Hi, Milinda,
Sorry to reply late on this. Here are some of my comments:
1) In Calcite's model, it seems that there is no stream-to-relation
conversion step. In the first example where the window specification is
missing, I like your solution to add the default LogicalNowWindow operator
s.t. it
Hey, Geoffry,
We have started some work in SAMZA-552 to create a window operator API in
samza, as part of effort to implement support for a high-level language. I
will probably be able to have something to share in a few days and would
love to get feedbacks regarding to the window operator.
+1 on consolidating the terminology as well. Azure's definition looks good
to me.
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:13 AM, Chris Riccomini criccom...@apache.org
wrote:
Hey Julian,
+1 I'm not sure if we actually *are* using the right terminology, but I
agree that Azure's terminology is what we should
/task/sql/StreamSqlTask.java
PRE-CREATION
settings.gradle 3a01fd66359b8c79954ae8f34eeaf4b2e3fdc0b4
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29754/diff/
Testing
---
run ./bin/check-all.sh passed
Thanks,
Yi Pan (Data Infrastructure)
of work and 90% of the functionality
is identical in a streaming and non-streaming system.
Lastly, building a stack based on extended standard SQL does not preclude
adding other high-level languages on top of the algebra at a later date.
Julian
On Jan 28, 2015, at 5:36 PM, Yi Pan nickpa
Hyde jul...@hydromatic.net
wrote:
On Jan 29, 2015, at 3:04 PM, Yi Pan nickpa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, Julian,
Thanks for sharing your idea! It is interesting and well organized. Let
me
try to summarize the main difference between yours and the current
proposal
are:
- removing
and join expression are expressions that all
generate a table-type data source entity.
- Yi Pan (Data Infrastructure)
On Jan. 26, 2015, 10:04 p.m., Milinda Pathirage wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit
701 - 707 of 707 matches
Mail list logo
