Hello Kohei, Eike, all,
for public interest, I post my knowledge about formula separators in MS
Excel into the mailing list...
After some testing with different Excel versions with different UI
languages (3.0 German, 4.0 German, 5.0 German, 2003 English and German,
2007 English) in combina
Hi Kohei,
On Tuesday, 2008-03-18 14:13:43 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> I'd like to make sure one thing before I go with this. It seems to me
> that, if we tie the separators to ScCompiler::mxSymbolsNative, then it
> will not be possible to switch between the Excel style separators and
> the con
Hi Kohei,
On Monday, 2008-03-17 21:23:11 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > [... separators at ScAddress::Convention ...]
> Well, that code was implemented before ScGrammar arrived in DEV300_m2.
> So, I couldn't have used ScGrammar at the time I implemented.
Understood.
> Of course now that we hav
Hi Eike,
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 12:29 +0100, Eike Rathke wrote:
> They should be merged into the SymbolsNative map
> instead.
I'd like to make sure one thing before I go with this. It seems to me
that, if we tie the separators to ScCompiler::mxSymbolsNative, then it
will not be possible to switch
Hi Eike,
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 12:29 +0100, Eike Rathke wrote:
> Hi Kohei,
>
> I took a short glance at the changes you did in CWS koheiformula01. Any
> reason why ScAddress::Convention is used to manage the localized
> separators? I'm not quite happy with that. It spoils the clean ScGrammar
> at
Hi Kohei,
I took a short glance at the changes you did in CWS koheiformula01. Any
reason why ScAddress::Convention is used to manage the localized
separators? I'm not quite happy with that. It spoils the clean ScGrammar
attempt just introduced and IMHO unnecessarily complicates things.
I also don'
