Re: [Discussion] About validation

2017-10-02 Thread Harbs
I have very few work days until the 15th. I doubt I’m going to work more on validation until then. If someone else wants to do work on it before that, it’s fine with me… > On Oct 2, 2017, at 8:46 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > I didn't look at the Validation commit too closely because I saw commit

Re: [Discussion] About validation

2017-10-02 Thread Alex Harui
I didn't look at the Validation commit too closely because I saw commit comments that it was work in progress and need refactoring into beads and PAYG. So work with Herbs and others to figure out a better implementation that takes into account different validation implementations. Although I'd pr

[Discussion] About validation

2017-10-02 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi, I notice Harbs was including one of the missing parts in Royale: Validation. So great, since that is something very needed to get 1.0 state. I'd want to understand about the implementation. I suppose is based on the Flex Validator implementation to use it in MXML. Is that right? When it's fi