GitHub user shanthoosh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/samza/pull/527
SAMZA-1720: Remove javafx.util dependency from samza-sql tests.
In samza-sql module, currently few test
classes(`TestSamzaSqlRelMessageSerde` and `TestSamzaSqlRelRecordSerde`) are
dependent upon
GitHub user shanthoosh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/samza/pull/526
Schedule ZkBarrierChangeHandler into debounce thread for execution.
In existing implementation, `ZkBarrierChangeHandler` is executed from the
`ZkEventThread` and has following drawbacks:
*
Hi, Sanil,
Thanks for the proposal! Overall, looks good to me. Here a few minor
comments:
- Event Builder Stream (p2): why do we need this instead of injecting
events along w/ messages/timer function in CollectionStream?
- Closable Task: if there is a per-task system resource opened, close()
Extend the vote to Friday, May 18 5pm. Please take a chance to run the
tests and vote for it.
Thanks,
Xinyu
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 10:44 AM, Xinyu Liu wrote:
> A reminder to download the build and vote for it. Since we are passing the
> end date for the vote, let's
+1
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 11:54 AM, santhosh venkat <
santhoshvenkat1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1.
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 10:13 AM, Jacob Maes wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 9:56 AM, Jagadish Venkatraman <
> > jagadish1...@gmail.com> wrote:
+1 can't wait to have this in! :)
From: Jacob Maes
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2018 10:13:57 AM
To: dev@samza.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] SEP-12: Integration Test Framework
+1
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 9:56 AM, Jagadish Venkatraman <
+1
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 9:56 AM, Jagadish Venkatraman <
jagadish1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Sanil for the proposal. This will go a long way in simplifying
> testing of Samza applications.
>
> +1 (binding)
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 9:45 AM, Daniel Nishimura
>
Thanks Sanil for the proposal. This will go a long way in simplifying
testing of Samza applications.
+1 (binding)
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 9:45 AM, Daniel Nishimura
wrote:
> +1
>
> Looks great!
>
> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 9:08 AM, Xinyu Liu wrote:
+1
Looks great!
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 9:08 AM, Xinyu Liu wrote:
> +1
>
> The proposal looks great to me. Look forward to seeing the implementation.
>
> Thanks,
> Xinyu
>
> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 6:12 PM, Sanil Jain
> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
>