Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Apache Samza 0.10.1 RC0

2016-08-07 Thread Yi Pan
Hi, Navina, Great! Thanks! -Yi On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 8:01 PM, Navina Ramesh wrote: > Thanks , Yi! I was just about to send the email. > > +1 (Binding) = 3 > +1 (non-binding) = 5 > > I think this is good enough. I will publish the release by tomorrow. > > Thanks!

Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Apache Samza 0.10.1 RC0

2016-08-07 Thread Yi Pan
It has been more than 5 days and we have got 3 +1 (binding) and 5 +1 (non-binding) already. Can we conclude this vote? Thanks! On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Boris Shkolnik wrote: > +1 (non-binding). > > Boris. > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Navina Ramesh >

Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Apache Samza 0.10.1 RC0

2016-08-02 Thread Boris Shkolnik
+1 (non-binding). Boris. On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Navina Ramesh wrote: > Hey all, > > This is a call for a vote on a release of Apache Samza 0.10.0. Thanks > to everyone > who has contributed to this release. We are very glad to see some new >

Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Apache Samza 0.10.1 RC0

2016-08-01 Thread Julian Hyde
> On Aug 1, 2016, at 5:24 PM, Navina Ramesh > wrote: > > Are you referring to the Gemfile.lock in docs/ ? I do see that in the > source release. I was mistaken. Apparently it is OK to check in Gemfile.lock; see

Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Apache Samza 0.10.1 RC0

2016-08-01 Thread Navina Ramesh
s > > good. > > > > > > One question - the key used to sign isn't in the KEYS file in the git > > repo > > > -- is this a convenieence mechanism or does the release process mean > it > > > should be there? > > > > > > Garry &g

Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Apache Samza 0.10.1 RC0

2016-08-01 Thread Julian Hyde
lease process mean it >> should be there? >> >> Garry >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Jacob Maes [mailto:jacob.m...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Monday, August 01, 2016 7:45 PM >> To: dev@samza.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Apache Samz

RE: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Apache Samza 0.10.1 RC0

2016-08-01 Thread Garry Turkington
@samza.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Apache Samza 0.10.1 RC0 @Garry: Yeah. I wasn't very clear about it either. @Yi: Do you know if it is a part of the release process to add my keys to the KEYS file in git repo? Navina On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Garry Turkington < g.turk

RE: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Apache Samza 0.10.1 RC0

2016-08-01 Thread Garry Turkington
: Jacob Maes [mailto:jacob.m...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, August 01, 2016 7:45 PM To: dev@samza.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Apache Samza 0.10.1 RC0 +1 non-binding Lots of good fixes in this release. On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Jagadish Venkatraman < jagadish1...@gmail.com>

Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Apache Samza 0.10.1 RC0

2016-08-01 Thread Jacob Maes
+1 non-binding Lots of good fixes in this release. On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Jagadish Venkatraman < jagadish1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for driving this release.+1 approve (non-binding) > > Thanks, > Jagadish > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Navina Ramesh >

Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Apache Samza 0.10.1 RC0

2016-08-01 Thread xinyu liu
+1 (non-binding). Thanks, Xinyu On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Jagadish Venkatraman < jagadish1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for driving this release.+1 approve (non-binding) > > Thanks, > Jagadish > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Navina Ramesh > > wrote:

[DISCUSS] [VOTE] Apache Samza 0.10.1 RC0

2016-08-01 Thread Navina Ramesh
Hey all, This is a call for a vote on a release of Apache Samza 0.10.0. Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release. We are very glad to see some new contributors in this release. **NOTE**: This release is primarily a bug-fix release with no major changes to the public api. Since we