Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs #36

2019-10-15 Thread apacheroyaleci
See 


Changes:


--
[...truncated 2.04 MB...]
 [java] ^
 [java] 
 [java] 
:
 col: 2 public var may not work in minified JS output.  Use getter/setter 
instead.
 [java] 
 [java] public static var excludedCount:int = 0;
 [java] ^
 [java] 
 [java] 
:
 col: 2 public var may not work in minified JS output.  Use getter/setter 
instead.
 [java] 
 [java] public var valueChanged:Boolean;
 [java] ^
 [java] 
 [java] 4.1591012 seconds
 [java] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms384m -Xmx2g
 [java] Java Result: 2

compile-js:

main:

basictests-compile-java:
   [delete] Deleting directory 

[mkdir] Created dir: 

[javac] 
:1317:
 warning: 'includeantruntime' was not set, defaulting to 
build.sysclasspath=last; set to false for repeatable builds
[javac] Compiling 12 source files to 

[javac] Note: 

 uses or overrides a deprecated API.
[javac] Note: Recompile with -Xlint:deprecation for details.

basictests:
[mxmlc] MXMLJSC
[mxmlc] 
-sdk-js-lib=
[mxmlc] +env.PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME=C:\adobe\flash
[mxmlc] -compiler.debug=true
[mxmlc] 
+royalelib=
[mxmlc] 
-closure-lib=
[mxmlc] 
-compiler.library-path+=
[mxmlc] 
-compiler.js-external-library-path=
[mxmlc] 
-compiler.js-library-path=
[mxmlc] 
-compiler.js-library-path+=
[mxmlc] --
[mxmlc] 

[mxmlc] Loading configuration: 

[mxmlc] Loading configuration: 

[mxmlc] 
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IFlexInfo
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ApplicationBase
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IEventDispatcher
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IInitialViewApplication
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IParent
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IPopUpHost
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IPopUpHostParent
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IRenderedObject
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IStrand
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: Application
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: BasicTestsApp
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: DontSendScriptComplete
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ExitWhenDone
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: SendFormattedResultsToLog
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: RoyaleContext
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: UnitTester
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ButtonTestScript
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: CheckBoxTestScript
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: HTMLElementWrapper
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IId
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IChild
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IUIBase
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ILayoutChild
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IParentIUIBase
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IRoyaleElement
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IStrandWithModel
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IStrandWithModelView
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IStyleableObject
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: UIBase
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IContainer
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IContentViewHost
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ILayoutP

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs #35

2019-10-15 Thread apacheroyaleci
See 


Changes:

[greg.dove] First cut at addressing issue #466 (support for legacy decoding 
only,


--
[...truncated 2.05 MB...]
 [java] ^
 [java] 
 [java] 
:
 col: 2 public var may not work in minified JS output.  Use getter/setter 
instead.
 [java] 
 [java] public static var excludedCount:int = 0;
 [java] ^
 [java] 
 [java] 
:
 col: 2 public var may not work in minified JS output.  Use getter/setter 
instead.
 [java] 
 [java] public var valueChanged:Boolean;
 [java] ^
 [java] 
 [java] 4.2833727 seconds
 [java] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms384m -Xmx2g
 [java] Java Result: 2

compile-js:

main:

basictests-compile-java:
   [delete] Deleting directory 

[mkdir] Created dir: 

[javac] 
:1317:
 warning: 'includeantruntime' was not set, defaulting to 
build.sysclasspath=last; set to false for repeatable builds
[javac] Compiling 12 source files to 

[javac] Note: 

 uses or overrides a deprecated API.
[javac] Note: Recompile with -Xlint:deprecation for details.

basictests:
[mxmlc] MXMLJSC
[mxmlc] 
-sdk-js-lib=
[mxmlc] +env.PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME=C:\adobe\flash
[mxmlc] -compiler.debug=true
[mxmlc] 
+royalelib=
[mxmlc] 
-closure-lib=
[mxmlc] 
-compiler.library-path+=
[mxmlc] 
-compiler.js-external-library-path=
[mxmlc] 
-compiler.js-library-path=
[mxmlc] 
-compiler.js-library-path+=
[mxmlc] --
[mxmlc] 

[mxmlc] Loading configuration: 

[mxmlc] Loading configuration: 

[mxmlc] 
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IFlexInfo
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ApplicationBase
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IEventDispatcher
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IInitialViewApplication
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IParent
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IPopUpHost
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IPopUpHostParent
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IRenderedObject
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IStrand
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: Application
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: BasicTestsApp
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: DontSendScriptComplete
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ExitWhenDone
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: SendFormattedResultsToLog
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: RoyaleContext
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: UnitTester
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ButtonTestScript
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: CheckBoxTestScript
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: HTMLElementWrapper
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IId
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IChild
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IUIBase
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ILayoutChild
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IParentIUIBase
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IRoyaleElement
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IStrandWithModel
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IStrandWithModelView
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IStyleableObject
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: UIBase
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IContainer

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs #34

2019-10-15 Thread apacheroyaleci
See 


Changes:

[carlosrovira] remove toString in EventDispatcher since all seems to work ok 
know

[carlosrovira] set EventDispatcher toString again using [object Object] string


--
[...truncated 2.04 MB...]
 [java] ^
 [java] 
 [java] 
:
 col: 2 public var may not work in minified JS output.  Use getter/setter 
instead.
 [java] 
 [java] public static var excludedCount:int = 0;
 [java] ^
 [java] 
 [java] 
:
 col: 2 public var may not work in minified JS output.  Use getter/setter 
instead.
 [java] 
 [java] public var valueChanged:Boolean;
 [java] ^
 [java] 
 [java] 4.2874858 seconds
 [java] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms384m -Xmx2g
 [java] Java Result: 2

compile-js:

main:

basictests-compile-java:
   [delete] Deleting directory 

[mkdir] Created dir: 

[javac] 
:1317:
 warning: 'includeantruntime' was not set, defaulting to 
build.sysclasspath=last; set to false for repeatable builds
[javac] Compiling 12 source files to 

[javac] Note: 

 uses or overrides a deprecated API.
[javac] Note: Recompile with -Xlint:deprecation for details.

basictests:
[mxmlc] MXMLJSC
[mxmlc] 
-sdk-js-lib=
[mxmlc] +env.PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME=C:\adobe\flash
[mxmlc] -compiler.debug=true
[mxmlc] 
+royalelib=
[mxmlc] 
-closure-lib=
[mxmlc] 
-compiler.library-path+=
[mxmlc] 
-compiler.js-external-library-path=
[mxmlc] 
-compiler.js-library-path=
[mxmlc] 
-compiler.js-library-path+=
[mxmlc] --
[mxmlc] 

[mxmlc] Loading configuration: 

[mxmlc] Loading configuration: 

[mxmlc] 
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IFlexInfo
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ApplicationBase
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IEventDispatcher
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IInitialViewApplication
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IParent
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IPopUpHost
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IPopUpHostParent
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IRenderedObject
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IStrand
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: Application
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: BasicTestsApp
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: DontSendScriptComplete
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ExitWhenDone
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: SendFormattedResultsToLog
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: RoyaleContext
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: UnitTester
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ButtonTestScript
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: CheckBoxTestScript
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: HTMLElementWrapper
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IId
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IChild
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IUIBase
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ILayoutChild
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IParentIUIBase
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IRoyaleElement
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IStrandWithModel
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IStrandWithModelView
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IStyleableObject
[mxmlc

Re: AMF and RemoteObjects under the ipv6 network

2019-10-15 Thread Carlos Rovira
ok Alex, I'll do for you
thanks

El mar., 15 oct. 2019 a las 18:17, Alex Harui ()
escribió:

> Please go ahead and respond for me.  I haven't really figured out Twitter
> yet.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 10/15/19, 9:05 AM, "Carlos Rovira"  wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
> do you want to respond yourself in the twitter thread? if not I can
> respond
> in your line
> thanks
>
> El mar., 15 oct. 2019 a las 16:30, Alex Harui
> ()
> escribió:
>
> > Someone needs to try it.  I would think the transport would work.
> The
> > next thing I wondered about was specification of destination and
> channels
> > in IPV6.  If the IP is resolved in DNS then it should be abstracted,
> but
> > not sure if we have any code expecting a certain pattern of "." in
> the URL
> > handling in Channel and ChannelSet and related classes.
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 10/15/19, 2:21 AM, "Carlos Rovira" 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > in this twitter thread [1] someone asks :
> >
> > "Anyone tested AMF and RemoteObjects under the ipv6 network?"
> >
> > I think ipv4 or ipv6 should not be a problem like any other REST
> > transfer.
> > We just serialize or deserialize and communications goes over
> > XMLHttpRequest right?
> > so nothing should be a problem here, but want to ask here before
> to
> > confirm
> > what I say
> >
> > Anyway seems people could have problems depending on browser
> providers
> > having some issue or not prepared for ipv6 [2], although if is
> the
> > case, I
> > think is up to them fix
> > Andy XMLHttpRequest issue.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fseddik82%2Fstatus%2F1183763122861105152%3Fs%3D20&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cde3cb67214b848f15c3f08d751899092%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637067523589944045&sdata=BTW8e9qcbIg%2F0YyV6Am%2Fv0or1X4D%2BTuOxKnQxVgjuSU%3D&reserved=0
> > [2]
> >
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstackoverflow.com%2Fquestions%2F40611863%2Fipv6-issues-with-ajax-requests&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cde3cb67214b848f15c3f08d751899092%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637067523589944045&sdata=UhRu2FlFUY2iiH2nP58DcQkuZHtq6WQHigV89EcjAV8%3D&reserved=0
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> >
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cde3cb67214b848f15c3f08d751899092%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637067523589944045&sdata=%2BIASXzpMAvkhuL7FvFeQIlwxKR4ziZfPoILgcW%2B%2FDIQ%3D&reserved=0
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
>
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cde3cb67214b848f15c3f08d751899092%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637067523589944045&sdata=%2BIASXzpMAvkhuL7FvFeQIlwxKR4ziZfPoILgcW%2B%2FDIQ%3D&reserved=0
>
>
>

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Jenkins build is back to normal : royale-asjs_jsonly #34

2019-10-15 Thread apacheroyaleci
See 




Re: AMF and RemoteObjects under the ipv6 network

2019-10-15 Thread Alex Harui
Please go ahead and respond for me.  I haven't really figured out Twitter yet.

-Alex

On 10/15/19, 9:05 AM, "Carlos Rovira"  wrote:

Hi Alex,
do you want to respond yourself in the twitter thread? if not I can respond
in your line
thanks

El mar., 15 oct. 2019 a las 16:30, Alex Harui ()
escribió:

> Someone needs to try it.  I would think the transport would work.  The
> next thing I wondered about was specification of destination and channels
> in IPV6.  If the IP is resolved in DNS then it should be abstracted, but
> not sure if we have any code expecting a certain pattern of "." in the URL
> handling in Channel and ChannelSet and related classes.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 10/15/19, 2:21 AM, "Carlos Rovira"  wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> in this twitter thread [1] someone asks :
>
> "Anyone tested AMF and RemoteObjects under the ipv6 network?"
>
> I think ipv4 or ipv6 should not be a problem like any other REST
> transfer.
> We just serialize or deserialize and communications goes over
> XMLHttpRequest right?
> so nothing should be a problem here, but want to ask here before to
> confirm
> what I say
>
> Anyway seems people could have problems depending on browser providers
> having some issue or not prepared for ipv6 [2], although if is the
> case, I
> think is up to them fix
> Andy XMLHttpRequest issue.
>
> Thanks
>
> [1]
> 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fseddik82%2Fstatus%2F1183763122861105152%3Fs%3D20&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cde3cb67214b848f15c3f08d751899092%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637067523589944045&sdata=BTW8e9qcbIg%2F0YyV6Am%2Fv0or1X4D%2BTuOxKnQxVgjuSU%3D&reserved=0
> [2]
>
> 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstackoverflow.com%2Fquestions%2F40611863%2Fipv6-issues-with-ajax-requests&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cde3cb67214b848f15c3f08d751899092%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637067523589944045&sdata=UhRu2FlFUY2iiH2nP58DcQkuZHtq6WQHigV89EcjAV8%3D&reserved=0
>
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
>
> 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cde3cb67214b848f15c3f08d751899092%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637067523589944045&sdata=%2BIASXzpMAvkhuL7FvFeQIlwxKR4ziZfPoILgcW%2B%2FDIQ%3D&reserved=0
>
>
>

-- 
Carlos Rovira

https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cde3cb67214b848f15c3f08d751899092%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637067523589944045&sdata=%2BIASXzpMAvkhuL7FvFeQIlwxKR4ziZfPoILgcW%2B%2FDIQ%3D&reserved=0




Re: AMF and RemoteObjects under the ipv6 network

2019-10-15 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Alex,
do you want to respond yourself in the twitter thread? if not I can respond
in your line
thanks

El mar., 15 oct. 2019 a las 16:30, Alex Harui ()
escribió:

> Someone needs to try it.  I would think the transport would work.  The
> next thing I wondered about was specification of destination and channels
> in IPV6.  If the IP is resolved in DNS then it should be abstracted, but
> not sure if we have any code expecting a certain pattern of "." in the URL
> handling in Channel and ChannelSet and related classes.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 10/15/19, 2:21 AM, "Carlos Rovira"  wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> in this twitter thread [1] someone asks :
>
> "Anyone tested AMF and RemoteObjects under the ipv6 network?"
>
> I think ipv4 or ipv6 should not be a problem like any other REST
> transfer.
> We just serialize or deserialize and communications goes over
> XMLHttpRequest right?
> so nothing should be a problem here, but want to ask here before to
> confirm
> what I say
>
> Anyway seems people could have problems depending on browser providers
> having some issue or not prepared for ipv6 [2], although if is the
> case, I
> think is up to them fix
> Andy XMLHttpRequest issue.
>
> Thanks
>
> [1]
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fseddik82%2Fstatus%2F1183763122861105152%3Fs%3D20&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Caf4b8359fb4f45b3fed708d751510155%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637067280664222854&sdata=D2sqzGnz%2BkAgKJNkEYiM9mfgZoiOUwbkkh8AiSu9rwA%3D&reserved=0
> [2]
>
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstackoverflow.com%2Fquestions%2F40611863%2Fipv6-issues-with-ajax-requests&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Caf4b8359fb4f45b3fed708d751510155%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637067280664222854&sdata=1iAEnaWL0LOSAZG3L%2F5dfgNMG2XsastEKPhkMJy8xpA%3D&reserved=0
>
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
>
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Caf4b8359fb4f45b3fed708d751510155%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637067280664222854&sdata=xzFDHWbOdmIEaD0ea7hKediqghvaXsE%2FoWYNCA4bH0E%3D&reserved=0
>
>
>

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: [royale-asjs] 01/06: RoyaleArrayLike support (IArrayList and BinaryData)

2019-10-15 Thread Josh Tynjala
Thanks, Greg!

--
Josh Tynjala
Bowler Hat LLC 


On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 5:08 PM Greg Dove  wrote:

> Thanks for bringing that to my attention, Josh. it should be fixed now (I
> tested with your example, thanks for that).
>
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 10:31 AM Greg Dove  wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi Josh, thanks, I will look into that today.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 10:30 AM Josh Tynjala 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hey Greg,
> >>
> >> Starting with the commit, there are times when compilation gets stuck in
> >> an infinite loop. It should be possible to reproduce using the following
> >> code:
> >>
> >> for each(var key:Object in Fake.hello)
> >> {
> >> }
> >>
> >> "Fake" is a class that does not exist. It should result in an error, but
> >> the compiler seems to get stuck trying to resolve it over and over
> again.
> >>
> >> - Josh
> >>
> >> On 2019/10/02 08:39:35, gregd...@apache.org wrote:
> >> > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
> >> >
> >> > gregdove pushed a commit to branch develop
> >> > in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/royale-asjs.git
> >> >
> >> > commit e52954b22a4599c75ba242955273627867e00e4d
> >> > Author: greg-dove 
> >> > AuthorDate: Sun Sep 29 15:16:21 2019 +1300
> >> >
> >> > RoyaleArrayLike support (IArrayList and BinaryData)
> >> > ---
> >> >  frameworks/projects/Collections/pom.xml|  14 ++
> >> >  .../src/main/config/compile-swf-config.xml |   1 +
> >> >  .../src/main/royale/CollectionsClasses.as  |   2 +
> >> >  .../org/apache/royale/collections/ArrayList.as |   2 +-
> >> >  .../org/apache/royale/collections/IArrayList.as|  13 +-
> >> >  frameworks/projects/Core/pom.xml   |  19 +-
> >> >  .../Core/src/main/config/compile-swf-config.xml|   6 +-
> >> >  .../projects/Core/src/main/royale/CoreClasses.as   |   3 +
> >> >  .../royale/org/apache/royale/utils/BinaryData.as   |  11 +-
> >> >  .../Language/src/main/royale/LanguageClasses.as|   2 +-
> >> >  .../apache/royale/language/iterator/arrayLike.as   |  73 +++
> >> >  .../main/royale/flexUnitTests/LanguageTester.as|   8 +-
> >> >  .../language/LanguageTesterTestArraylikeGetSet.as  | 227
> >> +
> >> >  .../language/LanguageTesterTestForEach.as  | 205
> >> +++
> >> >  .../language/support/checkArrayLikeFunc.as |  30 +--
> >> >  15 files changed, 587 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/frameworks/projects/Collections/pom.xml
> >> b/frameworks/projects/Collections/pom.xml
> >> > index a105423..59cb218 100644
> >> > --- a/frameworks/projects/Collections/pom.xml
> >> > +++ b/frameworks/projects/Collections/pom.xml
> >> > @@ -60,6 +60,20 @@
> >> >
> >> >  
> >> >org.apache.royale.framework
> >> > +  Language
> >> > +  0.9.6-SNAPSHOT
> >> > +  swc
> >> > +  swf
> >> > +
> >> > +
> >> > +  org.apache.royale.framework
> >> > +  Language
> >> > +  0.9.6-SNAPSHOT
> >> > +  swc
> >> > +  js
> >> > +
> >> > +
> >> > +  org.apache.royale.framework
> >> >Core
> >> >0.9.6-SNAPSHOT
> >> >swc
> >> > diff --git
> >> a/frameworks/projects/Collections/src/main/config/compile-swf-config.xml
> >> b/frameworks/projects/Collections/src/main/config/compile-swf-config.xml
> >> > index 6116aec..1c00110 100644
> >> > ---
> >> a/frameworks/projects/Collections/src/main/config/compile-swf-config.xml
> >> > +++
> >> b/frameworks/projects/Collections/src/main/config/compile-swf-config.xml
> >> > @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
> >> >  
> >> >
> >>
> ${env.AIR_HOME}/frameworks/libs/air/airglobal.swc
> >> >  ../../../../../libs/Core.swc
> >> > +
> >> ../../../../../libs/Language.swc
> >> >  
> >> >
> >> >   
> >> > diff --git
> >> a/frameworks/projects/Collections/src/main/royale/CollectionsClasses.as
> >> b/frameworks/projects/Collections/src/main/royale/CollectionsClasses.as
> >> > index fe946df..ecc1033 100644
> >> > ---
> >> a/frameworks/projects/Collections/src/main/royale/CollectionsClasses.as
> >> > +++
> >> b/frameworks/projects/Collections/src/main/royale/CollectionsClasses.as
> >> > @@ -43,6 +43,8 @@ internal class CollectionsClasses
> >> >   import org.apache.royale.collections.SortField; SortField;
> >> >   import org.apache.royale.collections.SortFieldCompareTypes;
> >> SortFieldCompareTypes;
> >> >   import org.apache.royale.collections.CompareUtils; CompareUtils;
> >> > +
> >> > + import org.apache.royale.language.iterator.arrayLike;arrayLike;
> >> >
> >> >  }
> >> >
> >> > diff --git
> >>
> a/frameworks/projects/Collections/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/collections/ArrayList.as
> >>
> b/frameworks/projects/Collections/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/collections/ArrayList.as
> >> > index 38164aa..75ea856 100644
> >> > ---
> >>
> a/frameworks/projects/Collections/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/collections/Ar

Re: [royale-asjs] branch develop updated: remove toString in EventDispatcher since all seems to work ok know without it. (refers to: #502)

2019-10-15 Thread Carlos Rovira
Thanks Piotr,
I'll take a look

El mar., 15 oct. 2019 a las 16:48, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> It looks like this causes a fail ->
>
> http://apacheroyaleci2.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/33/console
>
> wt., 15 paź 2019 o 12:22  napisał(a):
>
> > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
> >
> > carlosrovira pushed a commit to branch develop
> > in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/royale-asjs.git
> >
> >
> > The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/develop by this push:
> >  new d64f02e  remove toString in EventDispatcher since all seems to
> > work ok know without it. (refers to: #502)
> > d64f02e is described below
> >
> > commit d64f02e7ebcc8c32bbd063cb2cf547510e211e37
> > Author: Carlos Rovira 
> > AuthorDate: Tue Oct 15 12:22:02 2019 +0200
> >
> > remove toString in EventDispatcher since all seems to work ok know
> > without it. (refers to: #502)
> > ---
> >  .../Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/events/EventDispatcher.as | 5
> > -
> >  1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git
> >
> a/frameworks/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/events/EventDispatcher.as
> >
> b/frameworks/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/events/EventDispatcher.as
> > index 466e769..360ed1f 100644
> > ---
> >
> a/frameworks/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/events/EventDispatcher.as
> > +++
> >
> b/frameworks/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/events/EventDispatcher.as
> > @@ -99,10 +99,5 @@ package org.apache.royale.events
> > }
> > return false;
> > }
> > -
> > -public function toString():String
> > -{
> > -return "EventDispatcher";
> > -}
> > }
> >  }
> >
> >
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> *
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: [royale-asjs] branch develop updated: remove toString in EventDispatcher since all seems to work ok know without it. (refers to: #502)

2019-10-15 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
It looks like this causes a fail ->
http://apacheroyaleci2.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/33/console

wt., 15 paź 2019 o 12:22  napisał(a):

> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>
> carlosrovira pushed a commit to branch develop
> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/royale-asjs.git
>
>
> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/develop by this push:
>  new d64f02e  remove toString in EventDispatcher since all seems to
> work ok know without it. (refers to: #502)
> d64f02e is described below
>
> commit d64f02e7ebcc8c32bbd063cb2cf547510e211e37
> Author: Carlos Rovira 
> AuthorDate: Tue Oct 15 12:22:02 2019 +0200
>
> remove toString in EventDispatcher since all seems to work ok know
> without it. (refers to: #502)
> ---
>  .../Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/events/EventDispatcher.as | 5
> -
>  1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git
> a/frameworks/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/events/EventDispatcher.as
> b/frameworks/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/events/EventDispatcher.as
> index 466e769..360ed1f 100644
> ---
> a/frameworks/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/events/EventDispatcher.as
> +++
> b/frameworks/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/events/EventDispatcher.as
> @@ -99,10 +99,5 @@ package org.apache.royale.events
> }
> return false;
> }
> -
> -public function toString():String
> -{
> -return "EventDispatcher";
> -}
> }
>  }
>
>

-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
*


Re: AMF and RemoteObjects under the ipv6 network

2019-10-15 Thread Alex Harui
Someone needs to try it.  I would think the transport would work.  The next 
thing I wondered about was specification of destination and channels in IPV6.  
If the IP is resolved in DNS then it should be abstracted, but not sure if we 
have any code expecting a certain pattern of "." in the URL handling in Channel 
and ChannelSet and related classes.

-Alex

On 10/15/19, 2:21 AM, "Carlos Rovira"  wrote:

Hi,

in this twitter thread [1] someone asks :

"Anyone tested AMF and RemoteObjects under the ipv6 network?"

I think ipv4 or ipv6 should not be a problem like any other REST transfer.
We just serialize or deserialize and communications goes over
XMLHttpRequest right?
so nothing should be a problem here, but want to ask here before to confirm
what I say

Anyway seems people could have problems depending on browser providers
having some issue or not prepared for ipv6 [2], although if is the case, I
think is up to them fix
Andy XMLHttpRequest issue.

Thanks

[1] 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fseddik82%2Fstatus%2F1183763122861105152%3Fs%3D20&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Caf4b8359fb4f45b3fed708d751510155%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637067280664222854&sdata=D2sqzGnz%2BkAgKJNkEYiM9mfgZoiOUwbkkh8AiSu9rwA%3D&reserved=0
[2]

https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstackoverflow.com%2Fquestions%2F40611863%2Fipv6-issues-with-ajax-requests&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Caf4b8359fb4f45b3fed708d751510155%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637067280664222854&sdata=1iAEnaWL0LOSAZG3L%2F5dfgNMG2XsastEKPhkMJy8xpA%3D&reserved=0



-- 
Carlos Rovira

https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Caf4b8359fb4f45b3fed708d751510155%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637067280664222854&sdata=xzFDHWbOdmIEaD0ea7hKediqghvaXsE%2FoWYNCA4bH0E%3D&reserved=0




Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_jsonly #33

2019-10-15 Thread apacheroyaleci
See 


Changes:


--
[...truncated 1.41 MB...]
 [java] 4.7412003 seconds
 [java] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms384m -Xmx2g
 [copy] Copying 1 file to 


main:

copy-swc:

check-for-tests:

test:

main:

HTML5:
 [echo] swc-date is 10/15/19 12:24 +

clean:
 [echo] swc-date is 10/15/19 12:24 +

check-for-tests:

clean-tests:

check-compiler-home:

check-transpiler-home:

check-compiler:

compile:

compile-js:
 [echo] swc-date is 10/15/19 12:24 +
   [delete] Deleting: 


clean:
 [echo] swc-date is 10/15/19 12:24 +
   [delete] Deleting: 


check-for-tests:

clean-tests:

check-compiler-home:

check-transpiler-home:

check-compiler:

compile:
 [echo] Cross-compiling HTML5JS.swc
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME: 

[mkdir] Created dir: 

 [java] args:
 [java] 
+royalelib=
 [java] -compiler.strict-xml=true
 [java] -compiler.targets=SWF,JSRoyale
 [java] -metadata.date=10/15/19 12:24 +
 [java] -metadata.dateFormat=MM/dd/yy HH:mm Z
 [java] -swf-debugfile-alias=/org/apache/royale/0.9.7
 [java] 
-output=
 [java] 
-load-config=
 [java] 
-load-config+=
 [java] target:SWF
 [java] target:JSRoyale
 [java] COMPC
 [java] Loading configuration: 

 [java] Loading configuration: 

 [java] 
 [java] 11024 bytes written to 
C:\jenkins\workspace\royale-asjs_jsonly\frameworks\js\projects\HTML5JS\target\HTML5JS.swc
 in 1.486 seconds
 [java] COMPCJSCRoyale
 [java] 3.0542316 seconds
 [java] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms384m -Xmx2g
 [copy] Copying 1 file to 


main:

copy-swc:

check-for-tests:

test:

main:

JQuery:
 [echo] swc-date is 10/15/19 12:24 +

clean:
 [echo] swc-date is 10/15/19 12:24 +

check-for-tests:

clean-tests:

check-compiler-home:

check-transpiler-home:

check-compiler:

compile:

compile-js:
 [echo] swc-date is 10/15/19 12:24 +
   [delete] Deleting: 


clean:
 [echo] swc-date is 10/15/19 12:24 +
   [delete] Deleting: 


check-for-tests:

clean-tests:

check-compiler-home:

check-transpiler-home:

check-compiler:

compile:
 [echo] Cross-compiling jQueryJS.swc
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME: 

[mkdir] Created dir: 

 [java] args:
 [java] 
+royalelib=
 [java] -compiler.strict-xml=true
 [java] -compiler.targets=SWF,JSRoyale
 [java] -metadata.date=10/15/19 12:24 +
 [java] -metadata.dateFormat=MM/dd/yy HH:mm Z
 [java] -swf-debugfile-alias=/org/apache/royale/0.9.7
 [java] 
-output=
 [java] 
-load-config=

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_jsonly #32

2019-10-15 Thread apacheroyaleci
See 


Changes:

[carlosrovira] remove toString in EventDispatcher since all seems to work ok 
know


--
[...truncated 1.41 MB...]
 [java] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms384m -Xmx2g
 [java] 4.5432679 seconds
 [copy] Copying 1 file to 


main:

copy-swc:

check-for-tests:

test:

main:

HTML5:
 [echo] swc-date is 10/15/19 10:51 +

clean:
 [echo] swc-date is 10/15/19 10:51 +

check-for-tests:

clean-tests:

check-compiler-home:

check-transpiler-home:

check-compiler:

compile:

compile-js:
 [echo] swc-date is 10/15/19 10:51 +
   [delete] Deleting: 


clean:
 [echo] swc-date is 10/15/19 10:51 +
   [delete] Deleting: 


check-for-tests:

clean-tests:

check-compiler-home:

check-transpiler-home:

check-compiler:

compile:
 [echo] Cross-compiling HTML5JS.swc
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME: 

[mkdir] Created dir: 

 [java] args:
 [java] 
+royalelib=
 [java] -compiler.strict-xml=true
 [java] -compiler.targets=SWF,JSRoyale
 [java] -metadata.date=10/15/19 10:51 +
 [java] -metadata.dateFormat=MM/dd/yy HH:mm Z
 [java] -swf-debugfile-alias=/org/apache/royale/0.9.7
 [java] 
-output=
 [java] 
-load-config=
 [java] 
-load-config+=
 [java] target:SWF
 [java] target:JSRoyale
 [java] COMPC
 [java] Loading configuration: 

 [java] Loading configuration: 

 [java] 
 [java] 11024 bytes written to 
C:\jenkins\workspace\royale-asjs_jsonly\frameworks\js\projects\HTML5JS\target\HTML5JS.swc
 in 1.455 seconds
 [java] COMPCJSCRoyale
 [java] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms384m -Xmx2g
 [java] 3.126975 seconds
 [copy] Copying 1 file to 


main:

copy-swc:

check-for-tests:

test:

main:

JQuery:
 [echo] swc-date is 10/15/19 10:51 +

clean:
 [echo] swc-date is 10/15/19 10:51 +

check-for-tests:

clean-tests:

check-compiler-home:

check-transpiler-home:

check-compiler:

compile:

compile-js:
 [echo] swc-date is 10/15/19 10:51 +
   [delete] Deleting: 


clean:
 [echo] swc-date is 10/15/19 10:51 +
   [delete] Deleting: 


check-for-tests:

clean-tests:

check-compiler-home:

check-transpiler-home:

check-compiler:

compile:
 [echo] Cross-compiling jQueryJS.swc
 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME: 

[mkdir] Created dir: 

 [java] args:
 [java] 
+royalelib=
 [java] -compiler.strict-xml=true
 [java] -compiler.targets=SWF,JSRoyale
 [java] -metadata.date=10/15/19 10:51 +
 [java] -metadata.dateFormat=MM/dd/yy HH:mm Z
 [java] -swf-debugfile-alias=/org/apache/royale/0.9.7
 [java] 
-output=
 [java] 

AMF and RemoteObjects under the ipv6 network

2019-10-15 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi,

in this twitter thread [1] someone asks :

"Anyone tested AMF and RemoteObjects under the ipv6 network?"

I think ipv4 or ipv6 should not be a problem like any other REST transfer.
We just serialize or deserialize and communications goes over
XMLHttpRequest right?
so nothing should be a problem here, but want to ask here before to confirm
what I say

Anyway seems people could have problems depending on browser providers
having some issue or not prepared for ipv6 [2], although if is the case, I
think is up to them fix
Andy XMLHttpRequest issue.

Thanks

[1] https://twitter.com/seddik82/status/1183763122861105152?s=20
[2]
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/40611863/ipv6-issues-with-ajax-requests



-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira