have prepared today all stuff which is needed for making RC
> >>> branch. I
> will check whether everything is working tomorrow. In the other
> >>> words
> probably tomorrow I will push RC1 branch.
> 
> Thanks,
> Piotr
> 
> sob., 8 wrz 2018 o 18:55 Piotr Zarzycki <
> >>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> napisał(a):
> 
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > I see that typedefs build is up and running. Is there
> >> anything
>  important
> > which you would like to add?
> >
> > I wanted to start on Monday playing with release.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 6, 2018, 6:05 PM Piotr Zarzycki <
>  piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Alex,
> >>
> >> Is there anything I need to know before I jump into your
> >>> notes [1]
>  and
> >> start play with develop for release ?
> >>
> >> [1]
> 
> >>>
> >>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notesdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf8dac71af4ff417b97c008d6174e1dd4%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722021606204100sdata=njV1vRpOrRyftdwcr17NLQpu3jYwS%2FQ7evR90iqEFBo%3Dreserved=0
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Piotr
> >>
> >> czw., 6 wrz 2018 o 09:08 Piotr Zarzycki <
> >>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> >> napisał(a):
> >>
> >>> Hi Guys,
> >>>
> >>> I was trying to check Tour De Flex if it has the same issue
> >>> as the
>  rest
> >>> of MX examples. In order to do that I would like to build
>  Framework using
> >>> ANT. I got it working couple of days ago, but now it's
> >>> constantly
>  failing.
> >>> Pixel blender is downloaded corrupted. [1] Do you have any
> >>> idea
>  why it is
> >>> happen ?
> >>>
> >>> When I reach url directly through the browser I'm able to
> >>> download
>  good
> >>> file.
> >>>
> >>> [1]
> 
> >>>
> >>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FLsmzdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf8dac71af4ff417b97c008d6174e1dd4%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722021606204100sdata=VhIxm9udY6XPMpFyBA8mfGuopTYu%2B1HXEhX5cOoUKBU%3Dreserved=0
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Piotr
> >>>
> >>> wt., 4 wrz 2018 o 15:57 Piotr Zarzycki <
> >>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> >>> napisał(a):
> >>>
>  It looks like main application is using ApplicationLayout,
> >>> but it
>  is
>  not  ILayoutHost type.
> 
>  wt., 4 wrz 2018 o 15:35 Piotr Zarzycki <
> >>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> >
>  napisał(a):
> 
> > It looks like there is a missing Layout for main
> >>> application,
>  because
> > that function returns null:
> >
> > var /** @type {org.apache.royale.core.ILayoutHost} */
> >>> viewBead =
> > this.host.getLayoutHost();
> >
> > wt., 4 wrz 2018 o 15:25 Piotr Zarzycki <
>  piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> > 

Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

2018-09-11 Thread Alex Harui
FWIW, I think the framework swcs are built using the config Piotr is using 
since want JSRoyale output, but we don't want to assume SWC dependencies 
specified in royale-config (because we are building the SWCs in those 
dependencies).

However, you are correct for most SWCs that application developers will be 
building.

Of course, I could be wrong...
-Alex

On 9/11/18, 10:21 AM, "Josh Tynjala"  wrote:

Hey Piotr,

There's something a little strange in your compiler options that you should 
probably fix:

You're specifying JSRoyale and js-config.xml together, but these two aren't 
necessarily compatible. Here's what you have in your compiler options:

-compiler.targets=SWF,JSRoyale
-load-config=d:\royale_nightly_js_swf\frameworks\js-config.xml

However, it should either be this:

-compiler.targets=SWF,JSRoyale
-load-config=d:\royale_nightly_js_swf\frameworks\royale-config.xml

or maybe this (depending on if you want Royale components or pure JS):

-compiler.targets=SWF,JS
-load-config=d:\royale_nightly_js_swf\frameworks\js-config.xml

Basically, you use JSRoyale with royale-config.xml, or you use JS with 
js-config.xml. The JSRoyale and JS targets produce very similar output, but 
it's best not to assume that they're exactly the same in all cases.

(As a side note, it's worth mentioning that there's also the JSNode target 
that's meant to work with node-config.xml. JSNode also produces different 
output than JSRoyale or JS because it generates code for Node.js)

One last thing. In order to use -compiler.targets=SWF,JS to build a SWC, 
you'll need my compiler changes from yesterday. For some reason, that was 
throwing an exception, while -compiler.targets=SWF,JSRoyale did not. I suspect 
that this may be why you were using JSRoyale instead of JS, but now JS should 
work too!

- Josh

On 2018/09/11 09:45:52, Piotr Zarzycki  wrote: 
> Hi Guys,
> 
> I'm having difficulties with using created Royale SWC in some project. I
> have two projects. (I've uploaded them on onedrive so you can try it
> yourself).
> 
> Using SWF version of prepared swc I'm able to build project with
> compiler.targets=SWF. Unfortunately using JS version of that SWC I'm not
> able to build project with it. [1]
> 
> 1. Library itself [2] - It contains configurations compile-swf-config.xml
> and compile-js-config.xml. Folder "bin" has swc JS and SWF version.
> 
> 2. Consumer of library [3] - This one is configured with Moonshine and
> VSCode.
> 
> I'm building JS and SWF version of SWC using following command lines [4]
> 
> Does anyone is seeing what could be wrong ? Those command lines [4] are
> based on how Royale is building swcs Basic, Jewel etc.
> 
> [1] 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FtvhYdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5a8dfde09c3a43c1dc5708d6180b0bf9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722833090144497sdata=8wNnZdcsKAwMUSPkEMln4lIYant36T0FNpCwbjhxE7w%3Dreserved=0
> [2] 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F1drv.ms%2Fu%2Fs!ApVpLyjpHDC2hZwM9OY5sNinrirEvQdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5a8dfde09c3a43c1dc5708d6180b0bf9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722833090144497sdata=p9FuFZl3Q69unFF%2F%2BWvoiQ1%2BgFgmKK432O8yfpSxHeI%3Dreserved=0
> [3] 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F1drv.ms%2Fu%2Fs!ApVpLyjpHDC2hZwNgXaX_G_qZip39gdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5a8dfde09c3a43c1dc5708d6180b0bf9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722833090144497sdata=j8eS3h60ZTJ%2Bdq5hmI1Fa1aLoZ6FJfYFXJzyasns054%3Dreserved=0
> [4] 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FOtDRdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5a8dfde09c3a43c1dc5708d6180b0bf9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722833090144497sdata=m7b68csRqLF0nnRHOemiNmryFekbHgUGgLFTNkSxZUQ%3Dreserved=0
> 
> Thanks,
> -- 
> 
> Piotr Zarzycki
> 
> Patreon: 
*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5a8dfde09c3a43c1dc5708d6180b0bf9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722833090144497sdata=ua2LEaq3tv5oEmOvalMBlT4q8CPJRUysSv5Bocy39QM%3Dreserved=0
> 
*
> 




Jenkins build is back to normal : royale-asjs_jsonly #1506

2018-09-11 Thread apacheroyaleci
See 




Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3

2018-09-11 Thread Harbs
I can revert the changes if that’s what folks want. We’re going to have trace 
calls output if I do that, but we can resolve that for the next release.

I’m going to see if a different version of the closure compiler plays better. 
The latest version throws a NoSuchMethod error on 
com.google.javascript.jscomp.CompilerOptions.setInlineLocalFunctions.

Anyone know which version we’re using now?

> On Sep 11, 2018, at 9:09 AM, Carlos Rovira  wrote:
> 
> I think is better move that changes to a branch and release.
> thanks
> 
> El lun., 10 sept. 2018 a las 20:59, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> 
>> Harbs,
>> 
>> Can you comment on that ? Any chance to move that changes to branch ?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Piotr
>> 
>> pon., 10 wrz 2018 o 20:54 Alex Harui 
>> napisał(a):
>> 
>>> Yes.  I think we are using the wrong annotation for variable number of
>>> parameters.
>>> 
>>> -Alex
>>> 
>>> On 9/10/18, 11:49 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" 
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>Alex,
>>> 
>>>What trace hack are you referring to ? This is related what Harbs
>>> commits ?
>>> 
>>>Thanks,
>>>Piotr
>>> 
>>>pon., 10 wrz 2018 o 20:47 Alex Harui 
>>> napisał(a):
>>> 
 FWIW, I am not in favor of releasing with the current trace hack in
>>> the
 compiler.  But if other's are ok with it, I'm not going to make a
>>> big deal
 out of it, I'll just abstain from voting.
 
 -Alex
 
 On 9/10/18, 1:15 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" 
>>> wrote:
 
Hi,
 
I have prepared today all stuff which is needed for making RC
>>> branch. I
will check whether everything is working tomorrow. In the other
>>> words
probably tomorrow I will push RC1 branch.
 
Thanks,
Piotr
 
sob., 8 wrz 2018 o 18:55 Piotr Zarzycki <
>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
napisał(a):
 
> Hi Guys,
> 
> I see that typedefs build is up and running. Is there
>> anything
 important
> which you would like to add?
> 
> I wanted to start on Monday playing with release.
> 
> Thanks,
> Piotr
> 
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018, 6:05 PM Piotr Zarzycki <
 piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Alex,
>> 
>> Is there anything I need to know before I jump into your
>>> notes [1]
 and
>> start play with develop for release ?
>> 
>> [1]
 
>>> 
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notesdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf8dac71af4ff417b97c008d6174e1dd4%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722021606204100sdata=njV1vRpOrRyftdwcr17NLQpu3jYwS%2FQ7evR90iqEFBo%3Dreserved=0
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Piotr
>> 
>> czw., 6 wrz 2018 o 09:08 Piotr Zarzycki <
>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>> napisał(a):
>> 
>>> Hi Guys,
>>> 
>>> I was trying to check Tour De Flex if it has the same issue
>>> as the
 rest
>>> of MX examples. In order to do that I would like to build
 Framework using
>>> ANT. I got it working couple of days ago, but now it's
>>> constantly
 failing.
>>> Pixel blender is downloaded corrupted. [1] Do you have any
>>> idea
 why it is
>>> happen ?
>>> 
>>> When I reach url directly through the browser I'm able to
>>> download
 good
>>> file.
>>> 
>>> [1]
 
>>> 
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FLsmzdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf8dac71af4ff417b97c008d6174e1dd4%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722021606204100sdata=VhIxm9udY6XPMpFyBA8mfGuopTYu%2B1HXEhX5cOoUKBU%3Dreserved=0
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Piotr
>>> 
>>> wt., 4 wrz 2018 o 15:57 Piotr Zarzycki <
>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>>> napisał(a):
>>> 
 It looks like main application is using ApplicationLayout,
>>> but it
 is
 not  ILayoutHost type.
 
 wt., 4 wrz 2018 o 15:35 Piotr Zarzycki <
>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> 
 napisał(a):
 
> It looks like there is a missing Layout for main
>>> application,
 because
> that function returns null:
> 
> var /** @type {org.apache.royale.core.ILayoutHost} */
>>> viewBead =
> this.host.getLayoutHost();
> 
> wt., 4 wrz 2018 o 15:25 Piotr Zarzycki <
 piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> napisał(a):
> 
>> Harbs,
>> 
>> Before I go to tour de flex I decided to build MX Hello
>>> World -
 using
>> Maven. [1] I'm getting exception in the Chrome console
>>> [2]. Do
 you have
>> idea what it could be ?
>> 
>> [1]
>> 
 
>>> 
>> 

Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

2018-09-11 Thread Josh Tynjala
Hey Piotr,

There's something a little strange in your compiler options that you should 
probably fix:

You're specifying JSRoyale and js-config.xml together, but these two aren't 
necessarily compatible. Here's what you have in your compiler options:

-compiler.targets=SWF,JSRoyale
-load-config=d:\royale_nightly_js_swf\frameworks\js-config.xml

However, it should either be this:

-compiler.targets=SWF,JSRoyale
-load-config=d:\royale_nightly_js_swf\frameworks\royale-config.xml

or maybe this (depending on if you want Royale components or pure JS):

-compiler.targets=SWF,JS
-load-config=d:\royale_nightly_js_swf\frameworks\js-config.xml

Basically, you use JSRoyale with royale-config.xml, or you use JS with 
js-config.xml. The JSRoyale and JS targets produce very similar output, but 
it's best not to assume that they're exactly the same in all cases.

(As a side note, it's worth mentioning that there's also the JSNode target 
that's meant to work with node-config.xml. JSNode also produces different 
output than JSRoyale or JS because it generates code for Node.js)

One last thing. In order to use -compiler.targets=SWF,JS to build a SWC, you'll 
need my compiler changes from yesterday. For some reason, that was throwing an 
exception, while -compiler.targets=SWF,JSRoyale did not. I suspect that this 
may be why you were using JSRoyale instead of JS, but now JS should work too!

- Josh

On 2018/09/11 09:45:52, Piotr Zarzycki  wrote: 
> Hi Guys,
> 
> I'm having difficulties with using created Royale SWC in some project. I
> have two projects. (I've uploaded them on onedrive so you can try it
> yourself).
> 
> Using SWF version of prepared swc I'm able to build project with
> compiler.targets=SWF. Unfortunately using JS version of that SWC I'm not
> able to build project with it. [1]
> 
> 1. Library itself [2] - It contains configurations compile-swf-config.xml
> and compile-js-config.xml. Folder "bin" has swc JS and SWF version.
> 
> 2. Consumer of library [3] - This one is configured with Moonshine and
> VSCode.
> 
> I'm building JS and SWF version of SWC using following command lines [4]
> 
> Does anyone is seeing what could be wrong ? Those command lines [4] are
> based on how Royale is building swcs Basic, Jewel etc.
> 
> [1] https://paste.apache.org/tvhY
> [2] https://1drv.ms/u/s!ApVpLyjpHDC2hZwM9OY5sNinrirEvQ
> [3] https://1drv.ms/u/s!ApVpLyjpHDC2hZwNgXaX_G_qZip39g
> [4] https://paste.apache.org/OtDR
> 
> Thanks,
> -- 
> 
> Piotr Zarzycki
> 
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> *
> 


Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

2018-09-11 Thread Alex Harui
I just looked in my working copy and the default royale-config.xml looks like 
it uses -js-library-path.  I don’t remember if the build scripts tweak that or 
not for a js-only package, so look in the royale-config you have and verify if 
that's true.  I guess we must have made that change to make it easier for 
JS-only projects to access browser APIs.  I thought we were still gambling that 
folks were not using platform-specific APIs, but I guess that's no longer true.

So if your royale-config is using -js-library-path, then yes, you just specify 
custom SWCs using -js-library-path.

HTH,
-Alex

On 9/11/18, 10:02 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

Alex,

In the other words I don't have any other option than put my JS only
library to js-library-path if I ever wanted to build my application to JS
only. Unless there is really a bug, because why following things are not
working.

-targets=JSRoyale
-source-path+=src
-library-path+=lib/RoyaleLibTestJS.swc

Having above parameters setup like that should we be able to build our
application or not ? IF YES it should work - We definitely have a Bug here.

Thanks,
Piotr

wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 18:49 Alex Harui  napisał(a):

> It sounds like I have still not clearly explained how
> library-path/swf-library-path/js-library-path work.
>
> Library-path is for SWCs that "might" work for both SWF and JS.  When we
> compile most Royale SWCs, we build the library.swf with COMPILE::SWF=true
> and then compile JS files with COMPILE::SWF=false.  The gamble is that
> folks will not use platform-specific APIs (like Flash classes or the
> Browser's HTMLElement.  The default configuration for Royale is to put the
> SWCs in frameworks/projects on the library-path.
>
> The swf-library-path and js-library-path options are for specifying SWCs
> that have APIs for that specific platform.  BUT (this is the key point), 
as
> soon as you specify even one SWC with js-library-path, the compiler will 
no
> longer us just plain -library-path in determining the list of SWCs.  If 
one
> SWC was specified with -js-library-path, then ALL swcs for the JS compile
> must be specified using js-library-path.
>
> So, if you used -js-library-path to specify your custom SWC, then you
> should get the error about not finding Application since it was specified
> with just plain "library-path" in royale-config.xml.  You might have to
> specify -js-library-path=/frameworks/js/libs" as well
> to get all of the other Royale SWCs.
>
> Anyone who can explain it better, please do so.
>
> HTH,
> -Alex
>
> On 9/11/18, 9:28 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:
>
> I just checked and here is the results.
>
> JS version of library:
> If I'm using js-external-library-path or js-library-path - SWC is 
being
> recognized and I'm able to build using it my project to JS (JSRoyale)
> If I'm using -library-path or external-library-path - It's failing 
with
> errors described in first email.
>
> SWF version of library:
> If I'm using -swf-library-path - I'm getting following error [1],
> however
> if I use -swf-external-library-path - project is able to produce
> correct
> swf. Maybe we have a bug in case of -swf-library-path.
> If I'm using -library-path and external-library-path I'm able to
> produce
> correct swf.
>
> It looks like I know how to implement all of that in Moonshine now.
> Very
> useful information. I'm wondering whether we shouldn't think that is
> all
> bugs in case of -library-path and swf-library-path.
>
> Many Thanks for help Alex.
>
> [1]
> 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2F13Sqdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cb5046911633b469f392908d618086565%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722821688617676sdata=Z3MfV3twGC%2F1BdfRMHBKIL4fcvh3ZSBMg7YRm2htQbw%3Dreserved=0
>
> wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 18:09 Piotr Zarzycki 
> napisał(a):
>
> > Alex,
> >
> > It looks like library.swf contains in both cases required
> information and
> > files. I have in this library two files.
> >
> > 1) MyClass -> Contains import of all classes
> > 2) MyViewClass - contains function in blocs COMPILE::SWF and
> COMPILE::JS
> >
> > JS library dump:
> 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FdLA2data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cb5046911633b469f392908d618086565%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722821688617676sdata=mAINfsmspL4wKRJx7WctjMMZnvE0RaR%2BB02FhDdO8po%3Dreserved=0
> > SWF library dump:
> 

Re: Ace Editor: Should it build/work for SWF?

2018-09-11 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
Carlos,

Yishay was working on separate branch as far as I remember. [1]

[1] https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/tree/ace-editor

Thanks,
Piotr

wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 18:50 Carlos Rovira  napisał(a):

> Right!, I remember Olaf's effort, but I though Yishay wasn't involved. And
> I don't remember ACE editor was involved.
> thanks!
>
> El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 18:02, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>
> > I'm surprised that you don't remember :) It suppose to be part of Try It
> > Out [1], but they probably didn't have enough time to finish it.
> >
> > [1] https://royale.apache.org/try-it-now/
> >
> > wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 18:01 Carlos Rovira 
> > napisał(a):
> >
> > > Interesting, I 'd love to know for what they use it? :)
> > > Thanks Piotr!
> > >
> > > El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 17:44, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > >
> > > > Carlos,
> > > >
> > > > This is it -> https://ace.c9.io/. I think more information about
> that
> > > can
> > > > provide you Yishay and Olaf. :)
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Piotr
> > > >
> > > > wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 17:40 Carlos Rovira 
> > > > napisał(a):
> > > >
> > > > > Sorry to answer, but what is ACE Editor?
> > > > >
> > > > > thanks
> > > > >
> > > > > El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 17:31, Alex Harui
> > > ( > > > > >)
> > > > > escribió:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I am thinking the answer is no.  Now that errors in SWF compile
> > > > correctly
> > > > > > fail builds, we are seeing problems.  I am going to remove SWF
> > > building
> > > > > for
> > > > > > ACE.SWC.  Let me know if you think it should work.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Alex
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > >
> > > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > > > *
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Carlos Rovira
> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > *
> >
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>


-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
*


Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

2018-09-11 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
Alex,

In the other words I don't have any other option than put my JS only
library to js-library-path if I ever wanted to build my application to JS
only. Unless there is really a bug, because why following things are not
working.

-targets=JSRoyale
-source-path+=src
-library-path+=lib/RoyaleLibTestJS.swc

Having above parameters setup like that should we be able to build our
application or not ? IF YES it should work - We definitely have a Bug here.

Thanks,
Piotr

wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 18:49 Alex Harui  napisał(a):

> It sounds like I have still not clearly explained how
> library-path/swf-library-path/js-library-path work.
>
> Library-path is for SWCs that "might" work for both SWF and JS.  When we
> compile most Royale SWCs, we build the library.swf with COMPILE::SWF=true
> and then compile JS files with COMPILE::SWF=false.  The gamble is that
> folks will not use platform-specific APIs (like Flash classes or the
> Browser's HTMLElement.  The default configuration for Royale is to put the
> SWCs in frameworks/projects on the library-path.
>
> The swf-library-path and js-library-path options are for specifying SWCs
> that have APIs for that specific platform.  BUT (this is the key point), as
> soon as you specify even one SWC with js-library-path, the compiler will no
> longer us just plain -library-path in determining the list of SWCs.  If one
> SWC was specified with -js-library-path, then ALL swcs for the JS compile
> must be specified using js-library-path.
>
> So, if you used -js-library-path to specify your custom SWC, then you
> should get the error about not finding Application since it was specified
> with just plain "library-path" in royale-config.xml.  You might have to
> specify -js-library-path=/frameworks/js/libs" as well
> to get all of the other Royale SWCs.
>
> Anyone who can explain it better, please do so.
>
> HTH,
> -Alex
>
> On 9/11/18, 9:28 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:
>
> I just checked and here is the results.
>
> JS version of library:
> If I'm using js-external-library-path or js-library-path - SWC is being
> recognized and I'm able to build using it my project to JS (JSRoyale)
> If I'm using -library-path or external-library-path - It's failing with
> errors described in first email.
>
> SWF version of library:
> If I'm using -swf-library-path - I'm getting following error [1],
> however
> if I use -swf-external-library-path - project is able to produce
> correct
> swf. Maybe we have a bug in case of -swf-library-path.
> If I'm using -library-path and external-library-path I'm able to
> produce
> correct swf.
>
> It looks like I know how to implement all of that in Moonshine now.
> Very
> useful information. I'm wondering whether we shouldn't think that is
> all
> bugs in case of -library-path and swf-library-path.
>
> Many Thanks for help Alex.
>
> [1]
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2F13Sqdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4ee5a0296b76446e222308d61803a8fc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722801337093590sdata=8j7p5BEsuPo0%2BDJswEDKd9sTYqnoTSMJ1Udecu6FSbY%3Dreserved=0
>
> wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 18:09 Piotr Zarzycki 
> napisał(a):
>
> > Alex,
> >
> > It looks like library.swf contains in both cases required
> information and
> > files. I have in this library two files.
> >
> > 1) MyClass -> Contains import of all classes
> > 2) MyViewClass - contains function in blocs COMPILE::SWF and
> COMPILE::JS
> >
> > JS library dump:
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FdLA2data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4ee5a0296b76446e222308d61803a8fc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722801337093590sdata=4TVP%2BBe2XjGHgTasVjcizK7z3MGC7fBsnUyNYHzi77E%3Dreserved=0
> > SWF library dump:
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2Fo1rWdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4ee5a0296b76446e222308d61803a8fc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722801337093590sdata=lyRLg0ahC%2Fqthf49onOBKZmL6LHgaT0uKnhwV%2Fie%2Bw0%3Dreserved=0
> >
> > Next step is to try using -js-library-path etc to check whether it
> makes
> > any difference.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr
> >
> >
> > wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 18:00 Piotr Zarzycki 
> > napisał(a):
> >
> >> Yes I did it. Both looks almost the same.
> >>
> >> JS ->
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FXhLidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4ee5a0296b76446e222308d61803a8fc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722801337093590sdata=a1qu6RWSm%2BNUOMday9oEoN7SBFBEfv%2FLNdBHUt9TCAM%3Dreserved=0
> >> SWF ->
> 

Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

2018-09-11 Thread Carlos Rovira
Thanks Alex, very useful, I think I'll must have this in sight when I'll
try to fix maven build distribution, since I think some of the problems are
in config xml and library paths declarations.

El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 18:49, Alex Harui ()
escribió:

> It sounds like I have still not clearly explained how
> library-path/swf-library-path/js-library-path work.
>
> Library-path is for SWCs that "might" work for both SWF and JS.  When we
> compile most Royale SWCs, we build the library.swf with COMPILE::SWF=true
> and then compile JS files with COMPILE::SWF=false.  The gamble is that
> folks will not use platform-specific APIs (like Flash classes or the
> Browser's HTMLElement.  The default configuration for Royale is to put the
> SWCs in frameworks/projects on the library-path.
>
> The swf-library-path and js-library-path options are for specifying SWCs
> that have APIs for that specific platform.  BUT (this is the key point), as
> soon as you specify even one SWC with js-library-path, the compiler will no
> longer us just plain -library-path in determining the list of SWCs.  If one
> SWC was specified with -js-library-path, then ALL swcs for the JS compile
> must be specified using js-library-path.
>
> So, if you used -js-library-path to specify your custom SWC, then you
> should get the error about not finding Application since it was specified
> with just plain "library-path" in royale-config.xml.  You might have to
> specify -js-library-path=/frameworks/js/libs" as well
> to get all of the other Royale SWCs.
>
> Anyone who can explain it better, please do so.
>
> HTH,
> -Alex
>
> On 9/11/18, 9:28 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:
>
> I just checked and here is the results.
>
> JS version of library:
> If I'm using js-external-library-path or js-library-path - SWC is being
> recognized and I'm able to build using it my project to JS (JSRoyale)
> If I'm using -library-path or external-library-path - It's failing with
> errors described in first email.
>
> SWF version of library:
> If I'm using -swf-library-path - I'm getting following error [1],
> however
> if I use -swf-external-library-path - project is able to produce
> correct
> swf. Maybe we have a bug in case of -swf-library-path.
> If I'm using -library-path and external-library-path I'm able to
> produce
> correct swf.
>
> It looks like I know how to implement all of that in Moonshine now.
> Very
> useful information. I'm wondering whether we shouldn't think that is
> all
> bugs in case of -library-path and swf-library-path.
>
> Many Thanks for help Alex.
>
> [1]
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2F13Sqdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4ee5a0296b76446e222308d61803a8fc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722801337093590sdata=8j7p5BEsuPo0%2BDJswEDKd9sTYqnoTSMJ1Udecu6FSbY%3Dreserved=0
>
> wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 18:09 Piotr Zarzycki 
> napisał(a):
>
> > Alex,
> >
> > It looks like library.swf contains in both cases required
> information and
> > files. I have in this library two files.
> >
> > 1) MyClass -> Contains import of all classes
> > 2) MyViewClass - contains function in blocs COMPILE::SWF and
> COMPILE::JS
> >
> > JS library dump:
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FdLA2data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4ee5a0296b76446e222308d61803a8fc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722801337093590sdata=4TVP%2BBe2XjGHgTasVjcizK7z3MGC7fBsnUyNYHzi77E%3Dreserved=0
> > SWF library dump:
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2Fo1rWdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4ee5a0296b76446e222308d61803a8fc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722801337093590sdata=lyRLg0ahC%2Fqthf49onOBKZmL6LHgaT0uKnhwV%2Fie%2Bw0%3Dreserved=0
> >
> > Next step is to try using -js-library-path etc to check whether it
> makes
> > any difference.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr
> >
> >
> > wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 18:00 Piotr Zarzycki 
> > napisał(a):
> >
> >> Yes I did it. Both looks almost the same.
> >>
> >> JS ->
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FXhLidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4ee5a0296b76446e222308d61803a8fc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722801337093590sdata=a1qu6RWSm%2BNUOMday9oEoN7SBFBEfv%2FLNdBHUt9TCAM%3Dreserved=0
> >> SWF ->
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FMwKBdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4ee5a0296b76446e222308d61803a8fc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722801337093590sdata=BSON%2B6%2Bqip94VGBFht19rWvmndAPqbcXNHbmSNq%2BCG8%3Dreserved=0
> >>
> >> I will provide in couple of minutes SWF dump.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Piotr
> >>
> >> wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 17:52 Alex 

Re: Ace Editor: Should it build/work for SWF?

2018-09-11 Thread Carlos Rovira
Right!, I remember Olaf's effort, but I though Yishay wasn't involved. And
I don't remember ACE editor was involved.
thanks!

El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 18:02, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> I'm surprised that you don't remember :) It suppose to be part of Try It
> Out [1], but they probably didn't have enough time to finish it.
>
> [1] https://royale.apache.org/try-it-now/
>
> wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 18:01 Carlos Rovira 
> napisał(a):
>
> > Interesting, I 'd love to know for what they use it? :)
> > Thanks Piotr!
> >
> > El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 17:44, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >
> > > Carlos,
> > >
> > > This is it -> https://ace.c9.io/. I think more information about that
> > can
> > > provide you Yishay and Olaf. :)
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Piotr
> > >
> > > wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 17:40 Carlos Rovira 
> > > napisał(a):
> > >
> > > > Sorry to answer, but what is ACE Editor?
> > > >
> > > > thanks
> > > >
> > > > El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 17:31, Alex Harui
> > ( > > > >)
> > > > escribió:
> > > >
> > > > > I am thinking the answer is no.  Now that errors in SWF compile
> > > correctly
> > > > > fail builds, we are seeing problems.  I am going to remove SWF
> > building
> > > > for
> > > > > ACE.SWC.  Let me know if you think it should work.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Alex
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > >
> > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > > *
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> *
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

2018-09-11 Thread Alex Harui
It sounds like I have still not clearly explained how 
library-path/swf-library-path/js-library-path work.

Library-path is for SWCs that "might" work for both SWF and JS.  When we 
compile most Royale SWCs, we build the library.swf with COMPILE::SWF=true and 
then compile JS files with COMPILE::SWF=false.  The gamble is that folks will 
not use platform-specific APIs (like Flash classes or the Browser's 
HTMLElement.  The default configuration for Royale is to put the SWCs in 
frameworks/projects on the library-path.

The swf-library-path and js-library-path options are for specifying SWCs that 
have APIs for that specific platform.  BUT (this is the key point), as soon as 
you specify even one SWC with js-library-path, the compiler will no longer us 
just plain -library-path in determining the list of SWCs.  If one SWC was 
specified with -js-library-path, then ALL swcs for the JS compile must be 
specified using js-library-path.

So, if you used -js-library-path to specify your custom SWC, then you should 
get the error about not finding Application since it was specified with just 
plain "library-path" in royale-config.xml.  You might have to specify 
-js-library-path=/frameworks/js/libs" as well to get all of 
the other Royale SWCs.

Anyone who can explain it better, please do so.

HTH,
-Alex

On 9/11/18, 9:28 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

I just checked and here is the results.

JS version of library:
If I'm using js-external-library-path or js-library-path - SWC is being
recognized and I'm able to build using it my project to JS (JSRoyale)
If I'm using -library-path or external-library-path - It's failing with
errors described in first email.

SWF version of library:
If I'm using -swf-library-path - I'm getting following error [1], however
if I use -swf-external-library-path - project is able to produce correct
swf. Maybe we have a bug in case of -swf-library-path.
If I'm using -library-path and external-library-path I'm able to produce
correct swf.

It looks like I know how to implement all of that in Moonshine now. Very
useful information. I'm wondering whether we shouldn't think that is all
bugs in case of -library-path and swf-library-path.

Many Thanks for help Alex.

[1] 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2F13Sqdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4ee5a0296b76446e222308d61803a8fc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722801337093590sdata=8j7p5BEsuPo0%2BDJswEDKd9sTYqnoTSMJ1Udecu6FSbY%3Dreserved=0

wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 18:09 Piotr Zarzycki 
napisał(a):

> Alex,
>
> It looks like library.swf contains in both cases required information and
> files. I have in this library two files.
>
> 1) MyClass -> Contains import of all classes
> 2) MyViewClass - contains function in blocs COMPILE::SWF and COMPILE::JS
>
> JS library dump: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FdLA2data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4ee5a0296b76446e222308d61803a8fc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722801337093590sdata=4TVP%2BBe2XjGHgTasVjcizK7z3MGC7fBsnUyNYHzi77E%3Dreserved=0
> SWF library dump: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2Fo1rWdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4ee5a0296b76446e222308d61803a8fc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722801337093590sdata=lyRLg0ahC%2Fqthf49onOBKZmL6LHgaT0uKnhwV%2Fie%2Bw0%3Dreserved=0
>
> Next step is to try using -js-library-path etc to check whether it makes
> any difference.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
>
> wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 18:00 Piotr Zarzycki 
> napisał(a):
>
>> Yes I did it. Both looks almost the same.
>>
>> JS -> 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FXhLidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4ee5a0296b76446e222308d61803a8fc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722801337093590sdata=a1qu6RWSm%2BNUOMday9oEoN7SBFBEfv%2FLNdBHUt9TCAM%3Dreserved=0
>> SWF -> 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FMwKBdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4ee5a0296b76446e222308d61803a8fc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722801337093590sdata=BSON%2B6%2Bqip94VGBFht19rWvmndAPqbcXNHbmSNq%2BCG8%3Dreserved=0
>>
>> I will provide in couple of minutes SWF dump.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Piotr
>>
>> wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 17:52 Alex Harui 
>> napisał(a):
>>
>>> Royale SWCs should always have a folder of JS files unless they are SWF
>>> only.
>>>
>>> Before you dump the library.swf, did you look in the catalog.xml?  It is
>>> easier to see what it thinks is in the SWC.  It could be that the 
manifest
>>> or other list of classes is not specified in the JS compile.
>>>
>>> HTH,
>>> 

Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

2018-09-11 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
I just checked and here is the results.

JS version of library:
If I'm using js-external-library-path or js-library-path - SWC is being
recognized and I'm able to build using it my project to JS (JSRoyale)
If I'm using -library-path or external-library-path - It's failing with
errors described in first email.

SWF version of library:
If I'm using -swf-library-path - I'm getting following error [1], however
if I use -swf-external-library-path - project is able to produce correct
swf. Maybe we have a bug in case of -swf-library-path.
If I'm using -library-path and external-library-path I'm able to produce
correct swf.

It looks like I know how to implement all of that in Moonshine now. Very
useful information. I'm wondering whether we shouldn't think that is all
bugs in case of -library-path and swf-library-path.

Many Thanks for help Alex.

[1] https://paste.apache.org/13Sq

wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 18:09 Piotr Zarzycki 
napisał(a):

> Alex,
>
> It looks like library.swf contains in both cases required information and
> files. I have in this library two files.
>
> 1) MyClass -> Contains import of all classes
> 2) MyViewClass - contains function in blocs COMPILE::SWF and COMPILE::JS
>
> JS library dump: https://paste.apache.org/dLA2
> SWF library dump: https://paste.apache.org/o1rW
>
> Next step is to try using -js-library-path etc to check whether it makes
> any difference.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
>
> wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 18:00 Piotr Zarzycki 
> napisał(a):
>
>> Yes I did it. Both looks almost the same.
>>
>> JS -> https://paste.apache.org/XhLi
>> SWF -> https://paste.apache.org/MwKB
>>
>> I will provide in couple of minutes SWF dump.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Piotr
>>
>> wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 17:52 Alex Harui 
>> napisał(a):
>>
>>> Royale SWCs should always have a folder of JS files unless they are SWF
>>> only.
>>>
>>> Before you dump the library.swf, did you look in the catalog.xml?  It is
>>> easier to see what it thinks is in the SWC.  It could be that the manifest
>>> or other list of classes is not specified in the JS compile.
>>>
>>> HTH,
>>> -Alex
>>>
>>> On 9/11/18, 8:49 AM, "piotrz"  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Alex,
>>>
>>> The first part of your answer is behind me. I have checked what is
>>> inside
>>> both swcs. On the left sight of the screenshot is JS version.
>>>
>>> <
>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com%2Ffile%2Ft1%2Fjs_swf.pngdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C433e8a0206c14a29f6de08d617fe3860%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722777968242370sdata=P6cfNMW8dyfFqNHlIrvlpLYbRdDsK5KLzz7QuLADZKQ%3Dreserved=0>
>>>
>>>
>>> Interesting thing is that in both cases I have folder with JS files.
>>>
>>> I have definitely my swcs in library-path, because SWF version is
>>> working
>>> fine.
>>>
>>> I will try to examine library.swf and get back to you.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Piotr
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sent from:
>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com%2Fdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C433e8a0206c14a29f6de08d617fe3860%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722777968242370sdata=mx1qBKZd81wM0BuMJgh7dWAr3dc%2FdGQLuKHphalMqRo%3Dreserved=0
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>
>> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
>> *
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> *
>


-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
*


Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

2018-09-11 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
Alex,

It looks like library.swf contains in both cases required information and
files. I have in this library two files.

1) MyClass -> Contains import of all classes
2) MyViewClass - contains function in blocs COMPILE::SWF and COMPILE::JS

JS library dump: https://paste.apache.org/dLA2
SWF library dump: https://paste.apache.org/o1rW

Next step is to try using -js-library-path etc to check whether it makes
any difference.

Thanks,
Piotr


wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 18:00 Piotr Zarzycki 
napisał(a):

> Yes I did it. Both looks almost the same.
>
> JS -> https://paste.apache.org/XhLi
> SWF -> https://paste.apache.org/MwKB
>
> I will provide in couple of minutes SWF dump.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 17:52 Alex Harui  napisał(a):
>
>> Royale SWCs should always have a folder of JS files unless they are SWF
>> only.
>>
>> Before you dump the library.swf, did you look in the catalog.xml?  It is
>> easier to see what it thinks is in the SWC.  It could be that the manifest
>> or other list of classes is not specified in the JS compile.
>>
>> HTH,
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 9/11/18, 8:49 AM, "piotrz"  wrote:
>>
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> The first part of your answer is behind me. I have checked what is
>> inside
>> both swcs. On the left sight of the screenshot is JS version.
>>
>> <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com%2Ffile%2Ft1%2Fjs_swf.pngdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C433e8a0206c14a29f6de08d617fe3860%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722777968242370sdata=P6cfNMW8dyfFqNHlIrvlpLYbRdDsK5KLzz7QuLADZKQ%3Dreserved=0>
>>
>>
>> Interesting thing is that in both cases I have folder with JS files.
>>
>> I have definitely my swcs in library-path, because SWF version is
>> working
>> fine.
>>
>> I will try to examine library.swf and get back to you.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Piotr
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent from:
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com%2Fdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C433e8a0206c14a29f6de08d617fe3860%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722777968242370sdata=mx1qBKZd81wM0BuMJgh7dWAr3dc%2FdGQLuKHphalMqRo%3Dreserved=0
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> *
>


-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
*


Re: Ace Editor: Should it build/work for SWF?

2018-09-11 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
I'm surprised that you don't remember :) It suppose to be part of Try It
Out [1], but they probably didn't have enough time to finish it.

[1] https://royale.apache.org/try-it-now/

wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 18:01 Carlos Rovira  napisał(a):

> Interesting, I 'd love to know for what they use it? :)
> Thanks Piotr!
>
> El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 17:44, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>
> > Carlos,
> >
> > This is it -> https://ace.c9.io/. I think more information about that
> can
> > provide you Yishay and Olaf. :)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr
> >
> > wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 17:40 Carlos Rovira 
> > napisał(a):
> >
> > > Sorry to answer, but what is ACE Editor?
> > >
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 17:31, Alex Harui
> ( > > >)
> > > escribió:
> > >
> > > > I am thinking the answer is no.  Now that errors in SWF compile
> > correctly
> > > > fail builds, we are seeing problems.  I am going to remove SWF
> building
> > > for
> > > > ACE.SWC.  Let me know if you think it should work.
> > > >
> > > > -Alex
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Carlos Rovira
> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > *
> >
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>


-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
*


Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

2018-09-11 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
Yes I did it. Both looks almost the same.

JS -> https://paste.apache.org/XhLi
SWF -> https://paste.apache.org/MwKB

I will provide in couple of minutes SWF dump.

Thanks,
Piotr

wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 17:52 Alex Harui  napisał(a):

> Royale SWCs should always have a folder of JS files unless they are SWF
> only.
>
> Before you dump the library.swf, did you look in the catalog.xml?  It is
> easier to see what it thinks is in the SWC.  It could be that the manifest
> or other list of classes is not specified in the JS compile.
>
> HTH,
> -Alex
>
> On 9/11/18, 8:49 AM, "piotrz"  wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> The first part of your answer is behind me. I have checked what is
> inside
> both swcs. On the left sight of the screenshot is JS version.
>
> <
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com%2Ffile%2Ft1%2Fjs_swf.pngdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C433e8a0206c14a29f6de08d617fe3860%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722777968242370sdata=P6cfNMW8dyfFqNHlIrvlpLYbRdDsK5KLzz7QuLADZKQ%3Dreserved=0>
>
>
> Interesting thing is that in both cases I have folder with JS files.
>
> I have definitely my swcs in library-path, because SWF version is
> working
> fine.
>
> I will try to examine library.swf and get back to you.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from:
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com%2Fdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C433e8a0206c14a29f6de08d617fe3860%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722777968242370sdata=mx1qBKZd81wM0BuMJgh7dWAr3dc%2FdGQLuKHphalMqRo%3Dreserved=0
>
>
>

-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
*


Re: Ace Editor: Should it build/work for SWF?

2018-09-11 Thread Carlos Rovira
Interesting, I 'd love to know for what they use it? :)
Thanks Piotr!

El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 17:44, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> Carlos,
>
> This is it -> https://ace.c9.io/. I think more information about that can
> provide you Yishay and Olaf. :)
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 17:40 Carlos Rovira 
> napisał(a):
>
> > Sorry to answer, but what is ACE Editor?
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 17:31, Alex Harui ( > >)
> > escribió:
> >
> > > I am thinking the answer is no.  Now that errors in SWF compile
> correctly
> > > fail builds, we are seeing problems.  I am going to remove SWF building
> > for
> > > ACE.SWC.  Let me know if you think it should work.
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> *
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

2018-09-11 Thread Alex Harui
Royale SWCs should always have a folder of JS files unless they are SWF only.

Before you dump the library.swf, did you look in the catalog.xml?  It is easier 
to see what it thinks is in the SWC.  It could be that the manifest or other 
list of classes is not specified in the JS compile.

HTH,
-Alex

On 9/11/18, 8:49 AM, "piotrz"  wrote:

Hi Alex,

The first part of your answer is behind me. I have checked what is inside
both swcs. On the left sight of the screenshot is JS version. 



 

Interesting thing is that in both cases I have folder with JS files.

I have definitely my swcs in library-path, because SWF version is working
fine. 

I will try to examine library.swf and get back to you.

Thanks,
Piotr



--
Sent from: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com%2Fdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C433e8a0206c14a29f6de08d617fe3860%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722777968242370sdata=mx1qBKZd81wM0BuMJgh7dWAr3dc%2FdGQLuKHphalMqRo%3Dreserved=0




Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

2018-09-11 Thread piotrz
Hi Alex,

The first part of your answer is behind me. I have checked what is inside
both swcs. On the left sight of the screenshot is JS version. 

 

Interesting thing is that in both cases I have folder with JS files.

I have definitely my swcs in library-path, because SWF version is working
fine. 

I will try to examine library.swf and get back to you.

Thanks,
Piotr



--
Sent from: http://apache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com/


Re: Ace Editor: Should it build/work for SWF?

2018-09-11 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
Carlos,

This is it -> https://ace.c9.io/. I think more information about that can
provide you Yishay and Olaf. :)

Thanks,
Piotr

wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 17:40 Carlos Rovira  napisał(a):

> Sorry to answer, but what is ACE Editor?
>
> thanks
>
> El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 17:31, Alex Harui ( >)
> escribió:
>
> > I am thinking the answer is no.  Now that errors in SWF compile correctly
> > fail builds, we are seeing problems.  I am going to remove SWF building
> for
> > ACE.SWC.  Let me know if you think it should work.
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> >
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>


-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
*


Re: Ace Editor: Should it build/work for SWF?

2018-09-11 Thread Carlos Rovira
Sorry to answer, but what is ACE Editor?

thanks

El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 17:31, Alex Harui ()
escribió:

> I am thinking the answer is no.  Now that errors in SWF compile correctly
> fail builds, we are seeing problems.  I am going to remove SWF building for
> ACE.SWC.  Let me know if you think it should work.
>
> -Alex
>
>

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Ace Editor: Should it build/work for SWF?

2018-09-11 Thread Alex Harui
I am thinking the answer is no.  Now that errors in SWF compile correctly fail 
builds, we are seeing problems.  I am going to remove SWF building for ACE.SWC. 
 Let me know if you think it should work.

-Alex



Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

2018-09-11 Thread Alex Harui
If you are having a problem with a SWC, it is best to dump the SWC and examine 
it.  A SWC is a ZIP file and contains at least a catalog.xml and library.swf 
and for Royale, usually it also contains JS files.

The catalog.xml file should list all classes found in the SWC.  If it lists a 
class but you still can't compile your app against it, the next steps are to 
verify that SWC is in the library-path (or external-library-path), and then to 
SWFDump the library.swf to see if it is or isn't in the library.swf.  The 
compiler does not read catalog.xml, it parses library.swf to find out what 
classes are in the SWF.

In Royale, not only is there a -library-path option, but also a 
-swf-library-path and -js-library-path option.  If only -library-path is used, 
both the SWF compile and JS compile will use the SWCs specified via 
-library-path.  But if even one -js-library-path option is used, then the JS 
compile will not look at -library-path and only look at -js-library-path so you 
may have to re-specify SWCs that were on -library-path with -js-library-path.  
Same goes for using -swf-library-path, and the same pattern applies for 
-external-library-path.

HTH,
-Alex

On 9/11/18, 7:34 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

I just prepared Maven pom file for Library [2]* project provided as an
example in the first email. -> 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FoShLdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cdf1efb7d645849b7c3f508d617f3a4b6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722732540977391sdata=F164h%2FVzFSZ7HkNK9%2FJkvg0AoeKYvfhxJOTmXUtBr4Y%3Dreserved=0

Unfortunately the result is the same - Using SWF version of build SWC I'm
able to build Royale application without the problem to SWF
(-compiler.target=SWF).
Using JS version I'm not able to build application
(-comipler.target=JSRoyale). -> 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FQuTxdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cdf1efb7d645849b7c3f508d617f3a4b6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722732540977391sdata=AuhGyunTcr9gY8pWWeJgVdbY9sU2XlK5bPuKssRx21g%3Dreserved=0

Something is wrong. :(

Piotr

wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 15:38 Piotr Zarzycki 
napisał(a):

> Carlos,
>
> It is very unlikely that yesterdays changes could make any problem and
> give that error. I think this is my second approach to have SWC support in
> Moonshine [1]. In first one I remember similar results. At that time I 
just
> didn't report it on dev list, cause I went into different tasks.
>
> [1] 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fprominic%2FMoonshine-IDE%2Fissues%2F195data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cdf1efb7d645849b7c3f508d617f3a4b6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722732540977391sdata=lfMS8nLf9qoDCYXYPWoU2HxXzHlfe05kziCHYFGbl58%3Dreserved=0
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 13:37 Carlos Rovira 
> napisał(a):
>
>> Hi, we cna remove from the list point 3, since it was something on my 
side
>> as I just reported a minute ago.
>>
>>
>> El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 13:30, Carlos Rovira (<
>> carlosrov...@apache.org>)
>> escribió:
>>
>> > Piotr, I must say that today I have various errors, as I reported:
>> > 1.- error in CI as we saw reported in email
>> > 2.- error building with maven in a blog example that before wasn't
>> > reporting error
>> > 3.- ANT failing creating SDK.
>> >
>> > Now yours:
>> > 4.- this one
>> >
>> > Maybe some changes yesterday in compiler or in typedefs are causing
>> this.
>> > Hope Josh or Alex could bring more light on this.
>> > As well could it be the change introduced by Harbs some days ago? (the
>> one
>> > that Alex don't want to release)
>> >
>> > Don't know if all if this is related.
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 12:59, Piotr Zarzycki (<
>> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>> >
>> >> Ok I understand now what you are trying to say. Just to be clear the
>> >> problem is following.
>> >>
>> >> If I prepare SWC which is SWF only - I'm able to consuming it and
>> project
>> >> which using it building without the problem to SWF.
>> >> If I prepare SWC which is JS only - Classes are not visible, project 
is
>> >> failing with error [1].
>> >>
>> >> I will prepare Maven build for library to compare the results with
>> command
>> >> line.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Piotr
>> >>
>> >> wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 12:53 Carlos Rovira 
>> >> napisał(a):
>> >>
>> >> > Piotr a project is used to be built. a lib to be compiled, and used
>> in a
>> >> > project app...
>> >> > if you're not trying to do that, better I left to others 

Re: [MAVEN-BUILD] Royale-asjs - Build # 1073 - Still Failing

2018-09-11 Thread Alex Harui
Amazing.  That means that the Maven builds have been failing to build the SWF 
version of these examples for quite a while now and we had not noticed.  I just 
fixed having the SWF compiler return the right process exit code.   I will 
patch up these examples.

-Alex

On 9/11/18, 1:30 AM, "Carlos Rovira"  wrote:

Hi, some latest change is breaking maven in *DesktopMap*, please take a
look.

In the other hand, I'm seeing locally the following fail in Blog Example
about list


royale-asjs/examples/blog/BE0004_Adding_an_item_to_a_Jewel_List/src/main/royale/BE0004_Adding_an_item_to_a_Jewel_List.mxml(53):
col: 97 Error: Implicit coercion of a value of type MouseEvent to an
unrelated type Event.





^

Should I change the example? or is something to fix in compiler?

thanks



El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 9:47, Apache Jenkins Server (<
jenk...@builds.apache.org>) escribió:

> The Apache Jenkins build system has built Royale-asjs (build #1073)
>
> Status: Still Failing
>
> Check console output at 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbuilds.apache.org%2Fjob%2FRoyale-asjs%2F1073%2Fdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cbd332843c157432da70908d617c0d9c3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722514408544138sdata=SuycsDZBtPh2TgJjk7v0UQHm6HiM%2Bf1DRxqwQ8NBtDw%3Dreserved=0
> to view the results.



-- 
Carlos Rovira

https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosroviradata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cbd332843c157432da70908d617c0d9c3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722514408544138sdata=dZqWDsp4XjCfGagSGaDyX5B5TobQqbis%2BXk55INBPlg%3Dreserved=0




Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

2018-09-11 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
I just prepared Maven pom file for Library [2]* project provided as an
example in the first email. -> https://paste.apache.org/oShL

Unfortunately the result is the same - Using SWF version of build SWC I'm
able to build Royale application without the problem to SWF
(-compiler.target=SWF).
Using JS version I'm not able to build application
(-comipler.target=JSRoyale). -> https://paste.apache.org/QuTx

Something is wrong. :(

Piotr

wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 15:38 Piotr Zarzycki 
napisał(a):

> Carlos,
>
> It is very unlikely that yesterdays changes could make any problem and
> give that error. I think this is my second approach to have SWC support in
> Moonshine [1]. In first one I remember similar results. At that time I just
> didn't report it on dev list, cause I went into different tasks.
>
> [1] https://github.com/prominic/Moonshine-IDE/issues/195
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 13:37 Carlos Rovira 
> napisał(a):
>
>> Hi, we cna remove from the list point 3, since it was something on my side
>> as I just reported a minute ago.
>>
>>
>> El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 13:30, Carlos Rovira (<
>> carlosrov...@apache.org>)
>> escribió:
>>
>> > Piotr, I must say that today I have various errors, as I reported:
>> > 1.- error in CI as we saw reported in email
>> > 2.- error building with maven in a blog example that before wasn't
>> > reporting error
>> > 3.- ANT failing creating SDK.
>> >
>> > Now yours:
>> > 4.- this one
>> >
>> > Maybe some changes yesterday in compiler or in typedefs are causing
>> this.
>> > Hope Josh or Alex could bring more light on this.
>> > As well could it be the change introduced by Harbs some days ago? (the
>> one
>> > that Alex don't want to release)
>> >
>> > Don't know if all if this is related.
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 12:59, Piotr Zarzycki (<
>> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>> >
>> >> Ok I understand now what you are trying to say. Just to be clear the
>> >> problem is following.
>> >>
>> >> If I prepare SWC which is SWF only - I'm able to consuming it and
>> project
>> >> which using it building without the problem to SWF.
>> >> If I prepare SWC which is JS only - Classes are not visible, project is
>> >> failing with error [1].
>> >>
>> >> I will prepare Maven build for library to compare the results with
>> command
>> >> line.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Piotr
>> >>
>> >> wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 12:53 Carlos Rovira 
>> >> napisał(a):
>> >>
>> >> > Piotr a project is used to be built. a lib to be compiled, and used
>> in a
>> >> > project app...
>> >> > if you're not trying to do that, better I left to others since I
>> don't
>> >> > understand the problem
>> >> >
>> >> > El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 12:38, Piotr Zarzycki (<
>> >> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>> >> >
>> >> > > Again to build what ? Project which is consuming SWC or SWCs
>> itself ?
>> >> > Which
>> >> > > one you are referring to. Link [2] is library, link [3] is
>> consumer of
>> >> > that
>> >> > > library ?
>> >> > >
>> >> > > wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 12:35 Carlos Rovira 
>> >> > > napisał(a):
>> >> > >
>> >> > > > OK, I saw [1] quickly and thought that was only a var
>> declaration.
>> >> > > > I see that you don't have either ant or maven files to build
>> >> (build.xml
>> >> > > or
>> >> > > > pom.xml).
>> >> > > > Why don't you try to make those files and from there you can go
>> to
>> >> > other
>> >> > > > config. I assume that config is for Moonshine right?
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 12:27, Piotr Zarzycki (<
>> >> > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > > Hi Carlos,
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > 1) Are you asking on SWC preparation or building of project
>> which
>> >> is
>> >> > > > using
>> >> > > > > that swc ?
>> >> > > > > 2) If you are asking about fail of build of project which is
>> >> consumer
>> >> > > of
>> >> > > > > that swc you have it in link [1]
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > Thanks,
>> >> > > > > Piotr
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 12:23 Carlos Rovira <
>> carlosrov...@apache.org>
>> >> > > > > napisał(a):
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > > Hi Piotr,
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > 1.- Are you building with ANT or Maven?
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > 2.- What's the output of the fail compilation with JS?
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 11:46, Piotr Zarzycki (<
>> >> > > > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > Hi Guys,
>> >> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > I'm having difficulties with using created Royale SWC in
>> some
>> >> > > > project.
>> >> > > > > I
>> >> > > > > > > have two projects. (I've uploaded them on onedrive so you
>> can
>> >> try
>> >> > > it
>> >> > > > > > > yourself).
>> >> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > Using SWF version of prepared swc I'm able to build project
>> >> with
>> >> > > > > > > compiler.targets=SWF. Unfortunately using JS version of
>> that
>> >> SWC
>> 

Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

2018-09-11 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
Carlos,

It is very unlikely that yesterdays changes could make any problem and give
that error. I think this is my second approach to have SWC support in
Moonshine [1]. In first one I remember similar results. At that time I just
didn't report it on dev list, cause I went into different tasks.

[1] https://github.com/prominic/Moonshine-IDE/issues/195

Thanks,
Piotr

wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 13:37 Carlos Rovira  napisał(a):

> Hi, we cna remove from the list point 3, since it was something on my side
> as I just reported a minute ago.
>
>
> El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 13:30, Carlos Rovira (<
> carlosrov...@apache.org>)
> escribió:
>
> > Piotr, I must say that today I have various errors, as I reported:
> > 1.- error in CI as we saw reported in email
> > 2.- error building with maven in a blog example that before wasn't
> > reporting error
> > 3.- ANT failing creating SDK.
> >
> > Now yours:
> > 4.- this one
> >
> > Maybe some changes yesterday in compiler or in typedefs are causing this.
> > Hope Josh or Alex could bring more light on this.
> > As well could it be the change introduced by Harbs some days ago? (the
> one
> > that Alex don't want to release)
> >
> > Don't know if all if this is related.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> >
> > El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 12:59, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >
> >> Ok I understand now what you are trying to say. Just to be clear the
> >> problem is following.
> >>
> >> If I prepare SWC which is SWF only - I'm able to consuming it and
> project
> >> which using it building without the problem to SWF.
> >> If I prepare SWC which is JS only - Classes are not visible, project is
> >> failing with error [1].
> >>
> >> I will prepare Maven build for library to compare the results with
> command
> >> line.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Piotr
> >>
> >> wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 12:53 Carlos Rovira 
> >> napisał(a):
> >>
> >> > Piotr a project is used to be built. a lib to be compiled, and used
> in a
> >> > project app...
> >> > if you're not trying to do that, better I left to others since I don't
> >> > understand the problem
> >> >
> >> > El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 12:38, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> >> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >> >
> >> > > Again to build what ? Project which is consuming SWC or SWCs itself
> ?
> >> > Which
> >> > > one you are referring to. Link [2] is library, link [3] is consumer
> of
> >> > that
> >> > > library ?
> >> > >
> >> > > wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 12:35 Carlos Rovira 
> >> > > napisał(a):
> >> > >
> >> > > > OK, I saw [1] quickly and thought that was only a var declaration.
> >> > > > I see that you don't have either ant or maven files to build
> >> (build.xml
> >> > > or
> >> > > > pom.xml).
> >> > > > Why don't you try to make those files and from there you can go to
> >> > other
> >> > > > config. I assume that config is for Moonshine right?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 12:27, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> >> > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > Hi Carlos,
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > 1) Are you asking on SWC preparation or building of project
> which
> >> is
> >> > > > using
> >> > > > > that swc ?
> >> > > > > 2) If you are asking about fail of build of project which is
> >> consumer
> >> > > of
> >> > > > > that swc you have it in link [1]
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Thanks,
> >> > > > > Piotr
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 12:23 Carlos Rovira  >
> >> > > > > napisał(a):
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > Hi Piotr,
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > 1.- Are you building with ANT or Maven?
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > 2.- What's the output of the fail compilation with JS?
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 11:46, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> >> > > > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Hi Guys,
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > I'm having difficulties with using created Royale SWC in
> some
> >> > > > project.
> >> > > > > I
> >> > > > > > > have two projects. (I've uploaded them on onedrive so you
> can
> >> try
> >> > > it
> >> > > > > > > yourself).
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Using SWF version of prepared swc I'm able to build project
> >> with
> >> > > > > > > compiler.targets=SWF. Unfortunately using JS version of that
> >> SWC
> >> > > I'm
> >> > > > > not
> >> > > > > > > able to build project with it. [1]
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > 1. Library itself [2] - It contains configurations
> >> > > > > compile-swf-config.xml
> >> > > > > > > and compile-js-config.xml. Folder "bin" has swc JS and SWF
> >> > version.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > 2. Consumer of library [3] - This one is configured with
> >> > Moonshine
> >> > > > and
> >> > > > > > > VSCode.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > I'm building JS and SWF version of SWC using following
> command
> >> > > lines
> >> > > > > [4]
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Does anyone is seeing what could be wrong ? Those command
> >> lines
> >> > 

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_jsonly #1505

2018-09-11 Thread apacheroyaleci
See 


Changes:

[noreply] Update DateField.as

[noreply] Update MXRoyaleClasses.as

--
[...truncated 187.58 KB...]

check-dependency:
 [echo] checking for C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler/lib/external//jflex.jar

download-dependency:
 [copy] Warning: C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler\in\temp\jflex-1.6.0 does not 
exist.
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler

check-dependency:
 [echo] checking for C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler/lib/external//lzma-sdk.jar

download-dependency:
 [echo] basedir is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler\src\main\resources
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler

check-dependency:
 [echo] checking for C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler/lib/external//flex-tool-api.jar

download-dependency:

main:

setup:

set.raw.as.tokenizer.uptodate:

raw.as.tokenizer:

set.raw.asdoc.tokenizer.uptodate:

raw.asdoc.tokenizer:

set.raw.mxml.tokenizer.uptodate:

raw.mxml.tokenizer:

jflex:

set.as.parser.uptodate:

as.parser:

set.metadata.parser.uptodate:

metadata.parser:

set.css.lexer.and.parser.uptodate:

css.lexer.and.parser:
 [echo] Generating CSSLexer and CSSParser
 [java] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xmx512m

set.css.tree.uptodate:

css.tree:

antlr:

set.unknown.tree.handler.patterns.uptodate:

unknown.tree.handler.patterns:

set.cmc.emitter.uptodate:

cmc.emitter:
 [echo] Generating CmcEmitter
 [java] Using Language Adaptor : jburg.burg.emitlangs.EmitJava
 [java] Using i-node adapter 
org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.as.codegen.IASNodeAdapter
 [java] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xmx512m
 [java] Adding @SuppressWarnings({"rawtypes", "unchecked", "unused"}) to 
class: C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler\target\generated-sources\jburg\org\apache\royale\compiler\internal\as\codegen\CmcEmitter.java

set.css.emitter.uptodate:

css.emitter:
 [echo] Generating CSSEmitter
 [java] Using Language Adaptor : jburg.burg.emitlangs.EmitJava
 [java] Using i-node adapter jburg.burg.inode.DefaultAdapter
 [java] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xmx512m
 [java] Adding @SuppressWarnings({"rawtypes", "unchecked", "unused"}) to 
class: C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler\target\generated-sources\jburg\org\apache\royale\compiler\internal\css\codegen\CSSEmitter.java
 [java] 
org.apache.royale.compiler.tools.annotate.AnnotateClass$AnnotateClassRenameException:
 Error renaming the temp file from: C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler\target\generated-sources\jburg\org\apache\royale\compiler\internal\css\codegen\CSSEmitter.java.tmp
 to: C:\Program Files 
(x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler\target\generated-sources\jburg\org\apache\royale\compiler\internal\css\codegen\CSSEmitter.java
 [java] at 
org.apache.royale.compiler.tools.annotate.AnnotateClass.processFile(AnnotateClass.java:103)
 [java] at 
org.apache.royale.compiler.tools.annotate.AnnotateClass.main(AnnotateClass.java:117)
 [java] at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
 [java] at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
 [java] at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
 [java] at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
 [java] at 
org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.ExecuteJava.run(ExecuteJava.java:221)
 [java] at 
org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.ExecuteJava.execute(ExecuteJava.java:154)
 [java] at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Java.run(Java.java:834)
 [java] at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Java.executeJava(Java.java:228)
 [java] at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Java.executeJava(Java.java:137)
 [java] at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Java.execute(Java.java:110)
 [java] at 
org.apache.tools.ant.UnknownElement.execute(UnknownElement.java:293)
 [java] at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor4.invoke(Unknown Source)
 [java] at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
 [java] at 

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-compiler #429

2018-09-11 Thread apacheroyaleci
See 


--
[...truncated 247.81 KB...]
 [java] Adding @SuppressWarnings("all") to class: 

 [java] Adding @SuppressWarnings("unused") to class: 


set.css.lexer.and.parser.uptodate:

css.lexer.and.parser:
 [echo] Generating CSSLexer and CSSParser
[mkdir] Created dir: 

 [java] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xmx512m

set.css.tree.uptodate:

css.tree:
 [echo] Generating CSSTree
 [java] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xmx512m

antlr:

set.unknown.tree.handler.patterns.uptodate:

unknown.tree.handler.patterns:
[mkdir] Created dir: 

 [java] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xmx512m

set.cmc.emitter.uptodate:

cmc.emitter:
 [echo] Generating CmcEmitter
[mkdir] Created dir: 

 [java] Using Language Adaptor : jburg.burg.emitlangs.EmitJava
 [java] Using i-node adapter 
org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.as.codegen.IASNodeAdapter
 [java] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xmx512m
 [java] Adding @SuppressWarnings({"rawtypes", "unchecked", "unused"}) to 
class: 

 [java] 
org.apache.royale.compiler.tools.annotate.AnnotateClass$AnnotateClassDeleteException:
 Error deleting original file at: 

 [java] at 
org.apache.royale.compiler.tools.annotate.AnnotateClass.processFile(AnnotateClass.java:97)
 [java] at 
org.apache.royale.compiler.tools.annotate.AnnotateClass.main(AnnotateClass.java:117)
 [java] at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
 [java] at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
 [java] at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
 [java] at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
 [java] at 
org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.ExecuteJava.run(ExecuteJava.java:221)
 [java] at 
org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.ExecuteJava.execute(ExecuteJava.java:154)
 [java] at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Java.run(Java.java:834)
 [java] at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Java.executeJava(Java.java:228)
 [java] at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Java.executeJava(Java.java:137)
 [java] at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Java.execute(Java.java:110)
 [java] at 
org.apache.tools.ant.UnknownElement.execute(UnknownElement.java:293)
 [java] at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor4.invoke(Unknown Source)
 [java] at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
 [java] at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
 [java] at 
org.apache.tools.ant.dispatch.DispatchUtils.execute(DispatchUtils.java:106)
 [java] at org.apache.tools.ant.Task.perform(Task.java:348)
 [java] at 
org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Sequential.execute(Sequential.java:68)
 [java] at 
org.apache.tools.ant.UnknownElement.execute(UnknownElement.java:293)
 [java] at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor4.invoke(Unknown Source)
 [java] at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
 [java] at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
 [java] at 
org.apache.tools.ant.dispatch.DispatchUtils.execute(DispatchUtils.java:106)
 [java] at org.apache.tools.ant.Task.perform(Task.java:348)
 [java] at 
org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.MacroInstance.execute(MacroInstance.java:402)
 [java] at 
org.apache.tools.ant.UnknownElement.execute(UnknownElement.java:293)
 [java] at 

Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

2018-09-11 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi, we cna remove from the list point 3, since it was something on my side
as I just reported a minute ago.


El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 13:30, Carlos Rovira ()
escribió:

> Piotr, I must say that today I have various errors, as I reported:
> 1.- error in CI as we saw reported in email
> 2.- error building with maven in a blog example that before wasn't
> reporting error
> 3.- ANT failing creating SDK.
>
> Now yours:
> 4.- this one
>
> Maybe some changes yesterday in compiler or in typedefs are causing this.
> Hope Josh or Alex could bring more light on this.
> As well could it be the change introduced by Harbs some days ago? (the one
> that Alex don't want to release)
>
> Don't know if all if this is related.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 12:59, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>
>> Ok I understand now what you are trying to say. Just to be clear the
>> problem is following.
>>
>> If I prepare SWC which is SWF only - I'm able to consuming it and project
>> which using it building without the problem to SWF.
>> If I prepare SWC which is JS only - Classes are not visible, project is
>> failing with error [1].
>>
>> I will prepare Maven build for library to compare the results with command
>> line.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Piotr
>>
>> wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 12:53 Carlos Rovira 
>> napisał(a):
>>
>> > Piotr a project is used to be built. a lib to be compiled, and used in a
>> > project app...
>> > if you're not trying to do that, better I left to others since I don't
>> > understand the problem
>> >
>> > El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 12:38, Piotr Zarzycki (<
>> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>> >
>> > > Again to build what ? Project which is consuming SWC or SWCs itself ?
>> > Which
>> > > one you are referring to. Link [2] is library, link [3] is consumer of
>> > that
>> > > library ?
>> > >
>> > > wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 12:35 Carlos Rovira 
>> > > napisał(a):
>> > >
>> > > > OK, I saw [1] quickly and thought that was only a var declaration.
>> > > > I see that you don't have either ant or maven files to build
>> (build.xml
>> > > or
>> > > > pom.xml).
>> > > > Why don't you try to make those files and from there you can go to
>> > other
>> > > > config. I assume that config is for Moonshine right?
>> > > >
>> > > > El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 12:27, Piotr Zarzycki (<
>> > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hi Carlos,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > 1) Are you asking on SWC preparation or building of project which
>> is
>> > > > using
>> > > > > that swc ?
>> > > > > 2) If you are asking about fail of build of project which is
>> consumer
>> > > of
>> > > > > that swc you have it in link [1]
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > Piotr
>> > > > >
>> > > > > wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 12:23 Carlos Rovira 
>> > > > > napisał(a):
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Hi Piotr,
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > 1.- Are you building with ANT or Maven?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > 2.- What's the output of the fail compilation with JS?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 11:46, Piotr Zarzycki (<
>> > > > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Hi Guys,
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > I'm having difficulties with using created Royale SWC in some
>> > > > project.
>> > > > > I
>> > > > > > > have two projects. (I've uploaded them on onedrive so you can
>> try
>> > > it
>> > > > > > > yourself).
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Using SWF version of prepared swc I'm able to build project
>> with
>> > > > > > > compiler.targets=SWF. Unfortunately using JS version of that
>> SWC
>> > > I'm
>> > > > > not
>> > > > > > > able to build project with it. [1]
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > 1. Library itself [2] - It contains configurations
>> > > > > compile-swf-config.xml
>> > > > > > > and compile-js-config.xml. Folder "bin" has swc JS and SWF
>> > version.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > 2. Consumer of library [3] - This one is configured with
>> > Moonshine
>> > > > and
>> > > > > > > VSCode.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > I'm building JS and SWF version of SWC using following command
>> > > lines
>> > > > > [4]
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Does anyone is seeing what could be wrong ? Those command
>> lines
>> > [4]
>> > > > are
>> > > > > > > based on how Royale is building swcs Basic, Jewel etc.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > [1] https://paste.apache.org/tvhY
>> > > > > > > [2] https://1drv.ms/u/s!ApVpLyjpHDC2hZwM9OY5sNinrirEvQ
>> > > > > > > [3] https://1drv.ms/u/s!ApVpLyjpHDC2hZwNgXaX_G_qZip39g
>> > > > > > > [4] https://paste.apache.org/OtDR
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > > > --
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
>> > > > > > > *
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > --
>> > > > > > > Carlos Rovira
>> > > > > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > 

Re: build SDK with ANT fails

2018-09-11 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi,

finaly this is not an issue, it seems that building sometimes with ANT and
others with MAVEN sometimes can left the folders with unwanted artifacts
and must be cleaned

again, sorry for the noise.

El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 12:54, Carlos Rovira ()
escribió:

> Hi,
>
> another problem I get now is building SDK with ANT (a part from the
> problem of getting FlexUnit 4.2 and have to remove "_flex" swc commented in
> other thread). build fails here:
>
> get-flat-fonts:
>
>   [get] Getting:
> https://github.com/designmodo/Flat-UI/archive/2.2.2.zip
>
>   [get] To:
> /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/in/flat-ui_2_2.zip
>
>   [get] Error getting
> https://github.com/designmodo/Flat-UI/archive/2.2.2.zip to
> /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/in/flat-ui_2_2.zip
>
>
> double-check-file:
>
>  [echo] Need file: ${still_no_file}
>
>
> get-from-cache-if-needed:
>
>
> fail-if-not-found:
>
>
> BUILD FAILED
>
> /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/build.xml:193: The
> following error occurred while executing this line:
>
> /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/frameworks/build.xml:106:
> The following error occurred while executing this line:
>
> /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/frameworks/downloads.xml:230:
> The following error occurred while executing this line:
>
> /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/frameworks/downloads.xml:345:
> flat-ui_2_2.zip could not be downloaded or found in cache
>
>
> Total time: 2 minutes 30 seconds
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

2018-09-11 Thread Carlos Rovira
Piotr, I must say that today I have various errors, as I reported:
1.- error in CI as we saw reported in email
2.- error building with maven in a blog example that before wasn't
reporting error
3.- ANT failing creating SDK.

Now yours:
4.- this one

Maybe some changes yesterday in compiler or in typedefs are causing this.
Hope Josh or Alex could bring more light on this.
As well could it be the change introduced by Harbs some days ago? (the one
that Alex don't want to release)

Don't know if all if this is related.

Thanks



El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 12:59, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> Ok I understand now what you are trying to say. Just to be clear the
> problem is following.
>
> If I prepare SWC which is SWF only - I'm able to consuming it and project
> which using it building without the problem to SWF.
> If I prepare SWC which is JS only - Classes are not visible, project is
> failing with error [1].
>
> I will prepare Maven build for library to compare the results with command
> line.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 12:53 Carlos Rovira 
> napisał(a):
>
> > Piotr a project is used to be built. a lib to be compiled, and used in a
> > project app...
> > if you're not trying to do that, better I left to others since I don't
> > understand the problem
> >
> > El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 12:38, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >
> > > Again to build what ? Project which is consuming SWC or SWCs itself ?
> > Which
> > > one you are referring to. Link [2] is library, link [3] is consumer of
> > that
> > > library ?
> > >
> > > wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 12:35 Carlos Rovira 
> > > napisał(a):
> > >
> > > > OK, I saw [1] quickly and thought that was only a var declaration.
> > > > I see that you don't have either ant or maven files to build
> (build.xml
> > > or
> > > > pom.xml).
> > > > Why don't you try to make those files and from there you can go to
> > other
> > > > config. I assume that config is for Moonshine right?
> > > >
> > > > El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 12:27, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Carlos,
> > > > >
> > > > > 1) Are you asking on SWC preparation or building of project which
> is
> > > > using
> > > > > that swc ?
> > > > > 2) If you are asking about fail of build of project which is
> consumer
> > > of
> > > > > that swc you have it in link [1]
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Piotr
> > > > >
> > > > > wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 12:23 Carlos Rovira 
> > > > > napisał(a):
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Piotr,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1.- Are you building with ANT or Maven?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2.- What's the output of the fail compilation with JS?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 11:46, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Guys,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm having difficulties with using created Royale SWC in some
> > > > project.
> > > > > I
> > > > > > > have two projects. (I've uploaded them on onedrive so you can
> try
> > > it
> > > > > > > yourself).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Using SWF version of prepared swc I'm able to build project
> with
> > > > > > > compiler.targets=SWF. Unfortunately using JS version of that
> SWC
> > > I'm
> > > > > not
> > > > > > > able to build project with it. [1]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 1. Library itself [2] - It contains configurations
> > > > > compile-swf-config.xml
> > > > > > > and compile-js-config.xml. Folder "bin" has swc JS and SWF
> > version.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2. Consumer of library [3] - This one is configured with
> > Moonshine
> > > > and
> > > > > > > VSCode.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm building JS and SWF version of SWC using following command
> > > lines
> > > > > [4]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Does anyone is seeing what could be wrong ? Those command lines
> > [4]
> > > > are
> > > > > > > based on how Royale is building swcs Basic, Jewel etc.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [1] https://paste.apache.org/tvhY
> > > > > > > [2] https://1drv.ms/u/s!ApVpLyjpHDC2hZwM9OY5sNinrirEvQ
> > > > > > > [3] https://1drv.ms/u/s!ApVpLyjpHDC2hZwNgXaX_G_qZip39g
> > > > > > > [4] https://paste.apache.org/OtDR
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > > > > > > *
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > > >
> > > > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > > > > *
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Piotr Zarzycki
> 

Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

2018-09-11 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
Ok I understand now what you are trying to say. Just to be clear the
problem is following.

If I prepare SWC which is SWF only - I'm able to consuming it and project
which using it building without the problem to SWF.
If I prepare SWC which is JS only - Classes are not visible, project is
failing with error [1].

I will prepare Maven build for library to compare the results with command
line.

Thanks,
Piotr

wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 12:53 Carlos Rovira  napisał(a):

> Piotr a project is used to be built. a lib to be compiled, and used in a
> project app...
> if you're not trying to do that, better I left to others since I don't
> understand the problem
>
> El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 12:38, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>
> > Again to build what ? Project which is consuming SWC or SWCs itself ?
> Which
> > one you are referring to. Link [2] is library, link [3] is consumer of
> that
> > library ?
> >
> > wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 12:35 Carlos Rovira 
> > napisał(a):
> >
> > > OK, I saw [1] quickly and thought that was only a var declaration.
> > > I see that you don't have either ant or maven files to build (build.xml
> > or
> > > pom.xml).
> > > Why don't you try to make those files and from there you can go to
> other
> > > config. I assume that config is for Moonshine right?
> > >
> > > El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 12:27, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > >
> > > > Hi Carlos,
> > > >
> > > > 1) Are you asking on SWC preparation or building of project which is
> > > using
> > > > that swc ?
> > > > 2) If you are asking about fail of build of project which is consumer
> > of
> > > > that swc you have it in link [1]
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Piotr
> > > >
> > > > wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 12:23 Carlos Rovira 
> > > > napisał(a):
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Piotr,
> > > > >
> > > > > 1.- Are you building with ANT or Maven?
> > > > >
> > > > > 2.- What's the output of the fail compilation with JS?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 11:46, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Guys,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm having difficulties with using created Royale SWC in some
> > > project.
> > > > I
> > > > > > have two projects. (I've uploaded them on onedrive so you can try
> > it
> > > > > > yourself).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Using SWF version of prepared swc I'm able to build project with
> > > > > > compiler.targets=SWF. Unfortunately using JS version of that SWC
> > I'm
> > > > not
> > > > > > able to build project with it. [1]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1. Library itself [2] - It contains configurations
> > > > compile-swf-config.xml
> > > > > > and compile-js-config.xml. Folder "bin" has swc JS and SWF
> version.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2. Consumer of library [3] - This one is configured with
> Moonshine
> > > and
> > > > > > VSCode.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm building JS and SWF version of SWC using following command
> > lines
> > > > [4]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Does anyone is seeing what could be wrong ? Those command lines
> [4]
> > > are
> > > > > > based on how Royale is building swcs Basic, Jewel etc.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1] https://paste.apache.org/tvhY
> > > > > > [2] https://1drv.ms/u/s!ApVpLyjpHDC2hZwM9OY5sNinrirEvQ
> > > > > > [3] https://1drv.ms/u/s!ApVpLyjpHDC2hZwNgXaX_G_qZip39g
> > > > > > [4] https://paste.apache.org/OtDR
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > > > > > *
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > >
> > > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > > > *
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Carlos Rovira
> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > *
> >
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>


-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
*


build SDK with ANT fails

2018-09-11 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi,

another problem I get now is building SDK with ANT (a part from the problem
of getting FlexUnit 4.2 and have to remove "_flex" swc commented in other
thread). build fails here:

get-flat-fonts:

  [get] Getting: https://github.com/designmodo/Flat-UI/archive/2.2.2.zip

  [get] To:
/Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/in/flat-ui_2_2.zip

  [get] Error getting
https://github.com/designmodo/Flat-UI/archive/2.2.2.zip to
/Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/in/flat-ui_2_2.zip


double-check-file:

 [echo] Need file: ${still_no_file}


get-from-cache-if-needed:


fail-if-not-found:


BUILD FAILED

/Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/build.xml:193: The
following error occurred while executing this line:

/Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/frameworks/build.xml:106:
The following error occurred while executing this line:

/Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/frameworks/downloads.xml:230:
The following error occurred while executing this line:

/Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/frameworks/downloads.xml:345:
flat-ui_2_2.zip could not be downloaded or found in cache


Total time: 2 minutes 30 seconds

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

2018-09-11 Thread Carlos Rovira
Piotr a project is used to be built. a lib to be compiled, and used in a
project app...
if you're not trying to do that, better I left to others since I don't
understand the problem

El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 12:38, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> Again to build what ? Project which is consuming SWC or SWCs itself ? Which
> one you are referring to. Link [2] is library, link [3] is consumer of that
> library ?
>
> wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 12:35 Carlos Rovira 
> napisał(a):
>
> > OK, I saw [1] quickly and thought that was only a var declaration.
> > I see that you don't have either ant or maven files to build (build.xml
> or
> > pom.xml).
> > Why don't you try to make those files and from there you can go to other
> > config. I assume that config is for Moonshine right?
> >
> > El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 12:27, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >
> > > Hi Carlos,
> > >
> > > 1) Are you asking on SWC preparation or building of project which is
> > using
> > > that swc ?
> > > 2) If you are asking about fail of build of project which is consumer
> of
> > > that swc you have it in link [1]
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Piotr
> > >
> > > wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 12:23 Carlos Rovira 
> > > napisał(a):
> > >
> > > > Hi Piotr,
> > > >
> > > > 1.- Are you building with ANT or Maven?
> > > >
> > > > 2.- What's the output of the fail compilation with JS?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 11:46, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Guys,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm having difficulties with using created Royale SWC in some
> > project.
> > > I
> > > > > have two projects. (I've uploaded them on onedrive so you can try
> it
> > > > > yourself).
> > > > >
> > > > > Using SWF version of prepared swc I'm able to build project with
> > > > > compiler.targets=SWF. Unfortunately using JS version of that SWC
> I'm
> > > not
> > > > > able to build project with it. [1]
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. Library itself [2] - It contains configurations
> > > compile-swf-config.xml
> > > > > and compile-js-config.xml. Folder "bin" has swc JS and SWF version.
> > > > >
> > > > > 2. Consumer of library [3] - This one is configured with Moonshine
> > and
> > > > > VSCode.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm building JS and SWF version of SWC using following command
> lines
> > > [4]
> > > > >
> > > > > Does anyone is seeing what could be wrong ? Those command lines [4]
> > are
> > > > > based on how Royale is building swcs Basic, Jewel etc.
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] https://paste.apache.org/tvhY
> > > > > [2] https://1drv.ms/u/s!ApVpLyjpHDC2hZwM9OY5sNinrirEvQ
> > > > > [3] https://1drv.ms/u/s!ApVpLyjpHDC2hZwNgXaX_G_qZip39g
> > > > > [4] https://paste.apache.org/OtDR
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > > >
> > > > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > > > > *
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > >
> > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > > *
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> *
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

2018-09-11 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
Again to build what ? Project which is consuming SWC or SWCs itself ? Which
one you are referring to. Link [2] is library, link [3] is consumer of that
library ?

wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 12:35 Carlos Rovira  napisał(a):

> OK, I saw [1] quickly and thought that was only a var declaration.
> I see that you don't have either ant or maven files to build (build.xml or
> pom.xml).
> Why don't you try to make those files and from there you can go to other
> config. I assume that config is for Moonshine right?
>
> El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 12:27, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>
> > Hi Carlos,
> >
> > 1) Are you asking on SWC preparation or building of project which is
> using
> > that swc ?
> > 2) If you are asking about fail of build of project which is consumer of
> > that swc you have it in link [1]
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr
> >
> > wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 12:23 Carlos Rovira 
> > napisał(a):
> >
> > > Hi Piotr,
> > >
> > > 1.- Are you building with ANT or Maven?
> > >
> > > 2.- What's the output of the fail compilation with JS?
> > >
> > >
> > > El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 11:46, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > >
> > > > Hi Guys,
> > > >
> > > > I'm having difficulties with using created Royale SWC in some
> project.
> > I
> > > > have two projects. (I've uploaded them on onedrive so you can try it
> > > > yourself).
> > > >
> > > > Using SWF version of prepared swc I'm able to build project with
> > > > compiler.targets=SWF. Unfortunately using JS version of that SWC I'm
> > not
> > > > able to build project with it. [1]
> > > >
> > > > 1. Library itself [2] - It contains configurations
> > compile-swf-config.xml
> > > > and compile-js-config.xml. Folder "bin" has swc JS and SWF version.
> > > >
> > > > 2. Consumer of library [3] - This one is configured with Moonshine
> and
> > > > VSCode.
> > > >
> > > > I'm building JS and SWF version of SWC using following command lines
> > [4]
> > > >
> > > > Does anyone is seeing what could be wrong ? Those command lines [4]
> are
> > > > based on how Royale is building swcs Basic, Jewel etc.
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://paste.apache.org/tvhY
> > > > [2] https://1drv.ms/u/s!ApVpLyjpHDC2hZwM9OY5sNinrirEvQ
> > > > [3] https://1drv.ms/u/s!ApVpLyjpHDC2hZwNgXaX_G_qZip39g
> > > > [4] https://paste.apache.org/OtDR
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > >
> > > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > > > *
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > *
> >
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>


-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
*


Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

2018-09-11 Thread Carlos Rovira
OK, I saw [1] quickly and thought that was only a var declaration.
I see that you don't have either ant or maven files to build (build.xml or
pom.xml).
Why don't you try to make those files and from there you can go to other
config. I assume that config is for Moonshine right?

El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 12:27, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> Hi Carlos,
>
> 1) Are you asking on SWC preparation or building of project which is using
> that swc ?
> 2) If you are asking about fail of build of project which is consumer of
> that swc you have it in link [1]
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 12:23 Carlos Rovira 
> napisał(a):
>
> > Hi Piotr,
> >
> > 1.- Are you building with ANT or Maven?
> >
> > 2.- What's the output of the fail compilation with JS?
> >
> >
> > El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 11:46, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >
> > > Hi Guys,
> > >
> > > I'm having difficulties with using created Royale SWC in some project.
> I
> > > have two projects. (I've uploaded them on onedrive so you can try it
> > > yourself).
> > >
> > > Using SWF version of prepared swc I'm able to build project with
> > > compiler.targets=SWF. Unfortunately using JS version of that SWC I'm
> not
> > > able to build project with it. [1]
> > >
> > > 1. Library itself [2] - It contains configurations
> compile-swf-config.xml
> > > and compile-js-config.xml. Folder "bin" has swc JS and SWF version.
> > >
> > > 2. Consumer of library [3] - This one is configured with Moonshine and
> > > VSCode.
> > >
> > > I'm building JS and SWF version of SWC using following command lines
> [4]
> > >
> > > Does anyone is seeing what could be wrong ? Those command lines [4] are
> > > based on how Royale is building swcs Basic, Jewel etc.
> > >
> > > [1] https://paste.apache.org/tvhY
> > > [2] https://1drv.ms/u/s!ApVpLyjpHDC2hZwM9OY5sNinrirEvQ
> > > [3] https://1drv.ms/u/s!ApVpLyjpHDC2hZwNgXaX_G_qZip39g
> > > [4] https://paste.apache.org/OtDR
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > --
> > >
> > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > >
> > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > > *
> > >
> > > --
> > > Carlos Rovira
> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> *
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

2018-09-11 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
Hi Carlos,

1) Are you asking on SWC preparation or building of project which is using
that swc ?
2) If you are asking about fail of build of project which is consumer of
that swc you have it in link [1]

Thanks,
Piotr

wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 12:23 Carlos Rovira  napisał(a):

> Hi Piotr,
>
> 1.- Are you building with ANT or Maven?
>
> 2.- What's the output of the fail compilation with JS?
>
>
> El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 11:46, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > I'm having difficulties with using created Royale SWC in some project. I
> > have two projects. (I've uploaded them on onedrive so you can try it
> > yourself).
> >
> > Using SWF version of prepared swc I'm able to build project with
> > compiler.targets=SWF. Unfortunately using JS version of that SWC I'm not
> > able to build project with it. [1]
> >
> > 1. Library itself [2] - It contains configurations compile-swf-config.xml
> > and compile-js-config.xml. Folder "bin" has swc JS and SWF version.
> >
> > 2. Consumer of library [3] - This one is configured with Moonshine and
> > VSCode.
> >
> > I'm building JS and SWF version of SWC using following command lines [4]
> >
> > Does anyone is seeing what could be wrong ? Those command lines [4] are
> > based on how Royale is building swcs Basic, Jewel etc.
> >
> > [1] https://paste.apache.org/tvhY
> > [2] https://1drv.ms/u/s!ApVpLyjpHDC2hZwM9OY5sNinrirEvQ
> > [3] https://1drv.ms/u/s!ApVpLyjpHDC2hZwNgXaX_G_qZip39g
> > [4] https://paste.apache.org/OtDR
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > *
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >
> >
> >
> >
>


-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
*


Re: Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

2018-09-11 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Piotr,

1.- Are you building with ANT or Maven?

2.- What's the output of the fail compilation with JS?


El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 11:46, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> Hi Guys,
>
> I'm having difficulties with using created Royale SWC in some project. I
> have two projects. (I've uploaded them on onedrive so you can try it
> yourself).
>
> Using SWF version of prepared swc I'm able to build project with
> compiler.targets=SWF. Unfortunately using JS version of that SWC I'm not
> able to build project with it. [1]
>
> 1. Library itself [2] - It contains configurations compile-swf-config.xml
> and compile-js-config.xml. Folder "bin" has swc JS and SWF version.
>
> 2. Consumer of library [3] - This one is configured with Moonshine and
> VSCode.
>
> I'm building JS and SWF version of SWC using following command lines [4]
>
> Does anyone is seeing what could be wrong ? Those command lines [4] are
> based on how Royale is building swcs Basic, Jewel etc.
>
> [1] https://paste.apache.org/tvhY
> [2] https://1drv.ms/u/s!ApVpLyjpHDC2hZwM9OY5sNinrirEvQ
> [3] https://1drv.ms/u/s!ApVpLyjpHDC2hZwNgXaX_G_qZip39g
> [4] https://paste.apache.org/OtDR
>
> Thanks,
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> *
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>
>
>


Difficulties with using in project JS version of Royale swc

2018-09-11 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
Hi Guys,

I'm having difficulties with using created Royale SWC in some project. I
have two projects. (I've uploaded them on onedrive so you can try it
yourself).

Using SWF version of prepared swc I'm able to build project with
compiler.targets=SWF. Unfortunately using JS version of that SWC I'm not
able to build project with it. [1]

1. Library itself [2] - It contains configurations compile-swf-config.xml
and compile-js-config.xml. Folder "bin" has swc JS and SWF version.

2. Consumer of library [3] - This one is configured with Moonshine and
VSCode.

I'm building JS and SWF version of SWC using following command lines [4]

Does anyone is seeing what could be wrong ? Those command lines [4] are
based on how Royale is building swcs Basic, Jewel etc.

[1] https://paste.apache.org/tvhY
[2] https://1drv.ms/u/s!ApVpLyjpHDC2hZwM9OY5sNinrirEvQ
[3] https://1drv.ms/u/s!ApVpLyjpHDC2hZwNgXaX_G_qZip39g
[4] https://paste.apache.org/OtDR

Thanks,
-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
*


Re: [MAVEN-BUILD] Royale-asjs - Build # 1073 - Still Failing

2018-09-11 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi, some latest change is breaking maven in *DesktopMap*, please take a
look.

In the other hand, I'm seeing locally the following fail in Blog Example
about list

royale-asjs/examples/blog/BE0004_Adding_an_item_to_a_Jewel_List/src/main/royale/BE0004_Adding_an_item_to_a_Jewel_List.mxml(53):
col: 97 Error: Implicit coercion of a value of type MouseEvent to an
unrelated type Event.





^

Should I change the example? or is something to fix in compiler?

thanks



El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 9:47, Apache Jenkins Server (<
jenk...@builds.apache.org>) escribió:

> The Apache Jenkins build system has built Royale-asjs (build #1073)
>
> Status: Still Failing
>
> Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Royale-asjs/1073/
> to view the results.



-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: [royale-typedefs] branch develop updated: don't need patch step here either, assuming what we get from royale-extras is valid

2018-09-11 Thread Carlos Rovira
Sorry, this seems a problem in my end. sorry for the noise.


El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 8:16, Carlos Rovira ()
escribió:

> Hi this change, make Maven build break. I'll remove it localy while is
> fixed
> thanks
>
> El lun., 10 sept. 2018 a las 20:32,  escribió:
>
>> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>>
>> aharui pushed a commit to branch develop
>> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/royale-typedefs.git
>>
>>
>> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/develop by this push:
>>  new 48633af  don't need patch step here either, assuming what we get
>> from royale-extras is valid
>> 48633af is described below
>>
>> commit 48633af46db88ce091a409f9e0284f7f8c9d0f15
>> Author: Alex Harui 
>> AuthorDate: Mon Sep 10 11:32:06 2018 -0700
>>
>> don't need patch step here either, assuming what we get from
>> royale-extras is valid
>> ---
>>  jquery/pom.xml | 29 -
>>  1 file changed, 29 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/jquery/pom.xml b/jquery/pom.xml
>> index a135760..dfebaa0 100644
>> --- a/jquery/pom.xml
>> +++ b/jquery/pom.xml
>> @@ -60,35 +60,6 @@
>>
>>
>>
>> -org.codehaus.mojo
>> -exec-maven-plugin
>> -1.5.0
>> -
>> -  ${git.executable}
>> -  ${basedir}/..
>> -  
>> -apply
>> ---ignore-whitespace
>> ---whitespace=nowarn
>> -  
>> -
>> -
>> -  
>> -patch-jquery
>> -validate
>> -
>> -  exec
>> -
>> -
>> -  
>> -
>> ${basedir}/src/main/patch/jquery.patch
>> -  
>> -
>> -  
>> -
>> -  
>> -
>> -  
>>  org.apache.royale.compiler
>>  royale-maven-plugin
>>  ${royale.compiler.version}
>>
>>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: [royale-typedefs] branch develop updated: don't need patch step here either, assuming what we get from royale-extras is valid

2018-09-11 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi this change, make Maven build break. I'll remove it localy while is fixed
thanks

El lun., 10 sept. 2018 a las 20:32,  escribió:

> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>
> aharui pushed a commit to branch develop
> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/royale-typedefs.git
>
>
> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/develop by this push:
>  new 48633af  don't need patch step here either, assuming what we get
> from royale-extras is valid
> 48633af is described below
>
> commit 48633af46db88ce091a409f9e0284f7f8c9d0f15
> Author: Alex Harui 
> AuthorDate: Mon Sep 10 11:32:06 2018 -0700
>
> don't need patch step here either, assuming what we get from
> royale-extras is valid
> ---
>  jquery/pom.xml | 29 -
>  1 file changed, 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/jquery/pom.xml b/jquery/pom.xml
> index a135760..dfebaa0 100644
> --- a/jquery/pom.xml
> +++ b/jquery/pom.xml
> @@ -60,35 +60,6 @@
>
>
>
> -org.codehaus.mojo
> -exec-maven-plugin
> -1.5.0
> -
> -  ${git.executable}
> -  ${basedir}/..
> -  
> -apply
> ---ignore-whitespace
> ---whitespace=nowarn
> -  
> -
> -
> -  
> -patch-jquery
> -validate
> -
> -  exec
> -
> -
> -  
> -
> ${basedir}/src/main/patch/jquery.patch
> -  
> -
> -  
> -
> -  
> -
> -  
>  org.apache.royale.compiler
>  royale-maven-plugin
>  ${royale.compiler.version}
>
>

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3

2018-09-11 Thread Carlos Rovira
I think is better move that changes to a branch and release.
thanks

El lun., 10 sept. 2018 a las 20:59, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> Harbs,
>
> Can you comment on that ? Any chance to move that changes to branch ?
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> pon., 10 wrz 2018 o 20:54 Alex Harui 
> napisał(a):
>
> > Yes.  I think we are using the wrong annotation for variable number of
> > parameters.
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 9/10/18, 11:49 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" 
> wrote:
> >
> > Alex,
> >
> > What trace hack are you referring to ? This is related what Harbs
> > commits ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr
> >
> > pon., 10 wrz 2018 o 20:47 Alex Harui 
> > napisał(a):
> >
> > > FWIW, I am not in favor of releasing with the current trace hack in
> > the
> > > compiler.  But if other's are ok with it, I'm not going to make a
> > big deal
> > > out of it, I'll just abstain from voting.
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 9/10/18, 1:15 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have prepared today all stuff which is needed for making RC
> > branch. I
> > > will check whether everything is working tomorrow. In the other
> > words
> > > probably tomorrow I will push RC1 branch.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Piotr
> > >
> > > sob., 8 wrz 2018 o 18:55 Piotr Zarzycki <
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> > > napisał(a):
> > >
> > > > Hi Guys,
> > > >
> > > > I see that typedefs build is up and running. Is there
> anything
> > > important
> > > > which you would like to add?
> > > >
> > > > I wanted to start on Monday playing with release.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Piotr
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Sep 6, 2018, 6:05 PM Piotr Zarzycki <
> > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi Alex,
> > > >>
> > > >> Is there anything I need to know before I jump into your
> > notes [1]
> > > and
> > > >> start play with develop for release ?
> > > >>
> > > >> [1]
> > >
> >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notesdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf8dac71af4ff417b97c008d6174e1dd4%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722021606204100sdata=njV1vRpOrRyftdwcr17NLQpu3jYwS%2FQ7evR90iqEFBo%3Dreserved=0
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >> Piotr
> > > >>
> > > >> czw., 6 wrz 2018 o 09:08 Piotr Zarzycki <
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> > > >> napisał(a):
> > > >>
> > > >>> Hi Guys,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I was trying to check Tour De Flex if it has the same issue
> > as the
> > > rest
> > > >>> of MX examples. In order to do that I would like to build
> > > Framework using
> > > >>> ANT. I got it working couple of days ago, but now it's
> > constantly
> > > failing.
> > > >>> Pixel blender is downloaded corrupted. [1] Do you have any
> > idea
> > > why it is
> > > >>> happen ?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> When I reach url directly through the browser I'm able to
> > download
> > > good
> > > >>> file.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> [1]
> > >
> >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FLsmzdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf8dac71af4ff417b97c008d6174e1dd4%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722021606204100sdata=VhIxm9udY6XPMpFyBA8mfGuopTYu%2B1HXEhX5cOoUKBU%3Dreserved=0
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thanks,
> > > >>> Piotr
> > > >>>
> > > >>> wt., 4 wrz 2018 o 15:57 Piotr Zarzycki <
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> > > >>> napisał(a):
> > > >>>
> > >  It looks like main application is using ApplicationLayout,
> > but it
> > > is
> > >  not  ILayoutHost type.
> > > 
> > >  wt., 4 wrz 2018 o 15:35 Piotr Zarzycki <
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > >  napisał(a):
> > > 
> > > > It looks like there is a missing Layout for main
> > application,
> > > because
> > > > that function returns null:
> > > >
> > > > var /** @type {org.apache.royale.core.ILayoutHost} */
> > viewBead =
> > > > this.host.getLayoutHost();
> > > >
> > > > wt., 4 wrz 2018 o 15:25 Piotr Zarzycki <
> > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> > > > napisał(a):
> > > >
> > > >> Harbs,
> > > >>
> > > >> Before I go to tour de flex I decided to build MX Hello
> > World -
> > > using
> > > >> Maven. [1] I'm getting exception in the Chrome console
> > [2].