Re: Re: Source of build.xml files

2020-11-26 Thread Edward Stangler
If you use a custom ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME, like I do (on Windows), then very few of the build.xml files handle it properly. Most of them ignore the environment variable and just use ${ROYALE_HOME}/js, as you can see in what I wrote earlier. (ROYALE_COMPILER_REPO is not enough, at least on

Re: RE: Resource bundles and locales

2020-11-26 Thread Edward Stangler
Right, but how do you create the resource bundles and dynamically load the locales? It seems like it's very different in Royale. On 11/26/2020 1:58 AM, Yishay Weiss wrote: > In emulation components it’s similar to the Flex syntax. We have seen bugs > however with the @ annotator syntax in

Re: Release Step 003 Succeeded

2020-11-26 Thread Alex Harui
IIRC, on your local machine, if you clone the repo and run "mvn clean install", it should allow you to type a response and then that machine should be ok to use after that. -Alex On 11/26/20, 1:46 PM, "Harbs" wrote: That’s on my local machine. Passing the Dcom option to the ant script

Re: Release Step 003 Succeeded

2020-11-26 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
Harbs, I can send you off the list tomorrow and you can put it to a proper dir ;) It’s a hack :) You will do that once and forgot about that. Of course if we are talking about Maven:) Thanks, Piotr On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 at 22:46, Harbs wrote: > That’s on my local machine. Passing the Dcom

Re: Release Step 003 Succeeded

2020-11-26 Thread Harbs
That’s on my local machine. Passing the Dcom option to the ant script doesn’t help. How would I manually get the Adobe artifacts on my machine? > On Nov 26, 2020, at 11:18 PM, Christofer Dutz > wrote: > > I can tell you what’s going on here. > > You are building on a system where the Adobe

AW: Release Step 003 Succeeded

2020-11-26 Thread Christofer Dutz
I can tell you what’s going on here. You are building on a system where the Adobe artifacts aren’t available in the maven local repo. So the mavenizer (AKA maven extension I built to make non maven artifacts available as Maven artifacts) is kicking in. It expects a user to accept the license

Re: Release Step 003 Succeeded

2020-11-26 Thread Harbs
I don’t get it. I’m getting an endless loop of: [exec] The Adobe SDK license agreement applies to the Adobe Flash Player playerglobal.swc. Do you want to install the Adobe Flash Player playerglobal.swc? [exec] (In a non-interactive build such as a CI server build, alternatively to

Release Step 003 Succeeded

2020-11-26 Thread apacheroyaleci
>From the royale-compiler repo: 1. Run: ant -f releasesteps.xml Release_Step_003 -Drelease.version=0.9.8 This will download the artifacts then unzip and compile the source artifact. 2. Validate that the compiled artifacts match the downloaded artifacts. 3. If they do, then run ant -f

Release Step 002 Succeeded

2020-11-26 Thread apacheroyaleci
Log in to the server, open a command prompt, change directory to C:\jenkins\workspace\Royale_Release_Step_002 and run the following commands: git push git push origin org.apache.royale.compiler-0.9.8-rc1 You will need your Apache/Github username and 2FA token.

Re: Royale_Release_Step_002 - Build # 54 - Still Failing!

2020-11-26 Thread Harbs
I needed to do git pull on C:\jenkins\workspace\Royale_Release_Step_001 since I fixed this after step 1... > On Nov 26, 2020, at 8:10 PM, Harbs wrote: > > Any ideas why this is failing? > > I’m pretty sure I updated the repo to reference the new released version of > compiler-build-tools,

Re: [Result][VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.1

2020-11-26 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi, I count 4 binding votes ;) congrats! El jue, 26 nov 2020 a las 13:53, Harbs () escribió: > The vote passed with 3 binding and one non-binding votes. > > Thanks! > Harbs > -- Carlos Rovira Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC *Apache Software Foundation* http://about.me/carlosrovira

Re: Royale_Release_Step_002 - Build # 54 - Still Failing!

2020-11-26 Thread Harbs
Any ideas why this is failing? I’m pretty sure I updated the repo to reference the new released version of compiler-build-tools, but it seems to be picking up 1.2.1-SNAPSHOT instead of 1.2.1. > On Nov 26, 2020, at 7:31 PM, apacheroyal...@gmail.com wrote: > > Royale_Release_Step_002 - Build #

Royale_Release_Step_002 - Build # 54 - Still Failing!

2020-11-26 Thread apacheroyaleci
Royale_Release_Step_002 - Build # 54 - Still Failing: Check console output at http://apacheroyaleci2.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/Royale_Release_Step_002/54/ to view the results.

Royale_Release_Step_002 - Build # 53 - Still Failing!

2020-11-26 Thread apacheroyaleci
Royale_Release_Step_002 - Build # 53 - Still Failing: Check console output at http://apacheroyaleci2.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/Royale_Release_Step_002/53/ to view the results.

Royale_Release_Step_002 - Build # 52 - Still Failing!

2020-11-26 Thread apacheroyaleci
Royale_Release_Step_002 - Build # 52 - Still Failing: Check console output at http://apacheroyaleci2.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/Royale_Release_Step_002/52/ to view the results.

Royale_Release_Step_002 - Build # 51 - Still Failing!

2020-11-26 Thread apacheroyaleci
Royale_Release_Step_002 - Build # 51 - Still Failing: Check console output at http://apacheroyaleci2.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/Royale_Release_Step_002/51/ to view the results.

Release Step 001 Succeeded

2020-11-26 Thread apacheroyaleci
Log in to the server, open a command prompt, change directory to C:\jenkins\workspace\Royale_Release_Step_001 and run the following commands: git push git checkout release/0.9.8 git push -u origin release/0.9.8 You will need your Apache/Github username and 2FA token.

[Result][VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.1

2020-11-26 Thread Harbs
The vote passed with 3 binding and one non-binding votes. Thanks! Harbs

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale Compiler Build Tools 1.2.1

2020-11-26 Thread Harbs
And mine: +1 Package https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.1/rc1/apache-royale-compiler-build-tools-1.2.1-source-release.zip Java 1.8 OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.15.6 Source kit signatures match: y Source kit builds: y README is ok: ${readme.ok} RELEASE_NOTES is ok:

Re: Source of build.xml files

2020-11-26 Thread Harbs
You shouldn’t need to adjust anything, and no, it’s not generated. I have the following env vars set: #!/bin/sh export ROYALE_COMPILER_REPO=/Apache/royale-compiler export AIR_HOME=/Apache/frameworks/AIRSDK_Compiler export PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME=/Apache/frameworks/libs/player export

Source of build.xml files

2020-11-26 Thread Edward Stangler
Are the build.xml files automatically generated from some other files? Many of them are not seeing the ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME environment variable, so I have to manually adjust this: to this: And there are a lot of files to modify each time I do