Hi Leonard,
On Thursday, 2007-08-09 20:51:26 +0300, Leonard Mada wrote:
> >Excel converts ++ to =+ and ++
> >to =+, but converts + to =+
> >
> >Note that Excel does not convert single numbers like +1 or -1 but does
> >convert ++1 to =+1, --1 to =--1, +-1 to =+-1 and -+1 to =-1 (all without
> >any
Hi Leonard,
On Thursday, 2007-08-09 20:20:49 +0300, Leonard Mada wrote:
> there is one thing I definitely want to avoid - at all cost: namely
> converting non-formula input into a formula.
So do I. Anything that does not cleanly convert to a formula, no matter
which pattern it might fit otherwi
Hi all,
sorry for another post.
Eike Rathke wrote:
...
2. And w.r.t to the ++ -> =++ its for the similarity with excel (and also +
-> =+).
Excel converts ++ to =+ and ++
to =+, but converts + to =+
Note that Excel does not convert single numbers like +1 or -1 but does
convert ++1 to =+1
Hi all,
there is one thing I definitely want to avoid - at all cost: namely
converting non-formula input into a formula.
Lets say the user enters: +some_string
IF 'some_string' is NOT a valid formula, then:
A.) IF this would be converted to a formula, Calc would evaluate it
and display
Hi Muthu,
btw, this would be sorted into the corresponding thread if you replied
on the original mail instead of some digest.. anyway.
On Thursday, 2007-08-09 13:55:13 +0530, Muthu Subramanian wrote:
> Have you tried the patch that I have attached (in issue 20496)?
No, that issue went out of
Hi Eike,
Have you tried the patch that I have attached (in issue 20496)?
It would (really) be easier if we can comment on the changes required on
the patch (I think).
1. "+func(" should also cause a formula input (exception for +).
2. And w.r.t to the ++ -> =++ its for the similarity with excel
