Ahh Ok! Let me explain. If you create your custom item renderer something
like that [1] and set there href - without that null check you will have
Null Pointer Exception. If you have some other idea how to resolve that I
would be open to change that!
[1] https://paste.apache.org/emQl
Piotr
I mean that I don’t understand why you added the null checking. That seems like
"just in case". I also don’t understand how a Foot*Link*ItemRenderer could be
missing a link element.
> On Oct 27, 2017, at 12:13 AM, Piotr Zarzycki
> wrote:
>
> Hi Harbs,
>
> You
Hi Harbs,
You suggesting remove this part [1], and leave to the user setup it if he
want to ? That is what you mean ?
[1] https://paste.apache.org/8F4x
Piotr
2017-10-26 23:07 GMT+02:00 Harbs :
> Isn’t this "just in case” code?
>
> Why doesn’t the subclass just override
Isn’t this "just in case” code?
Why doesn’t the subclass just override the data setter if it doesn’t have a
link? (and why doesn’t it have one?)
Harbs
> On Oct 26, 2017, at 11:45 PM, pio...@apache.org wrote:
>
> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>
> piotrz