Re: [VOTE] Apache Samza 0.9.0 RC0

2015-03-31 Thread Roger Hoover
Nice. Thanks Yan! On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Yan Fang yanfang...@gmail.com wrote: Cool. * Published to maven, it's already there. * Uploaded to dist/release. It may take a while for mirrors to pick it up. * Updated the downloading page in

Re: [VOTE] Apache Samza 0.9.0 RC0

2015-03-31 Thread Ash W Matheson
Of say yes, is been a few days with little traffic on the topic. On Mar 31, 2015 9:18 AM, Chris Riccomini criccom...@apache.org wrote: Hey all, Is the vote done? Cheers, Chris On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Chris Riccomini criccom...@apache.org wrote: +1 1. Validated hello-samza

Re: [VOTE] Apache Samza 0.9.0 RC0

2015-03-31 Thread Chris Riccomini
Hey Yan, Let's confirm with Jakob. I *think* we don't need any intervention from Apache. We should be able to move forward with the release. @Jakob, can you confirm this? Cheers, Chris On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Yan Fang yanfang...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, After 72+ hours, we got +4

Re: [VOTE] Apache Samza 0.9.0 RC0

2015-03-31 Thread Jakob Homan
Correct. All that's necessary for a release is a more-+1s-than--1s-from-PMC-members vote, and then we can go ahead with distribution, publicity, etc. -jg On 31 March 2015 at 12:44, Chris Riccomini criccom...@apache.org wrote: Hey Yan, Let's confirm with Jakob. I *think* we don't need any

Re: [VOTE] Apache Samza 0.9.0 RC0

2015-03-31 Thread Chris Riccomini
Hey Yan/Jakob, Awesome, thanks! Yan, feel free to finish up the release. :) Very cool! Cheers, Chris On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Jakob Homan jgho...@gmail.com wrote: Correct. All that's necessary for a release is a more-+1s-than--1s-from-PMC-members vote, and then we can go ahead with

Re: [VOTE] Apache Samza 0.9.0 RC0

2015-03-30 Thread Chris Riccomini
+1 1. Validated hello-samza works with 0.9.0 Maven binaries. 2. Validated release-0.9.0-rc0 tag exists and has correct checksums. 3. Validated source release tarball builds, and has correct licenses (bin/check-all.sh). 4. Validated source release tarball validates against Yan's PGP key. 5. Ran

Re: [VOTE] Apache Samza 0.9.0 RC0

2015-03-29 Thread Jakob Homan
+1 (binding) * Verified sig and checksum * Spot checked files, verified license and notice * Built packages * Ran hello samza Good work, Yan. -jg On 29 March 2015 at 13:08, Chinmay Soman chinmay.cere...@gmail.com wrote: +1 * Verified signature against the release * Verified authenticity of

Re: [VOTE] Apache Samza 0.9.0 RC0

2015-03-29 Thread Chinmay Soman
+1 * Verified signature against the release * Verified authenticity of the key * Ran hello-samza (latest branch) - all 3 jobs succeed againt 0.9.0 release * Ran integration tests - all 3 tests pass (after addresing SAMZA-621. Also, once a failure occurs - I have to manually kill the Yarn daemons.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Samza 0.9.0 RC0

2015-03-27 Thread Yan Fang
Hi guys, It has been 72 hours. We got +1 from Yi Pan. Do we extend the voting to this weekend ? Thanks, Fang, Yan yanfang...@gmail.com +1 (206) 849-4108 On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:07 PM, Yi Pan nickpa...@gmail.com wrote: I have ran the integration test suite w/ 0.9.0-rc0. There were some

Re: [VOTE] Apache Samza 0.9.0 RC0

2015-03-25 Thread Chris Riccomini
Hey Yan, Were you able to validate the source tarball? I ran: $ gpg --keyserver pgpkeys.mit.edu --recv-key CAC06239EA00BA80 gpg: requesting key EA00BA80 from hkp server pgpkeys.mit.edu gpg: key EA00BA80: public key Yan Fang (CODE SIGNING KEY) yanf...@apache.org imported gpg: Total number