Re: Tabbar with scroll in TourDeJewel

2019-10-18 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Piotr,
just tested for Safari, Firefox and Chrome (I'm on Mac). And all seems
fine. There's scroll but without showing scrollbars like in MDL one. This
always was the same.
I have an issue in iOS where the scrollbar appears, but since current iOS
Safari version (13), this issue has gone (it's only on iOS12 and previous
versions)

El jue., 17 oct. 2019 a las 11:07, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> Hi Carlos,
>
> We have noticed that in tour de jewel Tabbar example where it should
> contains scroll doesn't have it anymore. [1] - Can you check what has
> happened if you found time?
>
> [1] *https://royale.apache.org/tourdejewel/
> <https://royale.apache.org/tourdejewel/>*
>
> Thanks,
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: Testimonials Page (Was: Re: About Royale Docs Improvements over latest months)

2019-10-18 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Piotr,
that's great. Hope Harbs, Yishay, Pashmina, Josh, Greg and others could
give some word about it.
I think 3-4 will be ok to start that page.
Thanks


Re: Future proof Flex/Flash apps.

2019-10-18 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Julien,

we have currently a problem with that server and I think Alex Harui is
trying to contact Azure to get the same url.
Maybe Alex can bring more light on this.

Thanks



El jue., 17 oct. 2019 a las 11:34, Julien Desquenne ()
escribió:

> Hello,
>
> Very interesting discussion.
>
> By the way, the link for Tour de Flex compiled with Apache Royale
> doesn't seem to work:
>
>
> http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/TourDeFlexMigration/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/examples/mxroyale/tourdeflexmodules/bin/js-debug/index.html
>
> Any other link ?
>
> Thanks
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: [Discussion] Where Nightly builds links must be located (we must remove it from download page)

2019-10-17 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi,

I switch to latest Harbs phrase. Hopefully it should be fine for now.

About website, I have some ideas in mind. I think the actual version
covered the needs to allow us to work on Royale while getting something
appropriate and appealing to newcomers, but as we are getting a more
consolidated framework we could spend some time on things like more visual
home and features page (still incomplete and need more attention) and even
get rid of the Wordpress dependency if possible to rely on GitHub pages now
that at least I have a better  knowledge on how to develop it. I have
visual ideas in mind, but I think for now docs and some ASDoc look and feel
improvements have more priority.

Thanks




El jue., 17 oct. 2019 a las 6:27, Alex Harui ()
escribió:

> I think our invitation to become a committer by getting source code or
> getting involved should be emphasized more, but I'm not doing the work on
> the website.  IMO, we've hit the point of diminishing returns.  Carlos
> should do something quick and simple to make the ASF happy unless he has
> time and energy to do more.
>
> In theory, we should be friendly enough to add the link to the nightlies
> in the emails we send to folks on dev@ so they don't have to go looking
> for it on our website.  And if they forgot and deleted the email with the
> link, it is in the archives.   It really should be rare for someone to need
> to remind themselves of the link by finding it on the website.
>
> My 2 cents,
> -Alex
>
> On 10/16/19, 2:10 PM, "Harbs"  wrote:
>
> Maybe something like this would be better?
>
> Source Code
>
> For developers who want to get involved in framework development,
> source code and nightly build download links can be found on our get
> involved page <
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Froyale.codeoscopic.com%2Fget-involved%2Fdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C64952ecd61b0454f330308d7527d4741%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637068570328531253sdata=xBp3SsuxsqWdXaDEUDLWZChgra%2BDUVJqr1bCUFyNGMA%3Dreserved=0
> >.
>
> > On Oct 16, 2019, at 11:36 PM, Alex Harui 
> wrote:
> >
> > I'm not sure how that is better than the disclaimer that was there.
> But if you feel it is important, we'll find out when the page gets reviewed
> again.
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 10/16/19, 12:44 PM, "Harbs"  wrote:
> >
> >I think we should add a section to the download page about
> nightly builds. Someone who is looking for the nightly builds might not
> know where to find it.
> >
> >Something like:
> >
> >We do not recommend nightly builds for application developers as
> they have not been properly tested and can have serious bugs. Nightly
> builds are useful if you want to get involved in framework development are
> are prepared to work with bleeding edge code. Source code and nightly build
> download links can be found on our “get involved” page[link].
> >
> >Harbs
> >
> >> On Oct 16, 2019, at 10:36 PM, Carlos Rovira <
> carlosrov...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I did it in pre:
> >>
> >>
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Froyale.codeoscopic.com%2Fdownload%2Fdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C64952ecd61b0454f330308d7527d4741%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637068570328531253sdata=8FZhtsvW5EJG8TmW4S%2BAdk7AtbsO%2Bl6UIB%2BfzLZ5YSA%3Dreserved=0
> >>
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Froyale.codeoscopic.com%2Fget-involved%2Fdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C64952ecd61b0454f330308d7527d4741%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637068570328531253sdata=xBp3SsuxsqWdXaDEUDLWZChgra%2BDUVJqr1bCUFyNGMA%3Dreserved=0
>     >>
> >> will push it tomorrow if nobody suggest any other change
> >>
> >> thanks
> >>
> >> Carlos
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> El mié., 16 oct. 2019 a las 21:27, Alex Harui
> ()
> >> escribió:
> >>
> >>> Sounds ok to me.
> >>>
> >>> On 10/16/19, 12:21 PM, "Carlos Rovira" 
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>   Hi,
> >>>
> >>>   thanks all for sharing ideas on how to deal with this issue. For
> what I
> >>>   read I like some of them.
> >>>
> >>>   We already have a "Get Involved" page (most of the time with
> forget we
> >>> have
> &g

Re: Testimonials Page (Was: Re: About Royale Docs Improvements over latest months)

2019-10-16 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi folks,

please remember we have this request open. It's very few time for you you
all, just invest 5 minutes in send a phrase, name, job and picture to
appear in out testimonials page :)

This can sum to the rest of things that will make others want to use Royale


El vie., 4 oct. 2019 a las 10:19, Carlos Rovira ()
escribió:

> Thanks Andrew!
>
> I look forward to at least 2 more (better 3) to be able to mount the
> page. We look forward to your help in this regard! :)
>
>
> El jue., 3 oct. 2019 a las 22:40, Andrew Wetmore ()
> escribió:
>
>> "Apache Royale captures the best of Apache Flex and the best of new trends
>> in web development, so it's the best of both worlds. We migrated a Flex
>> application to JavaScript in significantly less time than it would have
>> taken using the most popular JavaScript frameworks. The productivity,
>> programming model and combination of OOP and declarative languages make
>> Apache Royale a very solid development environment and a lot of fun to
>> work
>> with! :)"
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 3:30 PM Carlos Rovira 
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Here's main that could serve as well as example (@Andrew if you can fix
>> any
>> > grammar disaster I could make, please go ahead! :D) :
>> >
>> > -
>> >
>> > "Apache Royale captures the best of Apache Flex and the best of new
>> trends
>> > in web development, so it's best of both worlds. We migrated a Flex
>> > application to javascript in significant less time than using the
>> current
>> > top notch javascript frameworks out there. The productivity, the
>> programing
>> > model and the combination of OOP and declarative languages makes it a
>> very
>> > solid tech and very fun to work with! :)"
>> >
>> > Carlos Rovira
>> > Executive Chairman at Codeoscopic
>> >
>> > profile img to use: EB6igxEXYAE-PvU
>> > <https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EB6igxEXYAE-PvU?format=jpg=large>
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > I think is a small contribution that could be of help in our site.
>> Harbs,
>> > Yishay, Piotr, and the rest...please take this request into
>> consideration
>> > so we can fill the page with at least 4+ of this.
>> >
>> > thanks
>> >
>> > El mar., 1 oct. 2019 a las 20:54, Carlos Rovira (<
>> carlosrov...@apache.org
>> > >)
>> > escribió:
>> >
>> > > Hi all,
>> > >
>> > > we are talking about add a new "Testimonials" page were people could
>> > share
>> > > "How ApacheRoyale has helped" (you, your project, your company...)
>> with a
>> > > new app, or a migration from Flex.
>> > >
>> > > Please submit to this thread a phrase or a paragraph that will capture
>> > > that topic for you and help us to fill that page with useful
>> information
>> > > for others that come to Apache Royale.
>> > > (Note: Take into account that anyone that do this contribution is
>> under
>> > > the assumption that allows us to use his phrase, name and info
>> submitted
>> > in
>> > > out website as a Testimonial in that page and submitting implies give
>> us
>> > > permission to do that :))
>> > >
>> > > Please provide an image as well for the profile. It can be your
>> portrait,
>> > > or if you don't want your photo in our website, you can send us other
>> > > image(photo, logo or graphic) that represents you, to enhance the
>> > > testimonial. We reserve the option to use it or not depending on the
>> > image
>> > > provided if we think is not appropriate or could infringe some
>> copyright
>> > or
>> > > rule. For this reason, please try to use original content and nothing
>> > that
>> > > could be offensive or problematic with any of the Apache rules or the
>> > > common sense :)
>> > >
>> > > This will help others to decide to join us or use Royale since others
>> had
>> > > success in using it.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks all for your contribution to this page!! That will be of great
>> > > help! :)
>> > >
>> > > Carlos
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > El mar., 1 oct. 2019 a las 20:39, Carlos Rovira (<
>> > carlosrov...@apache.org>)
>

Re: [Discussion] Where Nightly builds links must be located (we must remove it from download page)

2019-10-16 Thread Carlos Rovira
Updated with your suggestion Harbs: https://royale.codeoscopic.com/download/



El mié., 16 oct. 2019 a las 21:44, Harbs () escribió:

> I think we should add a section to the download page about nightly builds.
> Someone who is looking for the nightly builds might not know where to find
> it.
>
> Something like:
>
> We do not recommend nightly builds for application developers as they have
> not been properly tested and can have serious bugs. Nightly builds are
> useful if you want to get involved in framework development are are
> prepared to work with bleeding edge code. Source code and nightly build
> download links can be found on our “get involved” page[link].
>
> Harbs
>
> > On Oct 16, 2019, at 10:36 PM, Carlos Rovira 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I did it in pre:
> >
> > https://royale.codeoscopic.com/download/
> > https://royale.codeoscopic.com/get-involved/
> >
> > will push it tomorrow if nobody suggest any other change
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > Carlos
> >
> >
> >
> > El mié., 16 oct. 2019 a las 21:27, Alex Harui ( >)
> > escribió:
> >
> >> Sounds ok to me.
> >>
> >> On 10/16/19, 12:21 PM, "Carlos Rovira" 
> wrote:
> >>
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>thanks all for sharing ideas on how to deal with this issue. For
> what I
> >>read I like some of them.
> >>
> >>We already have a "Get Involved" page (most of the time with forget
> we
> >> have
> >>menu options in the footer bar and top level menu options are only a
> >> subset
> >>of what we think "most important" for newcomers).
> >>With that page in mind, I think we have solve the "creation of a new
> >> page".
> >>We can use that.
> >>
> >>What I see more easy is then is to move the nightly builds section to
> >> that
> >>page, so we are done.
> >>
> >>Let me know what you think.
> >>
> >>Carlos
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>El mié., 16 oct. 2019 a las 18:38, Alex Harui
> >> ()
> >>escribió:
> >>
> >>> The principle behind the policy is not ridiculous.  AIUI, it is
> >> important
> >>> that the general public only downloads artifacts that the PMC has
> >> approved
> >>> as an act of the foundation, otherwise the foundation's ability to
> >> provide
> >>> a legal shield for release managers is weakened.
> >>>
> >>> I mostly agree that the way the word "might" in the policy is being
> >>> interpreted is "ridiculous".  I really don't think the general
> >> public is
> >>> being encouraged to download our nightly builds the way the current
> >> site
> >>> reads.  However, both Justin and I warned about the wording on the
> >> download
> >>> page [1] before it went live because we've seen other projects get
> >>> disrupted by similar nitpicking.  AFAICT, the trend at the ASF is to
> >>> continue to be more restrictive about the word "might" and make it
> >> harder
> >>> to find links to nightly builds on project websites.  Other projects
> >> that
> >>> used to have links or links "below the fold" no longer do when I went
> >>> looking just now.  It won't be worth it to fight it, so let's just
> >> plan on
> >>> changing.
> >>>
> >>> I see other projects with separate pages, but there is always a
> >> chance
> >>> that someday the word "might" will be restricted even more to include
> >>> separate pages.  I'm not making the changes to the site, so I'll
> >> leave it
> >>> up to those who are doing the work to decide.
> >>>
> >>> IMO, with that in mind, when I look at the current site, it is almost
> >>> entirely tuned towards our users.  The only place we invite folks to
> >>> contribute is way down on the landing page.  And the page that takes
> >> you to
> >>> is about mailing lists.  I guess you could say that the GitHub link
> >> is an
> >>> implied indicator that we're an open source project and that you
> >> should
> >>> contribute.
> >>>
> >>> So, here are my ideas.  Feel free to reject them all:
> >>>
> >>> 1) Move the nightly build portion of the download

Re: [Discussion] Where Nightly builds links must be located (we must remove it from download page)

2019-10-16 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi,

I did it in pre:

https://royale.codeoscopic.com/download/
https://royale.codeoscopic.com/get-involved/

will push it tomorrow if nobody suggest any other change

thanks

Carlos



El mié., 16 oct. 2019 a las 21:27, Alex Harui ()
escribió:

> Sounds ok to me.
>
> On 10/16/19, 12:21 PM, "Carlos Rovira"  wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> thanks all for sharing ideas on how to deal with this issue. For what I
> read I like some of them.
>
> We already have a "Get Involved" page (most of the time with forget we
> have
> menu options in the footer bar and top level menu options are only a
> subset
> of what we think "most important" for newcomers).
> With that page in mind, I think we have solve the "creation of a new
> page".
> We can use that.
>
> What I see more easy is then is to move the nightly builds section to
> that
> page, so we are done.
>
> Let me know what you think.
>
> Carlos
>
>
>
> El mié., 16 oct. 2019 a las 18:38, Alex Harui
> ()
> escribió:
>
> > The principle behind the policy is not ridiculous.  AIUI, it is
> important
> > that the general public only downloads artifacts that the PMC has
> approved
> > as an act of the foundation, otherwise the foundation's ability to
> provide
> > a legal shield for release managers is weakened.
> >
> > I mostly agree that the way the word "might" in the policy is being
> > interpreted is "ridiculous".  I really don't think the general
> public is
> > being encouraged to download our nightly builds the way the current
> site
> > reads.  However, both Justin and I warned about the wording on the
> download
> > page [1] before it went live because we've seen other projects get
> > disrupted by similar nitpicking.  AFAICT, the trend at the ASF is to
> > continue to be more restrictive about the word "might" and make it
> harder
> > to find links to nightly builds on project websites.  Other projects
> that
> > used to have links or links "below the fold" no longer do when I went
> > looking just now.  It won't be worth it to fight it, so let's just
> plan on
> > changing.
> >
> > I see other projects with separate pages, but there is always a
> chance
> > that someday the word "might" will be restricted even more to include
> > separate pages.  I'm not making the changes to the site, so I'll
> leave it
> > up to those who are doing the work to decide.
> >
> > IMO, with that in mind, when I look at the current site, it is almost
> > entirely tuned towards our users.  The only place we invite folks to
> > contribute is way down on the landing page.  And the page that takes
> you to
> > is about mailing lists.  I guess you could say that the GitHub link
> is an
> > implied indicator that we're an open source project and that you
> should
> > contribute.
> >
> > So, here are my ideas.  Feel free to reject them all:
> >
> > 1) Move the nightly build portion of the download page to a wiki
> page in
> > GitHub.
> > 2) Add a "Get Involved" or "Contributing" menu item similar to what
> Harbs
> > suggested that goes to a different page like Andrew suggested
> > 3) Replace the GitHub menu item with the "Get Involved" or
> "Contributing"
> > menu item
> > 4) Add analytics to the nightly build links so we can see how many
> people
> > click it
> > 5) Add a popup to the link to the nightly build so folks must agree
> to the
> > disclaimers.
> >
> > I recommend that we just do #1 and move on.  We've got plenty of
> other
> > things to work on.
> >
> > My 2 cents,
> > -Alex
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.apache.org%2Fthread.html%2F8564ab5687c631bd4961bf8b987a5e9d30d6673d5050f72b8a9aaa53%40%253Cdev.royale.apache.org%253Edata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C3069e9eec31c4fc643fd08d7526e02de%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637068504849942445sdata=2LPwIowIFGZmQ%2FzCMYeq8xPcXKJKBQPPkqpX41U3V40%3Dreserved=0
> >
> > On 10/16/19, 7:08 AM, "Josh Tynjala" 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hopefully a separate public page is allowed. What a ridiculous
> policy!
> >
> > --
> > Josh Tynjala
> > Bowler H

Re: [Discussion] Where Nightly builds links must be located (we must remove it from download page)

2019-10-16 Thread Carlos Rovira
Forgot to share the get involved page for you to check actual state:

https://royale.apache.org/get-involved/

Thanks

El mié., 16 oct. 2019 a las 21:20, Carlos Rovira ()
escribió:

> Hi,
>
> thanks all for sharing ideas on how to deal with this issue. For what I
> read I like some of them.
>
> We already have a "Get Involved" page (most of the time with forget we
> have menu options in the footer bar and top level menu options are only a
> subset of what we think "most important" for newcomers).
> With that page in mind, I think we have solve the "creation of a new
> page". We can use that.
>
> What I see more easy is then is to move the nightly builds section to that
> page, so we are done.
>
> Let me know what you think.
>
> Carlos
>
>
>
> El mié., 16 oct. 2019 a las 18:38, Alex Harui ()
> escribió:
>
>> The principle behind the policy is not ridiculous.  AIUI, it is important
>> that the general public only downloads artifacts that the PMC has approved
>> as an act of the foundation, otherwise the foundation's ability to provide
>> a legal shield for release managers is weakened.
>>
>> I mostly agree that the way the word "might" in the policy is being
>> interpreted is "ridiculous".  I really don't think the general public is
>> being encouraged to download our nightly builds the way the current site
>> reads.  However, both Justin and I warned about the wording on the download
>> page [1] before it went live because we've seen other projects get
>> disrupted by similar nitpicking.  AFAICT, the trend at the ASF is to
>> continue to be more restrictive about the word "might" and make it harder
>> to find links to nightly builds on project websites.  Other projects that
>> used to have links or links "below the fold" no longer do when I went
>> looking just now.  It won't be worth it to fight it, so let's just plan on
>> changing.
>>
>> I see other projects with separate pages, but there is always a chance
>> that someday the word "might" will be restricted even more to include
>> separate pages.  I'm not making the changes to the site, so I'll leave it
>> up to those who are doing the work to decide.
>>
>> IMO, with that in mind, when I look at the current site, it is almost
>> entirely tuned towards our users.  The only place we invite folks to
>> contribute is way down on the landing page.  And the page that takes you to
>> is about mailing lists.  I guess you could say that the GitHub link is an
>> implied indicator that we're an open source project and that you should
>> contribute.
>>
>> So, here are my ideas.  Feel free to reject them all:
>>
>> 1) Move the nightly build portion of the download page to a wiki page in
>> GitHub.
>> 2) Add a "Get Involved" or "Contributing" menu item similar to what Harbs
>> suggested that goes to a different page like Andrew suggested
>> 3) Replace the GitHub menu item with the "Get Involved" or "Contributing"
>> menu item
>> 4) Add analytics to the nightly build links so we can see how many people
>> click it
>> 5) Add a popup to the link to the nightly build so folks must agree to
>> the disclaimers.
>>
>> I recommend that we just do #1 and move on.  We've got plenty of other
>> things to work on.
>>
>> My 2 cents,
>> -Alex
>>
>> [1]
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8564ab5687c631bd4961bf8b987a5e9d30d6673d5050f72b8a9aaa53@%3Cdev.royale.apache.org%3E
>>
>> On 10/16/19, 7:08 AM, "Josh Tynjala"  wrote:
>>
>> Hopefully a separate public page is allowed. What a ridiculous policy!
>>
>> --
>> Josh Tynjala
>> Bowler Hat LLC <
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowlerhat.devdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc5a1640a5e5c45c5b09708d752424c48%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637068317009834112sdata=KCzYsqmguuSBdHlWZEq7V%2FgPmPMOa2pw9LFaxyZBTEo%3Dreserved=0
>> >
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 6:30 AM Andrew Wetmore 
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Can they have their own dedicated page, wreathed around with
>> cautions and
>> > disclaimers to scare away folks who should not be using them?
>> >
>> > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 9:42 AM Carlos Rovira <
>> carlosrov...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > we get request to remove Nightly builds from download page (see
>&

Re: [Discussion] Where Nightly builds links must be located (we must remove it from download page)

2019-10-16 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi,

thanks all for sharing ideas on how to deal with this issue. For what I
read I like some of them.

We already have a "Get Involved" page (most of the time with forget we have
menu options in the footer bar and top level menu options are only a subset
of what we think "most important" for newcomers).
With that page in mind, I think we have solve the "creation of a new page".
We can use that.

What I see more easy is then is to move the nightly builds section to that
page, so we are done.

Let me know what you think.

Carlos



El mié., 16 oct. 2019 a las 18:38, Alex Harui ()
escribió:

> The principle behind the policy is not ridiculous.  AIUI, it is important
> that the general public only downloads artifacts that the PMC has approved
> as an act of the foundation, otherwise the foundation's ability to provide
> a legal shield for release managers is weakened.
>
> I mostly agree that the way the word "might" in the policy is being
> interpreted is "ridiculous".  I really don't think the general public is
> being encouraged to download our nightly builds the way the current site
> reads.  However, both Justin and I warned about the wording on the download
> page [1] before it went live because we've seen other projects get
> disrupted by similar nitpicking.  AFAICT, the trend at the ASF is to
> continue to be more restrictive about the word "might" and make it harder
> to find links to nightly builds on project websites.  Other projects that
> used to have links or links "below the fold" no longer do when I went
> looking just now.  It won't be worth it to fight it, so let's just plan on
> changing.
>
> I see other projects with separate pages, but there is always a chance
> that someday the word "might" will be restricted even more to include
> separate pages.  I'm not making the changes to the site, so I'll leave it
> up to those who are doing the work to decide.
>
> IMO, with that in mind, when I look at the current site, it is almost
> entirely tuned towards our users.  The only place we invite folks to
> contribute is way down on the landing page.  And the page that takes you to
> is about mailing lists.  I guess you could say that the GitHub link is an
> implied indicator that we're an open source project and that you should
> contribute.
>
> So, here are my ideas.  Feel free to reject them all:
>
> 1) Move the nightly build portion of the download page to a wiki page in
> GitHub.
> 2) Add a "Get Involved" or "Contributing" menu item similar to what Harbs
> suggested that goes to a different page like Andrew suggested
> 3) Replace the GitHub menu item with the "Get Involved" or "Contributing"
> menu item
> 4) Add analytics to the nightly build links so we can see how many people
> click it
> 5) Add a popup to the link to the nightly build so folks must agree to the
> disclaimers.
>
> I recommend that we just do #1 and move on.  We've got plenty of other
> things to work on.
>
> My 2 cents,
> -Alex
>
> [1]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8564ab5687c631bd4961bf8b987a5e9d30d6673d5050f72b8a9aaa53@%3Cdev.royale.apache.org%3E
>
> On 10/16/19, 7:08 AM, "Josh Tynjala"  wrote:
>
> Hopefully a separate public page is allowed. What a ridiculous policy!
>
> --
> Josh Tynjala
> Bowler Hat LLC <
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowlerhat.devdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc5a1640a5e5c45c5b09708d752424c48%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637068317009834112sdata=KCzYsqmguuSBdHlWZEq7V%2FgPmPMOa2pw9LFaxyZBTEo%3Dreserved=0
> >
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 6:30 AM Andrew Wetmore 
> wrote:
>
> > Can they have their own dedicated page, wreathed around with
> cautions and
> > disclaimers to scare away folks who should not be using them?
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 9:42 AM Carlos Rovira <
> carlosrov...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > we get request to remove Nightly builds from download page (see
> issue in
> > > GitHub below).
> > > I open this thread to discuss where is better place for it.
> > >
> > > thanks
> > >
> > >
> > > El mié., 16 oct. 2019 a las 14:26, GitBox ()
> escribió:
> > >
> > > > carlosrovira commented on issue #498: Nightly builds must not be
> > promoted
> > > > on download pages
> > > > URL:
> > > >
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=h

[Discussion] Where Nightly builds links must be located (we must remove it from download page)

2019-10-16 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi,

we get request to remove Nightly builds from download page (see issue in
GitHub below).
I open this thread to discuss where is better place for it.

thanks


El mié., 16 oct. 2019 a las 14:26, GitBox () escribió:

> carlosrovira commented on issue #498: Nightly builds must not be promoted
> on download pages
> URL:
> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/issues/498#issuecomment-542675010
>
>
>I searched to the place in our mailing list that seems to be the source
> of the actual state for nightly on download page:
>
>
> http://apache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com/Need-help-with-CSS-class-selector-font-family-is-always-Arial-tp1418p1485.html
>
>I think If we want to change it we need to discuss in list how we want
> it now
>
>
>
> 
> This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
> To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
> URL above to go to the specific comment.
>
> For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
> us...@infra.apache.org
>
>
> With regards,
> Apache Git Services
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: AMF and RemoteObjects under the ipv6 network

2019-10-15 Thread Carlos Rovira
ok Alex, I'll do for you
thanks

El mar., 15 oct. 2019 a las 18:17, Alex Harui ()
escribió:

> Please go ahead and respond for me.  I haven't really figured out Twitter
> yet.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 10/15/19, 9:05 AM, "Carlos Rovira"  wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
> do you want to respond yourself in the twitter thread? if not I can
> respond
> in your line
> thanks
>
> El mar., 15 oct. 2019 a las 16:30, Alex Harui
> ()
> escribió:
>
> > Someone needs to try it.  I would think the transport would work.
> The
> > next thing I wondered about was specification of destination and
> channels
> > in IPV6.  If the IP is resolved in DNS then it should be abstracted,
> but
> > not sure if we have any code expecting a certain pattern of "." in
> the URL
> > handling in Channel and ChannelSet and related classes.
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 10/15/19, 2:21 AM, "Carlos Rovira" 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > in this twitter thread [1] someone asks :
> >
> > "Anyone tested AMF and RemoteObjects under the ipv6 network?"
> >
> > I think ipv4 or ipv6 should not be a problem like any other REST
> > transfer.
> > We just serialize or deserialize and communications goes over
> > XMLHttpRequest right?
> > so nothing should be a problem here, but want to ask here before
> to
> > confirm
> > what I say
> >
> > Anyway seems people could have problems depending on browser
> providers
> > having some issue or not prepared for ipv6 [2], although if is
> the
> > case, I
> > think is up to them fix
> > Andy XMLHttpRequest issue.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fseddik82%2Fstatus%2F1183763122861105152%3Fs%3D20data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cde3cb67214b848f15c3f08d751899092%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637067523589944045sdata=BTW8e9qcbIg%2F0YyV6Am%2Fv0or1X4D%2BTuOxKnQxVgjuSU%3Dreserved=0
> > [2]
> >
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstackoverflow.com%2Fquestions%2F40611863%2Fipv6-issues-with-ajax-requestsdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cde3cb67214b848f15c3f08d751899092%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637067523589944045sdata=UhRu2FlFUY2iiH2nP58DcQkuZHtq6WQHigV89EcjAV8%3Dreserved=0
> >
> >
> >
> > --
>     > Carlos Rovira
> >
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosroviradata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cde3cb67214b848f15c3f08d751899092%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637067523589944045sdata=%2BIASXzpMAvkhuL7FvFeQIlwxKR4ziZfPoILgcW%2B%2FDIQ%3Dreserved=0
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
>
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosroviradata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cde3cb67214b848f15c3f08d751899092%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637067523589944045sdata=%2BIASXzpMAvkhuL7FvFeQIlwxKR4ziZfPoILgcW%2B%2FDIQ%3Dreserved=0
>
>
>

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: AMF and RemoteObjects under the ipv6 network

2019-10-15 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Alex,
do you want to respond yourself in the twitter thread? if not I can respond
in your line
thanks

El mar., 15 oct. 2019 a las 16:30, Alex Harui ()
escribió:

> Someone needs to try it.  I would think the transport would work.  The
> next thing I wondered about was specification of destination and channels
> in IPV6.  If the IP is resolved in DNS then it should be abstracted, but
> not sure if we have any code expecting a certain pattern of "." in the URL
> handling in Channel and ChannelSet and related classes.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 10/15/19, 2:21 AM, "Carlos Rovira"  wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> in this twitter thread [1] someone asks :
>
> "Anyone tested AMF and RemoteObjects under the ipv6 network?"
>
> I think ipv4 or ipv6 should not be a problem like any other REST
> transfer.
> We just serialize or deserialize and communications goes over
> XMLHttpRequest right?
> so nothing should be a problem here, but want to ask here before to
> confirm
> what I say
>
> Anyway seems people could have problems depending on browser providers
> having some issue or not prepared for ipv6 [2], although if is the
> case, I
> think is up to them fix
> Andy XMLHttpRequest issue.
>
> Thanks
>
> [1]
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fseddik82%2Fstatus%2F1183763122861105152%3Fs%3D20data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Caf4b8359fb4f45b3fed708d751510155%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637067280664222854sdata=D2sqzGnz%2BkAgKJNkEYiM9mfgZoiOUwbkkh8AiSu9rwA%3Dreserved=0
> [2]
>
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstackoverflow.com%2Fquestions%2F40611863%2Fipv6-issues-with-ajax-requestsdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Caf4b8359fb4f45b3fed708d751510155%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637067280664222854sdata=1iAEnaWL0LOSAZG3L%2F5dfgNMG2XsastEKPhkMJy8xpA%3Dreserved=0
>
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
>
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosroviradata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Caf4b8359fb4f45b3fed708d751510155%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637067280664222854sdata=xzFDHWbOdmIEaD0ea7hKediqghvaXsE%2FoWYNCA4bH0E%3Dreserved=0
>
>
>

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: [royale-asjs] branch develop updated: remove toString in EventDispatcher since all seems to work ok know without it. (refers to: #502)

2019-10-15 Thread Carlos Rovira
Thanks Piotr,
I'll take a look

El mar., 15 oct. 2019 a las 16:48, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> It looks like this causes a fail ->
>
> http://apacheroyaleci2.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/33/console
>
> wt., 15 paź 2019 o 12:22  napisał(a):
>
> > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
> >
> > carlosrovira pushed a commit to branch develop
> > in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/royale-asjs.git
> >
> >
> > The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/develop by this push:
> >  new d64f02e  remove toString in EventDispatcher since all seems to
> > work ok know without it. (refers to: #502)
> > d64f02e is described below
> >
> > commit d64f02e7ebcc8c32bbd063cb2cf547510e211e37
> > Author: Carlos Rovira 
> > AuthorDate: Tue Oct 15 12:22:02 2019 +0200
> >
> > remove toString in EventDispatcher since all seems to work ok know
> > without it. (refers to: #502)
> > ---
> >  .../Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/events/EventDispatcher.as | 5
> > -
> >  1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git
> >
> a/frameworks/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/events/EventDispatcher.as
> >
> b/frameworks/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/events/EventDispatcher.as
> > index 466e769..360ed1f 100644
> > ---
> >
> a/frameworks/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/events/EventDispatcher.as
> > +++
> >
> b/frameworks/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/events/EventDispatcher.as
> > @@ -99,10 +99,5 @@ package org.apache.royale.events
> > }
> > return false;
> > }
> > -
> > -public function toString():String
> > -{
> > -return "EventDispatcher";
> > -}
> > }
> >  }
> >
> >
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


AMF and RemoteObjects under the ipv6 network

2019-10-15 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi,

in this twitter thread [1] someone asks :

"Anyone tested AMF and RemoteObjects under the ipv6 network?"

I think ipv4 or ipv6 should not be a problem like any other REST transfer.
We just serialize or deserialize and communications goes over
XMLHttpRequest right?
so nothing should be a problem here, but want to ask here before to confirm
what I say

Anyway seems people could have problems depending on browser providers
having some issue or not prepared for ipv6 [2], although if is the case, I
think is up to them fix
Andy XMLHttpRequest issue.

Thanks

[1] https://twitter.com/seddik82/status/1183763122861105152?s=20
[2]
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/40611863/ipv6-issues-with-ajax-requests



-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: Broken royale-config in JS only build of released Apache Royale SDK 0.9.6

2019-10-14 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Piotr,

about license: My common sense says that you can provide a modified SDK
(since is an Open Source project) but you should state that *it is not* the
official 0.9.6 SDK release, but a modified one provided by Moonshine to fix
an issue. Maybe others could know and say more about this.

Thanks



El lun., 14 oct. 2019 a las 12:39, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> Ok that's can be an idea - It may happen or not - We will see. Currently
> I'm interested really in an answer for the license question.
>
> pon., 14 paź 2019 o 12:34 Carlos Rovira 
> napisał(a):
>
> > Hi Piotr,
> >
> > I think since is a hot fix it starts from 0.9.6 release branch and there
> > you apply the fix to generate a 0.9.6.1.
> > Then when released the hot fix is merged in current develop branch with
> > 0.9.7
> > Or at least is what I suppose it should be
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > El lun., 14 oct. 2019 a las 12:15, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >
> > > Hi Carlos,
> > >
> > > I was talking exactly about hot fix. However it seems to me a bit
> > > difficult, cause we have now in develop version 0.9.7 - I'm not really
> > sure
> > > how maven react if I change it to 0.6.1 ;)
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Piotr
> > >
> > > pon., 14 paź 2019 o 11:13 Carlos Rovira 
> > > napisał(a):
> > >
> > > > Hi Piotr,
> > > >
> > > > other option is to release a hot fix version like 0.9.6.1 if you want
> > to
> > > > release in few days
> > > > what do you think?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > El lun., 14 oct. 2019 a las 9:58, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>)
> > > > escribió:
> > > >
> > > > > Hey Guys,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm willing to try release very soon another version of Royale just
> > > with
> > > > > fix for our issue with broken royale config. If it won't happen
> next
> > > > week I
> > > > > will probably do that next month which will be I think enough to
> have
> > > > > proper release not only with that fix.
> > > > >
> > > > > Anyway my question is a bit different. We are going to release
> > > Moonshine
> > > > > where one of the update is that user will be able download latest
> > > release
> > > > > of Apache Royale sdk trough our SDK Installer helper.
> > > > >
> > > > > We were thinking about fixing manually royale-config and provide
> > fixed
> > > > sdk,
> > > > > but does it break some lincenses if we do that ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Piotr
> > > > >
> > > > > pt., 11 paź 2019 o 19:56 Carlos Rovira 
> > > > > napisał(a):
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Fred,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > many thanks for sharing all this with us. Very useful info there
> :)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Since there's many things, I'll just to comment on few and hope
> > other
> > > > can
> > > > > > talk about others.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I didn't know about that video. I think Angel should report this
> > kind
> > > > of
> > > > > > work here to show to the rest of community. Then we can share in
> > > > > > official social media accounts. I'll do it later. Others in the
> > > > community
> > > > > > are working on videos I think there's at least 1 finished and
> > others
> > > on
> > > > > the
> > > > > > works. Piotr can share more hopefully about that. Hope it come
> > soon!
> > > :)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Current 0.9.6 version delays one year since many work has been
> done
> > > on
> > > > > make
> > > > > > a better release process. We expect to release more often thanks
> to
> > > > that
> > > > > > effort done. Maybe each 2 month will be a good timeframe to do
> it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think people like you is what we need this days. People
> playing,
> > > > > asking,
> > > > > > reporting, and as well helping others like you already did in SOF
> 

Re: Broken royale-config in JS only build of released Apache Royale SDK 0.9.6

2019-10-14 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Piotr,

I think since is a hot fix it starts from 0.9.6 release branch and there
you apply the fix to generate a 0.9.6.1.
Then when released the hot fix is merged in current develop branch with
0.9.7
Or at least is what I suppose it should be




El lun., 14 oct. 2019 a las 12:15, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> Hi Carlos,
>
> I was talking exactly about hot fix. However it seems to me a bit
> difficult, cause we have now in develop version 0.9.7 - I'm not really sure
> how maven react if I change it to 0.6.1 ;)
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> pon., 14 paź 2019 o 11:13 Carlos Rovira 
> napisał(a):
>
> > Hi Piotr,
> >
> > other option is to release a hot fix version like 0.9.6.1 if you want to
> > release in few days
> > what do you think?
> >
> >
> > El lun., 14 oct. 2019 a las 9:58, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>)
> > escribió:
> >
> > > Hey Guys,
> > >
> > > I'm willing to try release very soon another version of Royale just
> with
> > > fix for our issue with broken royale config. If it won't happen next
> > week I
> > > will probably do that next month which will be I think enough to have
> > > proper release not only with that fix.
> > >
> > > Anyway my question is a bit different. We are going to release
> Moonshine
> > > where one of the update is that user will be able download latest
> release
> > > of Apache Royale sdk trough our SDK Installer helper.
> > >
> > > We were thinking about fixing manually royale-config and provide fixed
> > sdk,
> > > but does it break some lincenses if we do that ?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Piotr
> > >
> > > pt., 11 paź 2019 o 19:56 Carlos Rovira 
> > > napisał(a):
> > >
> > > > Hi Fred,
> > > >
> > > > many thanks for sharing all this with us. Very useful info there :)
> > > >
> > > > Since there's many things, I'll just to comment on few and hope other
> > can
> > > > talk about others.
> > > >
> > > > I didn't know about that video. I think Angel should report this kind
> > of
> > > > work here to show to the rest of community. Then we can share in
> > > > official social media accounts. I'll do it later. Others in the
> > community
> > > > are working on videos I think there's at least 1 finished and others
> on
> > > the
> > > > works. Piotr can share more hopefully about that. Hope it come soon!
> :)
> > > >
> > > > Current 0.9.6 version delays one year since many work has been done
> on
> > > make
> > > > a better release process. We expect to release more often thanks to
> > that
> > > > effort done. Maybe each 2 month will be a good timeframe to do it.
> > > >
> > > > I think people like you is what we need this days. People playing,
> > > asking,
> > > > reporting, and as well helping others like you already did in SOF and
> > > other
> > > > channels. In this way we'll be able to make Royale bigger and better.
> > > This
> > > > is what make Open Source great that we can make it better thanks to
> all
> > > of
> > > > us.
> > > >
> > > > Last point. I think you have now the current knowledge to build from
> > > > scratch with repos. I can give you support if you want.
> > > > In that way you'll be able to develop the SDK if you want and submit
> > more
> > > > PRs. Eventually, you can be a committer and part of the team if you
> > show
> > > > things like motivation, knowledge on code base, activity,...
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >
> > > > Carlos
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > El jue., 10 oct. 2019 a las 23:06, 
> escribió:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Guys,
> > > > >
> > > > > I would share my experience and feelings as a new and fresh user on
> > > > > Apache Royale, hope it will help...
> > > > >
> > > > > The background :
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm a Flex developper since about 10 years. I love it because for
> me
> > > > > it's (was...for flashplayer) the fastest way to do something that
> > would
> > > > > have same render on all browser. Also no lost time on script config
> > or
>

Re: Broken royale-config in JS only build of released Apache Royale SDK 0.9.6

2019-10-14 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Piotr,

other option is to release a hot fix version like 0.9.6.1 if you want to
release in few days
what do you think?


El lun., 14 oct. 2019 a las 9:58, Piotr Zarzycki ()
escribió:

> Hey Guys,
>
> I'm willing to try release very soon another version of Royale just with
> fix for our issue with broken royale config. If it won't happen next week I
> will probably do that next month which will be I think enough to have
> proper release not only with that fix.
>
> Anyway my question is a bit different. We are going to release Moonshine
> where one of the update is that user will be able download latest release
> of Apache Royale sdk trough our SDK Installer helper.
>
> We were thinking about fixing manually royale-config and provide fixed sdk,
> but does it break some lincenses if we do that ?
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> pt., 11 paź 2019 o 19:56 Carlos Rovira 
> napisał(a):
>
> > Hi Fred,
> >
> > many thanks for sharing all this with us. Very useful info there :)
> >
> > Since there's many things, I'll just to comment on few and hope other can
> > talk about others.
> >
> > I didn't know about that video. I think Angel should report this kind of
> > work here to show to the rest of community. Then we can share in
> > official social media accounts. I'll do it later. Others in the community
> > are working on videos I think there's at least 1 finished and others on
> the
> > works. Piotr can share more hopefully about that. Hope it come soon! :)
> >
> > Current 0.9.6 version delays one year since many work has been done on
> make
> > a better release process. We expect to release more often thanks to that
> > effort done. Maybe each 2 month will be a good timeframe to do it.
> >
> > I think people like you is what we need this days. People playing,
> asking,
> > reporting, and as well helping others like you already did in SOF and
> other
> > channels. In this way we'll be able to make Royale bigger and better.
> This
> > is what make Open Source great that we can make it better thanks to all
> of
> > us.
> >
> > Last point. I think you have now the current knowledge to build from
> > scratch with repos. I can give you support if you want.
> > In that way you'll be able to develop the SDK if you want and submit more
> > PRs. Eventually, you can be a committer and part of the team if you show
> > things like motivation, knowledge on code base, activity,...
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Carlos
> >
> >
> >
> > El jue., 10 oct. 2019 a las 23:06,  escribió:
> >
> > > Hi Guys,
> > >
> > > I would share my experience and feelings as a new and fresh user on
> > > Apache Royale, hope it will help...
> > >
> > > The background :
> > >
> > > I'm a Flex developper since about 10 years. I love it because for me
> > > it's (was...for flashplayer) the fastest way to do something that would
> > > have same render on all browser. Also no lost time on script config or
> > > something else, just launch FlexBuilder set sdk main folder path and
> > > play with it, no headaches ...a real dream for a dev guy. At beginning
> I
> > > learned Flex essentialy with "TourDeFlex" and "Component style
> > > explorer", and after with somes blogs and articles dealing with
> > > componant life cycle and other interessing stuff
> > >
> > > All my customer are happy because of the short time of devs. When Adobe
> > > announce end of life of flashplayer plugin in browser, solutions like
> > > Angular, React, etc, seems to me and other devs guys from my
> sourronding
> > > a back to the past. I play a little with these frameworks but for me
> > > it's not the solution : you need to know bootstrap, css, html,
> > > javascript,etc..., this is a real nightmare... and dev time would be
> > > multiply by 2 or 3 on projects even small or big ones. So we move ours
> > > app to Air for those which doesn't need the browser use.
> > >
> > > Discover of Royale:
> > >
> > > I discover Royale because of search for alternate solutions to quick
> > > make browser applications. As I remember, when I meet Michael Chaize 6
> > > or 7 years ago at Montpellier (France), he tells that FalconJS will be
> > > the futur to output Flex content to Javascript. Unfortunaly I thought
> it
> > > was death because the lack of communication on it. Now I reborn using
> > > Royale, play with it since 2 weeks when I have some time to learn more.
> > > For 

Re: Nightly Build Server going offline

2019-10-12 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi,

sorry if I missed something. I could not follow this days due to much work
overhead.
It's not clear to me if we want to wait, or I should update links on
website. If I must do any intervention, please let me know what links and
the new public links
I can do this change this week-end
thanks


El jue., 10 oct. 2019 a las 18:43, Alex Harui ()
escribió:

> I changed the Global Security.  See if you can access the nightly
> artifacts without logging in.
>
> If we want to wait more, I will ask Azure if we can get the old URL back.
> Not sure how long that will take though.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 10/10/19, 5:50 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:
>
> Ok I will, but first they need to be accessible outside ;) Not only for
> commiters.
>
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019, 2:35 PM Carlos Rovira 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I don't know if finally is better to change links on website. If so,
> > please, let me know what links I must substitute and the new links
> to avoid
> > confusion.
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > El jue., 10 oct. 2019 a las 10:12, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >
> > > How can we expose Nightly build from new server outside ? Now if I
> would
> > > like to send links it requires from me login.
> > >
> > > śr., 9 paź 2019 o 20:08 Alex Harui 
> > napisał(a):
> > >
> > > > OK, I will switch the service to use the ApacheRoyaleCI account
> and see
> > > > what happens.
> > > >
> > > > -ALex
> > > >
> > > > On 10/9/19, 9:12 AM, "Josh Tynjala" 
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Well, the build made it a bit further after I set the
> default app
> > for
> > > > .swf
> > > > files. However, it seems that Flash Player is not picking up
> the
> > > trust
> > > > file
> > > > that the RoyaleUnit Ant Task is creating. Based on the
> console log,
> > > the
> > > > Jenkins job seems to be creating it here:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> C:\windows\system32\config\systemprofile\AppData\Roaming\Macromedia\Flash
> > > > Player\#Security\FlashPlayerTrust\royaleUnit.cfg
> > > >
> > > > Looking at Jenkins emails from the old server, it used to be
> in the
> > > > user
> > > > folder instead
> > > >
> > > > C:\Users\apacheroyale\AppData\Roaming\Macromedia\Flash
> > > > Player\#Security\FlashPlayerTrust\royaleUnit.cfg
> > > >
> > > > I guess that would be C:\Users\ApacheRoyaleCI\ on the new
> server.
> > It
> > > > looks
> > > > like royaleUnit.cfg exists in the user folder too, but I'm
> guessing
> > > > that's
> > > > from when I ran the tests manually. So maybe that's an
> interesting
> > > > clue? Is
> > > > the Jenkins job running as the ApacheRoyaleCI user, or could
> it be
> > a
> > > > different user account that can't access
> C:\Users\ApacheRoyaleCI\?
> > I
> > > > don't
> > > > really know Jenkins, so I'm just throwing out ideas here.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Josh Tynjala
> > > > Bowler Hat LLC <
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowlerhat.devdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5a1a7c82711d4c71f0f308d74d805e7d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637063086073928118sdata=4UqlPSfuE9UFxlhIfRuHcMHMInrOB7ESAG0UfTbe2A4%3Dreserved=0
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 8:21 AM Josh Tynjala <
> > > joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev
> > > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I logged into the server and discovered that js-swf build
> was
> > > failing
> > > > > because there was no default program for .swf files. I set
> the
> > > > > flashplayerdebugger.exe that you downloaded as the
> default, and I
> > > > was able
> > > > > to successfully run

Re: Broken royale-config in JS only build of released Apache Royale SDK 0.9.6

2019-10-11 Thread Carlos Rovira
ents seems to be here (I just
> have difficult with scrollable Datagrid that I didn't succes to use and
> I didn't try performance with big number of lines like 6000 lines). I
> don't think I loose my time learning Royale because mains contributors
> like you guys take care about questions from other users and efforts to
> do your best,
>
> - Will I tell around me to use Royale  ?
>
> Yes ! as soon I will show them what I have done with
>
> My others feelings, issues and thinkings:
>
> - Royale seems to me easy to use after do a first try and understanding
> the difference between all library (js, j, mx, etc...), and concept like
> beads. I like to be able to compile without have to make big change in
> config files and without spend my time on setting paths config. I don't
> really know what's happen when I clic on debug button and I don't really
> want to know except if it's necessary. I discover that using browser
> tools while debuging is a quick way to lookup css style in code.
>
> - sometimes I don't know where to put beads (beads dealing with
> databindings or css does it global scope or not ...)
>
> - I see some reading on "reflection" (when using mx I beleve) but I
> don't really know what is it and if i's important or not
>
> - sometimes I do a mix of j(jewel) and js(basic) in mxml but I don't
> know if it's a good practice or not. It seems it's working except for
> layouts
>
> - It isn't clear for me why there are 2 versions of SDK. One To create
> JavaScript applications only and the other (JavaScript + Flash) . Why
> need to create Flash application as we can't use it after 2020 ? Does it
> because the possibility to make Air apps ? Or the possibility to use a
> swc as a library in javascript ? I will dig this later...
>
> - I don't know how components lifecycle are working to try to optimize
> my code
>
> - are all the views created on startup ? (defered content, etc)
>
> - as the javascript seems to start before connect to debugger, it's
> difficult to know what happens on a starting app. I suppose there is a
> trick to wait for the debbuger connect and go on
>
> - my feeling is that Royale is ready to use in product environnement and
> I hope to see soon v1.0.0
>
> - for new user I think a 10 mins video showing from scratch to do an
> helloword with some IDE (Moonshine, vscode, etc) would be great (1 video
> by IDE) and facilitate the first step
>
> - I would prefer to have a new version of sdk every 2 months instead of
> one every year with more content, for 2 reasons : first it should be
> quick to adapt old code because not a lot of changed between versions
> and I don't need to wait a long time for a sdk bug fix
>
> - I like++ "exemple" folder in SDK this is a real source of knowledge on
> how to use Royale
>
> - I would like to be able to build sdk on a simple clic to help you and
> participate to fix obvious bug, but it seems to me not to be
> straightforward (perhaps later), so I do a PR code only on easy things,
> and prefer to bring you smallest tests cases of issues I found.
>
> One last word : I would like the existance of Royale to be more know, I
> wish to Royale become more and more used by people, thanks to you guys
> for all your hard work and please continue this way this is the road of
> success
>
>  Fred
>
> Le 10.10.2019 09:51, Harbs a écrit :
>
> > Hearing from new users what the roadblocks are, is very useful. To me,
> Royale feels very plug and play, but I know it well. It's hard to see the
> roadblocks to new users when you have been involved for a long time.
> >
> > Thinking back to the days I was learning Flex, I think it was easy to
> learn it because:
> > 1. Flex Builder (or Flash Builder -- depending when you started with it)
> was fully integrated. The new project wizards were very helpful.
> > 2. Flex in a Week was very useful to me to learn the concepts. I
> remember going through Flex in a Week while I was in the hospital with a
> relative many years ago...
> > 3. There were lots of blog posts and example code for many common use
> cases.
> >
> > What do you think the most important point are for us to make Royale
> more accessible?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Harbs



-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: Nightly Build Server going offline

2019-10-10 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi,

I don't know if finally is better to change links on website. If so,
please, let me know what links I must substitute and the new links to avoid
confusion.
Thanks


El jue., 10 oct. 2019 a las 10:12, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> How can we expose Nightly build from new server outside ? Now if I would
> like to send links it requires from me login.
>
> śr., 9 paź 2019 o 20:08 Alex Harui  napisał(a):
>
> > OK, I will switch the service to use the ApacheRoyaleCI account and see
> > what happens.
> >
> > -ALex
> >
> > On 10/9/19, 9:12 AM, "Josh Tynjala"  wrote:
> >
> > Well, the build made it a bit further after I set the default app for
> > .swf
> > files. However, it seems that Flash Player is not picking up the
> trust
> > file
> > that the RoyaleUnit Ant Task is creating. Based on the console log,
> the
> > Jenkins job seems to be creating it here:
> >
> >
> > C:\windows\system32\config\systemprofile\AppData\Roaming\Macromedia\Flash
> > Player\#Security\FlashPlayerTrust\royaleUnit.cfg
> >
> > Looking at Jenkins emails from the old server, it used to be in the
> > user
> > folder instead
> >
> > C:\Users\apacheroyale\AppData\Roaming\Macromedia\Flash
> > Player\#Security\FlashPlayerTrust\royaleUnit.cfg
> >
> > I guess that would be C:\Users\ApacheRoyaleCI\ on the new server. It
> > looks
> > like royaleUnit.cfg exists in the user folder too, but I'm guessing
> > that's
> > from when I ran the tests manually. So maybe that's an interesting
> > clue? Is
> > the Jenkins job running as the ApacheRoyaleCI user, or could it be a
> > different user account that can't access C:\Users\ApacheRoyaleCI\? I
> > don't
> > really know Jenkins, so I'm just throwing out ideas here.
> >
> > --
> > Josh Tynjala
> > Bowler Hat LLC <
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowlerhat.devdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca0a8b694fff24a69908b08d74cd380a7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637062343589197901sdata=CiqWmbjN8zckdXSyDfY8GlI9dA7dr6YuGwxgxGVzRzo%3Dreserved=0
> > >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 8:21 AM Josh Tynjala <
> joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I logged into the server and discovered that js-swf build was
> failing
> > > because there was no default program for .swf files. I set the
> > > flashplayerdebugger.exe that you downloaded as the default, and I
> > was able
> > > to successfully run the tests in a PowerShell window. I started a
> > new build
> > > in Jenkins, so we should hopefully see how it goes in a few
> minutes.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Josh Tynjala
> > > Bowler Hat LLC <
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowlerhat.devdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca0a8b694fff24a69908b08d74cd380a7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637062343589197901sdata=CiqWmbjN8zckdXSyDfY8GlI9dA7dr6YuGwxgxGVzRzo%3Dreserved=0
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 8:08 AM Alex Harui  >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> I sent an email to private@ with the new credentials and URL.  I
> > don't
> > >> know how to get the old URL back at this point in time.  The
> JSOnly
> > build
> > >> succeeded.  I'm trying to get the JS-SWF build to succeed.
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci2.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca0a8b694fff24a69908b08d74cd380a7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637062343589207904sdata=Syw8dIiAfta0WLwjYLZNc0VAuTlx%2BQQTunbzq7fNko4%3Dreserved=0
> > >>
> > >> We should update all links to use the new URL.  Having someone
> else
> > do
> > >> what would be appreciated.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> -Alex
> > >>
> > >> On 10/9/19, 6:23 AM, "Carlos Rovira" 
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hope Alex can let us know what he thinks about timing
> > >> We can do a quick change directly in production if needed and
> > then
> > >> revert
> > >> when needed to not mesh with pre for something punctual...
>

Re: Broken royale-config in JS only build of released Apache Royale SDK 0.9.6

2019-10-10 Thread Carlos Rovira
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > It looks like the Ant target that updates the library-path for
> > > the
> > > >> > > JS-only
> > > >> > > build is called tweak-for-jsonly. Copied here for convenience:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2Fasn0idata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C972794372a8a4037148008d74cd72cc9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637062359364655836sdata=7h3ZHxgGsfZqP8kE22amKQYDr7%2BNyQa7EpoG86147uU%3Dreserved=0
>
> >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > I see that it has unless="env.AIR_HOME", which means that this
> > > >> target
> > > >> > > is
> > > >> > > skipped if the AIR_HOME environment variable is set. With that
> > > in
> > > >> > > mind, I'm
> > > >> > > guessing that AIR_HOME needs to be set for the js-swf build,
> but
> > > >> > > cleared
> > > >> > > for the js-only build.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > --
> > > >> > > Josh Tynjala
> > > >> > > Bowler Hat LLC <
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowlerhat.devdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C972794372a8a4037148008d74cd72cc9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637062359364655836sdata=Ih2P7zf2c%2BLPn5ktks02EE7k6s24RKcabVem7VqjWeg%3Dreserved=0
>
> >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 6:52 AM Piotr Zarzycki <
> > > >> > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> > > >> > > wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > Hi Guys,
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > It looks like we have broken royale-config in released SDK.
> > > >> Andrew
> > > >> > > raised
> > > >> > > > in Moonshine GitHub issue that he couldn't build Hello World
> > > >> > > project. I
> > > >> > > > tried Moonshine and downloaded JS-only version of SDK. I get
> > > >> > > following
> > > >> > > > error [1].
> > > >> > > > I downloaded JS-SWF version and tried compile project again
> -
> > > >> this
> > > >> > > time it
> > > >> > > > went fine.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > JS-only version of released 0.9.6 contains in section
> > > >> > >  -
> > > >> > > > list of swc. - Those swc doesn't exists in JS-only.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Fragment of config
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > > 
> > > >> > > > > libs/Basic.swc
> > > >> > > > > libs/Binding.swc
> > > >> > > > > libs/Charts.swc
> > > >> > > > > libs/Collections.swc
> > > >> > > > > libs/Core.swc
> > > >> > > > > 
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > JS-only nightly build of 0.9.7 - doesn't contains in that
> > > >> section
> > > >> > > anything
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > > 
> > > >> > > > > 
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > [1]
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2F2lgvkdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C972794372a8a4037148008d74cd72cc9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637062359364655836sdata=IebVohnQGkmg%2BAO2RJCS2LRTdP3LQE0NoQ%2BUt7xlOJI%3Dreserved=0
>
> >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Thanks,
> > > >> > > > --
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Patreon: *
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C972794372a8a4037148008d74cd72cc9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637062359364655836sdata=BmbfQaY1AjgUQk61TOlDZqRi1jWSJWDFaxgzaFiw1c4%3Dreserved=0
>
> >
> > > >> > > > <
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C972794372a8a4037148008d74cd72cc9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637062359364655836sdata=BmbfQaY1AjgUQk61TOlDZqRi1jWSJWDFaxgzaFiw1c4%3Dreserved=0
>
> >
> > > >> > > >*
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > --
> > > >> > Andrew Wetmore
> > > >> >
> > > >> > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > <
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=webmail
>
> >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > Virus-free.
> > > >> > www.avast.com
> > > >> > <
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=webmail
>
> >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Andrew Wetmore
> > > >
> > > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > <
> > >
> >
> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=webmail>
>
> >
> > > Virus-free.
> > > > www.avast.com
> > > > <
> > >
> >
> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=webmail
>
> >
> > > >
> > > > <#m_-3106823410389824051_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Andrew Wetmore
> >
> > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > <
> >
> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=webmail>
>
> >
> > Virus-free.
> > www.avast.com
> > <
> >
> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=webmail>
>
> >
> > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
> >
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-10-10 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi,

yes, I already did some days ago an uploaded to website
If you search for some new class (like jewel SimpleButton) it appears now.



El jue., 10 oct. 2019 a las 11:49, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> Hi Carlos,
>
> Did you make an update API doc ? ->
> https://royale.apache.org/asdoc/index.html
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> pon., 7 paź 2019 o 19:38 Carlos Rovira 
> napisał(a):
>
> > Hi Piotr,
> > yes, I'll do in next few hours.
> > thanks.
> >
> > El lun., 7 oct. 2019 a las 9:54, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>)
> > escribió:
> >
> > > Hi Carlos,
> > >
> > > Will you be able update website with links for 0.9.6 release ?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Piotr
> > >
> > > niedz., 6 paź 2019 o 10:52 Piotr Zarzycki 
> > > napisał(a):
> > >
> > > > Hi Alex,
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for the fix. Everything worked fine this time.
> > > >
> > > > Piotr
> > > >
> > > > sob., 5 paź 2019 o 01:51 Alex Harui 
> > > napisał(a):
> > > >
> > > >> I found some time to try the releasecandidate.xml and found the
> > problem.
> > > >> I pushed the fix to release/0.9.6.  So try that and see what
> happens.
> > > >> It seemed to do the right thing for me on my Windows computer.
> > > >>
> > > >> You will next likely run into several merge conflicts.  I have not
> > > looked
> > > >> into the conflicts, but there is a good chance that some of that is
> > due
> > > to
> > > >> the cherry-picking.  I am going to start a separate thread about
> > branch
> > > >> management.
> > > >>
> > > >> -Alex
> > > >>
> > > >> On 10/4/19, 10:55 AM, "Alex Harui" 
> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> If we don't fix the release scripts, then the next RM is
> probably
> > > >> going to run into the same problem.  The time we spend now helps
> save
> > > time
> > > >> in the future.  It is wise to improve the process now in case I get
> > run
> > > >> over by a bus tomorrow.  If you do it manually and make a mistake,
> we
> > > might
> > > >> not catch it until later or cause more problems.
> > > >>
> > > >> IIRC, the Poms should not require changing.  Maven should have
> > done
> > > >> that already.
> > > >>
> > > >> All the places I know of changing are in the script.
> > > >>
> > > >> -Alex
> > > >>
> > > >> On 10/4/19, 10:46 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Alex,
> > > >>
> > > >> Can I just do that changes manually on release branch and
> > merge
> > > >> stuff to
> > > >> develop?
> > > >>
> > > >> I just don't won't to spend any more minute on release
> process
> > > >> anymore.
> > > >>
> > > >> 1) I should change build properties
> > > >> 2) I should change all poms
> > > >>
> > > >> Is there anymore place which I should know to change?
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >> Piotr
> > > >>
> > > >> On Fri, Oct 4, 2019, 7:41 PM Alex Harui
> > > 
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Piotr,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Again, I am asking you to get in the mindset of a
> developer
> > > and
> > > >> not just a
> > > >> > user.  You can see that the Ant script is making some
> > updates.
> > > >> You can
> > > >> > verify that the release branch does not have 0.9.7 for the
> > > >> release.version
> > > >> > in build.properties.  You can see there is 1 commit
> pending
> > in
> > > >> > royale-asjs.  You can see that the build.properties did
> get
> > > >> changed to have
> > > >> > release.version=0.9.7.
> > &

Re: CI emails

2019-10-10 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Alex,

if Commiters need are the target, maybe better to use the list for that

comm...@royale.apache.org 

thoughts?




El mié., 9 oct. 2019 a las 19:50, Alex Harui ()
escribió:

> IOM, we need the committers to see these in order to fix broken builds.
> You might be better off filtering out email from apacheroyal...@gmail.com
>
> HTH,
> -Alex
>
> On 10/9/19, 1:11 AM, "Chris Velevitch"  wrote:
>
> I'd like to suggest a new mailing list be created for all the CI and
> other build related emails. I'm suggesting this to keep the dev
> mailing clean from these automated emails.
>
> --
>
>
> Chris
>     --
>     Chris Velevitch
> m: 0415 469 095
>
>
>

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: maven fails on build royale-asjs 0.9.7-SNAPSHOT

2019-10-09 Thread Carlos Rovira
Many thanks Greg,

your change worked for me and I can rely on it in the meanwhile.

Thanks! :)

El mar., 8 oct. 2019 a las 21:11, Greg Dove ()
escribió:

> Carlos, you need:
>
> mvn clean install -Pmain,generate-swcs-for-swf -Dgenerate.swf.swcs=true
>
> But I think that could be avoided. I hope to check today with empty maven
> repo
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 8:00 AM Carlos Rovira 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > just trying to build as usual, but now with new 0.9.7-SNAPSHOT
> > when reach royale-asjs try to build with:
> >
> > mvn clean install -Pgenerate-swcs-for-swf,main -DskipTests
> >
> > and getting this error:
> >
> > https://paste.apache.org/kt8wi
> >
> > Maybe I miss some latest change?
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: Nightly Build Server going offline

2019-10-09 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hope Alex can let us know what he thinks about timing
We can do a quick change directly in production if needed and then revert
when needed to not mesh with pre for something punctual...

El mié., 9 oct. 2019 a las 9:50, Piotr Zarzycki ()
escribió:

> Hi,
>
> If we are going to stay for a longer time with nightly build offline we
> should also update link to nightly build on our website. If it's only for
> couple of days no problem.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> wt., 8 paź 2019 o 20:04 Carlos Rovira 
> napisał(a):
>
> > 爛
> >
> > :)
> >
> > El mar., 8 oct. 2019 a las 18:12, Alex Harui ( >)
> > escribió:
> >
> > > I am definitely planning to start rebuilding the server today.  Keep
> your
> > > fingers crossed.
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 10/7/19, 8:47 AM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:
> > >
> > > I think the merge happened, so I am going to try to do the rebuild
> > > this week, probably on my Tuesday if I can finish up some fixes to
> > > releasecandidate.xml needed for Windows today.
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 10/7/19, 12:39 AM, "Carlos Rovira" 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > don't think a day be a problem. When can better warn in social
> > > networks
> > > about that 24h unavailability.
> > > Other option is to store in pre web server (
> > Royale.codeoscopic.com).
> > > You
> > > have credentials and can upload to Wordpress and then we can
> > share
> > > that
> > > link.
> > > Whatever option could be fine, but for a day, I don't think we
> > > should
> > > invest much time.
> > >
> > > thanks!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > El dom., 6 oct. 2019 a las 9:28, Harbs ( >)
> > > escribió:
> > >
> > > > Seems fine to me.
> > > >
> > > > > On Oct 6, 2019, at 1:33 AM, Alex Harui
> > >  wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I was only thinking about temporary distribution of the
> > > nightly build
> > > > while the CI server is offline.  I'm not sure it makes sense
> to
> > > always copy
> > > > the nightly build somewhere else.  I think the bandwidth
> would
> > > add up.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm mainly asking if anyone thinks it would be a problem if
> > > the nightly
> > > > builds were unavailable for a day (hopefully only a day).
> > > > >
> > > > > -Alex
> > > > >
> > > > > On 10/5/19, 6:41 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <
> > carlosrov...@apache.org
> > >  > > > carlosrov...@apache.org>> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >Hi Alex,
> > > > >
> > > > >you're talking about just storing nightly builds? what
> > > about using
> > > > some
> > > > >free storage out there, like a google drive, dropbox, or
> > > other
> > > > service like
> > > > >this. We can create an "apacheroyale" account and share
> > > credentials in
> > > > >private.
> > > > >
> > > > >El sáb., 5 oct. 2019 a las 2:18, Alex Harui
> > > ( > > > >)
> > > > >escribió:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Hi,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> To prove that we can rebuild our nightly build server (so
> > > that someone
> > > > >> else can host a build server someday and to prove we know
> > > what our
> > > > >> dependencies are), I'm going to try to rebuild it once the
> > > release
> > > > branch
> > > > >> is merged into develop.  Could just take a day if I've
> saved
> > > a record of
> > > > >> everything we need.  Or not...
> > > > >>
> > >     > >> There will be other emails when I finally shut it down to
> > try
> > > it.  If
> > > > >> some

Re: How to skin components

2019-10-09 Thread Carlos Rovira
Thanks for consider it Chris,

about you question, I saw it responded in other of your thread by Alex.

Thanks



El mié., 9 oct. 2019 a las 9:57, Chris Velevitch ()
escribió:

> My apologies. I'll be more thoughtful and considerate in the future.
>
> On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 at 23:32, Carlos Rovira 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Chris,
> > before going far beyond, I want that you consider the way you are
> referring
> > to the concepts you don't share. Talk about that as "silly" seems not
> very
> > appropriate.
> > We try to respect as much as possible, the work and proposals from
> others.
> > You can disagree, but please maintain a level of respect since that way
> > will make others not want to enter the conversation.
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > El mar., 8 oct. 2019 a las 9:47, Chris Velevitch (<
> chris.velevi...@gmail.com>)
> > escribió:
> >
> > > When I was going through the documentation and code to get my head
> > > around this silly notation of "beads" and "strands", I realised the
> > > component plugins are very similar to the concept of skinning
> > > components that Adobe Flex talks about. And there doesn't seem to be
> > > any discussions on how to skin a component.
> > >
> > > I also noticed, there's no discussion on how plugins and components
> > > talk to each other and whether that is bidirectional or one-way.
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> Chris
> --
> Chris Velevitch
> m: 0415 469 095
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: Release 0.9.6 Announce for web post?

2019-10-09 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Piotr,
ok, I'm waiting for your announcement
thanks

El mar., 8 oct. 2019 a las 21:49, Piotr Zarzycki ()
escribió:

> Let me make announce. I will do that tomorrow morning. :)
>
> You can next post social media.
>
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019, 8:24 PM Carlos Rovira 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > website is updated.
> > @Piotr Zarzycki   do you want to share 0.9.6
> > in social media? or wait for announcement?
> >
> > thanks
> >
> >
> > El mar., 8 oct. 2019 a las 20:03, Carlos Rovira (<
> carlosrov...@apache.org>)
> > escribió:
> >
> >> Hi Andrew,
> >>
> >> if you don't mind I take into account for next release, since I'm this
> >> days a bit out of time.
> >> Thanks for taking the review. I'll try to publish now
> >>
> >> Carlos
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> El mar., 8 oct. 2019 a las 18:57, Andrew Wetmore ( >)
> >> escribió:
> >>
> >>> I have edited the release. The only thing I would improve, if I could,
> is
> >>> the graphic at the top. The release number appears as "v0.9.6". I am
> >>> pretty
> >>> sure it would be better as "v. 0.9.6", but this is obviously not
> >>> something
> >>> to delay the release for.
> >>>
> >>> Andrew
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 11:56 AM Andrew Wetmore 
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Got it! Thanks!
> >>> >
> >>> > On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 10:49 AM Carlos Rovira <
> carlosrov...@apache.org
> >>> >
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >> Yes! that's it :)
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> El mar., 8 oct. 2019 a las 16:31, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> >>> >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>)
> >>> >> escribió:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> > I think that would be the link:
> >>> >> > https://royale.codeoscopic.com/apache-royale-v0-9-6-released/
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > wt., 8 paź 2019 o 16:29 Andrew Wetmore 
> >>> >> napisał(a):
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > > @Carlos Rovira  where is the draft
> >>> post? I
> >>> >> had
> >>> >> > a
> >>> >> > > hard disk failure this past weekend and am slowly rebuilding my
> >>> >> system.
> >>> >> > > Have to find all my links again.
> >>> >> > >
> >>> >> > > a
> >>> >> > >
> >>> >> > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 9:48 AM Andrew Wetmore <
> >>> cottag...@gmail.com>
> >>> >> > wrote:
> >>> >> > >
> >>> >> > > > I can do this in a couple of hours
> >>> >> > > >
> >>> >> > > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2019, 9:24 AM Carlos Rovira, <
> >>> >> carlosrov...@apache.org>
> >>> >> > > > wrote:
> >>> >> > > >
> >>> >> > > >> Hi Piotr,
> >>> >> > > >>
> >>> >> > > >> I'll wait Andrew's review and then will publish it. If Andrew
> >>> make
> >>> >> his
> >>> >> > > >> changes this afternoon, I can follow up and publish it.
> >>> >> > > >> Then we can post on social networks next or wait to tomorrow
> >>> >> > > >>
> >>> >> > > >>
> >>> >> > > >>
> >>> >> > > >> El mar., 8 oct. 2019 a las 11:21, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> >>> >> > > >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>)
> >>> >> > > >> escribió:
> >>> >> > > >>
> >>> >> > > >> > Just to make sure that you understand why I asked you to
> post
> >>> >> > download
> >>> >> > > >> > links on website along with source code.
> >>> >> > > >> >
> >>> >> > > >> > I will announce on dev, users and announce list - someone
> who
> >>> >> read
> >>> >> > > >> email -
> >>> >> > > >> > wi

maven fails on build royale-asjs 0.9.7-SNAPSHOT

2019-10-08 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi,

just trying to build as usual, but now with new 0.9.7-SNAPSHOT
when reach royale-asjs try to build with:

mvn clean install -Pgenerate-swcs-for-swf,main -DskipTests

and getting this error:

https://paste.apache.org/kt8wi

Maybe I miss some latest change?

thanks

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: Acceptance of Royale by Flex Developers

2019-10-08 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi

I think we could remove one level or even two.

Have at first level

MIGRATE AN EXISTING APPLICATION  (instead of inside CREATE AN APPLICATION
<https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/create-an-application/create-an-application>
 )

then MIGRATE FROM FLEX
<https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/create-an-application/create-an-application/migrate-an-existing-app/migrate-from-flex.html>
 (nested)

And inside this we can add other entries to help that migration.


We still don't have anything about MX / SPARK emulation components in docs,
so more info should be added if we want to make it people use it.

just my 2

Carlos




El mar., 8 oct. 2019 a las 19:00, Andrew Wetmore ()
escribió:

> Really good suggestions, @Alex Harui  . I could add text
> and links to the "migrating" page based on what you outlined. I can get
> that done sometime this week, but am not going to jump on it today in case
> the conversation continues and an enhanced idea bubbles up.
>
> Andrew
>
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 12:48 PM Alex Harui 
> wrote:
>
> > I'm going to try to address all of Chris Velevitch's several threads from
> > today in this response.
> >
> > We have a page on Migrating Flex Apps here:
> >
> https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/create-an-application/migrate-an-existing-app/migrate-from-flex.html
> > But it is hard to find (took me several clicks to find it).  And it
> > doesn't address the questions that I think Chris is asking, which are:
> >
> > -Which component sets should I use?
> > -After I choose a component set, how do I figure out how something that
> > worked in Flex works in that component set?
> >
> > We've offered Chris the opportunity to help with the doc, which would be
> > great, but I'd settle for having Chris and others simply add the kinds of
> > questions they have so we can add them to our FAQ and/or the docs.
> >
> > We may need to make it easier for Chris and others to decide on component
> > sets first.  The way I think of it now, the trade offs are:
> > A) I need the result to be as small and fast as possible and have time to
> > rewrite the UI -> Use Basic and Strands and Beads
> > B) I want to rewrite the UI to get a more modern look-and-feel -> Use
> Jewel
> > C) I want to touch as little code as possible -> Use MXRoyale and
> > SparkRoyale.
> >
> > If you choose C, you should not have to know anything about Strands and
> > Beads.  MXRoyale and SparkRoyale should hide that from you.  Skinning
> > should work like it used to.  Your app will not be as small and fast as
> if
> > you spend more time rewriting it to Basic or Jewel, but TourDeFlex seems
> to
> > be running ok.  As Alina and Pashmina finish up, we'll see how a really
> big
> > Flex migration performs in Royale.
> >
> > It has taken them longer than expected, but for every bug or missing
> > feature that is emulated correctly, the time to migrate for the next
> person
> > goes down.  And as 2019 becomes 2020, there will be less time to migrate
> > for some folks, so having more people on the emulation helps everyone
> else.
> >
> > So, we should figure out where to place information like this so Chris
> and
> > others find it more easily.  Once a component set/migration strategy is
> > chosen, it focuses a lot of other questions, such as how to do skinning,
> or
> > how much about Strands and Beads you have to know.  In fact, it would be
> > great to find a place to recommend to folks that when they write to us
> with
> > questions that they specify which component set(s) they are using because
> > the answer can be quite different based on the component sets involved.
> >
> > Suggestions from Chris and others as to how to make this information more
> > accessible are encouraged.
> >
> > My 2 cents,
> > -Alex
> >
> >
> > On 10/8/19, 8:18 AM, "Carlos Rovira"  wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I mean that like RO, that's a non visual component used to perform
> > communications, we have other "components" or "code" that can be
> > implemented as beads or strands.
> > The concept behind is that Royale have the minimum code needed for
> > functionality, and compose other parts (whatever the purpose of the
> > code
> > could be). So while UI Components use to refer to code that are
> visual
> > and
> > use to be a Button, a List or a Checkbox, strands are more agonistic
> > about
> > that particular use case, so seems, IMHO a better way to describe it
> > from
> > that point of v

Re: Release 0.9.6 Announce for web post?

2019-10-08 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi

website is updated.
@Piotr Zarzycki   do you want to share 0.9.6 in
social media? or wait for announcement?

thanks


El mar., 8 oct. 2019 a las 20:03, Carlos Rovira ()
escribió:

> Hi Andrew,
>
> if you don't mind I take into account for next release, since I'm this
> days a bit out of time.
> Thanks for taking the review. I'll try to publish now
>
> Carlos
>
>
>
> El mar., 8 oct. 2019 a las 18:57, Andrew Wetmore ()
> escribió:
>
>> I have edited the release. The only thing I would improve, if I could, is
>> the graphic at the top. The release number appears as "v0.9.6". I am
>> pretty
>> sure it would be better as "v. 0.9.6", but this is obviously not something
>> to delay the release for.
>>
>> Andrew
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 11:56 AM Andrew Wetmore 
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Got it! Thanks!
>> >
>> > On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 10:49 AM Carlos Rovira 
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Yes! that's it :)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> El mar., 8 oct. 2019 a las 16:31, Piotr Zarzycki (<
>> >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>)
>> >> escribió:
>> >>
>> >> > I think that would be the link:
>> >> > https://royale.codeoscopic.com/apache-royale-v0-9-6-released/
>> >> >
>> >> > wt., 8 paź 2019 o 16:29 Andrew Wetmore 
>> >> napisał(a):
>> >> >
>> >> > > @Carlos Rovira  where is the draft post?
>> I
>> >> had
>> >> > a
>> >> > > hard disk failure this past weekend and am slowly rebuilding my
>> >> system.
>> >> > > Have to find all my links again.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > a
>> >> > >
>> >> > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 9:48 AM Andrew Wetmore > >
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > > I can do this in a couple of hours
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2019, 9:24 AM Carlos Rovira, <
>> >> carlosrov...@apache.org>
>> >> > > > wrote:
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >> Hi Piotr,
>> >> > > >>
>> >> > > >> I'll wait Andrew's review and then will publish it. If Andrew
>> make
>> >> his
>> >> > > >> changes this afternoon, I can follow up and publish it.
>> >> > > >> Then we can post on social networks next or wait to tomorrow
>> >> > > >>
>> >> > > >>
>> >> > > >>
>> >> > > >> El mar., 8 oct. 2019 a las 11:21, Piotr Zarzycki (<
>> >> > > >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>)
>> >> > > >> escribió:
>> >> > > >>
>> >> > > >> > Just to make sure that you understand why I asked you to post
>> >> > download
>> >> > > >> > links on website along with source code.
>> >> > > >> >
>> >> > > >> > I will announce on dev, users and announce list - someone who
>> >> read
>> >> > > >> email -
>> >> > > >> > will have two options:
>> >> > > >> > 1) Can click in that email on royale.apache.org
>> >> > > >> > 2) Can download directly binaries or source code from provided
>> >> links
>> >> > > in
>> >> > > >> the
>> >> > > >> > email
>> >> > > >> >
>> >> > > >> > If user do #1 he will see old links on website which will be
>> >> > > >> misleading. -
>> >> > > >> > Do you understand now why I asked you to publish stuff first ?
>> >> > > >> >
>> >> > > >> > However as I said if you prefer do this in a opposite way
>> that's
>> >> > fine
>> >> > > >> with
>> >> > > >> > me. :)
>> >> > > >> >
>> >> > > >> >
>> >> > > >> > wt., 8 paź 2019 o 11:17 Piotr Zarzycki <
>> >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>> >> > > >> > napisał(a):
>> >> > > >> >
>> >> > > >> > > This is the goal of syncing everything tomorrow. I 

Re: Nightly Build Server going offline

2019-10-08 Thread Carlos Rovira
爛

:)

El mar., 8 oct. 2019 a las 18:12, Alex Harui ()
escribió:

> I am definitely planning to start rebuilding the server today.  Keep your
> fingers crossed.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 10/7/19, 8:47 AM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:
>
> I think the merge happened, so I am going to try to do the rebuild
> this week, probably on my Tuesday if I can finish up some fixes to
> releasecandidate.xml needed for Windows today.
>
>     -Alex
>
> On 10/7/19, 12:39 AM, "Carlos Rovira"  wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> don't think a day be a problem. When can better warn in social
> networks
> about that 24h unavailability.
> Other option is to store in pre web server (Royale.codeoscopic.com).
> You
> have credentials and can upload to Wordpress and then we can share
> that
> link.
> Whatever option could be fine, but for a day, I don't think we
> should
> invest much time.
>
> thanks!
>
>
>
> El dom., 6 oct. 2019 a las 9:28, Harbs ()
> escribió:
>
> > Seems fine to me.
> >
> > > On Oct 6, 2019, at 1:33 AM, Alex Harui
>  wrote:
> > >
> > > I was only thinking about temporary distribution of the
> nightly build
> > while the CI server is offline.  I'm not sure it makes sense to
> always copy
> > the nightly build somewhere else.  I think the bandwidth would
> add up.
> > >
> > > I'm mainly asking if anyone thinks it would be a problem if
> the nightly
> > builds were unavailable for a day (hopefully only a day).
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 10/5/19, 6:41 AM, "Carlos Rovira"   > carlosrov...@apache.org>> wrote:
> > >
> > >Hi Alex,
> > >
> > >you're talking about just storing nightly builds? what
> about using
> > some
> > >free storage out there, like a google drive, dropbox, or
> other
> > service like
> > >this. We can create an "apacheroyale" account and share
> credentials in
> > >private.
> > >
> > >El sáb., 5 oct. 2019 a las 2:18, Alex Harui
> ( > >)
> > >escribió:
> > >
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> To prove that we can rebuild our nightly build server (so
> that someone
> > >> else can host a build server someday and to prove we know
> what our
> > >> dependencies are), I'm going to try to rebuild it once the
> release
> > branch
> > >> is merged into develop.  Could just take a day if I've saved
> a record of
> > >> everything we need.  Or not...
> > >>
> > >> There will be other emails when I finally shut it down to try
> it.  If
> > >> someone wants to host the last nightly somewhere and update
> our links to
> > >> it, great, otherwise we'll just cross our fingers...
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> -Alex
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >--
> > >Carlos Rovira
> > >
>     >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosroviradata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C6f4957799c04453d1ef308d74b3da007%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637060600359555721sdata=AB%2BoIdhv4B5EMHSvpOwX9XEZTPgZVdW5Rs7mOEI0fHw%3Dreserved=0
> > <
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosroviradata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C6f4957799c04453d1ef308d74b3da007%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637060600359565716sdata=O6hyvC%2FH%2BuPOuD8K%2FHBC4YYM71aEPEcvMs8ufKZkXqU%3Dreserved=0
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
>
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosroviradata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C6f4957799c04453d1ef308d74b3da007%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637060600359565716sdata=O6hyvC%2FH%2BuPOuD8K%2FHBC4YYM71aEPEcvMs8ufKZkXqU%3Dreserved=0
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: Release 0.9.6 Announce for web post?

2019-10-08 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Andrew,

if you don't mind I take into account for next release, since I'm this days
a bit out of time.
Thanks for taking the review. I'll try to publish now

Carlos



El mar., 8 oct. 2019 a las 18:57, Andrew Wetmore ()
escribió:

> I have edited the release. The only thing I would improve, if I could, is
> the graphic at the top. The release number appears as "v0.9.6". I am pretty
> sure it would be better as "v. 0.9.6", but this is obviously not something
> to delay the release for.
>
> Andrew
>
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 11:56 AM Andrew Wetmore 
> wrote:
>
> > Got it! Thanks!
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 10:49 AM Carlos Rovira 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Yes! that's it :)
> >>
> >>
> >> El mar., 8 oct. 2019 a las 16:31, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>)
> >> escribió:
> >>
> >> > I think that would be the link:
> >> > https://royale.codeoscopic.com/apache-royale-v0-9-6-released/
> >> >
> >> > wt., 8 paź 2019 o 16:29 Andrew Wetmore 
> >> napisał(a):
> >> >
> >> > > @Carlos Rovira  where is the draft post? I
> >> had
> >> > a
> >> > > hard disk failure this past weekend and am slowly rebuilding my
> >> system.
> >> > > Have to find all my links again.
> >> > >
> >> > > a
> >> > >
> >> > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 9:48 AM Andrew Wetmore 
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > I can do this in a couple of hours
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2019, 9:24 AM Carlos Rovira, <
> >> carlosrov...@apache.org>
> >> > > > wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > >> Hi Piotr,
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> I'll wait Andrew's review and then will publish it. If Andrew
> make
> >> his
> >> > > >> changes this afternoon, I can follow up and publish it.
> >> > > >> Then we can post on social networks next or wait to tomorrow
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> El mar., 8 oct. 2019 a las 11:21, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> >> > > >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>)
> >> > > >> escribió:
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> > Just to make sure that you understand why I asked you to post
> >> > download
> >> > > >> > links on website along with source code.
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > I will announce on dev, users and announce list - someone who
> >> read
> >> > > >> email -
> >> > > >> > will have two options:
> >> > > >> > 1) Can click in that email on royale.apache.org
> >> > > >> > 2) Can download directly binaries or source code from provided
> >> links
> >> > > in
> >> > > >> the
> >> > > >> > email
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > If user do #1 he will see old links on website which will be
> >> > > >> misleading. -
> >> > > >> > Do you understand now why I asked you to publish stuff first ?
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > However as I said if you prefer do this in a opposite way
> that's
> >> > fine
> >> > > >> with
> >> > > >> > me. :)
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > wt., 8 paź 2019 o 11:17 Piotr Zarzycki <
> >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> >> > > >> > napisał(a):
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > > This is the goal of syncing everything tomorrow. I asked you
> to
> >> > > >> publish
> >> > > >> > > first link and source code on website, cause my announce
> >> probably
> >> > go
> >> > > >> > first
> >> > > >> > > one and I didn't want to mislead with what will be on
> website.
> >> > > >> However if
> >> > > >> > > you wanted to do that differently I'm fine - Couple of hours
> of
> >> > > >> > misleading
> >> > > >> > > doesn't hur

Re: How to skin components

2019-10-08 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Chris,
before going far beyond, I want that you consider the way you are referring
to the concepts you don't share. Talk about that as "silly" seems not very
appropriate.
We try to respect as much as possible, the work and proposals from others.
You can disagree, but please maintain a level of respect since that way
will make others not want to enter the conversation.

Thanks in advance.

El mar., 8 oct. 2019 a las 9:47, Chris Velevitch ()
escribió:

> When I was going through the documentation and code to get my head
> around this silly notation of "beads" and "strands", I realised the
> component plugins are very similar to the concept of skinning
> components that Adobe Flex talks about. And there doesn't seem to be
> any discussions on how to skin a component.
>
> I also noticed, there's no discussion on how plugins and components
> talk to each other and whether that is bidirectional or one-way.
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: Pay as You Go (PAYG) Suggestion

2019-10-08 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Chris,

I think that will be a good addition and can complement PAYG in our current
state.
While PAYG and Strands and Beads give users the power to choose one code
and avoid other, Some code can still have vars or functions unused in some
cases.
With PAYG this will be very few, since the code is created to be very
"atomic" for each case, but I think some improvement will do.

If you're interested you can lead the effort and propose your contribution
to gather some acceptance (first) and then propose how to bring that to
Royale. Then try to work on a branch and ask for help when needed.

Thanks



El mar., 8 oct. 2019 a las 10:00, Chris Velevitch (<
chris.velevi...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> If the whole point of PAYG is to eliminate unused code from being
> included in the final app distribution, then I'd like to suggest that
> we take advantage of the tools the JavaScript ecosystem already has
> for eliminating unused code.
>
> I think we should take a look at Webpack [1] and create a compilation
> pipeline that feeds into Webpack to create the final compacted
> distributable app.
>
>
>
> [1] https://webpack.js.org/guides/tree-shaking/
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: Acceptance of Royale by Flex Developers

2019-10-08 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi,

I mean that like RO, that's a non visual component used to perform
communications, we have other "components" or "code" that can be
implemented as beads or strands.
The concept behind is that Royale have the minimum code needed for
functionality, and compose other parts (whatever the purpose of the code
could be). So while UI Components use to refer to code that are visual and
use to be a Button, a List or a Checkbox, strands are more agonistic about
that particular use case, so seems, IMHO a better way to describe it from
that point of view.

El mar., 8 oct. 2019 a las 10:14, Chris Velevitch (<
chris.velevi...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> So you are suggesting a RemoteObject is a headless component who's
> base class only supports the model and controller plugins and that UI
> classes extend the headless component to add in the view?
>
> On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 at 15:52, Carlos Rovira 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> > thanks for sharing your thoughts.
> >
> > IMHO, not always a "strand" is a "visual component". This relation is not
> > always true. a strand could be a non visual component (for example the
> > implementation of RemoteObject in the Network library). And a bead could
> be
> > a strand itself.
> >
> > I think the term component is right in most cases and accomplish a
> meaning
> > purpose, but strand/beads concept comes to give another subset of meaning
> >
> > just my opinion about this.
> >
> > Carlos
> >
> >
> >
> > El mar., 8 oct. 2019 a las 9:23, Chris Velevitch (<
> chris.velevi...@gmail.com>)
> > escribió:
> >
> > > The use of the terms "strands" and "beads" still doesn't make sense to
> > > me because they are concepts I have never heard before and it is
> > > creating a barrier to acceptance and deepens the learning curve. As
> > > far as I can tell, it's something to do with visual/UI components.
> > >
> > > The section "Strands and Beads" should ideally be titled "Visual
> > > Components" because that section is about visual components and is
> > > alluding to the fact visual components are standalone microcosms of
> > > the MVC pattern and the ability to treat the model, view and
> > > controller as plugins to the component. The statement that components
> > > are "strands" is, in my mind, misleading because it doesn't make sense
> > > to interchange terms components and strands if a strand is a
> > > component. In fact, diving into the code, the "addBead" function gives
> > > the "bead" a reference to the component the "bead" is being added to.
> > >
> > > It is clear from the documentation that "beads" are "plugins" and the
> > > documentation should be talking about extending components with
> > > plugins. All references to "bead" should be replaced with "plugin" and
> > > all references to "strand" be replaced with either "hostComponent", or
> > > "parent" or appropriately something else.
> > >
> > > We seem to be neglecting the rich heritage that we have gotten from
> > > Adobe Flex and I don't see the point giving existing concepts new
> > > names.
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> Chris
> --
> Chris Velevitch
> m: 0415 469 095
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: Component Sets

2019-10-08 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Chris,

although we get a much better docswith the work in the latest months,
there's still many missing points to cover, some with its own reserved
place, but still empty, and others will need to reserve its place. As
always we'll try our best to cover it as soon as possible. To be fastest we
want others to join us and help us to make Royale better and bigger. You're
welcome to join and contribute if you consider worth it and fun :)

El mar., 8 oct. 2019 a las 10:36, Andrew Wetmore ()
escribió:

> There is not such a document yet, no. Help creating one would be welcome.
>
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 4:22 AM Chris Velevitch 
> wrote:
>
> > There doesn't seem to be an all-encompassing document describing, MX,
> > Spark and Jewel components and as well as the pros and cons of each
> > nor is there a discussion on using third party web components,
> > creating custom web components and how to the material design
> > components.
> >
>
>
> --
> Andrew Wetmore
>
> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: Release 0.9.6 Announce for web post?

2019-10-08 Thread Carlos Rovira
Yes! that's it :)


El mar., 8 oct. 2019 a las 16:31, Piotr Zarzycki ()
escribió:

> I think that would be the link:
> https://royale.codeoscopic.com/apache-royale-v0-9-6-released/
>
> wt., 8 paź 2019 o 16:29 Andrew Wetmore  napisał(a):
>
> > @Carlos Rovira  where is the draft post? I had
> a
> > hard disk failure this past weekend and am slowly rebuilding my system.
> > Have to find all my links again.
> >
> > a
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 9:48 AM Andrew Wetmore 
> wrote:
> >
> > > I can do this in a couple of hours
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2019, 9:24 AM Carlos Rovira, 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Piotr,
> > >>
> > >> I'll wait Andrew's review and then will publish it. If Andrew make his
> > >> changes this afternoon, I can follow up and publish it.
> > >> Then we can post on social networks next or wait to tomorrow
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> El mar., 8 oct. 2019 a las 11:21, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>)
> > >> escribió:
> > >>
> > >> > Just to make sure that you understand why I asked you to post
> download
> > >> > links on website along with source code.
> > >> >
> > >> > I will announce on dev, users and announce list - someone who read
> > >> email -
> > >> > will have two options:
> > >> > 1) Can click in that email on royale.apache.org
> > >> > 2) Can download directly binaries or source code from provided links
> > in
> > >> the
> > >> > email
> > >> >
> > >> > If user do #1 he will see old links on website which will be
> > >> misleading. -
> > >> > Do you understand now why I asked you to publish stuff first ?
> > >> >
> > >> > However as I said if you prefer do this in a opposite way that's
> fine
> > >> with
> > >> > me. :)
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > wt., 8 paź 2019 o 11:17 Piotr Zarzycki 
> > >> > napisał(a):
> > >> >
> > >> > > This is the goal of syncing everything tomorrow. I asked you to
> > >> publish
> > >> > > first link and source code on website, cause my announce probably
> go
> > >> > first
> > >> > > one and I didn't want to mislead with what will be on website.
> > >> However if
> > >> > > you wanted to do that differently I'm fine - Couple of hours of
> > >> > misleading
> > >> > > doesn't hurts anyone maybe. - We will see tomorrow.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > wt., 8 paź 2019 o 11:05 Carlos Rovira 
> > >> > > napisał(a):
> > >> > >
> > >> > >> Hi,
> > >> > >> ok, is normal,
> > >> > >> as people following our dev, are as well using links to 0.9.6
> > >> releases.
> > >> > >> The update of links in website is more about to announce to the
> > rest
> > >> of
> > >> > >> the
> > >> > >> world that is not as close to us as the rest of community.
> > >> > >> So it's important to communicate in the most organized way we
> can.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> thanks!
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> El mar., 8 oct. 2019 a las 10:51, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > >> > >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>)
> > >> > >> escribió:
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> > Just FYI: npm stuff and Maven artifacts are being published for
> > >> couple
> > >> > >> of
> > >> > >> > days already, so people are using released 0.9.6 trough npm. -
> > It's
> > >> > >> happen
> > >> > >> > automatically in case of npm.
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > wt., 8 paź 2019 o 10:48 Piotr Zarzycki <
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> > >> > >> > napisał(a):
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > > Fine with me. I make announce tomorrow morning and review
> what
> > >> was
> > >> > >> your
> > >> > >> > > change and update Draft.
> > >> > >> > >
> > >

Re: Release 0.9.6 Announce for web post?

2019-10-08 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Piotr,

I'll wait Andrew's review and then will publish it. If Andrew make his
changes this afternoon, I can follow up and publish it.
Then we can post on social networks next or wait to tomorrow



El mar., 8 oct. 2019 a las 11:21, Piotr Zarzycki ()
escribió:

> Just to make sure that you understand why I asked you to post download
> links on website along with source code.
>
> I will announce on dev, users and announce list - someone who read email -
> will have two options:
> 1) Can click in that email on royale.apache.org
> 2) Can download directly binaries or source code from provided links in the
> email
>
> If user do #1 he will see old links on website which will be misleading. -
> Do you understand now why I asked you to publish stuff first ?
>
> However as I said if you prefer do this in a opposite way that's fine with
> me. :)
>
>
> wt., 8 paź 2019 o 11:17 Piotr Zarzycki 
> napisał(a):
>
> > This is the goal of syncing everything tomorrow. I asked you to publish
> > first link and source code on website, cause my announce probably go
> first
> > one and I didn't want to mislead with what will be on website. However if
> > you wanted to do that differently I'm fine - Couple of hours of
> misleading
> > doesn't hurts anyone maybe. - We will see tomorrow.
> >
> > wt., 8 paź 2019 o 11:05 Carlos Rovira 
> > napisał(a):
> >
> >> Hi,
> >> ok, is normal,
> >> as people following our dev, are as well using links to 0.9.6 releases.
> >> The update of links in website is more about to announce to the rest of
> >> the
> >> world that is not as close to us as the rest of community.
> >> So it's important to communicate in the most organized way we can.
> >>
> >> thanks!
> >>
> >> El mar., 8 oct. 2019 a las 10:51, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>)
> >> escribió:
> >>
> >> > Just FYI: npm stuff and Maven artifacts are being published for couple
> >> of
> >> > days already, so people are using released 0.9.6 trough npm. - It's
> >> happen
> >> > automatically in case of npm.
> >> >
> >> > wt., 8 paź 2019 o 10:48 Piotr Zarzycki 
> >> > napisał(a):
> >> >
> >> > > Fine with me. I make announce tomorrow morning and review what was
> >> your
> >> > > change and update Draft.
> >> > >
> >> > > wt., 8 paź 2019 o 10:46 Carlos Rovira 
> >> > > napisał(a):
> >> > >
> >> > >> Hi, Piotr,
> >> > >>
> >> > >> I think we should update all at the same time, since we want to
> post
> >> in
> >> > >> twitter, Facebook and linkedin.
> >> > >> Doesn't have sense to me upload just a few links since almost
> nobody
> >> > will
> >> > >> notice it (and are already in GitHub releases). If we need to wait
> a
> >> day
> >> > >> to
> >> > >> send the official announcement it's ok for me. We can finish to
> >> improve
> >> > >> the
> >> > >> blog post in the meanwhile to do it better.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> For example, I changed a bit the wording, since we are not as
> >> "early" or
> >> > >> "alpha" and I mention as well that we have Apps in production, what
> >> is
> >> > now
> >> > >> important.
> >> > >> And finally talk about the improved Royale Docs that will be of
> help
> >> for
> >> > >> newcomers.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> I think Andrew can review the blog post and improve it and then be
> >> ready
> >> > >> to
> >> > >> publish all tomorrow.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> As well if someone notice something that needs to be updated can
> >> notify
> >> > >> us.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Thanks
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> El mar., 8 oct. 2019 a las 10:37, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> >> > >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>)
> >> > >> escribió:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> > Download and source code websites looks good to me. In blog post
> >> you
> >> > >> have
> >> > >> > broken github links - review them and fix.
> >> > >> >
> >> 

Re: Release 0.9.6 Announce for web post?

2019-10-08 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi,
ok, is normal,
as people following our dev, are as well using links to 0.9.6 releases.
The update of links in website is more about to announce to the rest of the
world that is not as close to us as the rest of community.
So it's important to communicate in the most organized way we can.

thanks!

El mar., 8 oct. 2019 a las 10:51, Piotr Zarzycki ()
escribió:

> Just FYI: npm stuff and Maven artifacts are being published for couple of
> days already, so people are using released 0.9.6 trough npm. - It's happen
> automatically in case of npm.
>
> wt., 8 paź 2019 o 10:48 Piotr Zarzycki 
> napisał(a):
>
> > Fine with me. I make announce tomorrow morning and review what was your
> > change and update Draft.
> >
> > wt., 8 paź 2019 o 10:46 Carlos Rovira 
> > napisał(a):
> >
> >> Hi, Piotr,
> >>
> >> I think we should update all at the same time, since we want to post in
> >> twitter, Facebook and linkedin.
> >> Doesn't have sense to me upload just a few links since almost nobody
> will
> >> notice it (and are already in GitHub releases). If we need to wait a day
> >> to
> >> send the official announcement it's ok for me. We can finish to improve
> >> the
> >> blog post in the meanwhile to do it better.
> >>
> >> For example, I changed a bit the wording, since we are not as "early" or
> >> "alpha" and I mention as well that we have Apps in production, what is
> now
> >> important.
> >> And finally talk about the improved Royale Docs that will be of help for
> >> newcomers.
> >>
> >> I think Andrew can review the blog post and improve it and then be ready
> >> to
> >> publish all tomorrow.
> >>
> >> As well if someone notice something that needs to be updated can notify
> >> us.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >>
> >> El mar., 8 oct. 2019 a las 10:37, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>)
> >> escribió:
> >>
> >> > Download and source code websites looks good to me. In blog post you
> >> have
> >> > broken github links - review them and fix.
> >> >
> >> > Apart of that publish only Download and Source code. Blog post should
> be
> >> > publish after I think official announce on dev, users and announce
> >> mailing
> >> > list. I'm going to do that tomorrow, cause there is still time for
> >> review
> >> > Draft of announcement.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Piotr
> >> >
> >> > wt., 8 paź 2019 o 10:32 Carlos Rovira 
> >> > napisał(a):
> >> >
> >> > > Hi,
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks Piotr, for the link :)
> >> > >
> >> > > I just updated website on pre site please take a quick look and I'll
> >> > > publish it:
> >> > >
> >> > > https://royale.codeoscopic.com/apache-royale-v0-9-6-released/
> >> > > https://royale.codeoscopic.com/download/
> >> > > https://royale.codeoscopic.com/source-code/
> >> > >
> >> > > thanks
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > El mar., 8 oct. 2019 a las 10:06, Carlos Rovira (<
> >> > carlosrov...@apache.org
> >> > > >)
> >> > > escribió:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Hi,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I'm updating all website in pre. I changed download and source
> code
> >> > > pages.
> >> > > > I'm going to do the blog post, for this I need the Annoucment,
> but I
> >> > > can't
> >> > > > see it in my mail client.
> >> > > > @Piotr Zarzycki  can you send me that
> >> email
> >> > > > off list? I'm going to start from the 0.9.4 one in the meanwhile
> >> > > >
> >> > > > thanks
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Carlos
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > El mar., 8 oct. 2019 a las 9:54, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> >> > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >> > > >
> >> > > >> Carlos,
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Let me know if you have problems with updating links on website.
> If
> >> >

Re: Release 0.9.6 Announce for web post?

2019-10-08 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi, Piotr,

I think we should update all at the same time, since we want to post in
twitter, Facebook and linkedin.
Doesn't have sense to me upload just a few links since almost nobody will
notice it (and are already in GitHub releases). If we need to wait a day to
send the official announcement it's ok for me. We can finish to improve the
blog post in the meanwhile to do it better.

For example, I changed a bit the wording, since we are not as "early" or
"alpha" and I mention as well that we have Apps in production, what is now
important.
And finally talk about the improved Royale Docs that will be of help for
newcomers.

I think Andrew can review the blog post and improve it and then be ready to
publish all tomorrow.

As well if someone notice something that needs to be updated can notify us.

Thanks


El mar., 8 oct. 2019 a las 10:37, Piotr Zarzycki ()
escribió:

> Download and source code websites looks good to me. In blog post you have
> broken github links - review them and fix.
>
> Apart of that publish only Download and Source code. Blog post should be
> publish after I think official announce on dev, users and announce mailing
> list. I'm going to do that tomorrow, cause there is still time for review
> Draft of announcement.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> wt., 8 paź 2019 o 10:32 Carlos Rovira 
> napisał(a):
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks Piotr, for the link :)
> >
> > I just updated website on pre site please take a quick look and I'll
> > publish it:
> >
> > https://royale.codeoscopic.com/apache-royale-v0-9-6-released/
> > https://royale.codeoscopic.com/download/
> > https://royale.codeoscopic.com/source-code/
> >
> > thanks
> >
> >
> >
> > El mar., 8 oct. 2019 a las 10:06, Carlos Rovira (<
> carlosrov...@apache.org
> > >)
> > escribió:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm updating all website in pre. I changed download and source code
> > pages.
> > > I'm going to do the blog post, for this I need the Annoucment, but I
> > can't
> > > see it in my mail client.
> > > @Piotr Zarzycki  can you send me that email
> > > off list? I'm going to start from the 0.9.4 one in the meanwhile
> > >
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > Carlos
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > El mar., 8 oct. 2019 a las 9:54, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > >
> > >> Carlos,
> > >>
> > >> Let me know if you have problems with updating links on website. If
> yes
> > I
> > >> will try to figure out how to do that.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Piotr
> > >>
> > >> wt., 8 paź 2019 o 06:54 Piotr Zarzycki 
> > >> napisał(a):
> > >>
> > >> > Hey Andrew,
> > >> >
> > >> > Thank you!
> > >> >
> > >> > On Mon, Oct 7, 2019, 11:17 PM Andrew Wetmore 
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> I looked over the draft announcement, Piotr, and it seems fine as
> to
> > >> the
> > >> >> English. I cannot speak to the technical details as well as other
> > >> >> committers can.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Andrew
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 5:01 PM Piotr Zarzycki <
> > >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> > >> >> wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > Currently I'm waiting for review of Draft of announcement. Till
> > >> maximum
> > >> >> > Wednesday. Than I will send announce to dev, users and announce
> > >> mailing
> > >> >> > list.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > I think you should create draft and post it once announce will be
> > >> sent.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Apart of that I should add our release somewhere in the whimsy
> but
> > I
> > >> >> don't
> > >> >> > remember where - I need to find that.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Piotr
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > On Mon, Oct 7, 2019, 9:33 PM Andrew Wetmore  >
> > >> >> wrote:
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > > That would be good
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2019, 4:10 PM Carlos Rovira, <
> > >> carlosrov...@apache.org>
> > >> >> > > wrote:
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > > Hi,
> > >> >> > > > I'll be updating website in next few hours, but I was
> thinking
> > we
> > >> >> don't
> > >> >> > > > have the habitual blog post for 0.9.6 release.
> > >> >> > > > Should I create one from scratch based on 0.9.4?
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > > thanks
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > > --
> > >> >> > > > Carlos Rovira
> > >> >> > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> --
> > >> >> Andrew Wetmore
> > >> >>
> > >> >> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >>
> > >> Piotr Zarzycki
> > >>
> > >> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > >> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Carlos Rovira
> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: Release 0.9.6 Announce for web post?

2019-10-08 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi,

Thanks Piotr, for the link :)

I just updated website on pre site please take a quick look and I'll
publish it:

https://royale.codeoscopic.com/apache-royale-v0-9-6-released/
https://royale.codeoscopic.com/download/
https://royale.codeoscopic.com/source-code/

thanks



El mar., 8 oct. 2019 a las 10:06, Carlos Rovira ()
escribió:

> Hi,
>
> I'm updating all website in pre. I changed download and source code pages.
> I'm going to do the blog post, for this I need the Annoucment, but I can't
> see it in my mail client.
> @Piotr Zarzycki  can you send me that email
> off list? I'm going to start from the 0.9.4 one in the meanwhile
>
> thanks
>
> Carlos
>
>
>
>
> El mar., 8 oct. 2019 a las 9:54, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>
>> Carlos,
>>
>> Let me know if you have problems with updating links on website. If yes I
>> will try to figure out how to do that.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Piotr
>>
>> wt., 8 paź 2019 o 06:54 Piotr Zarzycki 
>> napisał(a):
>>
>> > Hey Andrew,
>> >
>> > Thank you!
>> >
>> > On Mon, Oct 7, 2019, 11:17 PM Andrew Wetmore 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I looked over the draft announcement, Piotr, and it seems fine as to
>> the
>> >> English. I cannot speak to the technical details as well as other
>> >> committers can.
>> >>
>> >> Andrew
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 5:01 PM Piotr Zarzycki <
>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Currently I'm waiting for review of Draft of announcement. Till
>> maximum
>> >> > Wednesday. Than I will send announce to dev, users and announce
>> mailing
>> >> > list.
>> >> >
>> >> > I think you should create draft and post it once announce will be
>> sent.
>> >> >
>> >> > Apart of that I should add our release somewhere in the whimsy but I
>> >> don't
>> >> > remember where - I need to find that.
>> >> >
>> >> > Piotr
>> >> >
>> >> > On Mon, Oct 7, 2019, 9:33 PM Andrew Wetmore 
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > > That would be good
>> >> > >
>> >> > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2019, 4:10 PM Carlos Rovira, <
>> carlosrov...@apache.org>
>> >> > > wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > > Hi,
>> >> > > > I'll be updating website in next few hours, but I was thinking we
>> >> don't
>> >> > > > have the habitual blog post for 0.9.6 release.
>> >> > > > Should I create one from scratch based on 0.9.4?
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > thanks
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > --
>> >> > > > Carlos Rovira
>> >> > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
>> >> > > >
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Andrew Wetmore
>> >>
>> >> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
>> >>
>> >
>>
>> --
>>
>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>
>> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
>> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>>
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: Release 0.9.6 Announce for web post?

2019-10-08 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi,

I'm updating all website in pre. I changed download and source code pages.
I'm going to do the blog post, for this I need the Annoucment, but I can't
see it in my mail client.
@Piotr Zarzycki  can you send me that email off
list? I'm going to start from the 0.9.4 one in the meanwhile

thanks

Carlos




El mar., 8 oct. 2019 a las 9:54, Piotr Zarzycki ()
escribió:

> Carlos,
>
> Let me know if you have problems with updating links on website. If yes I
> will try to figure out how to do that.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> wt., 8 paź 2019 o 06:54 Piotr Zarzycki 
> napisał(a):
>
> > Hey Andrew,
> >
> > Thank you!
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 7, 2019, 11:17 PM Andrew Wetmore 
> wrote:
> >
> >> I looked over the draft announcement, Piotr, and it seems fine as to the
> >> English. I cannot speak to the technical details as well as other
> >> committers can.
> >>
> >> Andrew
> >>
> >> On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 5:01 PM Piotr Zarzycki <
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Currently I'm waiting for review of Draft of announcement. Till
> maximum
> >> > Wednesday. Than I will send announce to dev, users and announce
> mailing
> >> > list.
> >> >
> >> > I think you should create draft and post it once announce will be
> sent.
> >> >
> >> > Apart of that I should add our release somewhere in the whimsy but I
> >> don't
> >> > remember where - I need to find that.
> >> >
> >> > Piotr
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Oct 7, 2019, 9:33 PM Andrew Wetmore 
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > That would be good
> >> > >
> >> > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2019, 4:10 PM Carlos Rovira, <
> carlosrov...@apache.org>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Hi,
> >> > > > I'll be updating website in next few hours, but I was thinking we
> >> don't
> >> > > > have the habitual blog post for 0.9.6 release.
> >> > > > Should I create one from scratch based on 0.9.4?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > thanks
> >> > > >
> >> > > > --
> >> > > > Carlos Rovira
> >> > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Andrew Wetmore
> >>
> >> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> >>
> >
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: Acceptance of Royale by Flex Developers

2019-10-08 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Chris,

thanks for sharing your thoughts.

IMHO, not always a "strand" is a "visual component". This relation is not
always true. a strand could be a non visual component (for example the
implementation of RemoteObject in the Network library). And a bead could be
a strand itself.

I think the term component is right in most cases and accomplish a meaning
purpose, but strand/beads concept comes to give another subset of meaning

just my opinion about this.

Carlos



El mar., 8 oct. 2019 a las 9:23, Chris Velevitch ()
escribió:

> The use of the terms "strands" and "beads" still doesn't make sense to
> me because they are concepts I have never heard before and it is
> creating a barrier to acceptance and deepens the learning curve. As
> far as I can tell, it's something to do with visual/UI components.
>
> The section "Strands and Beads" should ideally be titled "Visual
> Components" because that section is about visual components and is
> alluding to the fact visual components are standalone microcosms of
> the MVC pattern and the ability to treat the model, view and
> controller as plugins to the component. The statement that components
> are "strands" is, in my mind, misleading because it doesn't make sense
> to interchange terms components and strands if a strand is a
> component. In fact, diving into the code, the "addBead" function gives
> the "bead" a reference to the component the "bead" is being added to.
>
> It is clear from the documentation that "beads" are "plugins" and the
> documentation should be talking about extending components with
> plugins. All references to "bead" should be replaced with "plugin" and
> all references to "strand" be replaced with either "hostComponent", or
> "parent" or appropriately something else.
>
> We seem to be neglecting the rich heritage that we have gotten from
> Adobe Flex and I don't see the point giving existing concepts new
> names.
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: issues with Sourcetree in Mac

2019-10-08 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Piotr,

no, I'll do from command line now, and will check the source tree issue
later. Just asking to see if was something I was missing
thanks


issues with Sourcetree in Mac

2019-10-07 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi,

I'm having issues with source tree on Mac
this Saturday I tried to commit some changes and I was not able to do it. I
can commit to local but not push to remote
I thought that was some punctual problem, and since I had not much time, I
decided to wait to next day.
I'm trying today and still the problem remains.
I could determine that I can git push from command line and what is failing
is GitHub

Tomorrow I'll try to solve it, but in the meantime I want to ask if it's
only me. I didn't do anything in my Mac to have this kind of changes so
don't know why it's this happening.
Maybe something has changed in GitHub or something that is what is causing
this issue?

thanks

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Release 0.9.6 Announce for web post?

2019-10-07 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi,
I'll be updating website in next few hours, but I was thinking we don't
have the habitual blog post for 0.9.6 release.
Should I create one from scratch based on 0.9.4?

thanks

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-10-07 Thread Carlos Rovira
; The login and password is available in the
> >> private@
> >> > archives.
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> > In mentioned lines in the stacktrace I
> have:
> >> > > >>> >
> >> > > >>> > Line 1088:
> >> > > >>> > 
> >> > > >>> >
> >> > > >>> > Line 1216:
> >> > > >>> >  dir="${compiler}"
> >> > > failonerror="true" >
> >> > > >>> > 
> >> > > >>> > 
> >> > > >>> >  >> > > >>> />
> >> > > >>> > 
> >> > > >>> >
> >> > > >>> > [1]
> >> > > >>>
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2F15biudata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C500bc3fa811d49d7fae908d748f40ca3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637058085331719010sdata=vVBlXC7nYVUkQAFYGZvqH1kq6uV5WeI%2BCG5W2nyYFEE%3Dreserved=0
> >> > >     >>>
> >> > > >>> You did not post the whole log, so it is
> possible
> >> you missed
> >> > a
> >> > > step.
> >> > > >>> There is almost no way there shouldn't be
> changes
> >> and the
> >> > head
> >> > > should not
> >> > > >>> be detached.
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> -Alex
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> --
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Piotr Zarzycki
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Patreon: *
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C500bc3fa811d49d7fae908d748f40ca3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637058085331729004sdata=DtkqAnAr82aCGscm196qyKrdwTVOyNMJeqM5vRfvpiA%3Dreserved=0
> >> > > >> <
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C500bc3fa811d49d7fae908d748f40ca3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637058085331729004sdata=DtkqAnAr82aCGscm196qyKrdwTVOyNMJeqM5vRfvpiA%3Dreserved=0
> >> > > >*
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > --
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Patreon: *
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C500bc3fa811d49d7fae908d748f40ca3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637058085331729004sdata=DtkqAnAr82aCGscm196qyKrdwTVOyNMJeqM5vRfvpiA%3Dreserved=0
> >> > > > <
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C500bc3fa811d49d7fae908d748f40ca3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637058085331729004sdata=DtkqAnAr82aCGscm196qyKrdwTVOyNMJeqM5vRfvpiA%3Dreserved=0
> >> > > >*
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > >
> >> > > Piotr Zarzycki
> >> > >
> >> > > Patreon: *
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C500bc3fa811d49d7fae908d748f40ca3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637058085331729004sdata=DtkqAnAr82aCGscm196qyKrdwTVOyNMJeqM5vRfvpiA%3Dreserved=0
> >> > > <
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C500bc3fa811d49d7fae908d748f40ca3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637058085331729004sdata=DtkqAnAr82aCGscm196qyKrdwTVOyNMJeqM5vRfvpiA%3Dreserved=0
> >> > > >*
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> >
> >> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >> >
> >> > Patreon: *
> >> >
> >>
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C500bc3fa811d49d7fae908d748f40ca3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637058085331729004sdata=DtkqAnAr82aCGscm196qyKrdwTVOyNMJeqM5vRfvpiA%3Dreserved=0
> >> > <
> >> >
> >>
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C500bc3fa811d49d7fae908d748f40ca3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637058085331729004sdata=DtkqAnAr82aCGscm196qyKrdwTVOyNMJeqM5vRfvpiA%3Dreserved=0
> >> > >*
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: Nightly Build Server going offline

2019-10-07 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi,

don't think a day be a problem. When can better warn in social networks
about that 24h unavailability.
Other option is to store in pre web server (Royale.codeoscopic.com). You
have credentials and can upload to Wordpress and then we can share that
link.
Whatever option could be fine, but for a day, I don't think we should
invest much time.

thanks!



El dom., 6 oct. 2019 a las 9:28, Harbs () escribió:

> Seems fine to me.
>
> > On Oct 6, 2019, at 1:33 AM, Alex Harui  wrote:
> >
> > I was only thinking about temporary distribution of the nightly build
> while the CI server is offline.  I'm not sure it makes sense to always copy
> the nightly build somewhere else.  I think the bandwidth would add up.
> >
> > I'm mainly asking if anyone thinks it would be a problem if the nightly
> builds were unavailable for a day (hopefully only a day).
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 10/5/19, 6:41 AM, "Carlos Rovira"  carlosrov...@apache.org>> wrote:
> >
> >Hi Alex,
> >
> >you're talking about just storing nightly builds? what about using
> some
> >free storage out there, like a google drive, dropbox, or other
> service like
> >this. We can create an "apacheroyale" account and share credentials in
> >private.
> >
> >El sáb., 5 oct. 2019 a las 2:18, Alex Harui ( >)
> >escribió:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> To prove that we can rebuild our nightly build server (so that someone
> >> else can host a build server someday and to prove we know what our
> >> dependencies are), I'm going to try to rebuild it once the release
> branch
> >> is merged into develop.  Could just take a day if I've saved a record of
> >> everything we need.  Or not...
> >>
> >> There will be other emails when I finally shut it down to try it.  If
> >> someone wants to host the last nightly somewhere and update our links to
> >> it, great, otherwise we'll just cross our fingers...
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >>
> >
> >--
> >Carlos Rovira
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosroviradata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C7c275412ee1640742d6d08d74999bf61%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637058797001459149sdata=YKPzypxxtGprdoc3vB3n8MXGYL1Ds%2BU6n2vXgZ6cQcM%3Dreserved=0
> <
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosroviradata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C7c275412ee1640742d6d08d74999bf61%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637058797001459149sdata=YKPzypxxtGprdoc3vB3n8MXGYL1Ds%2BU6n2vXgZ6cQcM%3Dreserved=0
> >
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: Branches and Commits and Cherry-Picking

2019-10-07 Thread Carlos Rovira
HI Alex,

right, I'm only saying that as part as the natural process, people should
not need to ask for agreement, since what is in develop should not go to
release. And if something need to be fixed in release it will happen there
(of course promoted by some discussion about something is not working
there), and that will, in the end merged back ro develop and master when
release is done. Otherwise means people in team are not applying the before
mentioned git branch model article.

Thanks





El dom., 6 oct. 2019 a las 0:40, Alex Harui ()
escribió:

>
>
> On 10/5/19, 7:08 AM, "Carlos Rovira"  wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> - release: Here's where I see differences. Once we decided we want to
> release, is because develop has the final state to cut a release. No
> more
> commits are needed for that release. So once a RM start the process and
> creates release branch from develop, then no more things should go to
> release branch. NOW: If we have to fix something for release, this is
> done
> in release and then "merged" (not cherry-picked) to develop at any
> time.
> Finally as we get to the final process, release is merged in master and
> develop.
>
> Notice that in parallel: develop can continue to evolve, but that will
> not
> go into that current release, will go to the next.
>
> As well, I think Cherry pick can be an option for many other use
> cases. Is
> like using rebase, those are very powerful tools to use when needed.
> Just
> we all need to know when is the right way to use it.
>
> I think the problem right now is that when we start the release, we
> continue with open mind to add all we do in develop. This is due to our
> current release process getting to long in time. I think next release
> process should be very less time and will be less new things in
> develop so
> what we have in release will be what we really release, instead of
> continue
> adding new develop things.
>
>
> IMO, because we don't have dedicated testing, we are going to find
> important things when we start testing the release branch.  So it isn’t "if
> we have to fix something for release" it is "when we have to fix something
> for release" and I am asking the other committers to be more careful in the
> next release and not just commit stuff to develop.  Be aware if a release
> is in progress and get agreement to push your fix to the release branch.
>
> I sure hope the release branch is open only for a much shorter time, but
> I'm also sure we will find something to fix in almost every release.
>
> -Alex
>
>

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: Branches and Commits and Cherry-Picking

2019-10-05 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Alex,

I'm with the article exposed in [1], I think I'm using it since 2010.

But I think we have a different interpretation of a release branch. For
what I saw for almost 10 years using git is that we have:
- master: Is the "stable" branch with "released" content. So latest release
can be found at master
- develop: Is what we use to develop incrementally. If we need to fix a bug
or add an enhancement, we do here. develop must be always stable, so if a
fix is just one commit, we can do this directly on develop, but if more
work needs to be done, and more than one commit is needed to be stable
again, then we need to create a feature branch.
- feature: changes that need more than 1 commit to be stable. Do all
commits in this kind of branch, and finally merge in develop when finished.
Then this branch can be removed.
- release: Here's where I see differences. Once we decided we want to
release, is because develop has the final state to cut a release. No more
commits are needed for that release. So once a RM start the process and
creates release branch from develop, then no more things should go to
release branch. NOW: If we have to fix something for release, this is done
in release and then "merged" (not cherry-picked) to develop at any time.
Finally as we get to the final process, release is merged in master and
develop.
- hotfix: we don't use it this for now. I think is normal since we are
still doing very heavy development, but when we get to 1.0 I expect hot
fixes will start to have relevance. IOW, I expect we'll get a time where
releases will be lower since we'll have a very stable tech, so hot fixes
will come to fix concrete bugs discovered in a release that need to be
fixed, and users don't want to enter other kind of evolutions in the SDK.

Notice that in parallel: develop can continue to evolve, but that will not
go into that current release, will go to the next.

As well, I think Cherry pick can be an option for many other use cases. Is
like using rebase, those are very powerful tools to use when needed. Just
we all need to know when is the right way to use it.

I think the problem right now is that when we start the release, we
continue with open mind to add all we do in develop. This is due to our
current release process getting to long in time. I think next release
process should be very less time and will be less new things in develop so
what we have in release will be what we really release, instead of continue
adding new develop things.






[1] https://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/

El sáb., 5 oct. 2019 a las 2:19, Alex Harui ()
escribió:

> Hi,
>
> I think we may need to be more careful about branches and commits in the
> future.  I saw a fair number of merge conflicts for the RM to have to
> resolve to merge the release branch back into develop.  The use of
> cherry-picking may be part of the problem.  I wrote down my thoughts on the
> subject in the wiki
> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/wiki/Branch-Management
>
> Now it is true that in the future, the release branches may not live as
> long so there will be fewer conflicts, but if we are successful and become
> a more active community, we will want to have good practices around this so
> that the develop branch can handle less stable commits while were getting a
> release out.
>
> My takeaway is that cherry-picking is not a best practice
> http://www.draconianoverlord.com/2013/09/07/no-cherry-picking.html
> because the changes in each branch are not correlated.
>
> Let's discuss,
> -Alex
>
>

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: Nightly Build Server going offline

2019-10-05 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Alex,

you're talking about just storing nightly builds? what about using some
free storage out there, like a google drive, dropbox, or other service like
this. We can create an "apacheroyale" account and share credentials in
private.

El sáb., 5 oct. 2019 a las 2:18, Alex Harui ()
escribió:

> Hi,
>
> To prove that we can rebuild our nightly build server (so that someone
> else can host a build server someday and to prove we know what our
> dependencies are), I'm going to try to rebuild it once the release branch
> is merged into develop.  Could just take a day if I've saved a record of
> everything we need.  Or not...
>
> There will be other emails when I finally shut it down to try it.  If
> someone wants to host the last nightly somewhere and update our links to
> it, great, otherwise we'll just cross our fingers...
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
>

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: RoyaleArrayLike - quick summary

2019-10-04 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Greg,

I know about this change, but missed this email. Thanks for working on this
improvement.
I think this was very needed, and we know about it since we suffer lots of
for each loops for collections
that we need to migrate to some more basic loop, what made the task very
cumbersome.

This change will make migration more close to change less code, so this is
a very cool change, thanks! :)

In fact with this improvement, I think coding in Royale now is very very
close to coding in Flex. Right now I don't remember
other issues of this kind...maybe others can think in something we already
can't be done in Royale, exposing it would be good
to take it into account :)



El mié., 2 oct. 2019 a las 11:44, Greg Dove ()
escribió:

> Just a quick overview of something I added that I was meaning to do for a
> long time. It makes a huge difference when porting from things like
> ArrayCollection to Royale ArrayList. It saved me hours of menial stuff on
> something I had to do recently, and that was also a time-consuming task
> that both Carlos and I experienced when working on his app.
>
> The latest updates include support for IArrayList and BinaryData to be used
> in for each loops and also to use indexed array access. This works the same
> (and uses the same code) to make it work between swf and js - it is
> metadata driven.  This only works with strong typing - it is compile-time
> only, and follows normal inheritance rules (so AMFBinaryData should also
> work the same because it inherits from BinaryData, for example).
>
>
> So you can do (assuming myArrayList and myOtherArrayList are either
> IArrayList typed or some implementing type or subclass such as ArrayList or
> ArrayListView):
> myArrayList[0] = myOtherArrayList[100]
>
> and it will generate:
> myArrayList.setItemAt(myOtherArrayList.getItemAt(100),0)
>
> or:
> myBinaryData[0] = 255;
>
> and things like:
> for each(var byte:uint in myBinaryData) 
>
> for-each loops (and for-in loops) are supported without special methods or
> properties needed on the classes that are supported. There is a single
> support function in Language that provides backing support and is included
> in the build only if it is needed. At the moment it is a one-size-fits-all
> support function.
> The loops behave like normal as3 for loops, and handle null target values
> and also loop target mutation inside the loop (e.g removeAll() on an
> ArrayList loop target instance inside the loop will stop the loop early).
> This could also be a safer option for things like XMLList and
> ArrayCollection as well, I did not consider that yet, but I will test those
> in the coming days.
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: Testimonials Page (Was: Re: About Royale Docs Improvements over latest months)

2019-10-04 Thread Carlos Rovira
Thanks Andrew!

I look forward to at least 2 more (better 3) to be able to mount the
page. We look forward to your help in this regard! :)


El jue., 3 oct. 2019 a las 22:40, Andrew Wetmore ()
escribió:

> "Apache Royale captures the best of Apache Flex and the best of new trends
> in web development, so it's the best of both worlds. We migrated a Flex
> application to JavaScript in significantly less time than it would have
> taken using the most popular JavaScript frameworks. The productivity,
> programming model and combination of OOP and declarative languages make
> Apache Royale a very solid development environment and a lot of fun to work
> with! :)"
>
> On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 3:30 PM Carlos Rovira 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here's main that could serve as well as example (@Andrew if you can fix
> any
> > grammar disaster I could make, please go ahead! :D) :
> >
> > -
> >
> > "Apache Royale captures the best of Apache Flex and the best of new
> trends
> > in web development, so it's best of both worlds. We migrated a Flex
> > application to javascript in significant less time than using the current
> > top notch javascript frameworks out there. The productivity, the
> programing
> > model and the combination of OOP and declarative languages makes it a
> very
> > solid tech and very fun to work with! :)"
> >
> > Carlos Rovira
> > Executive Chairman at Codeoscopic
> >
> > profile img to use: EB6igxEXYAE-PvU
> > <https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EB6igxEXYAE-PvU?format=jpg=large>
> >
> > --
> >
> > I think is a small contribution that could be of help in our site. Harbs,
> > Yishay, Piotr, and the rest...please take this request into consideration
> > so we can fill the page with at least 4+ of this.
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > El mar., 1 oct. 2019 a las 20:54, Carlos Rovira (<
> carlosrov...@apache.org
> > >)
> > escribió:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > we are talking about add a new "Testimonials" page were people could
> > share
> > > "How ApacheRoyale has helped" (you, your project, your company...)
> with a
> > > new app, or a migration from Flex.
> > >
> > > Please submit to this thread a phrase or a paragraph that will capture
> > > that topic for you and help us to fill that page with useful
> information
> > > for others that come to Apache Royale.
> > > (Note: Take into account that anyone that do this contribution is under
> > > the assumption that allows us to use his phrase, name and info
> submitted
> > in
> > > out website as a Testimonial in that page and submitting implies give
> us
> > > permission to do that :))
> > >
> > > Please provide an image as well for the profile. It can be your
> portrait,
> > > or if you don't want your photo in our website, you can send us other
> > > image(photo, logo or graphic) that represents you, to enhance the
> > > testimonial. We reserve the option to use it or not depending on the
> > image
> > > provided if we think is not appropriate or could infringe some
> copyright
> > or
> > > rule. For this reason, please try to use original content and nothing
> > that
> > > could be offensive or problematic with any of the Apache rules or the
> > > common sense :)
> > >
> > > This will help others to decide to join us or use Royale since others
> had
> > > success in using it.
> > >
> > > Thanks all for your contribution to this page!! That will be of great
> > > help! :)
> > >
> > > Carlos
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > El mar., 1 oct. 2019 a las 20:39, Carlos Rovira (<
> > carlosrov...@apache.org>)
> > > escribió:
> > >
> > >> Hi,
> > >> we can add testimonials page (as an additional page a part from
> showcase
> > >> page). The actual theme has that integrated that will be easy to do.
> > >> Will start a thread so others can write its own testimonial to be
> added.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks for the suggestion :)
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> El mar., 1 oct. 2019 a las 19:37, Alex Harui
> ( > >)
> > >> escribió:
> > >>
> > >>> The showcase would be great, but if it is easier/faster to simply
> have
> > a
> > >>> page of links to blogs of our committers like you and Harbs t

Re: Welcome Andrew Wetmore to Apache Royale's PMC

2019-10-04 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Andrew

well deserved, thanks for your excellent work in the project and taking
care of it!
Great to have you on board!

Carlos


El jue., 3 oct. 2019 a las 20:13, Serkan Taş ()
escribió:

> Congrat. Andrew.
>
> Serkan.
>
> Android için Outlook <https://aka.ms/ghei36>'u edinin
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 8:56 PM +0300, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <
> bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It is with great pleasure that I announce that the Apache Royale PMC
>> members have voted in Andrew Wetmore to the PMC.  Please join us in
>> welcoming him.  This is a recognition of Andrew's great work in helping out
>> with Apache Royale's documentation among other things.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Om
>> (On behalf of Apache Royale PMC)
>>
>>

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: Testimonials Page (Was: Re: About Royale Docs Improvements over latest months)

2019-10-03 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi,

Here's main that could serve as well as example (@Andrew if you can fix any
grammar disaster I could make, please go ahead! :D) :

-

"Apache Royale captures the best of Apache Flex and the best of new trends
in web development, so it's best of both worlds. We migrated a Flex
application to javascript in significant less time than using the current
top notch javascript frameworks out there. The productivity, the programing
model and the combination of OOP and declarative languages makes it a very
solid tech and very fun to work with! :)"

Carlos Rovira
Executive Chairman at Codeoscopic

profile img to use: EB6igxEXYAE-PvU
<https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EB6igxEXYAE-PvU?format=jpg=large>

--

I think is a small contribution that could be of help in our site. Harbs,
Yishay, Piotr, and the rest...please take this request into consideration
so we can fill the page with at least 4+ of this.

thanks

El mar., 1 oct. 2019 a las 20:54, Carlos Rovira ()
escribió:

> Hi all,
>
> we are talking about add a new "Testimonials" page were people could share
> "How ApacheRoyale has helped" (you, your project, your company...) with a
> new app, or a migration from Flex.
>
> Please submit to this thread a phrase or a paragraph that will capture
> that topic for you and help us to fill that page with useful information
> for others that come to Apache Royale.
> (Note: Take into account that anyone that do this contribution is under
> the assumption that allows us to use his phrase, name and info submitted in
> out website as a Testimonial in that page and submitting implies give us
> permission to do that :))
>
> Please provide an image as well for the profile. It can be your portrait,
> or if you don't want your photo in our website, you can send us other
> image(photo, logo or graphic) that represents you, to enhance the
> testimonial. We reserve the option to use it or not depending on the image
> provided if we think is not appropriate or could infringe some copyright or
> rule. For this reason, please try to use original content and nothing that
> could be offensive or problematic with any of the Apache rules or the
> common sense :)
>
> This will help others to decide to join us or use Royale since others had
> success in using it.
>
> Thanks all for your contribution to this page!! That will be of great
> help! :)
>
> Carlos
>
>
>
> El mar., 1 oct. 2019 a las 20:39, Carlos Rovira ()
> escribió:
>
>> Hi,
>> we can add testimonials page (as an additional page a part from showcase
>> page). The actual theme has that integrated that will be easy to do.
>> Will start a thread so others can write its own testimonial to be added.
>>
>> Thanks for the suggestion :)
>>
>>
>>
>> El mar., 1 oct. 2019 a las 19:37, Alex Harui ()
>> escribió:
>>
>>> The showcase would be great, but if it is easier/faster to simply have a
>>> page of links to blogs of our committers like you and Harbs that just
>>> contain a paragraph or two about how Royale has helped, that might be a
>>> good place to start.
>>>
>>> -Alex
>>>
>>> On 10/1/19, 10:02 AM, "Carlos Rovira"  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Alex,
>>>
>>> El mar., 1 oct. 2019 a las 17:50, Alex Harui
>>> ()
>>> escribió:
>>>
>>> > Thanks for working on the docs.
>>> >
>>> > Beyond the docs, what I would most like to see is "success
>>> stories".  I
>>> > keep thinking it would help if it was easier for folks to read
>>> about how
>>> > Royale has helped.
>>> >
>>>
>>> You refer to "showcase" page?
>>>
>>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Froyale.apache.org%2Fshowcase%2Fdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C2738afd6ca5c4c4807bf08d746912887%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637055461576181142sdata=%2BN%2FcdilLG3C%2F2wPoJHWts04%2FxO0%2BVDRlqtW%2Bw%2BMrh9I%3Dreserved=0
>>> I still has that on my plate. I have to plan the info to showcase
>>> and post
>>> so people can submit about it
>>> But yes is one of the important pieces to work on. I'll try to get
>>> over it
>>> soon.
>>>
>>> thanks
>>>
>> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: About Royale Docs Improvements over latest months

2019-10-01 Thread Carlos Rovira
Yeah! that would be great Andrew :)

Other things I have planned to is to go over ASDoc visuals to make it more
near to Royale Docs and more mobile friendly when possible.

I think we're getting a really good product with all the current efforts in
progress :D

El mar., 1 oct. 2019 a las 20:40, Andrew Wetmore ()
escribió:

> I have not forgotten "Royale in a Week", the reworking of "Flex in a Week"
> which I undertook to do. Will be working on that.
>
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 2:37 PM Alex Harui 
> wrote:
>
> > The showcase would be great, but if it is easier/faster to simply have a
> > page of links to blogs of our committers like you and Harbs that just
> > contain a paragraph or two about how Royale has helped, that might be a
> > good place to start.
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 10/1/19, 10:02 AM, "Carlos Rovira"  wrote:
> >
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > El mar., 1 oct. 2019 a las 17:50, Alex Harui
> ( > >)
> > escribió:
> >
> > > Thanks for working on the docs.
> > >
> > > Beyond the docs, what I would most like to see is "success
> > stories".  I
> > > keep thinking it would help if it was easier for folks to read
> about
> > how
> > > Royale has helped.
> > >
> >
> > You refer to "showcase" page?
> >
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Froyale.apache.org%2Fshowcase%2Fdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C2738afd6ca5c4c4807bf08d746912887%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637055461576181142sdata=%2BN%2FcdilLG3C%2F2wPoJHWts04%2FxO0%2BVDRlqtW%2Bw%2BMrh9I%3Dreserved=0
> > I still has that on my plate. I have to plan the info to showcase and
> > post
> > so people can submit about it
> > But yes is one of the important pieces to work on. I'll try to get
> > over it
> > soon.
> >
> > thanks
> >
> >
> > > My 2 cents,
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 10/1/19, 3:54 AM, "Andrew Wetmore"  wrote:
> > >
> > > This is great progress!
> > >
> > > I think one other area where we are still very thin is on using
> > > RoyaleUnit
> > > for testing.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 6:56 AM Carlos Rovira <
> > carlosrov...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > about latest changes in docs done is latest months. This is a
> > > summary of
> > > > the work done (still in progress at some points):
> > > >
> > > > About layout, search and usability:
> > > >
> > > > * Now we have a more polished layout that should work right
> on
> > > desktop,
> > > > tablet and mobile, making more easy for new users coming to
> > Royale
> > > learn
> > > > about it
> > > > * The sidebar menu will show on the right as normal in tablet
> > and
> > > desktop.
> > > > In mobile shows a button on the right side that make the menu
> > slide
> > > from
> > > > the right
> > > > * Now we have search functionality implemented thanks to
> > Algolia
> > > search.
> > > > The index is crawled every 24h. Take into account if you make
> > some
> > > change
> > > > and don't see it when searching as you upload the change.
> > > > * Main menu now turns to dropdown if there's no enough room
> to
> > show
> > > it
> > > > horizontally
> > > >
> > > > About content:
> > > >
> > > > * Added global styles for better readability and support of
> > most of
> > > the
> > > > markdown options and highlighting of code (specially for AS3
> > and
> > > MXML)
> > > > * Now all pages has "description" and "permalink" in the head
> > > section to
> > > > improve sharing and searching on internet. Remember to add
> this
> > > lines so we
> > > > make all navigation consistent with the rest of pages. If
> > someone
> > > notice a
> > > > page without this, 

Testimonials Page (Was: Re: About Royale Docs Improvements over latest months)

2019-10-01 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi all,

we are talking about add a new "Testimonials" page were people could share
"How ApacheRoyale has helped" (you, your project, your company...) with a
new app, or a migration from Flex.

Please submit to this thread a phrase or a paragraph that will capture that
topic for you and help us to fill that page with useful information for
others that come to Apache Royale.
(Note: Take into account that anyone that do this contribution is under the
assumption that allows us to use his phrase, name and info submitted in out
website as a Testimonial in that page and submitting implies give us
permission to do that :))

Please provide an image as well for the profile. It can be your portrait,
or if you don't want your photo in our website, you can send us other
image(photo, logo or graphic) that represents you, to enhance the
testimonial. We reserve the option to use it or not depending on the image
provided if we think is not appropriate or could infringe some copyright or
rule. For this reason, please try to use original content and nothing that
could be offensive or problematic with any of the Apache rules or the
common sense :)

This will help others to decide to join us or use Royale since others had
success in using it.

Thanks all for your contribution to this page!! That will be of great help!
:)

Carlos



El mar., 1 oct. 2019 a las 20:39, Carlos Rovira ()
escribió:

> Hi,
> we can add testimonials page (as an additional page a part from showcase
> page). The actual theme has that integrated that will be easy to do.
> Will start a thread so others can write its own testimonial to be added.
>
> Thanks for the suggestion :)
>
>
>
> El mar., 1 oct. 2019 a las 19:37, Alex Harui ()
> escribió:
>
>> The showcase would be great, but if it is easier/faster to simply have a
>> page of links to blogs of our committers like you and Harbs that just
>> contain a paragraph or two about how Royale has helped, that might be a
>> good place to start.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 10/1/19, 10:02 AM, "Carlos Rovira"  wrote:
>>
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> El mar., 1 oct. 2019 a las 17:50, Alex Harui
>> ()
>> escribió:
>>
>> > Thanks for working on the docs.
>> >
>> > Beyond the docs, what I would most like to see is "success
>> stories".  I
>> > keep thinking it would help if it was easier for folks to read
>> about how
>> > Royale has helped.
>> >
>>
>> You refer to "showcase" page?
>>
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Froyale.apache.org%2Fshowcase%2Fdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C2738afd6ca5c4c4807bf08d746912887%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637055461576181142sdata=%2BN%2FcdilLG3C%2F2wPoJHWts04%2FxO0%2BVDRlqtW%2Bw%2BMrh9I%3Dreserved=0
>> I still has that on my plate. I have to plan the info to showcase and
>> post
>> so people can submit about it
>> But yes is one of the important pieces to work on. I'll try to get
>> over it
>> soon.
>>
>> thanks
>>
> --
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: About Royale Docs Improvements over latest months

2019-10-01 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi,
we can add testimonials page (as an additional page a part from showcase
page). The actual theme has that integrated that will be easy to do.
Will start a thread so others can write its own testimonial to be added.

Thanks for the suggestion :)



El mar., 1 oct. 2019 a las 19:37, Alex Harui ()
escribió:

> The showcase would be great, but if it is easier/faster to simply have a
> page of links to blogs of our committers like you and Harbs that just
> contain a paragraph or two about how Royale has helped, that might be a
> good place to start.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 10/1/19, 10:02 AM, "Carlos Rovira"  wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> El mar., 1 oct. 2019 a las 17:50, Alex Harui ( >)
> escribió:
>
> > Thanks for working on the docs.
> >
> > Beyond the docs, what I would most like to see is "success
> stories".  I
> > keep thinking it would help if it was easier for folks to read about
> how
> > Royale has helped.
> >
>
> You refer to "showcase" page?
>
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Froyale.apache.org%2Fshowcase%2Fdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C2738afd6ca5c4c4807bf08d746912887%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637055461576181142sdata=%2BN%2FcdilLG3C%2F2wPoJHWts04%2FxO0%2BVDRlqtW%2Bw%2BMrh9I%3Dreserved=0
> I still has that on my plate. I have to plan the info to showcase and
> post
> so people can submit about it
> But yes is one of the important pieces to work on. I'll try to get
> over it
> soon.
>
> thanks
>
>
> > My 2 cents,
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 10/1/19, 3:54 AM, "Andrew Wetmore"  wrote:
> >
> >     This is great progress!
> >
> > I think one other area where we are still very thin is on using
> > RoyaleUnit
> > for testing.
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 6:56 AM Carlos Rovira <
> carlosrov...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > about latest changes in docs done is latest months. This is a
> > summary of
> > > the work done (still in progress at some points):
> > >
> > > About layout, search and usability:
> > >
> > > * Now we have a more polished layout that should work right on
> > desktop,
> > > tablet and mobile, making more easy for new users coming to
> Royale
> > learn
> > > about it
> > > * The sidebar menu will show on the right as normal in tablet
> and
> > desktop.
> > > In mobile shows a button on the right side that make the menu
> slide
> > from
> > > the right
> > > * Now we have search functionality implemented thanks to
> Algolia
> > search.
> > > The index is crawled every 24h. Take into account if you make
> some
> > change
> > > and don't see it when searching as you upload the change.
> > > * Main menu now turns to dropdown if there's no enough room to
> show
> > it
> > > horizontally
> > >
> > > About content:
> > >
> > > * Added global styles for better readability and support of
> most of
> > the
> > > markdown options and highlighting of code (specially for AS3
> and
> > MXML)
> > > * Now all pages has "description" and "permalink" in the head
> > section to
> > > improve sharing and searching on internet. Remember to add this
> > lines so we
> > > make all navigation consistent with the rest of pages. If
> someone
> > notice a
> > > page without this, please add it or report it.
> > > * Added metadata for sharing in social networks more easily
> > capturing the
> > > previous point plus screenshot and name.
> > > * I tried to bring pages to the index that was still missing
> so we
> > have
> > > most of the overall structure in place. I'm pretty sure
> there's still
> > > missing concepts and things to bring to the docs, so keep your
> eyes
> > open to
> > > see what could still be missing and report it or add yourself.
> > > * Notice that some of that content is still a page mostly
> empty and
> > waiting
> > > to be fil

Re: About Royale Docs Improvements over latest months

2019-10-01 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Alex,

El mar., 1 oct. 2019 a las 17:50, Alex Harui ()
escribió:

> Thanks for working on the docs.
>
> Beyond the docs, what I would most like to see is "success stories".  I
> keep thinking it would help if it was easier for folks to read about how
> Royale has helped.
>

You refer to "showcase" page?
https://royale.apache.org/showcase/
I still has that on my plate. I have to plan the info to showcase and post
so people can submit about it
But yes is one of the important pieces to work on. I'll try to get over it
soon.

thanks


> My 2 cents,
> -Alex
>
> On 10/1/19, 3:54 AM, "Andrew Wetmore"  wrote:
>
> This is great progress!
>
> I think one other area where we are still very thin is on using
> RoyaleUnit
> for testing.
>
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 6:56 AM Carlos Rovira 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > about latest changes in docs done is latest months. This is a
> summary of
> > the work done (still in progress at some points):
> >
> > About layout, search and usability:
> >
> > * Now we have a more polished layout that should work right on
> desktop,
> > tablet and mobile, making more easy for new users coming to Royale
> learn
> > about it
> > * The sidebar menu will show on the right as normal in tablet and
> desktop.
> > In mobile shows a button on the right side that make the menu slide
> from
> > the right
> > * Now we have search functionality implemented thanks to Algolia
> search.
> > The index is crawled every 24h. Take into account if you make some
> change
> > and don't see it when searching as you upload the change.
> > * Main menu now turns to dropdown if there's no enough room to show
> it
> > horizontally
> >
> > About content:
> >
> > * Added global styles for better readability and support of most of
> the
> > markdown options and highlighting of code (specially for AS3 and
> MXML)
> > * Now all pages has "description" and "permalink" in the head
> section to
> > improve sharing and searching on internet. Remember to add this
> lines so we
> > make all navigation consistent with the rest of pages. If someone
> notice a
> > page without this, please add it or report it.
> > * Added metadata for sharing in social networks more easily
> capturing the
> > previous point plus screenshot and name.
> > * I tried to bring pages to the index that was still missing so we
> have
> > most of the overall structure in place. I'm pretty sure there's still
> > missing concepts and things to bring to the docs, so keep your eyes
> open to
> > see what could still be missing and report it or add yourself.
> > * Notice that some of that content is still a page mostly empty and
> waiting
> > to be filled. You're all invited to do so, just let others know
> about it to
> > avoid duplicate efforts.
> > * For Component Sets, I started to create a page per component where
> we add
> > the most needed info to start with the component. It then refers to
> ASDocs
> > for a full spec and access to all classes. I'm working on Jewel.
> Others are
> > invited to use Jewel finished pages and use it as template for Basic,
> > MXRoyale and other sets, and/or create new ones for components that
> are not
> > similar and there's no counterpart on Jewel.
> > * I added live content on Jewel components, since visual running
> examples
> > are very powerful.
> > * I added live example on the GitHub tutorial app.
> > * I added many cross link references between Royale-docs, blog
> examples and
> > ASDocs pages. Content must be in only one place but that content
> should be
> > linked with the rest of royale contents in our network.
> > * I tried to format all the pages I could to get most of the new
> visuals
> > created, but I'm sure threr's still content to format, we can do this
> > between all here, and anyone coming to Royale and browse content is
> invited
> > to help in this point as well to submit more content to be reviewed
> and
> > added.
> > * I refactored all license pages to make all consistent with one
> style.
> >
> > To Help:
> >
> > I think there's many content already done and formatted in the right
> way to
> > make others be able to add content that aligns to the rest of the doc
> > pages. Andrew a

Re: ASDoc fails to compile with ANT

2019-10-01 Thread Carlos Rovira
Seem all is ok. As Alex pointed, I forgot to restore env vars after testing
RC3.
So seems dev version is ok just seems to have many warnings:

https://paste.apache.org/fsev9

if you think is ok, I can upload changes for ASDoc to website (unless you
think there's something needed from release branch)

thanks


El mar., 1 oct. 2019 a las 17:46, Piotr Zarzycki ()
escribió:

> I will run tomorrow releasecandidate script and see what will happen, so
> expect some merge tomorrow ;)
>
> wt., 1 paź 2019 o 17:41 Alex Harui  napisał(a):
>
> > That was fixed in the release branch.  I think Piotr will merge soon to
> > develop.  For now, define the Adobe environment variables (AIR_HOME,
> > PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME, FLASHPLAYER_DEBUGGER).
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 10/1/19, 3:39 AM, "Carlos Rovira"  wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I tried to run ASDoc to update site with latest reference. I remember
> > that
> > ASDoc can only be compiled right with ANT.
> > This is what I get after run "ant" in ASDoc folder:
> >
> > build_example.check-air:
> >
> >
> > build_example.copy-app-xml:
> >
> >
> > main:
> >
> >
> > json:
> >
> >  [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME:
> > /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/js
> >
> >  [java] 0.673472226 seconds
> >
> >  [java]
> >
> >
> /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/examples/royale/ASDoc/src/main/config/asdoc-js-config.xml(145):
> > col: 0 unable to open
> >
> >
> '/Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/examples/royale/ASDoc/src/main/config//11.1'.
> >
> >  [java]
> >
> >
> /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/examples/royale/ASDoc/src/main/config/asdoc-js-config.xml
> > (line: 145)
> >
> >  [java]
> >
> >  [java]   
> >
> >  [java]
> >
> >  [java]
> >
> >  [java] Java Result: 5
> >
> >
> > BUILD FAILED
> >
> >
> >
> /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/examples/royale/ASDoc/build.xml:48:
> > The following error occurred while executing this line:
> >
> >
> >
> /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/examples/royale/ASDoc/build.xml:107:
> > condition satisfied
> >
> >
> > Total time: 14 seconds
> >
> >
> >
> > I suppose that some of the latest changes in building must be
> > propagated to
> > ASDoc as well.
> >
> >
> > Can someone take a look to see what could be the problem?
> >
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> >
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosroviradata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C3c194c67a3ff4cbbc02508d7465baa7b%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C637055231831849685sdata=wUmzvVFO%2By9l8G45rJkOKqu3%2FFeid%2FYrvU0f%2Bcfhb80%3Dreserved=0
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-10-01 Thread Carlos Rovira
Thanks for all the hard work on getting releases more robust.

Probably you'll know better than me, but 0.9.7 could be very easy to do :)

El mar., 1 oct. 2019 a las 14:55, Piotr Zarzycki ()
escribió:

> Vote passes with 4 +1 votes.
>
> Thank you for voting! We are finally having release.
> Piotr
>
> pon., 30 wrz 2019 o 16:23 Piotr Zarzycki 
> napisał(a):
>
> > +1 (Binding)
> >
> > Package
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.6/rc3/apache-royale-0.9.6-src.zip
> > Java 1.8
> > OS: Windows 10 amd64 10.0
> > Source kit signatures match: y
> > Source kit builds: y
> > README is ok: y
> > RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y
> > NOTICE is ok: y
> > LICENSE is ok: y
> > No unapproved licenses or archives: y
> > No unapproved binaries: y
> >
> > Package
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.6/rc3/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.6-bin-js-swf.zip
> > Binary kit signatures match: y
> > NOTICE is ok: y
> > LICENSE is ok: y
> > No unapproved licenses or archives in binary package: y
> > No unapproved binaries in binary package: y
> >
> > Additionally I was able build and run big Apache Royale application
> > I was able build PureMVC source code to swc.
> >
> > sob., 28 wrz 2019 o 02:40 Carlos Rovira 
> > napisał(a):
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >> approve:
> >>
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >> Package
> >>
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.6/rc3/apache-royale-0.9.6-src.tar.gz
> >>
> >> Java 1.8
> >>
> >> OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.14.6
> >>
> >> Source kit signatures match: y
> >>
> >> Source kit builds: y
> >>
> >> README is ok: y
> >>
> >> RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y
> >>
> >> NOTICE is ok: y
> >>
> >> LICENSE is ok: y
> >>
> >> No unapproved licenses or archives: y
> >>
> >> No unapproved binaries: y
> >>
> >>
> >> Package
> >>
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.6/rc3/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.6-bin-js-swf.tar.gz
> >>
> >> Binary kit signatures match: y
> >>
> >> NOTICE is ok: y
> >>
> >> LICENSE is ok: y
> >>
> >> No unapproved licenses or archives in binary package: y
> >>
> >> No unapproved binaries in binary package: y
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> El jue., 26 sept. 2019 a las 21:05, Alex Harui
> ( >> >)
> >> escribió:
> >>
> >> > +1
> >> > Package
> >> >
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.6/rc3/apache-royale-0.9.6-src.tar.gz
> >> > Java 1.8
> >> > OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.12.6
> >> > Source kit signatures match: y
> >> > Source kit builds: y
> >> > README is ok: y
> >> > RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y
> >> > NOTICE is ok: y
> >> > LICENSE is ok: y
> >> > No unapproved licenses or archives: y
> >> > No unapproved binaries: y
> >> >
> >> > Package
> >> >
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.6/rc3/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.6-bin-js-swf.tar.gz
> >> > Binary kit signatures match: y
> >> > NOTICE is ok: y
> >> > LICENSE is ok: y
> >> > No unapproved licenses or archives in binary package: y
> >> > No unapproved binaries in binary package: y
> >> >
> >> > I tested with both a clean js-only and clean js-swf configuration.
> >> >
> >> > -Alex
> >> >
> >> > On 9/25/19, 7:23 AM, "Apache Royale CI Server" <
> >> apacheroyal...@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > This is the vote for the 0.9.6 release of Apache Royale.
> >> >
> >> > The release candidate can be found here;
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Froyale%2F0.9.6%2Frc3%2Fdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cb8881952698c4de9211a08d741c3e343%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C637050181900826730sdata=7mgOGrzL7RpQR%2FmCwIrw1EZzmUN2UpfkqvuuXPcVTDo%3Dreserved=0
> >> >
> >> > Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF
> >> requirements
> >> >

ASDoc fails to compile with ANT

2019-10-01 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi,

I tried to run ASDoc to update site with latest reference. I remember that
ASDoc can only be compiled right with ANT.
This is what I get after run "ant" in ASDoc folder:

build_example.check-air:


build_example.copy-app-xml:


main:


json:

 [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME:
/Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/js

 [java] 0.673472226 seconds

 [java]
/Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/examples/royale/ASDoc/src/main/config/asdoc-js-config.xml(145):
col: 0 unable to open
'/Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/examples/royale/ASDoc/src/main/config//11.1'.

 [java]
/Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/examples/royale/ASDoc/src/main/config/asdoc-js-config.xml
(line: 145)

 [java]

 [java]   

 [java]

 [java]

 [java] Java Result: 5


BUILD FAILED

/Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/examples/royale/ASDoc/build.xml:48:
The following error occurred while executing this line:

/Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/examples/royale/ASDoc/build.xml:107:
condition satisfied


Total time: 14 seconds



I suppose that some of the latest changes in building must be propagated to
ASDoc as well.


Can someone take a look to see what could be the problem?


thanks

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


About Royale Docs Improvements over latest months

2019-10-01 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi,

about latest changes in docs done is latest months. This is a summary of
the work done (still in progress at some points):

About layout, search and usability:

* Now we have a more polished layout that should work right on desktop,
tablet and mobile, making more easy for new users coming to Royale learn
about it
* The sidebar menu will show on the right as normal in tablet and desktop.
In mobile shows a button on the right side that make the menu slide from
the right
* Now we have search functionality implemented thanks to Algolia search.
The index is crawled every 24h. Take into account if you make some change
and don't see it when searching as you upload the change.
* Main menu now turns to dropdown if there's no enough room to show it
horizontally

About content:

* Added global styles for better readability and support of most of the
markdown options and highlighting of code (specially for AS3 and MXML)
* Now all pages has "description" and "permalink" in the head section to
improve sharing and searching on internet. Remember to add this lines so we
make all navigation consistent with the rest of pages. If someone notice a
page without this, please add it or report it.
* Added metadata for sharing in social networks more easily capturing the
previous point plus screenshot and name.
* I tried to bring pages to the index that was still missing so we have
most of the overall structure in place. I'm pretty sure there's still
missing concepts and things to bring to the docs, so keep your eyes open to
see what could still be missing and report it or add yourself.
* Notice that some of that content is still a page mostly empty and waiting
to be filled. You're all invited to do so, just let others know about it to
avoid duplicate efforts.
* For Component Sets, I started to create a page per component where we add
the most needed info to start with the component. It then refers to ASDocs
for a full spec and access to all classes. I'm working on Jewel. Others are
invited to use Jewel finished pages and use it as template for Basic,
MXRoyale and other sets, and/or create new ones for components that are not
similar and there's no counterpart on Jewel.
* I added live content on Jewel components, since visual running examples
are very powerful.
* I added live example on the GitHub tutorial app.
* I added many cross link references between Royale-docs, blog examples and
ASDocs pages. Content must be in only one place but that content should be
linked with the rest of royale contents in our network.
* I tried to format all the pages I could to get most of the new visuals
created, but I'm sure threr's still content to format, we can do this
between all here, and anyone coming to Royale and browse content is invited
to help in this point as well to submit more content to be reviewed and
added.
* I refactored all license pages to make all consistent with one style.

To Help:

I think there's many content already done and formatted in the right way to
make others be able to add content that aligns to the rest of the doc
pages. Andrew and I are here to help to give the finished results that
conform to actual specs.

There's still many things to do to get a full docs site. This is the list
of things I see:

* Fill Features and concepts pages still empty (View States, Data Binding,
RPC methods pages, ). I think this can be the most important ones since
are core concepts in Royale.
* Complete Jewel and other sets reference pages. Very important for people
coming. Here I plan to add for Jewel "style specs" too as someone mentioned
some days ago, and I think this will be a very good idea.
* Add Crux documentation, that should come in part from swiz framework docs

What more things you still think are missing?

Thanks


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-09-28 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Alex,

About Vars: I have:

   -  ANT_HOME
   - MAVEN_OPTS
   - JAVA_HOME,
   - GOOG_HOME
   - ROYALE_HOME
   - ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME
   - ROYALE_TYPEDEFS_HOME
   - FLEX_HOME (I supposed this last one can be removed too, but didn't
   notice

I commented

   - PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME
   - PLAYERGLOBAL_VERSION
   - FLASHPLAYER_DEBUGGER
   - AIR_HOME


This is the entire log of my latest failed: https://paste.apache.org/23e88

The settings that Piotr is this: https://paste.apache.org/gfift

Thanks


Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-09-27 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi,

ok, seems the latest test didn't work. it failed here:

[INFO]


[INFO] BUILD FAILURE

[INFO]


[INFO] Total time:  01:38 min

[INFO] Finished at: 2019-09-28T03:13:17+02:00

[INFO]


*[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.royale.compiler:royale-maven-plugin:0.9.6:compile-as
(default-compile-as) on project BasicTheme: Could not resolve dependencies
for project org.apache.royale.framework:BasicTheme:swc:0.9.6: Could not
find artifact com.adobe.air.framework:airglobal:swc:20.0 in apache-release *
(https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases) -> [Help 1]

[ERROR]

[ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the -e
switch.

[ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.

[ERROR]

[ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions,
please read the following articles:

[ERROR] [Help 1]
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/MojoExecutionException

[ERROR]

[ERROR] After correcting the problems, you can resume the build with the
command

[ERROR]   mvn  -rf :BasicTheme


BUILD FAILED

/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc3/ApproveRoyale.xml:778: The following
error occurred while executing this line:

/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc3/ApproveRoyale.xml:811: exec returned:
1


Total time: 30 minutes 54 seconds


Maybe some more refinement should be done in BasicTheme?
Also the following Discuss threads could have more instructions about
removing env vars for beginners trying to use the process




El sáb., 28 sept. 2019 a las 3:05, Carlos Rovira ()
escribió:

> Hi,
>
> thanks Josh and Alex for your help on this. I finally get the approve xml
> method to work on my machine :)
>
> I need to :
> - Use the latest Aprove xml
> - remove my AIR_HOME and FLASH (player and debugger) env vars.
> - and use the settings provided by Piotr. Although I'm making a new try
> now with my own setting to see if that is not needed trying to understand
> finally what's really needed or not.
>
> Since the process is long (more than 50' in my machine, I'll probably
> report here tomorrow if this final experiement finally worked :).
>
>
> El jue., 26 sept. 2019 a las 23:47, Alex Harui ()
> escribió:
>
>> Thanks for trying it.  I just updated the ApproveRoyale.xml linked to in
>> the vote thread to try to eliminate people getting the wrong one..
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 9/26/19, 1:48 PM, "Josh Tynjala"  wrote:
>>
>> Thank you, Alex! I tried your changes with adobe/royale artifacts
>> deleted
>> from .m2, and I was able to get through both js and js-swf builds
>> successfully.
>>
>> Carlos, I think that these changes will allow you to get through the
>> process now too.
>>
>> For everyone's convenience, here's a link to the latest
>> ApproveRoyale.xml
>> script for 0.9.6:
>>
>>
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Frelease%2F0.9.6%2FApproveRoyale.xmldata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C42a3ce7a5d684b82c6c108d742c2ce68%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637051276838990699sdata=djQYfxCvBrh5dkSnZI7ocryl515uHvkLk7qkXOFy2WQ%3Dreserved=0
>>
>> Use this one instead of the one linked from the [VOTE] thread. Just
>> to be
>> clear, since ApproveRoyale.xml is a convenience script for PMC
>> members to
>> aid with the release voting process, and not something that end users
>> or
>> potential contributors need to use, these latest changes to
>> ApproveRoyale.xml don't require the creation of a new RC.
>>
>> --
>> Josh Tynjala
>> Bowler Hat LLC <
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowlerhat.devdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C42a3ce7a5d684b82c6c108d742c2ce68%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637051276838990699sdata=I4Hl9o57gg8F3Yk3TlzTYQE3eJTYFLdzj7xsfpgPfnw%3Dreserved=0
>> >
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 11:34 AM Alex Harui > >
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Yeah, I just saw that myself.  That's because I didn't merge in my
>> changes
>> > correctly.  I just pushed one that seems to be working better.
>> >
>> > -Alex
>> >
>> > On 9/26/19, 10:27 AM, "Josh Tynjala" 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Thanks, Alex. The ApproveRoyale.mxml from the latest
>> release/0.9.6 is
>> > working for me

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-09-27 Thread Carlos Rovira
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 12:47 AM Alex Harui
> 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Looks like I missed a commit.  I just pushed the
> ApproveRoyale.xml I
> > was
> > > using to the release branch.
> > >
> > > Try that one and see if it works better.  It shouldn't require
> the
> > > workaround you used.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 9/25/19, 4:16 PM, "Josh Tynjala"  >
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > To get the system property working with ApproveRoyale.xml,
> I
> > added the
> > > following line to each of the mvn commands in my local
> copy of
> > > ApproveRoyale.xml:
> > >
> > >  > >
> > >
> >
> value="-Dcom.adobe.systemIdsForWhichTheTermsOfTheAdobeLicenseAgreementAreAccepted=499700b6"/>
> > >
> > > This should work for anyone using Bash's yes command to
> quickly
> > > approve the
> > > license headers (after you've already done it once
> manually, of
> > > course).
> > >
> > > yes | ant -e -f ApproveRoyale.xml -Drelease.version=0.9.6
> -Drc=3
> > >
> > > --
> > > Josh Tynjala
> > > Bowler Hat LLC <
> > >
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowlerhat.devdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C42a3ce7a5d684b82c6c108d742c2ce68%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637051276838990699sdata=I4Hl9o57gg8F3Yk3TlzTYQE3eJTYFLdzj7xsfpgPfnw%3Dreserved=0
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 2:58 PM Josh Tynjala <
> > > joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I deleted all com.adobe artifacts in my Maven .m2
> folder, and
> > I can
> > > see
> > > > the prompt to accept the license for the Adobe
> dependencies.
> > > >
> > > > The build output suggests that you can set a system
> property to
> > > accept the
> > > > agreement, so I tried adding that property to my
> command, like
> > this:
> > > >
> > > > ant -e -f ApproveRoyale.xml -Drelease.version=0.9.6
> -Drc=3
> > > >
> > >
>     >
> -Dcom.adobe.systemIdsForWhichTheTermsOfTheAdobeLicenseAgreementAreAccepted=
> > > >
> > > > (Where  is replaced by my real system ID)
> > > >
> > > > However, it still asked me to accept the agreement.
> Perhaps
> > this
> > > system
> > > > property isn't getting inherited by the Maven build.
> > > >
> > > > I am using the RC3 ApproveRoyale.xml linked from the Vote
> > thread,
> > > and not
> > > > an older one.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Josh Tynjala
> > > > Bowler Hat LLC <
> > >
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowlerhat.devdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C42a3ce7a5d684b82c6c108d742c2ce68%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637051276838990699sdata=I4Hl9o57gg8F3Yk3TlzTYQE3eJTYFLdzj7xsfpgPfnw%3Dreserved=0
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 11:25 AM Carlos Rovira <
> > > carlosrov...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi
> > > >> I tried in the meanwhile with your settings and enter
> in the
> > > endless loop
> > > >> as in RC2
> > > >>
> > > >> I'll try to run now adding that to the command and
> report back
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> El mié., 25 sept. 2019 a las 18:59, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> >  

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-09-27 Thread Carlos Rovira
is release:
> +1 Approve the release
> -1 Disapprove the release (please provide specific comments to why)
>
> This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.
>
> The vote passes if there is:
> - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
> - More positive votes than negative votes
>
> Remember that this is a 'beta-quality' release so expect there
> will be many bugs found.  IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix
> bugs
> in the RC, but to make sure we have the packaging right, and enough
> functionality that folks will have some success trying to use it.
>
> People who are not in PMC are also encouraged to test out the release
> and
> vote, although their votes will not be binding, they can influence how
> the
> PMC votes.
>
> When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR
> version you tested with.
>
> For your convenience, there is an ant script that automates the common
> steps to validate a release.  Instead of individually downloading the
> package and signature files, unzipping, etc, you can instead:
> 1) create an empty folder,
> 2) download into that folder this file:
>
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Froyale%2F0.9.6%2Frc3%2FApproveRoyale.xmldata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cb8881952698c4de9211a08d741c3e343%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C637050181900826730sdata=mYm%2BktB70vGktO0tSGi4caVWKkswNHtR8wuCil3p5HI%3Dreserved=0
> 3) run the script:
>ant -e -f ApproveRoyale.xml -Drelease.version=0.9.6 -Drc=3
>If you want to test SWF support during the approval, use:
>    ant -e -f ApproveRoyale.xml -Drelease.version=0.9.6 -Drc=3
> -Duse-flash=true
>
> You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the
> packages and build results are always encouraged.
>
> Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread
> not this VOTE thread.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
>

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-09-25 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Josh,

you're right, I have AIR_HOME in my .bash_profile set, since I left all env
vars set (flex, air, playerglobal, royale)
So,
- should I remove some more in addition to AIR_HOME?

additionally:

- Should I use the settings from Piotr too?
- Should I add -Dgenerate.swf.swcs=true and -DskipTests=true ?

thanks!



El mié., 25 sept. 2019 a las 23:03, Josh Tynjala ()
escribió:

> Carlos,
>
> Can you check to see if the AIR_HOME environment variable is set or not?
>
> If I'm understanding the logic in ApproveRoyale.xml, then you need to
> ensure that AIR_HOME is *NOT* set, unless you include -Duse-flash=true in
> your command. If AIR_HOME is set, then you should clear it. It may also be
> a good idea to clear both PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME and FLASHPLAYER_DEBUGGER too,
> just to be safe.
>
> --
> Josh Tynjala
> Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 9:41 AM Carlos Rovira 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > sorry to report that my try failed. I tried with clean .m2 and my own
> > settings.xml. Maybe I need to switch to the settings Piotr send to me?
> >
> > as well I used the instruction provided in email: ant -e -f
> > ApproveRoyale.xml -Drelease.version=0.9.6 -Drc=3
> >
> >
> > ache.org/maven2/org/antlr/antlr/3.4/antlr-3.4.jar (1.1 MB at 2.7
> > MB/s)[INFO]
> > 
> >
> > [INFO] Reactor Build Order:
> >
> > [INFO]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent
> > [pom]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common
> > [jar]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils
> > [jar]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc
> > [jar]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler
> > [jar]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX
> > [jar]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils
> > [jar]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger
> > [jar]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer
> > [jar]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks
> > [jar]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: RoyaleUnit Ant Tasks
> > [jar]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin
> > [maven-plugin]
> >
> > [INFO]
> >
> > [INFO] -< org.apache.royale.compiler:royale-compiler-parent
> > >--
> >
> > [INFO] Building Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent 0.9.6
> > [1/12]
> >
> > [INFO] [ pom
> > ]-
> >
> > Downloading from apache-release:
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/com/adobe/flash/framework/playerglobal/20.0/playerglobal-20.0.pom
> >
> > Downloading from central:
> >
> >
> https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/com/adobe/flash/framework/playerglobal/20.0/playerglobal-20.0.pom
> >
> > [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flash.framework:playerglobal:swc:20.0 is
> > missing, no dependency information available
> >
> > Downloading from apache-release:
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/com/adobe/flash/framework/playerglobal/20.0/playerglobal-20.0.swc
> >
> > Downloading from central:
> >
> >
> https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/com/adobe/flash/framework/playerglobal/20.0/playerglobal-20.0.swc
> >
> > [INFO]
> > 
> >
> > [INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent 0.9.6:
> >
> > [INFO]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent  FAILURE [
> > 0.982 s]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common ... SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils  SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc ... SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler .. SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX ... SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils .. SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger .. SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer . SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks  SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: RoyaleUnit Ant Tasks  SKIPPED
> &

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-09-25 Thread Carlos Rovira
Let's wait to Alex, I suppose something was not working as expected with
the changes he did yesterday to solve this issue.

El mié., 25 sept. 2019 a las 22:57, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> Carlos,
>
> I can only propose copy player global in appropriate place and try again. I
> have no idea how to resolve your problem.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2019, 10:37 PM Carlos Rovira 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi, yes, I copied in the RC2 thread what was appearing
> >
> > btw, I tried again adding the proposed commands with no luck. The fail is
> > the same as before:
> >
> > Downloading from central:
> >
> >
> https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/com/adobe/flash/framework/playerglobal/20.0/playerglobal-20.0.swc
> >
> > [INFO]
> > 
> >
> > [INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent 0.9.6:
> >
> > [INFO]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent  FAILURE [
> > 0.953 s]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common ... SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils  SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc ... SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler .. SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX ... SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils .. SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger .. SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer . SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks  SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: RoyaleUnit Ant Tasks  SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin . SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO]
> > 
> >
> > [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> >
> > [INFO]
> > 
> >
> > [INFO] Total time:  8.704 s
> >
> > [INFO] Finished at: 2019-09-25T21:00:22+02:00
> >
> > [INFO]
> > 
> >
> > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project royale-compiler-parent: Could
> not
> > resolve dependencies for project
> > org.apache.royale.compiler:royale-compiler-parent:pom:0.9.6: Could not
> find
> > artifact com.adobe.flash.framework:playerglobal:swc:20.0 in
> apache-release
> > (
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases) -> [Help 1]
> >
> > [ERROR]
> >
> > [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the
> -e
> > switch.
> >
> > [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.
> >
> > [ERROR]
> >
> > [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions,
> > please read the following articles:
> >
> > [ERROR] [Help 1]
> >
> >
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/DependencyResolutionException
> >
> >
> > BUILD FAILED
> >
> > /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc3/ApproveRoyale.xml:778: The
> following
> > error occurred while executing this line:
> >
> > /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc3/ApproveRoyale.xml:801: exec
> returned:
> > 1
> >
> >
> > Total time: 28 minutes 57 seconds
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > El mié., 25 sept. 2019 a las 21:27, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >
> > > By endless loop you mean that script cannot download playerglobal -
> > Asking
> > > for the license?
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019, 8:25 PM Carlos Rovira 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi
> > > > I tried in the meanwhile with your settings and enter in the endless
> > loop
> > > > as in RC2
> > > >
> > > > I'll try to run now adding that to the command and report back
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > El mié., 25 sept. 2019 a las 18:59, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > > >
> > > > > The same issue as it was previously. You are missing playerglobal
> - I
> > 

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-09-25 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi, yes, I copied in the RC2 thread what was appearing

btw, I tried again adding the proposed commands with no luck. The fail is
the same as before:

Downloading from central:
https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/com/adobe/flash/framework/playerglobal/20.0/playerglobal-20.0.swc

[INFO]


[INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent 0.9.6:

[INFO]

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent  FAILURE [
0.953 s]

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common ... SKIPPED

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils  SKIPPED

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc ... SKIPPED

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler .. SKIPPED

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX ... SKIPPED

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils .. SKIPPED

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger .. SKIPPED

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer . SKIPPED

[INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks  SKIPPED

[INFO] Apache Royale: RoyaleUnit Ant Tasks  SKIPPED

[INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin . SKIPPED

[INFO]


[INFO] BUILD FAILURE

[INFO]


[INFO] Total time:  8.704 s

[INFO] Finished at: 2019-09-25T21:00:22+02:00

[INFO]


[ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project royale-compiler-parent: Could not
resolve dependencies for project
org.apache.royale.compiler:royale-compiler-parent:pom:0.9.6: Could not find
artifact com.adobe.flash.framework:playerglobal:swc:20.0 in apache-release (
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases) -> [Help 1]

[ERROR]

[ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the -e
switch.

[ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.

[ERROR]

[ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions,
please read the following articles:

[ERROR] [Help 1]
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/DependencyResolutionException


BUILD FAILED

/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc3/ApproveRoyale.xml:778: The following
error occurred while executing this line:

/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc3/ApproveRoyale.xml:801: exec returned:
1


Total time: 28 minutes 57 seconds





El mié., 25 sept. 2019 a las 21:27, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> By endless loop you mean that script cannot download playerglobal - Asking
> for the license?
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2019, 8:25 PM Carlos Rovira 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> > I tried in the meanwhile with your settings and enter in the endless loop
> > as in RC2
> >
> > I'll try to run now adding that to the command and report back
> >
> >
> > El mié., 25 sept. 2019 a las 18:59, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >
> > > The same issue as it was previously. You are missing playerglobal - I
> > don't
> > > know why at all. You can try to switch to my settings - don't forget
> > update
> > > link to maven artifacts in it.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure also but maybe you should try to run approve script with
> > this
> > > one: -Dgenerate.swf.swcs=true and -DskipTests=true.
> > >
> > > śr., 25 wrz 2019 o 18:41 Carlos Rovira 
> > > napisał(a):
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > sorry to report that my try failed. I tried with clean .m2 and my own
> > > > settings.xml. Maybe I need to switch to the settings Piotr send to
> me?
> > > >
> > > > as well I used the instruction provided in email: ant -e -f
> > > > ApproveRoyale.xml -Drelease.version=0.9.6 -Drc=3
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ache.org/maven2/org/antlr/antlr/3.4/antlr-3.4.jar (1.1 MB at 2.7
> > > > MB/s)[INFO]
> > > >
> > 
> > > >
> > > > [INFO] Reactor Build Order:
> > > >
> > > > [INFO]
> > > >
> > > > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent
> > > > [pom]
> > > >
> > > > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common
> > > > [jar]
> > > >
> > > > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils
> > > > [jar]
> > > >
> > > > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc
> > > > [jar]
> > > >
> > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-09-25 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi
I tried in the meanwhile with your settings and enter in the endless loop
as in RC2

I'll try to run now adding that to the command and report back


El mié., 25 sept. 2019 a las 18:59, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> The same issue as it was previously. You are missing playerglobal - I don't
> know why at all. You can try to switch to my settings - don't forget update
> link to maven artifacts in it.
>
> I'm not sure also but maybe you should try to run approve script with this
> one: -Dgenerate.swf.swcs=true and -DskipTests=true.
>
> śr., 25 wrz 2019 o 18:41 Carlos Rovira 
> napisał(a):
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > sorry to report that my try failed. I tried with clean .m2 and my own
> > settings.xml. Maybe I need to switch to the settings Piotr send to me?
> >
> > as well I used the instruction provided in email: ant -e -f
> > ApproveRoyale.xml -Drelease.version=0.9.6 -Drc=3
> >
> >
> > ache.org/maven2/org/antlr/antlr/3.4/antlr-3.4.jar (1.1 MB at 2.7
> > MB/s)[INFO]
> > 
> >
> > [INFO] Reactor Build Order:
> >
> > [INFO]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent
> > [pom]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common
> > [jar]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils
> > [jar]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc
> > [jar]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler
> > [jar]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX
> > [jar]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils
> > [jar]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger
> > [jar]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer
> > [jar]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks
> > [jar]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: RoyaleUnit Ant Tasks
> > [jar]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin
> > [maven-plugin]
> >
> > [INFO]
> >
> > [INFO] -< org.apache.royale.compiler:royale-compiler-parent
> > >--
> >
> > [INFO] Building Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent 0.9.6
> > [1/12]
> >
> > [INFO] [ pom
> > ]-
> >
> > Downloading from apache-release:
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/com/adobe/flash/framework/playerglobal/20.0/playerglobal-20.0.pom
> >
> > Downloading from central:
> >
> >
> https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/com/adobe/flash/framework/playerglobal/20.0/playerglobal-20.0.pom
> >
> > [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flash.framework:playerglobal:swc:20.0 is
> > missing, no dependency information available
> >
> > Downloading from apache-release:
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/com/adobe/flash/framework/playerglobal/20.0/playerglobal-20.0.swc
> >
> > Downloading from central:
> >
> >
> https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/com/adobe/flash/framework/playerglobal/20.0/playerglobal-20.0.swc
> >
> > [INFO]
> > 
> >
> > [INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent 0.9.6:
> >
> > [INFO]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent  FAILURE [
> > 0.982 s]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common ... SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils  SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc ... SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler .. SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX ... SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils .. SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger .. SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer . SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks  SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: RoyaleUnit Ant Tasks  SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin . SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO]
> > 
> >
> > [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> >
> > [INFO]
> > -

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-09-25 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi,

sorry to report that my try failed. I tried with clean .m2 and my own
settings.xml. Maybe I need to switch to the settings Piotr send to me?

as well I used the instruction provided in email: ant -e -f
ApproveRoyale.xml -Drelease.version=0.9.6 -Drc=3


ache.org/maven2/org/antlr/antlr/3.4/antlr-3.4.jar (1.1 MB at 2.7
MB/s)[INFO]


[INFO] Reactor Build Order:

[INFO]

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent
[pom]

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common
[jar]

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils
[jar]

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc
[jar]

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler
[jar]

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX
[jar]

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils
[jar]

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger
[jar]

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer
[jar]

[INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks
[jar]

[INFO] Apache Royale: RoyaleUnit Ant Tasks
[jar]

[INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin
[maven-plugin]

[INFO]

[INFO] -< org.apache.royale.compiler:royale-compiler-parent
>--

[INFO] Building Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent 0.9.6
[1/12]

[INFO] [ pom
]-

Downloading from apache-release:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/com/adobe/flash/framework/playerglobal/20.0/playerglobal-20.0.pom

Downloading from central:
https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/com/adobe/flash/framework/playerglobal/20.0/playerglobal-20.0.pom

[WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flash.framework:playerglobal:swc:20.0 is
missing, no dependency information available

Downloading from apache-release:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/com/adobe/flash/framework/playerglobal/20.0/playerglobal-20.0.swc

Downloading from central:
https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/com/adobe/flash/framework/playerglobal/20.0/playerglobal-20.0.swc

[INFO]


[INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent 0.9.6:

[INFO]

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent  FAILURE [
0.982 s]

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common ... SKIPPED

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils  SKIPPED

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc ... SKIPPED

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler .. SKIPPED

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX ... SKIPPED

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils .. SKIPPED

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger .. SKIPPED

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer . SKIPPED

[INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks  SKIPPED

[INFO] Apache Royale: RoyaleUnit Ant Tasks  SKIPPED

[INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin . SKIPPED

[INFO]


[INFO] BUILD FAILURE

[INFO]


[INFO] Total time:  8.438 s

[INFO] Finished at: 2019-09-25T18:35:49+02:00

[INFO]


[ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project royale-compiler-parent: Could not
resolve dependencies for project
org.apache.royale.compiler:royale-compiler-parent:pom:0.9.6: Could not find
artifact com.adobe.flash.framework:playerglobal:swc:20.0 in apache-release (
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases) -> [Help 1]

[ERROR]

[ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the -e
switch.

[ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.

[ERROR]

[ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions,
please read the following articles:

[ERROR] [Help 1]
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/DependencyResolutionException


BUILD FAILED

/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc3/ApproveRoyale.xml:778: The following
error occurred while executing this line:

/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc3/ApproveRoyale.xml:801: exec returned:
1


Total time: 27 minutes 17 seconds

macbookpro:testrc3 carlosrovira$


El mié., 25 sept. 2019 a las 17:56, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> I'm not sure how it happened this time, but yeah we finally have. ;)
>
> śr., 25 wrz 2019 o 17:54 Carlos Rovira 
> napisał(a):
>
> > Hi Piotr,
> > great to see we have different threads in gmail :)
> >
> > El mié., 25 sept. 2019 a las 16:24, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >
> > > Ok, new and hopefully the last one RC3. I didn't run ApproveScript
> myself
> > > yet, but will do that tomorrow or next week.
> > >
> > > śr., 25 wrz 2019 o 16:23 Apache

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC3

2019-09-25 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Piotr,
great to see we have different threads in gmail :)

El mié., 25 sept. 2019 a las 16:24, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> Ok, new and hopefully the last one RC3. I didn't run ApproveScript myself
> yet, but will do that tomorrow or next week.
>
> śr., 25 wrz 2019 o 16:23 Apache Royale CI Server  >
> napisał(a):
>
> > This is the discussion thread.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr
>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: Jenkins down

2019-09-24 Thread Carlos Rovira
Congrats Piotr! :)

El mar., 24 sept. 2019 a las 14:58, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> I got it working! In jenkins folder jenkins.xml file has -Xrs -Xmx256m - I
> increased value to -Xrs -Xmx1024m.
>
> wt., 24 wrz 2019 o 12:38 Piotr Zarzycki 
> napisał(a):
>
> > Hi Carlos,
> >
> > I just took a risk and restart PC. It didn't help and Jenkins is still
> > down :(
> >
> > wt., 24 wrz 2019 o 10:44 Carlos Rovira 
> > napisał(a):
> >
> >> Hi Piotr,
> >>
> >> don't know too much about that machine (almost I never touched it). But
> I
> >> think a restart should not be a problem. I understand that processes in
> >> use
> >> are Maven, ANT, and things like that that should be present on restart.
> >> Also, don't know if we have some document for restart process somewhere,
> >> but if doesn't exit, I assume there should be no much problem. Also
> >> restoring machines is something needed sometimes...
> >>
> >> El mar., 24 sept. 2019 a las 10:35, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >>
> >> > Hi Guys,
> >> >
> >> > It looks like I broke something on our remote machine. Machine was
> >> pretty
> >> > slow today, so I have tried restart Jenkins and close some java
> >> processes.
> >> > It helped, but I cannot currently run jenkins at all. Maybe restarting
> >> > machine could help, but I'm not sure what would be repercussions after
> >> > that.
> >> >
> >> > Anyone know ?
> >> >
> >> > I'm sorry for troubles.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > --
> >> >
> >> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Carlos Rovira
> >> http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: Jenkins down

2019-09-24 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Piotr,

don't know too much about that machine (almost I never touched it). But I
think a restart should not be a problem. I understand that processes in use
are Maven, ANT, and things like that that should be present on restart.
Also, don't know if we have some document for restart process somewhere,
but if doesn't exit, I assume there should be no much problem. Also
restoring machines is something needed sometimes...

El mar., 24 sept. 2019 a las 10:35, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> Hi Guys,
>
> It looks like I broke something on our remote machine. Machine was pretty
> slow today, so I have tried restart Jenkins and close some java processes.
> It helped, but I cannot currently run jenkins at all. Maybe restarting
> machine could help, but I'm not sure what would be repercussions after
> that.
>
> Anyone know ?
>
> I'm sorry for troubles.
>
> Thanks,
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: [Discuss] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

2019-09-23 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi,

I will stop for today, want to work a bit on royale-docs mobile layout that
I have near finish, so I'll wait for Alex changes and try tomorrow. IMHO
this stuff is important, so it's worth the waiting time of a day or two.

Thanks





El lun., 23 sept. 201. 9 a las 17:59, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> My point is that all those fixes are for SDK Developers, not for Users. I
> would like to satisfy users not SDK developers, the first one are waiting
> too long for release.
>
> pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 17:53 Alex Harui 
> napisał(a):
>
> > Depends on your definition of small.  The .mvn/extensions.xml is missing
> > from royale-compiler.  That's why it won't auto-download the Adobe stuff.
> >
> > Then almost every pom.xml needs to be changed to support js-only.
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 9/23/19, 8:50 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" 
> wrote:
> >
> > Alex,
> >
> > Carlos is able to build framework by ANT so to me it's enough to go
> > with
> > release. I have pushed him to try cause I thought that with some
> small
> > workarounds he will be able to build that as well.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr
> >
> > pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 17:46 Alex Harui 
> > napisał(a):
> >
> > > Update:  There is definitely a problem with the source package that
> > > prevents building the source with Maven from a truly clean machine.
> > I have
> > > some changes pending.  This is going to be a pretty large commit as
> > if
> > > affects a lot of files.   I'm not sure why Piotr is have Carlos
> > continue to
> > > try things.  That seems like duplication of effort to me.  I will
> > hopefully
> > > have this working by end of my day today.
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 9/21/19, 4:51 PM, "Alex Harui" 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > I changed the subject to try to keep the threads separated.
> > >
> > > Please remember that the scripts and instructions are biased
> > towards
> > > js-only.  If you have PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME, AIR_HOME, and
> > FLASHPLAYER_DEBUGGER
> > > set then you will need different profiles.
> > >
> > > Looks like this failure is caused by change 228f4fbd1.  There
> > should
> > > not be hard dependencies on Adobe stuff in order to support
> js-only.
> > >
> > > In testing a fix, I found out how to reproduce Josh's first
> > issue with
> > > the Maven build from a clean machine (remove all adobe and royale
> > artifacts
> > > from local repo) for js-only.  More changes to the poms are
> > necessary.  I
> > > will try to figure it out.
> > >
> > > And so, this means that a few more folks are likely to have
> > trouble
> > > building from source.  Again, most folks are going to just use the
> > > binaries, but I'm worried about first impressions for those who do
> > use the
> > > source.
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 9/21/19, 2:32 PM, "Carlos Rovira" 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > HI Piotr,
> > >
> > > since I have work to do on docs, I prefer to try with some
> > > concrete info,
> > > or I'll end going like chicken without head :)
> > > I can test with and without vars on my .bash_profile too.
> > >
> > > Even we can release 0.9.6 and left this issues for 0.9.7
> > >
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > Carlos
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > El sáb., 21 sept. 2019 a las 22:44, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > >
> > > > You have example of such file in repository. Just based
> on
> > that
> > > setup
> > >     > staging link repository. Currently in that file you have
> > > Snapshot links and
> > > > release. Based on this you can setup staging.
> > > >
> > > > Apart of that I have shared such file some time ago in
> the
> > > previous
> > > > releases.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure ev

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

2019-09-23 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi,
process did the same endless loop.

@Piotr Zarzycki  do you mean to add to may
.bash_profile "export
systemIdsForWhichTheTermsOfTheAdobeLicenseAgreementAreAccepted= 6d2bc022" ?



El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 18:40, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> Do you have this env. setup
> systemIdsForWhichTheTermsOfTheAdobeLicenseAgreementAreAccepted ? You need
> to have with value I think  6d2bc022.
>
> pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 18:33 Carlos Rovira 
> napisał(a):
>
> > Hi Piotr,
> >
> > For this hour my laptop was running the build again, and now the script
> > seems to end in an endless loop repeating this in console all the time:
> >
> >
> >
> "Dcom.adobe.systemIdsForWhichTheTermsOfTheAdobeLicenseAgreementAreAccepted=6d2bc022
> > )
> >
> > Do you accept (Yes/No) ? Your System-Id: 6d2bc022
> >
> > The Adobe SDK license agreement applies to the Adobe AIR SDK. Do you want
> > to install the Adobe AIR SDK? Adobe AIR SDK License:
> > http://www.adobe.com/products/air/sdk-eula.html
> >
> > (In a non-interactive build such as a CI server build, alternatively to
> > typing y or yes you can also set a system property containing your system
> > which is interpreted as equivalent to accepting by typing y or yes: -"
> >
> > I can launch it again to see what happens...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 17:16, Carlos Rovira (<
> > carlosrov...@apache.org>)
> > escribió:
> >
> > > Hi Piotr,
> > >
> > > sorry, ignore my latest emails. Since I forgot to switch .m2
> > repositories.
> > > In the real one there's no such layout
> > > Going to rerun again.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 17:13, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > >
> > >> Ok so what is the output of your build now ?
> > >>
> > >> pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 17:11 Carlos Rovira 
> > >> napisał(a):
> > >>
> > >> > Hi Piotr,
> > >> > since finally layouts are the same, I think is not worth it to do
> the
> > >> > sending.
> > >> > The only difference is the file exposed in my last email
> > >> >
> > >> > El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 16:47, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > >> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Carlos,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Mailing list won't allow post screenshot. Upload them somewhere
> and
> > >> post
> > >> > > links.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 16:27 Carlos Rovira 
> > >> > > napisał(a):
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > Hi all,
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Piotr and I discover off list the following:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > this is what I have in my .m2
> > >> > > > [image: Captura de pantalla 2019-09-23 a las 16.11.04.png]
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > and this the Pitro's package layout that sent me off list:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > [image: Captura de pantalla 2019-09-23 a las 16.12.19.png]
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > how is possible Piotr and I get different layouts?
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > I'll try to build now with his layout
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 16:04, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > >> > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> Carlos,
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> It's not exactly the same, cause my settings eliminate one
> issue
> > >> from
> > >> > > your
> > >> > > >> log. I have send you player global off list - just put it
> > manually
> > >> > into
> > >> > > >> Maven folder and try again.
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> Thanks,
> > >> > > >> Piotr
> > >> > > >>
> &g

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

2019-09-23 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Piotr,

For this hour my laptop was running the build again, and now the script
seems to end in an endless loop repeating this in console all the time:

"Dcom.adobe.systemIdsForWhichTheTermsOfTheAdobeLicenseAgreementAreAccepted=6d2bc022
)

Do you accept (Yes/No) ? Your System-Id: 6d2bc022

The Adobe SDK license agreement applies to the Adobe AIR SDK. Do you want
to install the Adobe AIR SDK? Adobe AIR SDK License:
http://www.adobe.com/products/air/sdk-eula.html

(In a non-interactive build such as a CI server build, alternatively to
typing y or yes you can also set a system property containing your system
which is interpreted as equivalent to accepting by typing y or yes: -"

I can launch it again to see what happens...




El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 17:16, Carlos Rovira ()
escribió:

> Hi Piotr,
>
> sorry, ignore my latest emails. Since I forgot to switch .m2 repositories.
> In the real one there's no such layout
> Going to rerun again.
>
>
>
>
> El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 17:13, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>
>> Ok so what is the output of your build now ?
>>
>> pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 17:11 Carlos Rovira 
>> napisał(a):
>>
>> > Hi Piotr,
>> > since finally layouts are the same, I think is not worth it to do the
>> > sending.
>> > The only difference is the file exposed in my last email
>> >
>> > El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 16:47, Piotr Zarzycki (<
>> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>> >
>> > > Carlos,
>> > >
>> > > Mailing list won't allow post screenshot. Upload them somewhere and
>> post
>> > > links.
>> > >
>> > > pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 16:27 Carlos Rovira 
>> > > napisał(a):
>> > >
>> > > > Hi all,
>> > > >
>> > > > Piotr and I discover off list the following:
>> > > >
>> > > > this is what I have in my .m2
>> > > > [image: Captura de pantalla 2019-09-23 a las 16.11.04.png]
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > and this the Pitro's package layout that sent me off list:
>> > > >
>> > > > [image: Captura de pantalla 2019-09-23 a las 16.12.19.png]
>> > > >
>> > > > how is possible Piotr and I get different layouts?
>> > > >
>> > > > I'll try to build now with his layout
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 16:04, Piotr Zarzycki (<
>> > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>> > > >
>> > > >> Carlos,
>> > > >>
>> > > >> It's not exactly the same, cause my settings eliminate one issue
>> from
>> > > your
>> > > >> log. I have send you player global off list - just put it manually
>> > into
>> > > >> Maven folder and try again.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Thanks,
>> > > >> Piotr
>> > > >>
>> > > >> pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 13:50 Carlos Rovira 
>> > > >> napisał(a):
>> > > >>
>> > > >> > Hi,
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > sorry to say that build failed. Here's the final log. Mostly the
>> > same
>> > > >> > problem with flash player as always:
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > 0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1):
>> > > >> 1.0/1.0
>> > > >> > MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1):
>> > > 1.0/1.0
>> > > >> > MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1):
>> > > 1.0/1.0
>> > > >> > MBProgress (1): 1.0 MBDownloaded from
>> > central:
>> > > >> >
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/de/jflex/jflex/1.6.0/jflex-1.6.0.jar
>> > > >> > (1.0 MB at 3.7 MB/s)[INFO]
>> > > >> >
>> > >
>> 
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > [INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent 0.9.6:
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > [INFO]
&

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

2019-09-23 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Piotr,

sorry, ignore my latest emails. Since I forgot to switch .m2 repositories.
In the real one there's no such layout
Going to rerun again.




El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 17:13, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> Ok so what is the output of your build now ?
>
> pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 17:11 Carlos Rovira 
> napisał(a):
>
> > Hi Piotr,
> > since finally layouts are the same, I think is not worth it to do the
> > sending.
> > The only difference is the file exposed in my last email
> >
> > El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 16:47, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >
> > > Carlos,
> > >
> > > Mailing list won't allow post screenshot. Upload them somewhere and
> post
> > > links.
> > >
> > > pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 16:27 Carlos Rovira 
> > > napisał(a):
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > Piotr and I discover off list the following:
> > > >
> > > > this is what I have in my .m2
> > > > [image: Captura de pantalla 2019-09-23 a las 16.11.04.png]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > and this the Pitro's package layout that sent me off list:
> > > >
> > > > [image: Captura de pantalla 2019-09-23 a las 16.12.19.png]
> > > >
> > > > how is possible Piotr and I get different layouts?
> > > >
> > > > I'll try to build now with his layout
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 16:04, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > > >
> > > >> Carlos,
> > > >>
> > > >> It's not exactly the same, cause my settings eliminate one issue
> from
> > > your
> > > >> log. I have send you player global off list - just put it manually
> > into
> > > >> Maven folder and try again.
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >> Piotr
> > > >>
> > > >> pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 13:50 Carlos Rovira 
> > > >> napisał(a):
> > > >>
> > > >> > Hi,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > sorry to say that build failed. Here's the final log. Mostly the
> > same
> > > >> > problem with flash player as always:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > 0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1):
> > > >> 1.0/1.0
> > > >> > MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1):
> > > 1.0/1.0
> > > >> > MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1):
> > > 1.0/1.0
> > > >> > MBProgress (1): 1.0 MBDownloaded from
> > central:
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/de/jflex/jflex/1.6.0/jflex-1.6.0.jar
> > > >> > (1.0 MB at 3.7 MB/s)[INFO]
> > > >> >
> > >
> 
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent 0.9.6:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [INFO]
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent 
> SUCCESS
> > [
> > > >> > 6.206 s]
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common ...
> SUCCESS
> > > >> [01:24
> > > >> > min]
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils 
> SUCCESS
> > [
> > > >> > 3.174 s]
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc ...
> SUCCESS
> > [
> > > >> > 58.423 s]
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler ..
> FAILURE
> > [
> > > >> > 8.802 s]
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX ...
> SKIPPED
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils ..
> SKIPPED
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger .

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

2019-09-23 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Piotr,
since finally layouts are the same, I think is not worth it to do the
sending.
The only difference is the file exposed in my last email

El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 16:47, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> Carlos,
>
> Mailing list won't allow post screenshot. Upload them somewhere and post
> links.
>
> pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 16:27 Carlos Rovira 
> napisał(a):
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Piotr and I discover off list the following:
> >
> > this is what I have in my .m2
> > [image: Captura de pantalla 2019-09-23 a las 16.11.04.png]
> >
> >
> > and this the Pitro's package layout that sent me off list:
> >
> > [image: Captura de pantalla 2019-09-23 a las 16.12.19.png]
> >
> > how is possible Piotr and I get different layouts?
> >
> > I'll try to build now with his layout
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 16:04, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >
> >> Carlos,
> >>
> >> It's not exactly the same, cause my settings eliminate one issue from
> your
> >> log. I have send you player global off list - just put it manually into
> >> Maven folder and try again.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Piotr
> >>
> >> pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 13:50 Carlos Rovira 
> >> napisał(a):
> >>
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > sorry to say that build failed. Here's the final log. Mostly the same
> >> > problem with flash player as always:
> >> >
> >> > 0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1):
> >> 1.0/1.0
> >> > MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1):
> 1.0/1.0
> >> > MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1):
> 1.0/1.0
> >> > MBProgress (1): 1.0 MBDownloaded from central:
> >> >
> >>
> https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/de/jflex/jflex/1.6.0/jflex-1.6.0.jar
> >> > (1.0 MB at 3.7 MB/s)[INFO]
> >> >
> 
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent 0.9.6:
> >> >
> >> > [INFO]
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent  SUCCESS [
> >> > 6.206 s]
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common ... SUCCESS
> >> [01:24
> >> > min]
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils  SUCCESS [
> >> > 3.174 s]
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc ... SUCCESS [
> >> > 58.423 s]
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler .. FAILURE [
> >> > 8.802 s]
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX ... SKIPPED
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils .. SKIPPED
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger .. SKIPPED
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer . SKIPPED
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks  SKIPPED
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: RoyaleUnit Ant Tasks  SKIPPED
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin . SKIPPED
> >> >
> >> > [INFO]
> >> >
> 
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> >> >
> >> > [INFO]
> >> >
> 
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Total time:  02:51 min
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Finished at: 2019-09-23T13:40:46+02:00
> >> >
> >> > [INFO]
> >> >
> 
> >> >
> >> > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project compiler: Could not resolve
> >> > dependencies for project
> org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler:jar:0.9.6:
> >> > Could not find artifact
> com.adobe.flash.framework:playerglobal:swc:20.0
> >> in
> >> > apache-release (
> &

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

2019-09-23 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi,

sorry, but just notice that both layouts are exactly the same :?
The only change is in

playerglobal-20.0.pom.lastUpdated

Piotrs is:

#NOTE: This is an Aether internal implementation file, its format can be
changed without prior notice.
#Tue Aug 13 05:59:44 CEST 2019
https\://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/.error=
https\://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/.lastUpdated=1565668784011
https\://
repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/.lastUpdated=1565668783757
https\://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/.error=


and mine is:


#NOTE: This is a Maven Resolver internal implementation file, its format
can be changed without prior notice.
#Wed May 22 20:31:44 CEST 2019
https\://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/.lastUpdated=1558549904792
https\://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/.error=









El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 16:27, Carlos Rovira ()
escribió:

> Hi all,
>
> Piotr and I discover off list the following:
>
> this is what I have in my .m2
> [image: Captura de pantalla 2019-09-23 a las 16.11.04.png]
>
>
> and this the Pitro's package layout that sent me off list:
>
> [image: Captura de pantalla 2019-09-23 a las 16.12.19.png]
>
> how is possible Piotr and I get different layouts?
>
> I'll try to build now with his layout
>
>
>
>
>
> El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 16:04, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>
>> Carlos,
>>
>> It's not exactly the same, cause my settings eliminate one issue from your
>> log. I have send you player global off list - just put it manually into
>> Maven folder and try again.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Piotr
>>
>> pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 13:50 Carlos Rovira 
>> napisał(a):
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > sorry to say that build failed. Here's the final log. Mostly the same
>> > problem with flash player as always:
>> >
>> > 0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1):
>> 1.0/1.0
>> > MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0
>> > MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0
>> > MBProgress (1): 1.0 MBDownloaded from central:
>> >
>> https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/de/jflex/jflex/1.6.0/jflex-1.6.0.jar
>> > (1.0 MB at 3.7 MB/s)[INFO]
>> > 
>> >
>> > [INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent 0.9.6:
>> >
>> > [INFO]
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent  SUCCESS [
>> > 6.206 s]
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common ... SUCCESS
>> [01:24
>> > min]
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils  SUCCESS [
>> > 3.174 s]
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc ... SUCCESS [
>> > 58.423 s]
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler .. FAILURE [
>> > 8.802 s]
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX ... SKIPPED
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils .. SKIPPED
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger .. SKIPPED
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer . SKIPPED
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks  SKIPPED
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: RoyaleUnit Ant Tasks  SKIPPED
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin . SKIPPED
>> >
>> > [INFO]
>> > 
>> >
>> > [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
>> >
>> > [INFO]
>> > 
>> >
>> > [INFO] Total time:  02:51 min
>> >
>> > [INFO] Finished at: 2019-09-23T13:40:46+02:00
>> >
>> > [INFO]
>> > 
>> >
>> > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project compiler: Could not resolve
>> > dependencies for project org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler:jar:0.9.6:
>> > Could not find artifact com.adobe.flash.framework:playerglobal:swc:20.0
>> in
>> > apache-release (
>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases)
>> > -> [Help 1]
>> >
>> > [ERROR]
>> 

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

2019-09-23 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi all,

Piotr and I discover off list the following:

this is what I have in my .m2
[image: Captura de pantalla 2019-09-23 a las 16.11.04.png]


and this the Pitro's package layout that sent me off list:

[image: Captura de pantalla 2019-09-23 a las 16.12.19.png]

how is possible Piotr and I get different layouts?

I'll try to build now with his layout





El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 16:04, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> Carlos,
>
> It's not exactly the same, cause my settings eliminate one issue from your
> log. I have send you player global off list - just put it manually into
> Maven folder and try again.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 13:50 Carlos Rovira 
> napisał(a):
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > sorry to say that build failed. Here's the final log. Mostly the same
> > problem with flash player as always:
> >
> > 0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0
> > MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0
> > MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0
> > MBProgress (1): 1.0 MBDownloaded from central:
> >
> https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/de/jflex/jflex/1.6.0/jflex-1.6.0.jar
> > (1.0 MB at 3.7 MB/s)[INFO]
> > 
> >
> > [INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent 0.9.6:
> >
> > [INFO]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent  SUCCESS [
> > 6.206 s]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common ... SUCCESS
> [01:24
> > min]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils  SUCCESS [
> > 3.174 s]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc ... SUCCESS [
> > 58.423 s]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler .. FAILURE [
> > 8.802 s]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX ... SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils .. SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger .. SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer . SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks  SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: RoyaleUnit Ant Tasks  SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin . SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO]
> > 
> >
> > [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> >
> > [INFO]
> > 
> >
> > [INFO] Total time:  02:51 min
> >
> > [INFO] Finished at: 2019-09-23T13:40:46+02:00
> >
> > [INFO]
> > 
> >
> > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project compiler: Could not resolve
> > dependencies for project org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler:jar:0.9.6:
> > Could not find artifact com.adobe.flash.framework:playerglobal:swc:20.0
> in
> > apache-release (
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases)
> > -> [Help 1]
> >
> > [ERROR]
> >
> > [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the
> -e
> > switch.
> >
> > [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.
> >
> > [ERROR]
> >
> > [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions,
> > please read the following articles:
> >
> > [ERROR] [Help 1]
> >
> >
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/DependencyResolutionException
> >
> > [ERROR]
> >
> > [ERROR] After correcting the problems, you can resume the build with the
> > command
> >
> > [ERROR]   mvn  -rf :compiler
> >
> >
> > BUILD FAILED
> >
> > /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/ApproveRoyale.xml:778: The
> following
> > error occurred while executing this line:
> >
> > /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/ApproveRoyale.xml:789: exec
> returned:
> > 1
> >
> >
> > Total time: 40 minutes 58 seconds
> >
> > macbookpro:testrc2 carlosrovira$
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 12:39, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >
> > > Hey Carlos,
> > >
> &

Re: [royale-asjs] branch release/0.9.6 updated: fix ASDoc js-only

2019-09-23 Thread Carlos Rovira
I hope the few people building from sources would try with actual
instructions and if they have problems come to the list and try to solve it
with our help, so we can improve scripts and build process learning from
that kind of experiences.

El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 14:05, Andrew Wetmore ()
escribió:

> Yes: the PERFECT would be clear and simple instructions that work and do
> not scare people away. We do not seem to have those. I thought the
> discussion was whether to go forward with the release anyhow, since the
> number of users who build from source is smaller than the number who use
> the compiled binaries, or delay the release until we get the instructions
> right.
>
> My suggestion related to the first option, to make sure that, if we go
> ahead with the release including insufficient build instructions, that we
> warn people about that. That way we show that we know it's an issue, rather
> than looking like we don't know or, worse, don't care.
>
> a
>
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 8:28 AM Carlos Rovira 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > ok I understand.
> >
> > IMHO, instructions should be as easy as possible. People that see steps
> > depending on things that are not clear will be mostly lost and with high
> > probability of never come back. Royale SDK is a complex technology with
> > many pieces involved, we should make the install process as simple as
> > possible hidding all that complexity if we want to succeed. The main
> point
> > that is running against us is that complexity.
> >
> > just my 2...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

2019-09-23 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi,

sorry to say that build failed. Here's the final log. Mostly the same
problem with flash player as always:

0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0
MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0
MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0
MBProgress (1): 1.0 MBDownloaded from central:
https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/de/jflex/jflex/1.6.0/jflex-1.6.0.jar
(1.0 MB at 3.7 MB/s)[INFO]


[INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent 0.9.6:

[INFO]

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent  SUCCESS [
6.206 s]

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common ... SUCCESS [01:24
min]

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils  SUCCESS [
3.174 s]

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc ... SUCCESS [
58.423 s]

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler .. FAILURE [
8.802 s]

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX ... SKIPPED

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils .. SKIPPED

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger .. SKIPPED

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer . SKIPPED

[INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks  SKIPPED

[INFO] Apache Royale: RoyaleUnit Ant Tasks  SKIPPED

[INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin . SKIPPED

[INFO]


[INFO] BUILD FAILURE

[INFO]


[INFO] Total time:  02:51 min

[INFO] Finished at: 2019-09-23T13:40:46+02:00

[INFO]


[ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project compiler: Could not resolve
dependencies for project org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler:jar:0.9.6:
Could not find artifact com.adobe.flash.framework:playerglobal:swc:20.0 in
apache-release (https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases)
-> [Help 1]

[ERROR]

[ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the -e
switch.

[ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.

[ERROR]

[ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions,
please read the following articles:

[ERROR] [Help 1]
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/DependencyResolutionException

[ERROR]

[ERROR] After correcting the problems, you can resume the build with the
command

[ERROR]   mvn  -rf :compiler


BUILD FAILED

/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/ApproveRoyale.xml:778: The following
error occurred while executing this line:

/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/ApproveRoyale.xml:789: exec returned:
1


Total time: 40 minutes 58 seconds

macbookpro:testrc2 carlosrovira$




El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 12:39, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> Hey Carlos,
>
> Answers inline.
>
> pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 12:34 Carlos Rovira 
> napisał(a):
>
> > Hi Piotr,
> >
> > I want to try now. To try this xml with Approve xml workflow:
> >
> > 1.- should I put it in my .m2 folder (and remove mine)? or there's
> another
> > way?
> >
> Yes. You can also try to modify maven target and add to each exec run -s
> "path to your settings"
>
>
> > 2.- should I remove all my env vars in my .bash_profile?
> >
> Don't touch it.
>
>
> > 3.- I assume I must run the command: "ant -e -f ApproveRoyale.xml
> > -Drelease.version=0.9.6 -Drc=2" inside the folder I created with the
> > Approve xml file in it.
> >
>
> Yes. I'm running it with -DskipTests=true
>
>
> >
> > thanks
> >
> >
> > El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 10:20, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >
> > > Hi Carlos,
> > >
> > > Here you have settings.xml which I'm using. Please try this one with
> > > Approve script [1]. Pay attention in it that I have put there staging
> > > artifacts link, so you know what I'm talking about in the next release.
> > > According to what Josh is saying this settings with staging artifacts
> > > shouldn't be required, but still I would like to try that idea.
> > >
> > > Don't forget in approve script modify target build_maven and change
> exec
> > > which is starting royale-asjs build to:
> > >
> > >  > > dir="${basedir}/${maven.package.url.name}/royale-asjs"
> > > failonerror="true" >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> >

Re: [royale-asjs] branch release/0.9.6 updated: fix ASDoc js-only

2019-09-23 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Andrew,

ok I understand.

IMHO, instructions should be as easy as possible. People that see steps
depending on things that are not clear will be mostly lost and with high
probability of never come back. Royale SDK is a complex technology with
many pieces involved, we should make the install process as simple as
possible hidding all that complexity if we want to succeed. The main point
that is running against us is that complexity.

just my 2...




El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 13:01, Andrew Wetmore ()
escribió:

> Oops: edited my proposed text and did not check it afterwards. What I meant
> was this for the release page for 0.9.6::
>
> "The current version of Apache Royale is 0.9.6, released in MONTH YEAR. It
> is beta-quality. This means that Royale may not work entirely as you or we
> want it to, and that certain standard components and functions are not yet
> available. However, you can create and compile applications in Royale and
> run them either in a browser window or on the Flash and AIR platforms.
> Further: please note that the instructions for compiling Royale from the
> source code may not work for you as they are written. You may need to set
> additional environment variables, depending on your operating system. Send
> an email to EMAIL ADDRESS if you run into difficulties and need further
> instructions. You can, of course, use the compiled binaries of Royale and
> get to work immediately."
>
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 7:57 AM Andrew Wetmore 
> wrote:
>
> > The question is whether we release 0.9.6 when the instructions for
> > compiling from source are incomplete and/or inaccurate.
> >
> > For 0.9.4 the page says "The current version of *Apache Royale* is
> *0.9.4*,
> > released in *Diciembre, 2018*. It is *beta-quality*. This means that
> > Royale may not work entirely as you or we want it to, and that certain
> > “standard” components or functions are not yet available. However, you
> can
> > create applications in Royale and compile them to run either in a browser
> > window or on the Flash/AIR platforms."
> >
> > For 0.9.6, why can we not say, "The current version of Apache Royale is
> > 0.9.6, release in MONTH YEAR. It is beta-quality. This means that Royale
> > may not work entirely as you or we want it to, and that certain
> "standard"
> > components or functions are not yet available. However, you can create
> > applications and compile applications in Royale and run them either in a
> > browser window or on the Flash and AIR platforms.
> > Further: please note that the instructions for compiling Royale from the
> > source code may not work for you as they are written. You may need to set
> > additional environment variables, depending on your operating system.
> Send
> > an email to EMAIL ADDRESS if you run into difficulties and need further
> > instructions. You can, of course, use the compiled binaries of Royale and
> > get to work immediately."
> >
> > Andrew
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 6:57 AM Carlos Rovira 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Andrew,
> >>
> >> can you specify what you mean? Here's the download page with all
> download
> >> links: https://royale.apache.org/download/
> >>
> >> El dom., 22 sept. 2019 a las 20:11, Andrew Wetmore (<
> cottag...@gmail.com
> >> >)
> >> escribió:
> >>
> >> > Could it not also be posted on the website, where the link for
> >> downloading
> >> > the release is?
> >> >
> >> > On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 8:53 PM Alex Harui 
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > The only place to include it without altering the release artifacts
> >> is in
> >> > > the RELEASE_NOTES addendum in our wiki.
> >> > >
> >> > > We could do that, but folks probably won't look there until after
> they
> >> > > have a problem.
> >> > >
> >> > > -Alex
> >> > >
> >> > > On 9/21/19, 4:44 AM, "Andrew Wetmore"  wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > Would it be acceptable to include some sort of explanation that
> >> > > compiling
> >> > > from source will require setting a number of environment
> >> variables,
> >> > not
> >> > > just ANT_HOME, and that, if you really want to compile 0.9.6
> from
> >> > > source,
> >> > > you should contact [LIST EMAIL] for instructions on what to do?
> It
> >> > > sort of
> >> > > dodg

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

2019-09-23 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Piotr,

I want to try now. To try this xml with Approve xml workflow:

1.- should I put it in my .m2 folder (and remove mine)? or there's another
way?
2.- should I remove all my env vars in my .bash_profile?
3.- I assume I must run the command: "ant -e -f ApproveRoyale.xml
-Drelease.version=0.9.6 -Drc=2" inside the folder I created with the
Approve xml file in it.

thanks


El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 10:20, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> Hi Carlos,
>
> Here you have settings.xml which I'm using. Please try this one with
> Approve script [1]. Pay attention in it that I have put there staging
> artifacts link, so you know what I'm talking about in the next release.
> According to what Josh is saying this settings with staging artifacts
> shouldn't be required, but still I would like to try that idea.
>
> Don't forget in approve script modify target build_maven and change exec
> which is starting royale-asjs build to:
>
>  dir="${basedir}/${maven.package.url.name}/royale-asjs"
> failonerror="true" >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
> Let me know if it helps.
>
> [1] https://paste.apache.org/gfift
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> niedz., 22 wrz 2019 o 19:24 Carlos Rovira 
> napisał(a):
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > yes, I was not able to build even using -s settings-template.xml.
> > I tried adding it in the Approve xml workflow code and trying to build
> > directly with maven with a clean .m2
> > In exchange, If I try to build in my usual royale repo folder as usual
> from
> > clean, it works all ok
> > As well I tried commenting/uncommenting environment vars in my
> > .bash_profile
> >
> > thanks
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > El dom., 22 sept. 2019 a las 16:10, Josh Tynjala (<
> > joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev>)
> > escribió:
> >
> > > That was my original assumption, but it sounds like Carlos had issues
> > > trying that.
> > >
> > > - Josh
> > >
> > > On Sunday, September 22, 2019, Piotr Zarzycki <
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > > Josh,
> > > >
> > > > Are you saying that settings-template from repository should be
> enough
> > to
> > > > get stuff working for Carlos? I'm confused right now.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Piotr
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Sep 22, 2019, 1:43 AM Josh Tynjala <
> joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> I'm guessing that the settings template isn't supposed to be
> required
> > > for
> > > >> JS-only builds, similar to the other things discussed in this thread
> > (or
> > > >> the previous RC thread).
> > > >>
> > > >> I know that this file is needed to download the proprietary Adobe
> bits
> > > >> (since Maven doesn't know where to find them by default), and that
> > > seemed
> > > >> to be where your build failed.
> > > >>
> > > >> - Josh
> > > >>
> > > >> On Saturday, September 21, 2019, Carlos Rovira <
> > carlosrov...@apache.org
> > > >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > Thanks Josh,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I just tried with Approve xml and get similar results (I copy
> here)
> > > >> > I'll try using the setting, I forgot completely about it.. But
> this
> > > means
> > > >> > the instructions to build are wrong right?
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Here's my console output after try with the Approve xml script
> > (mostly
> > > >> the
> > > >> > same as trying to build with maven):
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [INFO] --- maven-install-plugin:2.5.2:install (default-install) @
> > > >> > compiler-externc ---
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [INFO] Installing
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/apache-royale-0.9.6-maven-src/royale-compiler/compiler-externc/target/compiler-externc-0.9.6.jar
> > > >> > to
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> /Users/carlosrovira/.m2/repository/org/apache/royale/compiler/compiler-externc/0.9.6/compiler-externc-0.9.6.jar
&

Re: [royale-asjs] branch release/0.9.6 updated: fix ASDoc js-only

2019-09-23 Thread Carlos Rovira
t; > > +
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ${frameworks_dir}/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/core/CSSSprite.as
> > > > > +
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ${frameworks_dir}/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/core/IBorderModel.as
> > > > > +
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ${frameworks_dir}/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/core/StageProxy.as
> > > > > +
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ${frameworks_dir}/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/core/StyleableCSSTextField.as
> > > > > +
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ${frameworks_dir}/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/core/WrappedMovieClip.as
> > > > > +
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ${frameworks_dir}/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/core/WrappedShape.as
> > > > > +
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ${frameworks_dir}/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/core/WrappedSprite.as
> > > > > +
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ${frameworks_dir}/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/core/WrappedTextField.as
> > > > > +
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ${frameworks_dir}/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/core/UIButtonBase.as
> > > > > +
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ${frameworks_dir}/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/utils/CSSBorderUtils.as
> > > > > +
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ${frameworks_dir}/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/utils/PNGEncoder.as
> > > > > +
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ${frameworks_dir}/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/utils/SolidBorderUtil.as
> >     > > > +
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ${frameworks_dir}/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/utils/dbg/DOMPathUtil.as
> > > > > +
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ${frameworks_dir}/projects/Graphics/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/graphics/utils/AdvancedLayoutFeatures.as
> > > > > +
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ${frameworks_dir}/projects/Graphics/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/graphics/utils/CompoundTransform.as
> > > > > +
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ${frameworks_dir}/projects/Graphics/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/graphics/utils/IAssetLayoutFeatures.as
> > > > > +
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ${frameworks_dir}/projects/Graphics/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/graphics/utils/MatrixUtil.as
> > > > > +
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ${frameworks_dir}/projects/Graphics/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/graphics/utils/PathHelper.as
> > > > > +
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ${frameworks_dir}/projects/Graphics/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/graphics/utils/TransformOffsets.as
> > > > > +
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ${frameworks_dir}/projects/Graphics/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/graphics/utils/shaderClasses/ColorShader.as
> > > > > +
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ${frameworks_dir}/projects/Graphics/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/graphics/utils/shaderClasses/ColorBurnShader.as
> > > > > +
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ${frameworks_dir}/projects/Graphics/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/graphics/utils/shaderClasses/ColorDodgeShader.as
> > > > > +
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ${frameworks_dir}/projects/Graphics/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/graphics/utils/shaderClasses/ExclusionShader.as
> > > > > +
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ${frameworks_dir}/projects/Graphics/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/graphics/utils/shaderClasses/HueShader.as
> > > > > +
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ${frameworks_dir}/projects/Graphics/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/graphics/utils/shaderClasses/LuminosityShader.as
> > > > > +
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ${frameworks_dir}/projects/Graphics/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/graphics/utils/shaderClasses/LuminosityMaskShader.as
> > > > > +
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ${frameworks_dir}/projects/Graphics/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/graphics/utils/shaderClasses/SaturationShader.as
> > > > > +
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ${frameworks_dir}/projects/Graphics/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/graphics/utils/shaderClasses/SoftLightShader.as
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ${frameworks_dir}/projects/Jewel/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/jewel/supportClasses/scrollbar/VScrollBar.as
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ${frameworks_dir}/projects/Jewel/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/jewel/supportClasses/scrollbar/HScrollBar.as
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ${frameworks_dir}/projects/Jewel/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/jewel/supportClasses/scrollbar/ScrollBar.as
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Andrew Wetmore
> >
> >
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14.blogspot.com%2Fdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cdde0aae4a55a4671118c08d73e89027d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637046630527648007sdata=klamay%2Bx1JOani5AUFRr5BQPRloR0%2F2J%2FmyYXX8iyg8%3Dreserved=0
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Andrew Wetmore
>
> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

2019-09-22 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi,

yes, I was not able to build even using -s settings-template.xml.
I tried adding it in the Approve xml workflow code and trying to build
directly with maven with a clean .m2
In exchange, If I try to build in my usual royale repo folder as usual from
clean, it works all ok
As well I tried commenting/uncommenting environment vars in my .bash_profile

thanks




El dom., 22 sept. 2019 a las 16:10, Josh Tynjala ()
escribió:

> That was my original assumption, but it sounds like Carlos had issues
> trying that.
>
> - Josh
>
> On Sunday, September 22, 2019, Piotr Zarzycki 
> wrote:
> > Josh,
> >
> > Are you saying that settings-template from repository should be enough to
> > get stuff working for Carlos? I'm confused right now.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 22, 2019, 1:43 AM Josh Tynjala 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I'm guessing that the settings template isn't supposed to be required
> for
> >> JS-only builds, similar to the other things discussed in this thread (or
> >> the previous RC thread).
> >>
> >> I know that this file is needed to download the proprietary Adobe bits
> >> (since Maven doesn't know where to find them by default), and that
> seemed
> >> to be where your build failed.
> >>
> >> - Josh
> >>
> >> On Saturday, September 21, 2019, Carlos Rovira  >
> >> wrote:
> >> > Thanks Josh,
> >> >
> >> > I just tried with Approve xml and get similar results (I copy here)
> >> > I'll try using the setting, I forgot completely about it.. But this
> means
> >> > the instructions to build are wrong right?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Here's my console output after try with the Approve xml script (mostly
> >> the
> >> > same as trying to build with maven):
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] --- maven-install-plugin:2.5.2:install (default-install) @
> >> > compiler-externc ---
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Installing
> >> >
> >>
> >>
>
> /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/apache-royale-0.9.6-maven-src/royale-compiler/compiler-externc/target/compiler-externc-0.9.6.jar
> >> > to
> >> >
> >>
> >>
>
> /Users/carlosrovira/.m2/repository/org/apache/royale/compiler/compiler-externc/0.9.6/compiler-externc-0.9.6.jar
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Installing
> >> >
> >>
> >>
>
> /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/apache-royale-0.9.6-maven-src/royale-compiler/compiler-externc/pom.xml
> >> > to
> >> >
> >>
> >>
>
> /Users/carlosrovira/.m2/repository/org/apache/royale/compiler/compiler-externc/0.9.6/compiler-externc-0.9.6.pom
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Installing
> >> >
> >>
> >>
>
> /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/apache-royale-0.9.6-maven-src/royale-compiler/compiler-externc/target/compiler-externc-0.9.6-tests.jar
> >> > to
> >> >
> >>
> >>
>
> /Users/carlosrovira/.m2/repository/org/apache/royale/compiler/compiler-externc/0.9.6/compiler-externc-0.9.6-tests.jar
> >> >
> >> > [INFO]
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] < org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler
> >> >>-
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Building Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler 0.9.6
> >> > [5/12]
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] [ jar
> >> > ]-
> >> >
> >> > [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flash.framework:playerglobal:swc:20.0
> is
> >> > missing, no dependency information available
> >> >
> >> > [INFO]
> >> >
> 
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent 0.9.6:
> >> >
> >> > [INFO]
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent  SUCCESS [
> >> > 2.102 s]
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common ... SUCCESS [
> >> > 4.555 s]
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils  SUCCESS [
> >> > 0.431 s]
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc ... SUCCESS [
> >> > 9.225 s]
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Com

Re: [Discuss] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

2019-09-21 Thread Carlos Rovira
HI Piotr,

since I have work to do on docs, I prefer to try with some concrete info,
or I'll end going like chicken without head :)
I can test with and without vars on my .bash_profile too.

Even we can release 0.9.6 and left this issues for 0.9.7

thanks

Carlos




El sáb., 21 sept. 2019 a las 22:44, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> You have example of such file in repository. Just based on that setup
> staging link repository. Currently in that file you have Snapshot links and
> release. Based on this you can setup staging.
>
> Apart of that I have shared such file some time ago in the previous
> releases.
>
> I'm not sure even if that is needed it's just I wanted to confirm that is
> really not needed.
>
> Do you have player global setup env variable?
>
> If you won't figure out stuff I will share it on Monday.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2019, 8:06 PM Carlos Rovira 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Piort,
> >
> > can you share here the set of links to add to my .m2/settings.xml?
> >
> > thanks
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > El sáb., 21 sept. 2019 a las 19:02, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >
> > > Switching subject to discuss.
> > >
> > > Carlos can you put in your settings link toavem staging artifacts? And
> > run
> > > approve script again.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Piotr
> > >
> > > On Sat, Sep 21, 2019, 6:49 PM Carlos Rovira 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Curious thing is:
> > > >
> > > > if I run in my source tree royale-compiler folder this:
> > > >
> > > > mvn -s settings-template.xml -DskipTests clean install
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > with clean .m2 all ends properly.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > if I run it in the downloaded RC2 folder it fails:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Downloaded from central:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/codehaus/plexus/plexus-container-default/1.0-alpha-9-stable-1/plexus-container-default-1.0-alpha-9-stable-1.jar
> > > > (194 kB at 290 kB/s)
> > > >
> > > > Downloaded from central:
> > > >
> https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/antlr/ST4/4.0.4/ST4-4.0.4.jar
> > > > (237
> > > > kB at 345 kB/s)
> > > >
> > > > [*ERROR*] [ERROR] Some problems were encountered while processing the
> > > POMs:
> > > >
> > > > [ERROR] Unresolveable build extension: Plugin
> > > > net.sourceforge.jburg:jburg-maven-plugin:1.10.4 or one of its
> > > dependencies
> > > > could not be resolved: Could not find artifact
> > > > org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler-jburg-types:jar:1.1.0 in
> > > > apache-plugins-release (
> > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases) @
> > > >
> > > > [ERROR] Unresolveable build extension: Plugin
> > > > net.sourceforge.jburg:jburg-maven-plugin:1.10.4 or one of its
> > > dependencies
> > > > could not be resolved: Could not find artifact
> > > > org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler-jburg-types:jar:1.1.0 in
> > > > apache-plugins-release (
> > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases) @
> > > >
> > > >  @
> > > >
> > > > [*ERROR*] The build could not read 2 projects -> *[Help 1]*
> > > >
> > > > [*ERROR*]
> > > >
> > > > [*ERROR*]   The project org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler:0.9.6
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> (/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/apache-royale-0.9.6-src/royale-compiler/compiler/pom.xml)
> > > > has 1 error
> > > >
> > > > [*ERROR*] Unresolveable build extension: Plugin
> > > > net.sourceforge.jburg:jburg-maven-plugin:1.10.4 or one of its
> > > dependencies
> > > > could not be resolved: Could not find artifact
> > > > org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler-jburg-types:jar:1.1.0 in
> > > > apache-plugins-release (
> > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases) ->
> *[Help
> > > 2]*
> > > >
> > > > [*ERROR*]
> > > >
> > > > [*ERROR*]   The project org.apache.royale.compiler:debugger:0.9.6
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> (/Users/carlosro

Re: [Discuss] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

2019-09-21 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Piort,

can you share here the set of links to add to my .m2/settings.xml?

thanks




El sáb., 21 sept. 2019 a las 19:02, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> Switching subject to discuss.
>
> Carlos can you put in your settings link toavem staging artifacts? And run
> approve script again.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2019, 6:49 PM Carlos Rovira 
> wrote:
>
> > Curious thing is:
> >
> > if I run in my source tree royale-compiler folder this:
> >
> > mvn -s settings-template.xml -DskipTests clean install
> >
> >
> > with clean .m2 all ends properly.
> >
> >
> > if I run it in the downloaded RC2 folder it fails:
> >
> >
> > Downloaded from central:
> >
> >
> https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/codehaus/plexus/plexus-container-default/1.0-alpha-9-stable-1/plexus-container-default-1.0-alpha-9-stable-1.jar
> > (194 kB at 290 kB/s)
> >
> > Downloaded from central:
> > https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/antlr/ST4/4.0.4/ST4-4.0.4.jar
> > (237
> > kB at 345 kB/s)
> >
> > [*ERROR*] [ERROR] Some problems were encountered while processing the
> POMs:
> >
> > [ERROR] Unresolveable build extension: Plugin
> > net.sourceforge.jburg:jburg-maven-plugin:1.10.4 or one of its
> dependencies
> > could not be resolved: Could not find artifact
> > org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler-jburg-types:jar:1.1.0 in
> > apache-plugins-release (
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases) @
> >
> > [ERROR] Unresolveable build extension: Plugin
> > net.sourceforge.jburg:jburg-maven-plugin:1.10.4 or one of its
> dependencies
> > could not be resolved: Could not find artifact
> > org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler-jburg-types:jar:1.1.0 in
> > apache-plugins-release (
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases) @
> >
> >  @
> >
> > [*ERROR*] The build could not read 2 projects -> *[Help 1]*
> >
> > [*ERROR*]
> >
> > [*ERROR*]   The project org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler:0.9.6
> >
> >
> (/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/apache-royale-0.9.6-src/royale-compiler/compiler/pom.xml)
> > has 1 error
> >
> > [*ERROR*] Unresolveable build extension: Plugin
> > net.sourceforge.jburg:jburg-maven-plugin:1.10.4 or one of its
> dependencies
> > could not be resolved: Could not find artifact
> > org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler-jburg-types:jar:1.1.0 in
> > apache-plugins-release (
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases) -> *[Help
> 2]*
> >
> > [*ERROR*]
> >
> > [*ERROR*]   The project org.apache.royale.compiler:debugger:0.9.6
> >
> >
> (/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/apache-royale-0.9.6-src/royale-compiler/debugger/pom.xml)
> > has 1 error
> >
> > [*ERROR*] Unresolveable build extension: Plugin
> > net.sourceforge.jburg:jburg-maven-plugin:1.10.4 or one of its
> dependencies
> > could not be resolved: Could not find artifact
> > org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler-jburg-types:jar:1.1.0 in
> > apache-plugins-release (
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases) -> *[Help
> 2]*
> >
> > [*ERROR*]
> >
> > [*ERROR*] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with
> the
> > *-e* switch.
> >
> > [*ERROR*] Re-run Maven using the *-X* switch to enable full debug
> logging.
> >
> > [*ERROR*]
> >
> > [*ERROR*] For more information about the errors and possible solutions,
> > please read the following articles:
> >
> > [*ERROR*] *[Help 1]*
> >
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/ProjectBuildingException
> >
> > [*ERROR*] *[Help 2]*
> > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/PluginManagerException
> >
> > macbookpro:royale-compiler carlosrovira$
> >
> >
> >
> > this time because I run without profiles main,utils
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > El sáb., 21 sept. 2019 a las 17:40, Carlos Rovira (<
> > carlosrov...@apache.org>)
> > escribió:
> >
> > > Josh,
> > >
> > > with a clean .m2, just tried in "royale-compiler" folder to run (after
> > mvn
> > > clean install -P -main,utils):
> > >
> > > mvn -s settings-template.xml clean install
> > >
> > >
> > > And still fail trying to get flash player 20.0
> > >
> > >
> > > 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

2019-09-21 Thread Carlos Rovira
Curious thing is:

if I run in my source tree royale-compiler folder this:

mvn -s settings-template.xml -DskipTests clean install


with clean .m2 all ends properly.


if I run it in the downloaded RC2 folder it fails:


Downloaded from central:
https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/codehaus/plexus/plexus-container-default/1.0-alpha-9-stable-1/plexus-container-default-1.0-alpha-9-stable-1.jar
(194 kB at 290 kB/s)

Downloaded from central:
https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/antlr/ST4/4.0.4/ST4-4.0.4.jar (237
kB at 345 kB/s)

[*ERROR*] [ERROR] Some problems were encountered while processing the POMs:

[ERROR] Unresolveable build extension: Plugin
net.sourceforge.jburg:jburg-maven-plugin:1.10.4 or one of its dependencies
could not be resolved: Could not find artifact
org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler-jburg-types:jar:1.1.0 in
apache-plugins-release (
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases) @

[ERROR] Unresolveable build extension: Plugin
net.sourceforge.jburg:jburg-maven-plugin:1.10.4 or one of its dependencies
could not be resolved: Could not find artifact
org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler-jburg-types:jar:1.1.0 in
apache-plugins-release (
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases) @

 @

[*ERROR*] The build could not read 2 projects -> *[Help 1]*

[*ERROR*]

[*ERROR*]   The project org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler:0.9.6
(/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/apache-royale-0.9.6-src/royale-compiler/compiler/pom.xml)
has 1 error

[*ERROR*] Unresolveable build extension: Plugin
net.sourceforge.jburg:jburg-maven-plugin:1.10.4 or one of its dependencies
could not be resolved: Could not find artifact
org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler-jburg-types:jar:1.1.0 in
apache-plugins-release (
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases) -> *[Help 2]*

[*ERROR*]

[*ERROR*]   The project org.apache.royale.compiler:debugger:0.9.6
(/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/apache-royale-0.9.6-src/royale-compiler/debugger/pom.xml)
has 1 error

[*ERROR*] Unresolveable build extension: Plugin
net.sourceforge.jburg:jburg-maven-plugin:1.10.4 or one of its dependencies
could not be resolved: Could not find artifact
org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler-jburg-types:jar:1.1.0 in
apache-plugins-release (
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases) -> *[Help 2]*

[*ERROR*]

[*ERROR*] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the
*-e* switch.

[*ERROR*] Re-run Maven using the *-X* switch to enable full debug logging.

[*ERROR*]

[*ERROR*] For more information about the errors and possible solutions,
please read the following articles:

[*ERROR*] *[Help 1]*
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/ProjectBuildingException

[*ERROR*] *[Help 2]*
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/PluginManagerException

macbookpro:royale-compiler carlosrovira$



this time because I run without profiles main,utils






El sáb., 21 sept. 2019 a las 17:40, Carlos Rovira ()
escribió:

> Josh,
>
> with a clean .m2, just tried in "royale-compiler" folder to run (after mvn
> clean install -P -main,utils):
>
> mvn -s settings-template.xml clean install
>
>
> And still fail trying to get flash player 20.0
>
>
> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler .. *FAILURE*
> [  9.009 s]
>
> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX ... *SKIPPED*
>
> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils .. *SKIPPED*
>
> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger .. *SKIPPED*
>
> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer . *SKIPPED*
>
> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks  *SKIPPED*
>
> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: RoyaleUnit Ant Tasks  *SKIPPED*
>
> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin . *SKIPPED*
>
> [*INFO*]
> **
>
> [*INFO*] *BUILD FAILURE*
>
> [*INFO*]
> **
>
> [*INFO*] Total time:  02:17 min
>
> [*INFO*] Finished at: 2019-09-21T17:35:48+02:00
>
> [*INFO*]
> **
>
> [*ERROR*] Failed to execute goal on project compiler: *Could not resolve
> dependencies for project org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler:jar:0.9.6:
> Could not find artifact com.adobe.flash.framework:playerglobal:swc:20.0 in
> apache-release (https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases>)* -> *[Help
> 1]*
>
>
>
>
>
> El sáb., 21 sept. 2019 a las 17:25, Carlos Rovira (<
> carlosrov...@apache.org>) escribió:
>
>> Thanks Josh,
>>
>> I just tried with Approve xm

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

2019-09-21 Thread Carlos Rovira
Josh,

with a clean .m2, just tried in "royale-compiler" folder to run (after mvn
clean install -P -main,utils):

mvn -s settings-template.xml clean install


And still fail trying to get flash player 20.0


[*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler .. *FAILURE* [
9.009 s]

[*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX ... *SKIPPED*

[*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils .. *SKIPPED*

[*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger .. *SKIPPED*

[*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer . *SKIPPED*

[*INFO*] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks  *SKIPPED*

[*INFO*] Apache Royale: RoyaleUnit Ant Tasks  *SKIPPED*

[*INFO*] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin . *SKIPPED*

[*INFO*]
**

[*INFO*] *BUILD FAILURE*

[*INFO*]
**

[*INFO*] Total time:  02:17 min

[*INFO*] Finished at: 2019-09-21T17:35:48+02:00

[*INFO*]
**

[*ERROR*] Failed to execute goal on project compiler: *Could not resolve
dependencies for project org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler:jar:0.9.6:
Could not find artifact com.adobe.flash.framework:playerglobal:swc:20.0 in
apache-release (https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases
<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases>)* -> *[Help
1]*





El sáb., 21 sept. 2019 a las 17:25, Carlos Rovira ()
escribió:

> Thanks Josh,
>
> I just tried with Approve xml and get similar results (I copy here)
> I'll try using the setting, I forgot completely about it.. But this means
> the instructions to build are wrong right?
>
>
> Here's my console output after try with the Approve xml script (mostly the
> same as trying to build with maven):
>
> [INFO] --- maven-install-plugin:2.5.2:install (default-install) @
> compiler-externc ---
>
> [INFO] Installing
> /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/apache-royale-0.9.6-maven-src/royale-compiler/compiler-externc/target/compiler-externc-0.9.6.jar
> to
> /Users/carlosrovira/.m2/repository/org/apache/royale/compiler/compiler-externc/0.9.6/compiler-externc-0.9.6.jar
>
> [INFO] Installing
> /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/apache-royale-0.9.6-maven-src/royale-compiler/compiler-externc/pom.xml
> to
> /Users/carlosrovira/.m2/repository/org/apache/royale/compiler/compiler-externc/0.9.6/compiler-externc-0.9.6.pom
>
> [INFO] Installing
> /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/apache-royale-0.9.6-maven-src/royale-compiler/compiler-externc/target/compiler-externc-0.9.6-tests.jar
> to
> /Users/carlosrovira/.m2/repository/org/apache/royale/compiler/compiler-externc/0.9.6/compiler-externc-0.9.6-tests.jar
>
> [INFO]
>
> [INFO] < org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler
> >-
>
> [INFO] Building Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler 0.9.6
> [5/12]
>
> [INFO] [ jar
> ]-
>
> [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flash.framework:playerglobal:swc:20.0 is
> missing, no dependency information available
>
> [INFO]
> 
>
> [INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent 0.9.6:
>
> [INFO]
>
> [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent  SUCCESS [
> 2.102 s]
>
> [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common ... SUCCESS [
> 4.555 s]
>
> [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils  SUCCESS [
> 0.431 s]
>
> [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc ... SUCCESS [
> 9.225 s]
>
> [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler .. FAILURE [
> 0.052 s]
>
> [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX ... SKIPPED
>
> [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils .. SKIPPED
>
> [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger .. SKIPPED
>
> [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer . SKIPPED
>
> [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks  SKIPPED
>
> [INFO] Apache Royale: RoyaleUnit Ant Tasks  SKIPPED
>
> [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin . SKIPPED
>
> [INFO]
> 
>
> [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
>
> [INFO]
> 
>
> [INFO] Total time:  16.690 s
>
> [INFO] Finished at: 2019-09-21T15:33:35+02:00
>
> [INFO]
> 
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

2019-09-21 Thread Carlos Rovira
Thanks Josh,

I just tried with Approve xml and get similar results (I copy here)
I'll try using the setting, I forgot completely about it.. But this means
the instructions to build are wrong right?


Here's my console output after try with the Approve xml script (mostly the
same as trying to build with maven):

[INFO] --- maven-install-plugin:2.5.2:install (default-install) @
compiler-externc ---

[INFO] Installing
/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/apache-royale-0.9.6-maven-src/royale-compiler/compiler-externc/target/compiler-externc-0.9.6.jar
to
/Users/carlosrovira/.m2/repository/org/apache/royale/compiler/compiler-externc/0.9.6/compiler-externc-0.9.6.jar

[INFO] Installing
/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/apache-royale-0.9.6-maven-src/royale-compiler/compiler-externc/pom.xml
to
/Users/carlosrovira/.m2/repository/org/apache/royale/compiler/compiler-externc/0.9.6/compiler-externc-0.9.6.pom

[INFO] Installing
/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/apache-royale-0.9.6-maven-src/royale-compiler/compiler-externc/target/compiler-externc-0.9.6-tests.jar
to
/Users/carlosrovira/.m2/repository/org/apache/royale/compiler/compiler-externc/0.9.6/compiler-externc-0.9.6-tests.jar

[INFO]

[INFO] < org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler
>-

[INFO] Building Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler 0.9.6
[5/12]

[INFO] [ jar
]-

[WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flash.framework:playerglobal:swc:20.0 is
missing, no dependency information available

[INFO]


[INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent 0.9.6:

[INFO]

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent  SUCCESS [
2.102 s]

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common ... SUCCESS [
4.555 s]

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils  SUCCESS [
0.431 s]

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc ... SUCCESS [
9.225 s]

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler .. FAILURE [
0.052 s]

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX ... SKIPPED

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils .. SKIPPED

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger .. SKIPPED

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer . SKIPPED

[INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks  SKIPPED

[INFO] Apache Royale: RoyaleUnit Ant Tasks  SKIPPED

[INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin . SKIPPED

[INFO]


[INFO] BUILD FAILURE

[INFO]


[INFO] Total time:  16.690 s

[INFO] Finished at: 2019-09-21T15:33:35+02:00

[INFO]


[ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project compiler: Could not resolve
dependencies for project org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler:jar:0.9.6:
Failure to find com.adobe.flash.framework:playerglobal:swc:20.0 in
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases was cached in
the local repository, resolution will not be reattempted until the update
interval of apache-release has elapsed or updates are forced -> [Help 1]

[ERROR]

[ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the -e
switch.

[ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.

[ERROR]

[ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions,
please read the following articles:

[ERROR] [Help 1]
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/DependencyResolutionException

[ERROR]

[ERROR] After correcting the problems, you can resume the build with the
command

[ERROR]   mvn  -rf :compiler


BUILD FAILED

/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/ApproveRoyale.xml:778: The following
error occurred while executing this line:

/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/ApproveRoyale.xml:789: exec returned:
1


Total time: 25 minutes 57 seconds

macbookpro:testrc2 carlosrovira$


Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

2019-09-21 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Piotr, I'm not using the Approval script xml, I'm building with Maven as
instructions report.
I can use Approval script too but I think that will be another way to do
things (and another will be ANT build too).


El sáb., 21 sept. 2019 a las 13:48, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> Hmm...Approval script is building stuff for you by Maven. Modify it as Josh
> suggested and run according to instruction in Voting thread.
>
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2019, 1:06 PM Carlos Rovira 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > having the time to try RC2. I'm having the following issues. In RC1 I
> tried
> > ANT and all went ok. Know as Piotr suggest I'm trying to build with Maven
> > with a clean(empty) .m2.
> >
> > packaged to test in RC2 is: apache-royale-0.9.6-src.tar.gz
> >
> > Instructions in src are the following:
> >
> > Building Royale With Apache Maven
> >
> > =
> >
> >
> > Royale requires Maven 3.3.9 or greater to be installed on your computer.
> >
> >
> > To build Royale with Apache Maven, run Maven in the 3 folders as follows:
> >
> >
> > royale-compiler:  mvn clean install -P -main,utils
> >
> > royale-compiler:  mvn clean install
> >
> > royale-typedefs:  mvn clean install
> >
> > royale-asjs:  mvn clean install
> >
> >
> > When complete, you should be able to use the Maven archetypes in
> > royale-asjs/archetypes
> >
> > to build Royale applications.
> >
> >
> >
> >  from downloaded src/royale-compiler folder I run first:
> >
> > mvn clean install -P -main,utils
> >
> > This was ok
> >
> > Then in the same compiler folder run:
> >
> > mvn clean install
> >
> > This time I get this error:
> >
> >
> > [*INFO*]
> >
> **
> >
> > [*INFO*] *Reactor Summary for Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent 0.9.6:*
> >
> > [*INFO*]
> >
> > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent  *SUCCESS* [
> > 1.763 s]
> >
> > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common ... *SUCCESS*
> > [01:07 min]
> >
> > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils  *SUCCESS* [
> > 2.307 s]
> >
> > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc ... *SUCCESS* [
> > 49.839 s]
> >
> > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler .. *FAILURE* [
> > 8.878 s]
> >
> > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX ... *SKIPPED*
> >
> > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils .. *SKIPPED*
> >
> > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger .. *SKIPPED*
> >
> > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer . *SKIPPED*
> >
> > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks  *SKIPPED*
> >
> > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: RoyaleUnit Ant Tasks  *SKIPPED*
> >
> > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin . *SKIPPED*
> >
> > [*INFO*]
> >
> **
> >
> > [*INFO*] *BUILD FAILURE*
> >
> > [*INFO*]
> >
> **
> >
> > [*INFO*] Total time:  02:18 min
> >
> > [*INFO*] Finished at: 2019-09-21T12:51:06+02:00
> >
> > [*INFO*]
> >
> **
> >
> > [*ERROR*] Failed to execute goal on project compiler: *Could not resolve
> > dependencies for project org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler:jar:0.9.6:
> > Could not find artifact com.adobe.flash.framework:playerglobal:swc:20.0
> in
> > apache-release (
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases
> > <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases>)* ->
> *[Help
> > 1]*
> >
> > [*ERROR*]
> >
> > [*ERROR*] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with
> the
> > *-e* switch.
> >
> > [*ERROR*] Re-run Maven using the *-X* switch to enable full debug
> logging.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > El vie., 20 sept. 2019 a las 18:24, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >
> > > Yes sure. I would like to hear from others what they think.
> > >
> > > Personally much worst

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

2019-09-21 Thread Carlos Rovira
tion
> > >> where the framework is built:
> > >>
> > >>  > >> dir="${basedir}/${maven.package.url.name}/royale-asjs"
> > >> failonerror="true">
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Josh Tynjala
> > >> Bowler Hat LLC <
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowlerhat.devdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cd794c4ef78a3433bc95e08d73d92bfc0%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637045572800498366sdata=seKWdtHYwJnr10AgVph8%2BOgYgk5746cRnEBpGNnKgwM%3Dreserved=0
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 1:08 AM Apache Royale CI Server <
> > >> apacheroyal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > This is the discussion thread.
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> > Piotr
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > >
> > > Patreon: *
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cd794c4ef78a3433bc95e08d73d92bfc0%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637045572800498366sdata=J%2BSrhIzulD7eR%2FUUruVIgxma%2FXS4%2FdvmBF4r48qhSEQ%3Dreserved=0
> > > <
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cd794c4ef78a3433bc95e08d73d92bfc0%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637045572800498366sdata=J%2BSrhIzulD7eR%2FUUruVIgxma%2FXS4%2FdvmBF4r48qhSEQ%3Dreserved=0
> > >*
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >     Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> > Patreon: *
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cd794c4ef78a3433bc95e08d73d92bfc0%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637045572800498366sdata=J%2BSrhIzulD7eR%2FUUruVIgxma%2FXS4%2FdvmBF4r48qhSEQ%3Dreserved=0
> > <
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cd794c4ef78a3433bc95e08d73d92bfc0%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637045572800498366sdata=J%2BSrhIzulD7eR%2FUUruVIgxma%2FXS4%2FdvmBF4r48qhSEQ%3Dreserved=0
> > >*
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: Release vote/discuss reply-to address

2019-09-18 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Josh,

yes, Piotr and I talk a bit about gmail doing strange things. I finally
could send messages to DISCUSS and to VOTE thread. But maybe the problem is
the configuration done in the process. Maybe is just a matter of make a
send to dev list and separate the two sendings, and remove that "
apacheroyal...@gmail.com" account since seems is not necessary.

El mar., 17 sept. 2019 a las 22:54, Josh Tynjala ()
escribió:

> Hmm... looking at the headers in Gmail seems to indicate that reply-to is
> actually set to the dev list. I wonder why Gmail is ignoring it...
>
> One thing that I see is that reply-to is showing up in the UI like this:
>
> reply-to: dev@royale.apache.org, dev@royale.apache.org
>
> Maybe Gmail is getting confused because it is set twice.
>
> --
> Josh Tynjala
> Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 1:42 PM Josh Tynjala 
> wrote:
>
> > I just realized that several replies that I sent to the 0.9.6 discuss
> > thread were lost because I was unexpectedly replying to
> > apacheroyal...@gmail.com.
> >
> > When the server sends out vote/discuss threads, is it possible to set the
> > reply-to address to dev@royale.apache.org?
> >
> > --
> > Josh Tynjala
> > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
> >
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC1

2019-09-17 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi,

+1

Package
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.6/rc1/apache-royale-0.9.6-src.tar.gz
Java 1.8.0_181
OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.14.6
Source kit signatures match: Y
Source kit builds: Y
README is ok: Y
RELEASE_NOTES is ok: Y
NOTICE is ok: Y
LICENSE is ok: Y
No unapproved licenses or archives: Y
No unapproved binaries: Y

Package
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.6/rc1/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.6-bin-js-swf.tar.gz
Binary kit signatures match: Y
README is ok: Y
RELEASE_NOTES is ok: Y
NOTICE is ok: Y
LICENSE is ok: Y
No unapproved licenses or archives in binary package: Y
No unapproved binaries in binary package: Y




El mar., 17 sept. 2019 a las 15:43, Apache Royale CI Server (<
apacheroyal...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> Hi,
>
> This is the vote for the 0.9.6 release of Apache Royale.
>
> The release candidate can be found here;
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.6/rc1/
>
> Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF requirements on
> approving a release?', at:
> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
>
> At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
> - SHA and signed packages are correct
> - README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
> - That the build script completes successfully
> - That you can compile and cross-compile a simple example using the SDK.
>
> The KEYS file is at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/royale/KEYS
>
> The source package is a combination of the 3 main Royale repos.
>
> To use the binary package, unzip it into a folder.  The -js package is
> ready-to-use in an IDE or command-line.  If you need SWF output, use the
> -js-swf package and use Apache Ant to run the InstallAdobeSDKs script via:
>   ant -f InstallAdobeSDKs.xml
>
> You may also get the binary packages via NPM.  The -js package can be
> installed via:
>
> npm install
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.6/rc1/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.6-bin-js.tar.gz
> -g
>
> The full package with SWF support can be installed via:
>
> npm install
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.6/rc1/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.6-bin-js-swf.tar.gz
> -g
>
> Maven artifacts are staged here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheroyale-1056
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
> +1 Approve the release
> -1 Disapprove the release (please provide specific comments to why)
>
> This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.
>
> The vote passes if there is:
> - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
> - More positive votes than negative votes
>
> Remember that this is a 'beta-quality' release so expect there
> will be many bugs found.  IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix bugs
> in the RC, but to make sure we have the packaging right, and enough
> functionality that folks will have some success trying to use it.
>
> People who are not in PMC are also encouraged to test out the release and
> vote, although their votes will not be binding, they can influence how the
> PMC votes.
>
> When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR
> version you tested with.
>
> For your convenience, there is an ant script that automates the common
> steps to validate a release.  Instead of individually downloading the
> package and signature files, unzipping, etc, you can instead:
> 1) create an empty folder,
> 2) download into that folder this file:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.6/rc1/ApproveRoyale.xml
> 3) run the script:
>ant -e -f ApproveRoyale.xml -Drelease.version=0.9.6 -Drc=1
>If you want to test SWF support during the approval, use:
>ant -e -f ApproveRoyale.xml -Drelease.version=0.9.6 -Drc=1
> -Duse-flash=true
>
> You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the packages
> and build results are always encouraged.
>
> Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread not
> this VOTE thread.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr



-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC1

2019-09-17 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Piotr, is ok is in royale-asjs README repo. All ok

(about gmail mixing topics, good catch...although that's very strange gmail
behavior :-? )



El mar., 17 sept. 2019 a las 18:25, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> Are you checking README in sources? I think those information are in some
> release notes file not readme.
>
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019, 6:17 PM Carlos Rovira 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Piotr,
> >
> > I notice this thread is VOTE and not DISCUSS.
> >
> > About celebration, I think it deserves admiration, although we know we
> > still could need a little final adjustment. But this process is about
> 99%,
> > so is good to celebrate all the hard work here by Alex, Om, you and
> others
> > involved :)
> >
> > Going to my checking of RC1: In README I think there are missing notes.
> We
> > provided a lot more. Don't know if is ok as is cause we couldn't add all
> > latest notes (I though only Andrew's revision was left from this
> release).
> > I see just this (while final notes was about x3 more lines):
> >
> > Apache Royale 0.9.6
> > ===
> >
> > - Compiles faster
> > - Many additional components available.
> > - Emulations of many other components available.
> > - For applications targeting JavaScript, you can now incorporate the
> >   vast resources available in existing, free JavaScript libraries.
> > - Dozens of bugs reported, investigated, and squashed. For details of
> >   closed bug reports see
> > https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> >
> > El mar., 17 sept. 2019 a las 17:14, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >
> > > Hi Carlos,
> > >
> > > Thanks but I won't start celebrate till someone build stuff on his PC
> > using
> > > approval script or whatever other method.
> > >
> > > I did try script. I reached the point where SDK need to be build - I
> left
> > > it for now to try tomorrow maybe.
> > >
> > > wt., 17 wrz 2019 o 17:02 Carlos Rovira 
> > > napisał(a):
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > > congrats to reach this step! many work involved here so far! :)
> > > >
> > > > El mar., 17 sept. 2019 a las 15:45, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Guys,
> > > > >
> > > > > I believe we can officially start testing, providing feedback and
> > > > hopefully
> > > > > voting.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Piotr
> > > > >
> > > > > wt., 17 wrz 2019 o 15:43 Apache Royale CI Server <
> > > > apacheroyal...@gmail.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > napisał(a):
> > > > >
> > > > > > This is the discussion thread.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Piotr
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > > >
> > > > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > > > > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > >
> > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC1

2019-09-17 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Piotr,

I notice this thread is VOTE and not DISCUSS.

About celebration, I think it deserves admiration, although we know we
still could need a little final adjustment. But this process is about 99%,
so is good to celebrate all the hard work here by Alex, Om, you and others
involved :)

Going to my checking of RC1: In README I think there are missing notes. We
provided a lot more. Don't know if is ok as is cause we couldn't add all
latest notes (I though only Andrew's revision was left from this release).
I see just this (while final notes was about x3 more lines):

Apache Royale 0.9.6
===

- Compiles faster
- Many additional components available.
- Emulations of many other components available.
- For applications targeting JavaScript, you can now incorporate the
  vast resources available in existing, free JavaScript libraries.
- Dozens of bugs reported, investigated, and squashed. For details of
  closed bug reports see
https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed

Thanks!



El mar., 17 sept. 2019 a las 17:14, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> Hi Carlos,
>
> Thanks but I won't start celebrate till someone build stuff on his PC using
> approval script or whatever other method.
>
> I did try script. I reached the point where SDK need to be build - I left
> it for now to try tomorrow maybe.
>
> wt., 17 wrz 2019 o 17:02 Carlos Rovira 
> napisał(a):
>
> > Hi,
> > congrats to reach this step! many work involved here so far! :)
> >
> > El mar., 17 sept. 2019 a las 15:45, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >
> > > Hi Guys,
> > >
> > > I believe we can officially start testing, providing feedback and
> > hopefully
> > > voting.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Piotr
> > >
> > > wt., 17 wrz 2019 o 15:43 Apache Royale CI Server <
> > apacheroyal...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > napisał(a):
> > >
> > > > This is the discussion thread.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Piotr
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > >
> > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC1

2019-09-17 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi,
congrats to reach this step! many work involved here so far! :)

El mar., 17 sept. 2019 a las 15:45, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> Hi Guys,
>
> I believe we can officially start testing, providing feedback and hopefully
> voting.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> wt., 17 wrz 2019 o 15:43 Apache Royale CI Server  >
> napisał(a):
>
> > This is the discussion thread.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr
>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >