Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_MXTests #1193

2019-09-26 Thread Apache Royale CI Server
See -- [...truncated 1004.46 KB...] [mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ObjectUtil [mxmlc] scanning for overrides: SolidBorderUtil [mxmlc]

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-09-26 Thread Alex Harui
Thanks for trying it. I just updated the ApproveRoyale.xml linked to in the vote thread to try to eliminate people getting the wrong one.. -Alex On 9/26/19, 1:48 PM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote: Thank you, Alex! I tried your changes with adobe/royale artifacts deleted from .m2, and I was

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-09-26 Thread Josh Tynjala
Thank you, Alex! I tried your changes with adobe/royale artifacts deleted from .m2, and I was able to get through both js and js-swf builds successfully. Carlos, I think that these changes will allow you to get through the process now too. For everyone's convenience, here's a link to the latest

New apache-royale questions for Sep 26 - Stack Exchange

2019-09-26 Thread Stack Exchange
***1 new question in [ApacheRoyale Tag Notifications filter]() on stackexchange.com*** [How to do a transition effect on state change with Apache

Re: Setting up Royale on Windows

2019-09-26 Thread Alex Harui
I think there are some integration tests that do not run by default that may still need those variables. -Alex On 9/26/19, 11:38 AM, "Yishay Weiss" wrote: Yes, they’re in the compiler readme. I don’t have them set and build the compiler regularly.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-09-26 Thread Alex Harui
+1 Package https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.6/rc3/apache-royale-0.9.6-src.tar.gz Java 1.8 OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.12.6 Source kit signatures match: y Source kit builds: y README is ok: y RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y NOTICE is ok: y LICENSE is ok: y No unapproved licenses or archives: y

RE: Setting up Royale on Windows

2019-09-26 Thread Yishay Weiss
Yes, they’re in the compiler readme. I don’t have them set and build the compiler regularly. From: Alex Harui Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 9:14:50 PM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: Re: Setting up Royale on Windows I believe they are only necessary

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-09-26 Thread Alex Harui
Yeah, I just saw that myself. That's because I didn't merge in my changes correctly. I just pushed one that seems to be working better. -Alex On 9/26/19, 10:27 AM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote: Thanks, Alex. The ApproveRoyale.mxml from the latest release/0.9.6 is working for me if I delete

Re: Setting up Royale on Windows

2019-09-26 Thread Alex Harui
I believe they are only necessary for building the compiler from sources. Which file or document were you looking at? Thanks, -Alex On 9/26/19, 8:56 AM, "Shiffy" wrote: I have Royale set up on my Windows Laptop and it compiles fine. I am now setting up Royale on a different Windows

Setting up Royale on Windows

2019-09-26 Thread Shiffy
I have Royale set up on my Windows Laptop and it compiles fine. I am now setting up Royale on a different Windows PC, and while setting up the environment variables I noticed that I don’t have ASJS_HOME or PLAYERGLOBAL_VERSION set on my laptop. Since it complies okay, I was wondering if and

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_MXTests #1192

2019-09-26 Thread Apache Royale CI Server
See Changes: [noreply] Update README -- [...truncated 1006.05 KB...] [mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ObjectUtil [mxmlc] scanning

Jenkins build is back to normal : royale-asjs_jsonly #3598

2019-09-26 Thread Apache Royale CI Server
See

Re: RemoteObject y addEventListener SyntaxError

2019-09-26 Thread Maria Jose Esteve
Hi Alex, Yes, it worked! I will try to apply this same logic to the rest of my code, but I don't know if I will be able to :( Now I have other problems with the interpretation of the data received, but this will be another post :P Thank you very much Alex. I can't reply to a post, I can only

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-09-26 Thread Alex Harui
Looks like I missed a commit. I just pushed the ApproveRoyale.xml I was using to the release branch. Try that one and see if it works better. It shouldn't require the workaround you used. Thanks, -Alex On 9/25/19, 4:16 PM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote: To get the system property working with

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_MXTests #1191

2019-09-26 Thread Apache Royale CI Server
See -- [...truncated 1004.88 KB...] [mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ObjectUtil [mxmlc] scanning for overrides: SolidBorderUtil [mxmlc]