Re: SVG for Flash (was Re: How to get assets (svg, png,...) inside *-js.swc and *-swf.swc libraries)

2018-02-26 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
I think supporting SVG natively is the best option going foward. It should be possible to utilize something like AS3SVGRenderer to support SVG rendering in Royale. [1] Thoughts? Thanks, Om [1] https://github.com/lucaslorentz/AS3SVGRenderer On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 10:10 PM, Alex Harui

Re: Page linked to from license page no longer exists

2018-02-17 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
://commons.wikimedia. > org/wiki/File:Blank_US_Map_(states_only).svg#file> > > > >> On Feb 16, 2018, at 6:49 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com > <mailto:bigosma...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >> > >> I'll look into it. > >> &

Re: How to install Nightly build through NPM

2018-02-17 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Harbs > On Feb 16, 2018, at 6:48 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > You can just do npm install -g > That should install the nightly for you. > > Thanks, > Om > > On Feb 16, 2018 5:49 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@g

Re: Page linked to from license page no longer exists

2018-02-16 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
I'll look into it. Thanks, Om On Feb 16, 2018 8:35 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > Bummer. Looks like WikiPedia decided to remove it. I think Om > contributed that, so I guess we should let him decide whether to find > another source for the data or remove the example. >

Re: How to install Nightly build through NPM

2018-02-16 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
You can just do npm install -g That should install the nightly for you. Thanks, Om On Feb 16, 2018 5:49 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote: > Hi Guys, > > Is it possible to install Nightly build of Royale through NPM ? I need to > check some scenario with Moonshine on Mac

Re: Introducing Royale CLI tool

2018-02-15 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
to have as >> > many samples of Royale use as possible. >> > >> > This tool can be written in ActionScript and compiled for node.js using >> > Royale. >> > >> > Harbs >> > >> > > On Feb 15, 2018, at 10:16 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala <omup

Re: Introducing Royale CLI tool

2018-02-15 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
the “new” command? > > BTW, it would be really great to try to stick to dog-fooding to have as > many samples of Royale use as possible. > > This tool can be written in ActionScript and compiled for node.js using > Royale. > > Harbs > > > On Feb 15, 2018, at 1

Re: Introducing Royale CLI tool

2018-02-15 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
l can be written in ActionScript and compiled for node.js using Royale. That has been on my to do list. Others are welcome to start porting these node/npm related scripts to AS. Thanks, Om Harbs > On Feb 15, 2018, at 10:16 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala <omup...@gmail.com> wrote: > > As I wa

Re: Introducing Royale CLI tool

2018-02-15 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
I will leave this Pull Request here, in case anyone wants to review it. https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/pull/118/files Thanks, Om On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 12:21 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > BTW, I have tested this on Windows: power shell, command promp

Re: Introducing Royale CLI tool

2018-02-15 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
BTW, I have tested this on Windows: power shell, command prompt and git bash. They all work fine. Someone needs to test on Mac and tell me what happens :-) Thanks, Om On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 12:16 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala <omup...@gmail.com> wrote: > As I was trying to write a `S

Introducing Royale CLI tool

2018-02-15 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
As I was trying to write a `Setting up Royale with npm `blog post, I realized that things could be much easier for npm users. So, I built the Royale CLI tool. It takes inspiration from the create-react-app and the angular cli projects. Here are the details: *To Install: * npm install

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.1 RC1

2018-02-12 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
o npm. Please try that and let me know how it goes. If this does not fix the issue, the next release should. But lets give this a shot, at least. Thanks, Om > > -Alex > > On 2/12/18, 12:08 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" > <omup...@gmail.com on beha

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.1 RC1

2018-02-12 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Feb 12, 2018 11:58 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote: On 2/12/18, 10:42 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >On Feb 12, 2018 10:13 AM, "Alex Harui"

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.1 RC1

2018-02-12 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
-asjs/frameworks/fonts/flat-ui-icons-regular.swf > [java] > [java] > [java] Java Result: 2 > >> On Feb 12, 2018, at 11:21 AM, Gabe Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Does this require a new rc or can the script just be updated? &g

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.1 RC1

2018-02-12 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
I've pushed in a fix for the broken js-swf npm installation process. https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/commit/b9a1b32975cc755475ade761f36993efc8f1f058 Alex, given that this release is about npm installation (as per the RELEASE_NOTES), we need this fix to go in. Sorry for the trouble :-(

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale 0.9.1 RC1

2018-02-11 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
+0 Binding Checksum matches Signature verified Building from sources works fine js-only npm packages installed fine Current apps seem to be working fine js-swf npm package seems to have a bug. I will check in a fix to 0.9.1 branch soon. Thanks, Om On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 10:25 AM, Piotr

Re: Royale Examples Blog proposal to all the team

2018-02-08 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Great idea, Carlos. Here is one I volunteer to write about: Getting started with Royale on npm I will write this over the weekend and share it here. We can post after Andrew (and others) makes a sweep over it :-) Thanks, Om On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 3:25 AM, Andrew Wetmore

Re: JSON Objects renaming (was Re: ASDoc, Routing, Releases)

2018-02-06 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
The java Jackson parser supports metadata based specification that can tell the deserializer to use a custom parser for specific sub properties. https://fasterxml.github.io/jackson-annotations/javadoc/2.0.0/com/fasterxml/jackson/annotation/JsonSetter.html This site has a pretty good rundown on

Re: Website description

2018-02-06 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Feb 5, 2018 11:39 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: Hi, Or if you want to use slack for Royale then create a channel on the “official” ASF slack group. Thanks, Justin 1. https://the-asf.slack.com Justin, Please don't invent issues when there are none. If you stop for

Re: [MAVEN-BUILD] Royale-asjs - Build # 450 - Still Failing

2018-01-31 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 10:32 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote: > I think I got it. > Thank you. Sorry for the noise. Regards, Om > > On 1/31/18, 5:18 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" > <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of b

Re: [MAVEN-BUILD] Royale-asjs - Build # 450 - Still Failing

2018-01-31 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
I will take a look soon. Thanks, Om On Jan 31, 2018 3:34 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote: > There is some file without license header. It'r related to latest NPM > changes ? > > 2018-01-31 12:17 GMT+01:00 Apache Jenkins Server < > jenk...@builds.apache.org> > : > > > The

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

2018-01-30 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
outsiders taking up package names that might cause confusion with our packages. Only we can deploy packages under the @apache-royale namespace going forward. Thanks, Om > > Thanks, > -Alex > > On 1/29/18, 1:14 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

2018-01-29 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 1:11 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote: > Om, > > Does that install our release or Nightly ? > The release version, i.e. 0.9.0. > > > 2018-01-29 22:09 GMT+01:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com>: > > &g

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

2018-01-29 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 1:06 PM, Andrew Wetmore wrote: > What about text like this for the download page on the website? > === > > The current version of Apache Royale is 0.9.0, released in January, 2018. > It is beta-quality. This means that Royale may not work entirely as

Re: Publishing to and installing from NPM

2018-01-29 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Gah, the installation commands should be: npm install @apache-royale/royale-js -g npm install @apache-royale/royale-js-swf -g Thanks, Om On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 2:41 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > The Apache Royale NPM packages are distributed under the Apac

Publishing to and installing from NPM

2018-01-29 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
The Apache Royale NPM packages are distributed under the Apache-Royale NPM organization: https://www.npmjs.com/org/apache-royale There are two packages available: 1. @apache-royale/royale-js [ https://www.npmjs.com/package/@apache-royale/royale-js] 2. @apache-royale/royale-js-swf [

Re: Royale Doc Table-of-Contents UX (was Re: Royale Documentation Page Layout Proposal)

2018-01-29 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
ll: https://help.github.com/articles/using-a-static-site-generator-other-than-jekyll/ Here's how we can do it with Gitbook: http://sangsoonam.github.io/2016/08/02/publish-gitbook-to-your-github-pages.html Thanks, Om > > -Alex > > On 1/28/18, 11:11 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf

Re: [DRAFT2][ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

2018-01-28 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
se of Royale. It would be best to recommend users to install via the github url for now. Thanks, Om > > Thanks, > -Alex > > On 1/28/18, 3:31 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" > <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com

Re: Royale Doc Table-of-Contents UX (was Re: Royale Documentation Page Layout Proposal)

2018-01-28 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
nks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fredux.js >>.org%2Fdocs%2Frecipes%2Freducers%2FPrerequisiteConcepts.html=02%7C01 >>%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce35c7c4743804324141308d5664c8547%7Cfa7b1b5a7b3443 >>8794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636527401200834465=4Bdy4FThikLGQukS0SS >>

Re: [DRAFT2][ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

2018-01-28 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
che-royale-0.9.0-bin-js.tar.gz Can we for that release ? Yes, we can announce this. Sorry for the confusion. Thanks, Om Thanks, Piotr 2018-01-28 12:31 GMT+01:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com>: > On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 3:29 AM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail

Re: [DRAFT2][ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

2018-01-28 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 3:29 AM, Piotr Zarzycki wrote: > Yeah. I was going to ask for the Announce as well. Let's mention link to > working version of NPM, which you Alex figure out. We could put them to the > website. > As mentioned earlier, the npm package is broken

Re: Royale Doc Table-of-Contents UX (was Re: Royale Documentation Page Layout Proposal)

2018-01-28 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Here is a very good example of what the end product would look like: https://redux.js.org/ Thanks, Om On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 3:14 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 3:13 AM, Gabe Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >

Re: Royale Doc Table-of-Contents UX (was Re: Royale Documentation Page Layout Proposal)

2018-01-28 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
files from the github repo and builds its own site. Thanks, Om > > Harbs > > > On Jan 28, 2018, at 1:09 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > I've been playing around with the tool: GitBook [www.gitbooks.io] > > I was able to

Re: Royale Doc Table-of-Contents UX (was Re: Royale Documentation Page Layout Proposal)

2018-01-28 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
I've been playing around with the tool: GitBook [www.gitbooks.io] I was able to connect my personal fork of the royale-docs to my gitbooks.io account. This way, all my .md files are automatically available for Docs creation. Here is an example I created in a few minutes:

Re: [DRAFT] [ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.0 Released

2018-01-24 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
I think it is perfectly fine to announce without npm support. We can add it in our next release. Thanks, Om On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 3:31 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > If we can edit the text later, then IMO, go ahead and publish. > > If not, we might want to wait to hear

Re: Updating 2015 FlexJS presentation

2018-01-24 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
ld update the presentation. > I will have other questions about how two years of development may have > affected the texts... > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 6:03 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > Andrew, > > > > Please feel

Re: Cannot install royale-swf from npm

2018-01-24 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
hanks, Om 2018-01-24 22:51 GMT+01:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com>: > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 1:15 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> > wrote: > > > OK, but I believe the royale-swf package still won't run. Or are you > > going to fix that befor

Re: Updating 2015 FlexJS presentation

2018-01-24 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Andrew, Please feel free to take this presentation and modify it. I have made the original ppt file available here: https://www.amazon.com/clouddrive/share/FPveqBSWJ5PiXXYkbSslIC36LLVgMYsHg8UUNHEV2c I don't have a presentation script (I just winged it :-D) But I would guess that by the time

Re: Cannot install royale-swf from npm

2018-01-24 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
ex > > On 1/24/18, 1:08 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" > <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >I'm going to republish both under the apache royale organization. Please > >hold off on making any changes till then

Re: Cannot install royale-swf from npm

2018-01-24 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
I'm going to republish both under the apache royale organization. Please hold off on making any changes till then. Thanks, Om On Jan 24, 2018 12:31 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > Interesting. There might be different rules for Apache Royale since our > repos are under

Re: Proposed table of contents for Royale help documentation

2018-01-23 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
A good workflow would be as follows: * Create your personal branch off of the `develop` branch * Make all your commits directly to your personal branch * When you are ready to share your work to the world, create a Pull Request from your branch to `develop` * This will let others look at and

Re: Proposed table of contents for Royale help documentation

2018-01-23 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > Can you use Git to clone a repo and try a test commit? That might help > determine if the problem is that your committer rights are still not right > or just the rights to use the GH UI (which does allow me to use

Re: Proposed table of contents for Royale help documentation

2018-01-23 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 11:22 AM, Andrew Wetmore wrote: > I have logged out of GitHub and logged back in on the browser. GitHub > congratulates me for having joined Apache, and shows me the repositories I > am involved in, including royale-docs. I don't see any reference to

Re: Proposed table of contents for Royale help documentation

2018-01-22 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
I believe you need to switch to the `develop` branch. Thanks, Om On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 11:11 AM, Andrew Wetmore wrote: > I do not see anything there that relates to the demo you did showing the > ToC for the help documentation. I see two .md pages, just placeholders. >

Re: Migrating existing FlexJS documentation to Royale

2018-01-18 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Here is how Electron does it with Github pages: Documentation result page: https://electronjs.org/docs/api/accelerator Source code: https://github.com/electron/electron/blob/master/docs/api/accelerator.md Some documentation on how this works:

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC1

2018-01-17 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Here is the relevant license text: = All code in any directories or sub-directories that end with *.html or *.css is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License, which full text can be found here:

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC1

2018-01-16 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Jan 16, 2018 8:47 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote: On 1/16/18, 1:13 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > >+1 to exclude the MDL examples from this re

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC1

2018-01-16 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 1:10 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > Thanks Olaf! Good to know that we don't have that restriction anymore. > > I'd like to get Piotr and Carlos's opinions about removing the MDL > examples since they worked so hard on it. I'm finishing up changing the

Re: Apache Royale website is live!!

2018-01-10 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
; > > >> Hi Om, > > >> > > >> that's not possible. We're making all changes in WP through admin and > > then > > >> exported and published. > > >> something out of this workflow will not be possible. > > >> > > >>

Re: Apache Royale website is live!!

2018-01-10 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
" for most > readers. > > Andrew > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 3:26 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > I think a better approach would be for Andrew to send a Pull Request to > > https://github.com/apache/royale-website/tree/

Re: Apache Royale website is live!!

2018-01-10 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
I think a better approach would be for Andrew to send a Pull Request to https://github.com/apache/royale-website/tree/asf-site. Carlos/Piotr, is that possible, given the current state of how the website is being deployed? Thanks, Om On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:13 AM, Carlos Rovira

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC1

2018-01-09 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 2:14 PM, Olaf Krueger wrote: > The ApproveRoyale script fails for me [1][2]. > I've just installed ant on my Windows 10 machine and followed the > instructions. > > I have to admit that I have no experience with ant... > Does it mean that the script

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC1

2018-01-08 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
As mentioned in the VOTE thread, I had unit tests failing while building the compiler with Maven. The full console log is available here [1] Thanks, Om [1] https://gist.github.com/anonymous/146e95749626a54dd2a6a2937c9591c0 On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:14 PM, Olaf Krueger

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC1

2018-01-08 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
l Unit test failure. Let's try to fix this unit test before releasing. More details in the DISCUSS thread. Thanks, Om On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 8:47 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > One small correction. These are the correct npm install commands: > &

Re: [Try-it-now app] Progress thread

2017-12-21 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Olaf Krueger <m...@olafkrueger.net> wrote: > OmPrakash Muppirala wrote > > Olaf, do I have your permission to commit this code into the Apache > github > > repo? Once I put that in, more folks can start contributing. > > I've just

Re: [Try-it-now app] Progress thread

2017-12-20 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Here is a screenshot in the meantime :-) https://snag.gy/ElDsMR.jpg On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 2:16 AM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote: > Cool :) > > Waiting to your commit! :) > > 2017-12-20 11:12 GMT+01:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com

Re: [Try-it-now app] Progress thread

2017-12-20 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Update: I have the UI hooked up. It's starting to resemble a real app now :-) Erik, can I haz the VM details, please? I would like to deploy this somewhere so folks can take a look. Olaf, do I have your permission to commit this code into the Apache github repo? Once I put that in, more

Re: mxmlc - build debug only?

2017-12-19 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Yes, that is what I was looking for. Thank you! On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 11:05 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote: > If -debug=true, mxmlc will generate bin/js-debug only. > > Is that what you are asking? > > -Alex > > On 12/19/17, 10:25 PM, "omup...@

Re: [Try-it-now app] Progress thread

2017-12-19 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Olaf, that worked! I'm going to try and add some UI around this. Do you want to simply check this into our apache github repo? Thanks, Om On Dec 18, 2017 1:37 PM, "Olaf Krueger" <m...@olafkrueger.net> wrote: > OmPrakash Muppirala wrote > > Can you give an > > e

Re: Testing npm deployment

2017-12-18 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
; would be helpful as well, especially now that Mac AIR SDKs are DMG files. > > Thanks, > -Alex > > On 12/18/17, 10:26 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash > Muppirala" <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >Okay, this

Re: Testing npm deployment

2017-12-18 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
ex > > [3] > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/21355508/publish- > development-version-of > -npm-package > > On 12/18/17, 9:19 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" > <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > &

Re: Testing npm deployment

2017-12-18 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
e5ce0294b18913c83c794a8819893ba9bb73e77f55 >b5cfce%40%253Cdev.royale.apache.org%253E=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com >%7C6d10fd8a41454eda3c2c08d545f7e592%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0 >%7C0%7C636491853411797328=iCM20R4mlH52eIWURoWvYzNregXW7PeZJCM7KRhbsU >0%3D=0 > >I am yet to get to

Re: Testing npm deployment

2017-12-18 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
e.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/66e1ee3ce5ce0294b18913c83c794a8819893ba9bb73e77f55b5cfce@%3Cdev.royale.apache.org%3E I am yet to get to this part. But we need to sort off agree on a path before I can proceed. > I'm shutting down for tonight > so I'll pick this up in the morning. &

Re: Testing npm deployment

2017-12-17 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
ect dependency between the royale codebase and the npm related stuff. Thanks, Om > > > On 12/17/17, 1:56 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" > <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >I have pushed a few changes

Re: NPM for Royale (was Re: Repos and Releases)

2017-12-17 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
e will support AIR runtimes. Unless of course I am wrong. Thanks, Om On 12/17/17, 12:25 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >I'm making progress on this front. > >I will get the apache-royale npm

Re: [Try-it-now app] Progress thread

2017-12-17 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Dec 17, 2017 1:57 PM, "Olaf Krueger" wrote: Hi guys, I've replaced Express by Restify at server side and revised the server side implementation a bit. For now, this still is a very simple implementation which is probably enough to start with. I've created a github repo

Testing npm deployment

2017-12-17 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
I have pushed a few changes to my branch: https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/commits/feature/npm-scripts Can someone give it a look over before I merge it into develop? Once it gets merged into develop, I can test out the build from the lastSuccessfulBuild from the jenkins build. I've given

Re: NPM for Royale (was Re: Repos and Releases)

2017-12-17 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
t? This is for naming the npm package. Did you mean the same thing? Thanks, Om > > On Sun, Dec 17, 2017, 09:26 OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I'm making progress on this front. > > > > I will get the apache-royale npm pac

Re: NPM for Royale (was Re: Repos and Releases)

2017-12-17 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
thing for quite a while, then it ran the rest of the install. > > Thanks, > -Alex > > On 12/12/17, 12:13 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash > Muppirala" <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 12:04 PM

Re: Slider Component

2017-12-13 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Peter Ent wrote: > I've pushed changes to the Slider component and resolved (I hope) most of > the issues listed below by Justin. Only one, having to do with arrow keys, > should be resolved or at least improved. The arrow keys should be

Re: NPM for Royale (was Re: Repos and Releases)

2017-12-12 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
ha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: > > >The package on the CI server aren't working with NPM. I think I messed up > >the Ant script. Looking into it now. > > > >-Alex > > > >On 12/12/17, 10:10 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash > >Muppirala"

Re: NPM for Royale (was Re: Repos and Releases)

2017-12-12 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Dec 12, 2017 8:41 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote: On 12/12/17, 3:51 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >On Dec 12, 2017 12:25 AM, "Alex Harui"

Re: NPM for Royale (was Re: Repos and Releases)

2017-12-12 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
r, >>> >>> royals-typedefs, royale-asjs) and without more fiddling, the JSOnly >>> >>>binary >>> >>> artifact will contain what is currently in the "JSOnly" nightly but >>>in >>> >>>a >>> >>> royale-a

Re: Hackathon

2017-12-11 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Dec 11, 2017 7:32 AM, "Peter Ent" wrote: Hi, Thanks for the invite, but I do not think it will be possible for me to join you. Regards, Peter On 12/9/17, 1:30 PM, "Harbs" wrote: >The only flights I can take on Thursday are pretty early in

Re: Repos and Releases

2017-12-02 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
With this setup, can we have the binary release package all the dependencies in one zip file? Thanks, Om On Dec 2, 2017 8:25 AM, "Harbs" wrote: > I don’t have much to add. For me, the simpler, the better. The decisions > should be to get the first release out as quickly

Re: [Try-it-now app] Progress thread

2017-11-28 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Olaf I will try to get your code working locally first. Then I will push it to Erik's vm. We dont need to figure out the db right away. I'm sure mongodb or dynamodb should work. We can figure that out when we come to that. Thanks, Om On Nov 28, 2017 5:27 AM, "Harbs"

Re: [Try-it-now app] Progress thread

2017-11-27 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > Olaf, > > (We need a NodeJS installation with access to the file system). > > > > How about I give you SSH access to a clean instance with Amazon Linux base > install? Will you be able to take it from there, or would you

Re: [Try-it-now app] Progress thread

2017-11-27 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > > I believe we committers have some Azure credits with which we can spin up > > some VMs that can host this. The last option is for some of us to pay > and > > host it somewhere. > > > > I've already offered to host any

Re: [website] Getting started page

2017-11-22 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Nov 22, 2017 7:02 AM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote: Hi, all you're completely right, I was a bit blind in this content and maybe we could move that content to other website page and create new one with the ideas you suggest here. So for the content could be more of a hello

Re: Publishing royale to npm

2017-11-15 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
gt;> into > >> >>>>>> one, that was something Chris was planning to do. The final step > >> >>>>>>would > >> >>> be > >> >>>>>> making only one "mvn clean install" and have compiler, typedefs > >>and > >&g

Re: Publishing royale to npm

2017-11-14 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
anks, Om > > Thoughts? > -Alex > > On 11/14/17, 10:44 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash > Muppirala" <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >I'm in the middle of updating the npm scripts. Are we planning to > &g

Re: Publishing royale to npm

2017-11-14 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote: > Yes, I was going to copy it someday so go ahead and do it now if you have > time. > > -Alex > > On 11/13/17, 12:50 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >Sounds good. > > > >> On Nov 13, 2017, at 10:41 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala

Re: [royale-asjs] branch develop updated: Add ‘glue’ utility script to allow WASM to be loaded in HTML

2017-11-14 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Harbs wrote: > Cool. > > I have not been following WASM very closely. > > As an aside: > It would be really cool if we could make the compiler understand arrow > functions for ActionScript. > Hmm, the point of the arrow function in ES6 is

Re: Publishing royale to npm

2017-11-13 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
t; about version number, I'll feel more happy with 0.8 than 0.9 My point > >>> is that we are getting a first release of Royale and is the same that > >>> FlexJS 0.8 but with some new fixes and little things. > >>> As well I can see many things to do to reach 1.0, and would be gr

Re: Publishing royale to npm

2017-11-09 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
aven users to use -SNAPSHOT > versions, we tell Ant/IDE users to get it from apacheflexbuild. What can > we tell npm users? > > Thanks, > -Alex > > On 11/9/17, 2:37 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" > <omup...@gmail.com on beh

Re: Publishing royale to npm

2017-11-09 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
UI/archive/;, "flatui_file_name": "2.2.2.zip" } Then, we up the version number and do a npm publish. The release manager would need to have the credentials for npmjs.org, but we could share that with priv...@royale.apache.org Thanks, Om > > -Alex > > On 11/9/17, 1

Re: Publishing royale to npm

2017-11-09 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
v 9, 2017, at 9:25 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi Om, > >> > >> I'm working on the website content and want to kn

Re: Publishing royale to npm

2017-11-09 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
quot;royale", although this was the right and only package, I'll be ask me if > > there's the right one. > > > > With apache-royale, there's no confusion problems ;) > > > > 2017-10-30 19:50 GMT+01:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com>: > > > >&

Re: [royale-asjs] branch develop updated: Fixed asconfigc files We now get full code intelligence in VS Code for the framework project code. This will work for even JS and SWF blocks.

2017-11-08 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Nov 8, 2017 10:28 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote: I was asking cause since you have added files for VSCode I could do the same with Moonshine. Just wanted to understand. It is not so uncommon having global file and open all modules. In Intellij I couldn't imagine

Re: Apache Royale static web site

2017-10-28 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
I suggest we just release what Carlos as a static website for now. As time goes by, volunteers can build up a separate website using just Royale. At some point we can simply swap out the wp.com site with the new Royale based website. There is absolutely no requirement that the new site has to

Re: Apache Royale WebSite Preview

2017-10-22 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Fantastic work, Carlos! I checked it out on mobile and it looks pretty good there. I do see a lot of references to Flex in the copy. Please take a look. Very inspiring  Thanks, Om On Oct 22, 2017 3:18 PM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote: > 2017-10-22 23:58 GMT+02:00 Harbs

Re: Flex2Royale

2017-10-16 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
The biggest problem with FXG is that there are no editors that support it. I kept using Illustrator CS5 for creating all my assets. While I don't have a problem with that or a need to upgrade to the latest version, it will be hard to ask users to use that version for their FlexJS/Royale skinning

VS code does for Royale swc projects

2017-10-14 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Harbs, if I remember correct, you had mentioned that you have switched over to VS code for all Royale related work. Any chance you can share the project files somewhere? Thanks, Om

Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)

2017-10-03 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
his email > or switch to one that is subscribed? > > Thanks, > -Alex > > On 10/3/17, 4:46 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" > <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >This should make things simpler: > >http

Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)

2017-10-03 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
> [1] > >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c > >>> o > >>> m%2Fok-at-github%2Fflexjs-docs%2Fwiki=02%7C01%7C% > 7C88a0571d57dc4f6ed > >>> 2 > >>> b708d50a35c2c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b

Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)

2017-10-03 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
I prefer royale-docs Thanks, Om On Oct 2, 2017 11:04 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > Per Infra: "Pages are not enabled until we have some content to point to. > Best thing I think is to create a new royale-pages repository (or whatever > name) and I'll enable it on that -

<    1   2   3