Re: locality groups

2016-03-28 Thread Brian McBride
includes the G component of a quad, and locality groups are not used, I don't see how Rya can limit its scans to a specific graph. To scan a specific graph, it would have to scan all the matching triples and filter out the ones from the specific graph. Is that right? Or is there some Accumu

Re: locality groups

2016-03-28 Thread Aaron D. Mihalik
nks Aaron. I can see that Accumulo would not be happy in > those circumstances. > > I've been trying to understand how Rya handles named graphs. To me it > looks like it treats them as a filter on the results of matching S P O > patterns. Since there is no index that includes the G c

Re: locality groups

2016-03-26 Thread Brian McBride
quad, and locality groups are not used, I don't see how Rya can limit its scans to a specific graph. To scan a specific graph, it would have to scan all the matching triples and filter out the ones from the specific graph. Is that right? Or is there some Accumulo magic I've missed.

Re: locality groups

2016-03-24 Thread Aaron D. Mihalik
No... it does not. We've run into extreme use cases where a graph is created for each statement (as means of providing properties for a statement). In that case, Accumulo would not be happy if Rya created a locality group for each graph. --Aaron On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 9:29 AM Brian McBride wr

locality groups

2016-03-24 Thread Brian McBride
Does Rya automatically create a locality group for each each graph? I'm assuming it does, but haven't found any confirmation anywhere and not got my head around the code yet. Brian -- Epimorphics Ltd, http://www.epimorphics.com Registered address: Court Lodge, 105 High Street, Portishead, Bri