Re: Re: [sc-dev] About issue25018

Daniel schrieb: Please do not rely on the item state only, but test the contents of the item too. See the example for the FID_MERGE_TOGGLE item in the same file: the test ... = SFX_ITEM_DEFAULT makes sure that the item exists (it has state DEFAULT or SET), and that it is possible to use the

Re: [sc-dev] missing function log1p and expm1

Hi Regina, On Saturday, 2008-07-12 19:13:47 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote: I have submit http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=91602 for the problem. I just added a comment about placing that in ::rtl::math and targeted it as PATCH to OOo3.1 Thanks Eike -- OOo/SO Calc core

[sc-dev] macro fails with oo 3.0 - returns byte instead of string array !

Hi, are there any known issues with the basic engine in oo 3.0 ? i tried m23/m25 with same results ... i have code *similar* to the snippet below, which will filter Named Ranges of a calc document, for example all Named Ranges starting with X_XXX ... it will return an array of strings,

Re: [sc-dev] macro fails with oo 3.0 - returns byte instead of string array !

forget to mention, that i get a basic error (overflow) in some cases here ' mRanges is a String Typ (correct) Test = mRanges() -- GnuPG key 0xCFD04A45: 8822 057F 4956 46D3 352C 1A06 4E2C AB40 CFD0 4A45 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature