Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC2

[Alex Harui]

I created a royale-swf account and was able to publish the royale-swf
package.  I did not try to publish a 'royale' package which is the js-only
package.  I will adjust the package names for the next release.

-Alex

On 1/23/18, 1:39 PM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:

>I've been trying to get the releasecandidate.xml script to do that, but it
>keeps failing.  First I had to upgrade to npm 5.6.0.  The error I am
>getting now is:  
>
>   User not found : royale-swf
>
>The internet is implying that we need to create accounts like royale-swf
>on npmjs.org.  Does that make sense?  I'm going to try that next and use
>private@ as the email.  From what I'm reading, the layers of auth are
>stricter than npm4.
>
>Thoughts?
>-Alex
>
>On 1/23/18, 12:40 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
> wrote:
>
>>Can I go ahead and publish the bits to npm?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Om
>>
>>On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 9:15 AM, Carlos Rovira 
>>wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry as well, I'm off this days due to work load. Hope to keep reading
>>> what's happen, but can't do much more in the project. This should
>>>change in
>>> few days.
>>> thanks for the hard work!
>>>
>>> 2018-01-23 12:52 GMT+01:00 Gabe Harbs :
>>>
>>> > Sorry for missing this vote. I’ve been struggling to get above water
>>>ever
>>> > since I got home…
>>> >
>>> > Harbs
>>> >
>>> > > On Jan 23, 2018, at 6:58 AM, Alex Harui 
>>> > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > Vote passes with 3 +1 votes.
>>> > >
>>> > > Thanks to Piotr and Yishay for voting.
>>> > >
>>> > > -Alex
>>> > >
>>> > > On 1/22/18, 10:07 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" 
>>> > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> Yep that's probably what it was! I'm changing my vote to: +1
>>> (Binding).
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Sorry about that!
>>> > >>
>>> > >> 2018-01-22 18:56 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :
>>> > >>
>>> > >>> MDL examples often use exclude-defaults-css-files and the version
>>>of
>>> > the
>>> > >>> SWC is included in the pom and needs updating.  In the examples
>>>in
>>> the
>>> > >>> release, the version is parameterized.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> Maybe that is what is affecting your external examples.
>>> > >>> -Alex
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> On 1/22/18, 9:37 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" 
>>> > wrote:
>>> > >>>
>>> >  +0 (Binding)
>>> > 
>>> >  Maven build - pass
>>> >  Ant build - pass
>>> > 
>>> >  I don't see any issues in the informational documents.
>>> > 
>>> >  Unfortunately after build two external examples, which in
>>>previous
>>> RC
>>> > >>> were
>>> >  perfectly fine - now they have for some components set position:
>>> > >>> absolute.
>>> >  Example is MDL Table. It messed up my layout. I will fix it in
>>>my
>>> > >>> examples
>>> >  by setting position: unset, but what actually has changed ? This
>>>is
>>> > not
>>> >  only MDL Table.
>>> > 
>>> >  Thanks, Piotr
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> >  2018-01-19 0:35 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :
>>> > 
>>> > > Hi,
>>> > >
>>> > > This is vote for the 0.9.0 release of Apache Royale.
>>> > >
>>> > > The release candidate can be found here;
>>> > >
>>> > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>> > >>> https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apa
>>> > > che.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Froyale%2F0.9.0%2Frc2%
>>> > >>> 2F=02%7C01%7Caha
>>> > > rui%40adobe.com%7Cf7be937565624544669408d561be
>>> > >>> cf55%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794ae
>>> > > d2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636522394510369820=I%
>>> > >>> 2Ftt5Pcut3Zhu%2Blee2cx7
>>> > > KSp8HsSAuQGas5Gxj%2BvnIs%3D=0
>>> > >
>>> > > Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF
>>> > >>> requirements
>>> > > on
>>> > > approving a release?', at:
>>> > >
>>> > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>> > >>> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apach
>>> > > e.org%2Fdev%2Frelease.html%23approving-a-release=02%
>>> > >>> 7C01%7Caharui%40
>>> > > adobe.com%7Cf7be937565624544669408d561becf55%
>>> > >>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178
>>> > >>>
>>> > > decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636522394510369820=
>>> > v03mBMgYUdJ1YkMAjRjOgxivJ4iNq
>>> > > D
>>> > >>> Q
>>> > > 2Un4J5DX3qWQ%3D=0
>>> > >
>>> > > At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
>>> > > - MD5 and signed packages are correct
>>> > > - README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
>>> > > - That the build script completes successfully
>>> > > - That you can compile and cross-compile a simple example using
>>>the
>>> > >>> SDK.
>>> > >
>>> > > The source package is a combination of the 3 main Royale repos.
>>> > >
>>> > > To use the binary package, unzip it into a folder.  The -js
>>>package
>>> > >>> is
>>> > > ready-to-use in an IDE or command-line.  If you need SWF
>>>output,
>>> use
>>> 

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC2

[Alex Harui]

I've been trying to get the releasecandidate.xml script to do that, but it
keeps failing.  First I had to upgrade to npm 5.6.0.  The error I am
getting now is:  

User not found : royale-swf

The internet is implying that we need to create accounts like royale-swf
on npmjs.org.  Does that make sense?  I'm going to try that next and use
private@ as the email.  From what I'm reading, the layers of auth are
stricter than npm4.

Thoughts?
-Alex

On 1/23/18, 12:40 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
 wrote:

>Can I go ahead and publish the bits to npm?
>
>Thanks,
>Om
>
>On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 9:15 AM, Carlos Rovira 
>wrote:
>
>> Sorry as well, I'm off this days due to work load. Hope to keep reading
>> what's happen, but can't do much more in the project. This should
>>change in
>> few days.
>> thanks for the hard work!
>>
>> 2018-01-23 12:52 GMT+01:00 Gabe Harbs :
>>
>> > Sorry for missing this vote. I’ve been struggling to get above water
>>ever
>> > since I got home…
>> >
>> > Harbs
>> >
>> > > On Jan 23, 2018, at 6:58 AM, Alex Harui 
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Vote passes with 3 +1 votes.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks to Piotr and Yishay for voting.
>> > >
>> > > -Alex
>> > >
>> > > On 1/22/18, 10:07 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" 
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Yep that's probably what it was! I'm changing my vote to: +1
>> (Binding).
>> > >>
>> > >> Sorry about that!
>> > >>
>> > >> 2018-01-22 18:56 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :
>> > >>
>> > >>> MDL examples often use exclude-defaults-css-files and the version
>>of
>> > the
>> > >>> SWC is included in the pom and needs updating.  In the examples in
>> the
>> > >>> release, the version is parameterized.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Maybe that is what is affecting your external examples.
>> > >>> -Alex
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On 1/22/18, 9:37 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" 
>> > wrote:
>> > >>>
>> >  +0 (Binding)
>> > 
>> >  Maven build - pass
>> >  Ant build - pass
>> > 
>> >  I don't see any issues in the informational documents.
>> > 
>> >  Unfortunately after build two external examples, which in
>>previous
>> RC
>> > >>> were
>> >  perfectly fine - now they have for some components set position:
>> > >>> absolute.
>> >  Example is MDL Table. It messed up my layout. I will fix it in my
>> > >>> examples
>> >  by setting position: unset, but what actually has changed ? This
>>is
>> > not
>> >  only MDL Table.
>> > 
>> >  Thanks, Piotr
>> > 
>> > 
>> >  2018-01-19 0:35 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :
>> > 
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > This is vote for the 0.9.0 release of Apache Royale.
>> > >
>> > > The release candidate can be found here;
>> > >
>> > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> > >>> https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apa
>> > > che.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Froyale%2F0.9.0%2Frc2%
>> > >>> 2F=02%7C01%7Caha
>> > > rui%40adobe.com%7Cf7be937565624544669408d561be
>> > >>> cf55%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794ae
>> > > d2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636522394510369820=I%
>> > >>> 2Ftt5Pcut3Zhu%2Blee2cx7
>> > > KSp8HsSAuQGas5Gxj%2BvnIs%3D=0
>> > >
>> > > Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF
>> > >>> requirements
>> > > on
>> > > approving a release?', at:
>> > >
>> > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> > >>> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apach
>> > > e.org%2Fdev%2Frelease.html%23approving-a-release=02%
>> > >>> 7C01%7Caharui%40
>> > > adobe.com%7Cf7be937565624544669408d561becf55%
>> > >>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178
>> > >>>
>> > > decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636522394510369820=
>> > v03mBMgYUdJ1YkMAjRjOgxivJ4iNq
>> > > D
>> > >>> Q
>> > > 2Un4J5DX3qWQ%3D=0
>> > >
>> > > At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
>> > > - MD5 and signed packages are correct
>> > > - README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
>> > > - That the build script completes successfully
>> > > - That you can compile and cross-compile a simple example using
>>the
>> > >>> SDK.
>> > >
>> > > The source package is a combination of the 3 main Royale repos.
>> > >
>> > > To use the binary package, unzip it into a folder.  The -js
>>package
>> > >>> is
>> > > ready-to-use in an IDE or command-line.  If you need SWF output,
>> use
>> > >>> the
>> > > -royale package and use Apache Ant to run the InstallAdobeSDKs
>> script
>> > > via:
>> > >  ant -f InstallAdobeSDKs.xml
>> > >
>> > > You may also get the binary packages via NPM.  The -js package
>>can
>> be
>> > > installed via:
>> > >
>> > > npm install
>> > >
>> > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> > >>> https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apa
>> > > 

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC2

[Gabe Harbs]

Sorry for missing this vote. I’ve been struggling to get above water ever since 
I got home…

Harbs

> On Jan 23, 2018, at 6:58 AM, Alex Harui  wrote:
> 
> Vote passes with 3 +1 votes.
> 
> Thanks to Piotr and Yishay for voting.
> 
> -Alex
> 
> On 1/22/18, 10:07 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:
> 
>> Yep that's probably what it was! I'm changing my vote to: +1 (Binding).
>> 
>> Sorry about that!
>> 
>> 2018-01-22 18:56 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :
>> 
>>> MDL examples often use exclude-defaults-css-files and the version of the
>>> SWC is included in the pom and needs updating.  In the examples in the
>>> release, the version is parameterized.
>>> 
>>> Maybe that is what is affecting your external examples.
>>> -Alex
>>> 
>>> On 1/22/18, 9:37 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:
>>> 
 +0 (Binding)
 
 Maven build - pass
 Ant build - pass
 
 I don't see any issues in the informational documents.
 
 Unfortunately after build two external examples, which in previous RC
>>> were
 perfectly fine - now they have for some components set position:
>>> absolute.
 Example is MDL Table. It messed up my layout. I will fix it in my
>>> examples
 by setting position: unset, but what actually has changed ? This is not
 only MDL Table.
 
 Thanks, Piotr
 
 
 2018-01-19 0:35 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :
 
> Hi,
> 
> This is vote for the 0.9.0 release of Apache Royale.
> 
> The release candidate can be found here;
> 
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>> https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apa
> che.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Froyale%2F0.9.0%2Frc2%
>>> 2F=02%7C01%7Caha
> rui%40adobe.com%7Cf7be937565624544669408d561be
>>> cf55%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794ae
> d2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636522394510369820=I%
>>> 2Ftt5Pcut3Zhu%2Blee2cx7
> KSp8HsSAuQGas5Gxj%2BvnIs%3D=0
> 
> Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF
>>> requirements
> on
> approving a release?', at:
> 
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apach
> e.org%2Fdev%2Frelease.html%23approving-a-release=02%
>>> 7C01%7Caharui%40
> adobe.com%7Cf7be937565624544669408d561becf55%
>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178
>>> 
> decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636522394510369820=v03mBMgYUdJ1YkMAjRjOgxivJ4iNq
> D
>>> Q
> 2Un4J5DX3qWQ%3D=0
> 
> At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
> - MD5 and signed packages are correct
> - README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
> - That the build script completes successfully
> - That you can compile and cross-compile a simple example using the
>>> SDK.
> 
> The source package is a combination of the 3 main Royale repos.
> 
> To use the binary package, unzip it into a folder.  The -js package
>>> is
> ready-to-use in an IDE or command-line.  If you need SWF output, use
>>> the
> -royale package and use Apache Ant to run the InstallAdobeSDKs script
> via:
>  ant -f InstallAdobeSDKs.xml
> 
> You may also get the binary packages via NPM.  The -js package can be
> installed via:
> 
> npm install
> 
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>> https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apa
> che.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Froyale%2F0.9.0%2Frc2%
>>> 2F=02%7C01%7Caha
> rui%40adobe.com%7Cf7be937565624544669408d561be
>>> cf55%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794ae
> d2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636522394510369820=I%
>>> 2Ftt5Pcut3Zhu%2Blee2cx7
> KSp8HsSAuQGas5Gxj%2BvnIs%3D=0
> binaries/apache-roy
> ale-0.9.0-bin-js.tar.gz -g
> 
> The full package with SWF support can be installed via:
> 
> npm install
> 
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>> https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apa
> che.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Froyale%2F0.9.0%2Frc&
>>> data=02%7C01%7Caharui%
> 40adobe.com%7Cf7be937565624544669408d561becf55%
>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c1
> 78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636522394510369820=
>>> NlN09LSWtwfTABRj4KCS%2BY4XO7d
> ARikZoS1HUs2voMk%3D=0{rc}/
> binaries/apache-
> royale-0.9.0-bin-js-swf.tar.gz -g
> 
> Maven artifacts are staged here:
> 
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>> https%3A%2F%2Freposito
> ry.apache.org%2Fcontent%2Frepositories%2Forgapacheroyale-1012=
>>> 02%7C0
> 1%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf7be937565624544669408d561be
>>> cf55%7Cfa7b1b5a7b344
> 38794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636522394510369820=
>>> xtKnhhwbbEElHVf8Iz
> Yj3j9a2TyMUqejENINqTKiwXs%3D=0
> 
> Please vote to approve this release:
> +1 Approve the release
> -1 Disapprove the release (please provide specific comments to why)
> 
> This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.
> 
> The vote passes if there is:
> - At least 3 +1 votes from the 

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC2

[Alex Harui]

Vote passes with 3 +1 votes.

Thanks to Piotr and Yishay for voting.

-Alex

On 1/22/18, 10:07 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

>Yep that's probably what it was! I'm changing my vote to: +1 (Binding).
>
>Sorry about that!
>
>2018-01-22 18:56 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :
>
>> MDL examples often use exclude-defaults-css-files and the version of the
>> SWC is included in the pom and needs updating.  In the examples in the
>> release, the version is parameterized.
>>
>> Maybe that is what is affecting your external examples.
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 1/22/18, 9:37 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:
>>
>> >+0 (Binding)
>> >
>> >Maven build - pass
>> >Ant build - pass
>> >
>> >I don't see any issues in the informational documents.
>> >
>> >Unfortunately after build two external examples, which in previous RC
>>were
>> >perfectly fine - now they have for some components set position:
>>absolute.
>> >Example is MDL Table. It messed up my layout. I will fix it in my
>>examples
>> >by setting position: unset, but what actually has changed ? This is not
>> >only MDL Table.
>> >
>> >Thanks, Piotr
>> >
>> >
>> >2018-01-19 0:35 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> This is vote for the 0.9.0 release of Apache Royale.
>> >>
>> >> The release candidate can be found here;
>> >>
>> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apa
>> >>che.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Froyale%2F0.9.0%2Frc2%
>> 2F=02%7C01%7Caha
>> >>rui%40adobe.com%7Cf7be937565624544669408d561be
>> cf55%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794ae
>> >>d2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636522394510369820=I%
>> 2Ftt5Pcut3Zhu%2Blee2cx7
>> >>KSp8HsSAuQGas5Gxj%2BvnIs%3D=0
>> >>
>> >> Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF
>>requirements
>> >>on
>> >> approving a release?', at:
>> >>
>> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apach
>> >>e.org%2Fdev%2Frelease.html%23approving-a-release=02%
>> 7C01%7Caharui%40
>> >>adobe.com%7Cf7be937565624544669408d561becf55%
>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178
>> 
decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636522394510369820=v03mBMgYUdJ1YkMAjRjOgxivJ4iNq
D
>> Q
>> >>2Un4J5DX3qWQ%3D=0
>> >>
>> >> At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
>> >> - MD5 and signed packages are correct
>> >> - README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
>> >> - That the build script completes successfully
>> >> - That you can compile and cross-compile a simple example using the
>>SDK.
>> >>
>> >> The source package is a combination of the 3 main Royale repos.
>> >>
>> >> To use the binary package, unzip it into a folder.  The -js package
>>is
>> >> ready-to-use in an IDE or command-line.  If you need SWF output, use
>>the
>> >> -royale package and use Apache Ant to run the InstallAdobeSDKs script
>> >>via:
>> >>   ant -f InstallAdobeSDKs.xml
>> >>
>> >> You may also get the binary packages via NPM.  The -js package can be
>> >> installed via:
>> >>
>> >> npm install
>> >>
>> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apa
>> >>che.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Froyale%2F0.9.0%2Frc2%
>> 2F=02%7C01%7Caha
>> >>rui%40adobe.com%7Cf7be937565624544669408d561be
>> cf55%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794ae
>> >>d2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636522394510369820=I%
>> 2Ftt5Pcut3Zhu%2Blee2cx7
>> >>KSp8HsSAuQGas5Gxj%2BvnIs%3D=0
>> >> binaries/apache-roy
>> >> ale-0.9.0-bin-js.tar.gz -g
>> >>
>> >> The full package with SWF support can be installed via:
>> >>
>> >> npm install
>> >>
>> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apa
>> >>che.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Froyale%2F0.9.0%2Frc&
>> data=02%7C01%7Caharui%
>> >>40adobe.com%7Cf7be937565624544669408d561becf55%
>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c1
>> >>78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636522394510369820=
>> NlN09LSWtwfTABRj4KCS%2BY4XO7d
>> >>ARikZoS1HUs2voMk%3D=0{rc}/
>> >> binaries/apache-
>> >> royale-0.9.0-bin-js-swf.tar.gz -g
>> >>
>> >> Maven artifacts are staged here:
>> >>
>> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> https%3A%2F%2Freposito
>> >>ry.apache.org%2Fcontent%2Frepositories%2Forgapacheroyale-1012=
>> 02%7C0
>> >>1%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf7be937565624544669408d561be
>> cf55%7Cfa7b1b5a7b344
>> >>38794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636522394510369820=
>> xtKnhhwbbEElHVf8Iz
>> >>Yj3j9a2TyMUqejENINqTKiwXs%3D=0
>> >>
>> >> Please vote to approve this release:
>> >> +1 Approve the release
>> >> -1 Disapprove the release (please provide specific comments to why)
>> >>
>> >> This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.
>> >>
>> >> The vote passes if there is:
>> >> - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
>> >> - More positive votes than negative votes
>> >>
>> >> Remember that this is a 'beta-quality' release so I expect there
>> >> will be many bugs found.  IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix
>> >>bugs
>> >> in the RC, but to make sure we have the packaging right, and enough
>> >> functionality that folks