ommunity. For those reasons, I did
> > not pursue adoption of a "Powered By" logo for Royale either.
> >
> > If someone wants to drive the adoption of the "Powered By" logo for
> Royale
> > I would probably support it. I'd be ok with a logo that may
out, the Flex community feedback was
> strongly against the graphic design of the logo. I petitioned the ASF for
> permission to modify the logo and was denied, so I did not pursue adoption
> of a "Powered By" logo by the Flex community. For those reasons, I did
> not pursue adoptio
For those reasons, I did not pursue
adoption of a "Powered By" logo for Royale either.
If someone wants to drive the adoption of the "Powered By" logo for Royale I
would probably support it. I'd be ok with a logo that may not be great from a
graphic design perspective.
-Alex
I am editing the ASF guidelines about branding and trademarks, and noted
this: "Projects are encouraged to create a variation of their main logo as
a "Powered By..." or " *Project* Inside" logo. This logo may be used by
third parties to denote that they build products or services using the
