Hi, Jakob and Yan,
I have back-ported SAMZA-608, SAMZA-658, and SAMZA-616 to 0.9.1 branch. And
the 0.9.1 release will now include bugfixes:
SAMZA-608
SAMZA-616
SAMZA-658
SAMZA-662
I think that would be a good minimum list of bugfixes. I have attached the
back-ported fixes to all JIRAs mentioned
Agreed to back port those bug fixes.
On the branch/tag methodology, I think we can start in next release because
we already have opened the 0.9.1 branch and applied patch to it.
Thanks,
Fang, Yan
yanfang...@gmail.com
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Yi Pan nickpa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Currently we have individual branches for each of the point releases
(0.8.1, 0.9.0, 0.9.1, etc). It may be better to have a single 0.9
branch and then demarcate the actual releases through git tags. This
way the branch becomes more stable over time as bug fixes are applied
(in a magical world
Hi, Yan,
I am voting to start it now. Guozhang has already signed up to follow the
release process that Chris wrote up. There will be an announcement soon.
Thanks!
-Yi
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Yan Fang yanfang...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
Just ask, are there any other bugs that we
Sounds good!
Thanks,
Fang, Yan
yanfang...@gmail.com
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Yi Pan nickpa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, Yan,
I am voting to start it now. Guozhang has already signed up to follow the
release process that Chris wrote up. There will be an announcement soon.
Thanks!
-Yi
Hi guys,
Just ask, are there any other bugs that we want to back port to 0.9.1
besides SAMZA-662 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-662 ?
If no, I think we can prepare the 0.9.1 release and ask for the vote.
Cheers,
Fang, Yan
yanfang...@gmail.com
Hi, Jakob,
Thanks a lot for the thorough check-through. I agree w/ your point that
those bug fixes are important and should be back ported.
@Yan and others, what are your opinions? I will back port SAMZA-608 now.
On the branch/tag methodology, I would prefer to make the change in the
next
