[jira] [Commented] (SEDONA-196) Add ST_Force3D to Sedona

2022-11-18 Thread Jia Yu (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SEDONA-196?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17636068#comment-17636068 ] Jia Yu commented on SEDONA-196: --- [~varsharavindra12] Assigned! > Add ST_Force3D to Sedona >

[jira] [Created] (SEDONA-196) Add ST_Force3D to Sedona

2022-11-18 Thread Varsha (Jira)
Varsha created SEDONA-196: - Summary: Add ST_Force3D to Sedona Key: SEDONA-196 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SEDONA-196 Project: Apache Sedona Issue Type: New Feature

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sedona 1.3.0-incubating-rc2

2022-11-18 Thread Mo Sarwat
Everyone, please remember to vote :) On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 3:37 AM Martin Andersson < u.martin.anders...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Tests for our pipelines passed with sedona-1.3.0-rc2 > > Den tors 17 nov. 2022 kl 19:38 skrev Mo Sarwat : > > > +1 > > > > I checked: > > * Download

[GitHub] [incubator-sedona] jiayuasu commented on pull request #711: [SEDONA-191] Support join types other than inner in BroadcastIndexJoinExec

2022-11-18 Thread GitBox
jiayuasu commented on PR #711: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/711#issuecomment-1320358302 @Kimahriman Adam, would you please share some insights about this? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to

Add raster type to Sedona

2022-11-18 Thread Martin Andersson
Hi all, I have a use case which involves raster geometries. Naturally I would like to use Sedona for that. The current raster functions operate on arrays of doubles. That means that all the spatial metadata is missing. That makes it impossible to implement anything like what Postgis has:

[GitHub] [incubator-sedona] tanelk commented on pull request #711: [SEDONA-191] Support join types other than inner in BroadcastIndexJoinExec

2022-11-18 Thread GitBox
tanelk commented on PR #711: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/711#issuecomment-1320173155 @Kimahriman you introduced broadcast joins here, perhaps you are the best person to take a look at this improvement. Also pinging @jiayuasu - I think this is ready for review now

[GitHub] [incubator-sedona] tanelk commented on a diff in pull request #711: [SEDONA-191] Support join types other than inner in BroadcastIndexJoinExec

2022-11-18 Thread GitBox
tanelk commented on code in PR #711: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/711#discussion_r1026563488 ## sql/src/test/scala/org/apache/sedona/sql/BroadcastIndexJoinSuite.scala: ## @@ -19,37 +19,42 @@ package org.apache.sedona.sql +import

[GitHub] [incubator-sedona] tanelk commented on a diff in pull request #711: [SEDONA-191] Support join types other than inner in BroadcastIndexJoinExec

2022-11-18 Thread GitBox
tanelk commented on code in PR #711: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/711#discussion_r1026562679 ## sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sedona_sql/strategy/join/JoinQueryDetector.scala: ## @@ -206,14 +223,32 @@ class JoinQueryDetector(sparkSession:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sedona 1.3.0-incubating-rc2

2022-11-18 Thread Martin Andersson
+1 (non-binding) Tests for our pipelines passed with sedona-1.3.0-rc2 Den tors 17 nov. 2022 kl 19:38 skrev Mo Sarwat : > +1 > > I checked: > * Download links are valid > * Checksums and PGP signatures are valid > * DISCLAIMER and NOTICE are included > * Source code artifacts have correct names