jiayuasu opened a new pull request #581:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/581
## Is this PR related to a proposed Issue?
## What changes were proposed in this PR?
## How was this patch tested?
## Did this PR include necessary documentation updates?
madzik555 opened a new pull request #580:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/580
## Is this PR related to a proposed Issue?
[SEDONA-82](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SEDONA-82)
## What changes were proposed in this PR?
ST_Symmetrical_Difference function
madzik555 closed pull request #579:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/579
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-u
madzik555 opened a new pull request #579:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/579
## Is this PR related to a proposed Issue?
[SEDONA
82](https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/compare/master...madzik555:SEDONA-82?expand=1)
## What changes were proposed in this
jiayuasu merged pull request #578:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/578
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-un
jiayuasu commented on pull request #578:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/578#issuecomment-1030942977
Thanks for your contribution!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
kseebaldt opened a new pull request #578:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/578
Authored-by: Kurtis Seebaldt
## Is this PR related to a proposed Issue?
SEDONA-4
## What changes were proposed in this PR?
Handle null geometries in multiple functions
jiayuasu merged pull request #577:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/577
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-un
Kimahriman commented on pull request #562:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/562#issuecomment-1030490328
Good catch, made #577
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
Kimahriman opened a new pull request #577:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/577
## Is this PR related to a proposed Issue?
## What changes were proposed in this PR?
## How was this patch tested?
## Did this PR include necessary documentation updates?
jiayuasu commented on pull request #562:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/562#issuecomment-1030229216
@Kimahriman Hi Adam, I received reports from several users.
This PR introduces a dependency [Scala Collection
Compat](https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.scala
jiayuasu merged pull request #576:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/576
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-un
jiayuasu commented on pull request #576:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/576#issuecomment-1030213013
Thank you for your contribution!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
madzik555 opened a new pull request #576:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/576
## Is this PR related to a proposed Issue?
[SEDONA-65](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SEDONA-65)
## What changes were proposed in this PR?
ST_Difference function
## H
jiayuasu merged pull request #575:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/575
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-un
jiayuasu commented on pull request #575:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/575#issuecomment-1026493449
@Imbruced Sounds good to me! I will merge the Java API first.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
Imbruced commented on pull request #575:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/575#issuecomment-1026186913
@jiayuasu For geometry objects at the moment logic is simple (wkb.loads).
When I have some working example will let you know about possibilites and then
we will decide.
jiayuasu commented on pull request #575:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/575#issuecomment-1025253846
@Imbruced Is there any Sedona python code can be shared between Sedona Spark
and SedonaFlink? E.g., the shapely binding of geometry objects?
Then for Python, we p
Imbruced commented on pull request #575:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/575#issuecomment-1025140482
@jiayuasu What is better approach, create new package for python flink ? or
add the code to exisitng one to python/sedona but create new sub module ?
--
This is an au
jiayuasu commented on pull request #575:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/575#issuecomment-1025055713
@Imbruced This is the Sedona Flink support. I just pushed several basic
operators and tried to re-use some functions in Sedona-core. I believe this
will be a good start
jiayuasu opened a new pull request #575:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/575
## Is this PR related to a proposed Issue?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SEDONA-80
## What changes were proposed in this PR?
Add the basic support for Apache Flink
jiayuasu merged pull request #574:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/574
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-un
mjohns-databricks opened a new pull request #574:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/574
Additional clarity on DBRs vs Generator class changes.
## Is this PR related to a proposed Issue?
No
## What changes were proposed in this PR?
Better mapping of Data
jiayuasu merged pull request #573:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/573
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-un
jiayuasu merged pull request #573:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/573
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-un
vinooganesh opened a new pull request #573:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/573
## Is this PR related to a proposed Issue?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SEDONA/issues/SEDONA-78?filter=reportedbyme
## What changes were proposed in this PR?
Add inte
jiayuasu merged pull request #572:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/572
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-un
edurdevic opened a new pull request #572:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/572
## Is this PR related to a proposed Issue?
It was discussed on
https://gitter.im/apache/sedona?at=61eb6179742c3d4b21acbbc4
## What changes were proposed in this PR?
Updated the Da
jiayuasu merged pull request #571:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/571
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-un
karthick-rn opened a new pull request #571:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/571
In the Databricks doc, I think the path to the init script should be
prefixed with `dbfs:` as opposed to a directory in the local file system. After
this change on my Azure Databricks clust
jiayuasu merged pull request #570:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/570
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-un
JassonHua commented on pull request #570:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/570#issuecomment-1007179341
您好，您的邮件我已收到，我会尽快给您回复。谢谢!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go t
jiayuasu merged pull request #570:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/570
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-un
JassonHua commented on pull request #570:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/570#issuecomment-1007179341
您好，您的邮件我已收到，我会尽快给您回复。谢谢!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go t
jiayuasu opened a new pull request #570:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/570
## Is this PR related to a proposed Issue?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SEDONA-77
## What changes were proposed in this PR?
Refactor format readers and spatial part
jiayuasu merged pull request #569:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/569
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-un
madzik555 commented on pull request #569:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/569#issuecomment-990170201
No problem. I can do this
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go t
JassonHua commented on pull request #569:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/569#issuecomment-989718448
您好，您的邮件我已收到，我会尽快给您回复。谢谢!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
madzik555 opened a new pull request #569:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/569
## Is this PR related to a proposed Issue?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SEDONA-18
## What changes were proposed in this PR?
In function getSplits()
(core/src/main/java/or
jiayuasu merged pull request #568:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/568
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-un
edurdevic opened a new pull request #568:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/568
## Is this PR related to a proposed Issue?
No
## What changes were proposed in this PR?
The Databricks docs had some broken links in the sample scripts that were
used to i
jiayuasu merged pull request #565:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/565
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-un
kseebaldt commented on a change in pull request #565:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/565#discussion_r761614410
##
File path: python/tests/sql/test_constructor_test.py
##
@@ -56,6 +60,24 @@ def test_st_geom_from_wkt(self):
polygon_df.show(10)
Imbruced commented on pull request #565:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/565#issuecomment-985107698
@jiayuasu It looks good to me, but we should avoid showing dataframes within
the tests or any unnecessary print statements.
--
This is an automated message from the A
Imbruced commented on a change in pull request #565:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/565#discussion_r761559267
##
File path: python/tests/sql/test_constructor_test.py
##
@@ -56,6 +60,24 @@ def test_st_geom_from_wkt(self):
polygon_df.show(10)
Imbruced commented on pull request #565:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/565#issuecomment-985092495
@jiayuasu I am finishing code review, should be finished within an hour.
About 3D join, I know it will work as it is now but as you said wont be
optimal, bcs we drop
jiayuasu commented on pull request #565:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/565#issuecomment-985089647
@Imbruced I would say it is yes and no.
"No": The existing code structure and index structure will work for 3D
geoms, and guarantee the correctness of the result.
Imbruced commented on pull request #565:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/565#issuecomment-985087744
But in case of 3D spatial join we should include tree structures like
octree. That sounds interesting :)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
jiayuasu edited a comment on pull request #565:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/565#issuecomment-985083882
@kseebaldt @Imbruced I just realized 3D geometries will not be considered in
SpatialJoin. For example, this SQL query won't trigger a Sedona optimized join
jiayuasu commented on pull request #565:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/565#issuecomment-985083882
@kseebaldt @Imbruced I just realized 3D geometries will not be considered in
SpatialJoin. For example, this SQL query won't trigger a Sedona optimized join
```
jiayuasu commented on pull request #565:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/565#issuecomment-984178945
@Imbruced Sure. I will wait for your response tomorrow.
BTW, the failed GitHub action of Example project has been fixed by me.
@kseebaldt On your local branch, can
Imbruced commented on pull request #565:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/565#issuecomment-984113463
One of our action is failing due to depricated exception we should fix that
in first place :) I can do that
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Servic
Imbruced commented on pull request #565:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/565#issuecomment-984112969
To me it looks good but if you dont mind I will check this branch locally
tomorrow.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the mes
jiayuasu commented on pull request #565:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/565#issuecomment-983539832
@Imbruced This looks good to me. What do you think?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and
jiayuasu merged pull request #566:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/566
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-un
jiayuasu merged pull request #567:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/567
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-un
skorski opened a new pull request #566:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/566
## Is this PR related to a proposed Issue?
Broken link to docs
## What changes were proposed in this PR?
Change to point to the correct path.
## How was this patch tested?
kseebaldt commented on pull request #565:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/565#issuecomment-982087380
Sure! I'll work on that.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go t
Imbruced commented on pull request #565:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/565#issuecomment-982078673
@kseebaldt Hi, Thank you for the PR (it's awesome). Can you also add tests
for Python ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
kseebaldt opened a new pull request #565:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/565
## Is this PR related to a proposed Issue?
[SEDONA-75](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SEDONA-75)
## What changes were proposed in this PR?
Preserve Z coordinates on
jiayuasu merged pull request #564:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/564
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-un
jiayuasu commented on pull request #564:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/564#issuecomment-968426114
@Imbruced You can leave those JIRA tickets open but add fixed version in it.
Once the version is release, you or I can close those tickets.
I will leave this PR to
Imbruced commented on pull request #564:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/564#issuecomment-968349188
@jiayuasu What is our approach to solved issues on Jira ? Can I close them ?
Examples, support for spark 3.2, ST_SetSRID etc.
--
This is an automated message from the
Imbruced commented on pull request #564:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/564#issuecomment-968342335
@jiayuasu sorry for that, I had some style violation inside tests to fix
that I installed scala style and by accident functions file was also "fixed".
--
This is an au
Imbruced opened a new pull request #564:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/564
## Is this PR related to a proposed Issue?
SEDONA-68
## What changes were proposed in this PR?
ST_Collect function
## How was this patch tested?
Scala, Python integration
jiayuasu merged pull request #563:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/563
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-un
jiayuasu merged pull request #562:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/562
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-un
jiayuasu commented on a change in pull request #562:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/562#discussion_r748631542
##
File path: .github/workflows/java.yml
##
@@ -23,6 +23,9 @@ jobs:
scala: 2.11.8
- spark: 3.0.3
scala: 2.11.
edurdevic opened a new pull request #563:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/563
The current master branch that has Spark 3.2 compatibility fixes the current
join issues with DBR 8.x+.
This documentation updates reflects the current compatibility with
Databricks.
Kimahriman commented on a change in pull request #562:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/562#discussion_r748345778
##
File path: .github/workflows/java.yml
##
@@ -23,6 +23,9 @@ jobs:
scala: 2.11.8
- spark: 3.0.3
scala: 2.1
edurdevic commented on pull request #561:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/561#issuecomment-967173462
@yitao-li @jiayuasu I have checked the merge commit on the commercial
version of Databricks and it seems to fix the issues with ST_INTERSECT for DBR
8.x+.
Great work
jiayuasu commented on a change in pull request #562:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/562#discussion_r747998469
##
File path: .github/workflows/java.yml
##
@@ -23,6 +23,9 @@ jobs:
scala: 2.11.8
- spark: 3.0.3
scala: 2.11.
Kimahriman opened a new pull request #562:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/562
## Is this PR related to a proposed Issue?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SEDONA-73
## What changes were proposed in this PR?
Adds a Scala 2.13 Maven profile and updates th
jiayuasu commented on pull request #557:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/557#issuecomment-966047257
@arturdryomov Good question. I will start to prepare Sedona 1.1.1 release
this weekend.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
arturdryomov commented on pull request #557:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/557#issuecomment-966020217
@jiayuasu, is there a rough timeline when the Spark 3.2 support might be
shipped?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the m
jiayuasu merged pull request #561:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/561
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-un
yitao-li edited a comment on pull request #557:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/557#issuecomment-964694607
@jiayuasu OK. I was able to make R builds for Spark 3.2 work again with the
changes from https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/561.
--
This is an auto
yitao-li commented on pull request #557:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/557#issuecomment-964694607
@jiayuasu OK. I re-enabled R builds for Spark 3.2 in
https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/561.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
yitao-li opened a new pull request #561:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/561
## Is this PR related to a proposed Issue?
## What changes were proposed in this PR?
## How was this patch tested?
## Did this PR include necessary documentation updates?
Imbruced closed pull request #560:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/560
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-un
Imbruced opened a new pull request #560:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/560
## Is this PR related to a proposed Issue?
SEDONA-68
## What changes were proposed in this PR?
ST_Collect function
## How was this patch tested?
scala unit tests, wait for python
jiayuasu merged pull request #557:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/557
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-un
jiayuasu commented on pull request #557:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/557#issuecomment-961491472
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
yitao-li edited a comment on pull request #557:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/557#issuecomment-961386177
@jiayuasu I pushed some more extensive changes to `sparklyr` in
https://github.com/sparklyr/sparklyr/pull/3198. `spark_install()` should be
flexible enough to han
yitao-li commented on pull request #557:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/557#issuecomment-961386177
@jiayuasu I pushed some more extensive changes to `sparklyr` in
https://github.com/sparklyr/sparklyr/pull/3198. `spark_install()` should be
flexible enough to handle new
jiayuasu merged pull request #558:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/558
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-un
jiayuasu commented on pull request #558:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/558#issuecomment-961700182
@edurdevic Thanks for reminding me. I was focusing on Spark 3.2 support,
which is relevant to this doc. Will merge it now. Thank you!
--
This is an automated message f
edurdevic commented on pull request #558:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/558#issuecomment-961695981
@jiayuasu This PR looks accurate to me now. Do you think we can merge it?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, pleas
Kimahriman commented on pull request #557:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/557#issuecomment-961239301
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
T
yitao-li edited a comment on pull request #557:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/557#issuecomment-961386177
@jiayuasu I pushed some more extensive changes to `sparklyr` in
https://github.com/sparklyr/sparklyr/pull/3198. `spark_install()` should be
flexible enough to han
yitao-li commented on pull request #557:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/557#issuecomment-961241588
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
jiayuasu merged pull request #558:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/558
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-un
jiayuasu commented on pull request #557:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/557#issuecomment-961258366
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
jiayuasu commented on pull request #558:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/558#issuecomment-961700182
@edurdevic Thanks for reminding me. I was focusing on Spark 3.2 support,
which is relevant to this doc. Will merge it now. Thank you!
--
This is an automated message f
edurdevic commented on pull request #558:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/558#issuecomment-961695981
@jiayuasu This PR looks accurate to me now. Do you think we can merge it?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, pleas
jiayuasu merged pull request #557:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/557
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-un
jiayuasu merged pull request #558:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/558
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-un
jiayuasu commented on pull request #558:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/558#issuecomment-961700182
@edurdevic Thanks for reminding me. I was focusing on Spark 3.2 support,
which is relevant to this doc. Will merge it now. Thank you!
--
This is an automated message f
jiayuasu merged pull request #557:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/557
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-un
jiayuasu commented on pull request #557:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/pull/557#issuecomment-961697656
Spark 3.2 R tests have been removed. @yitao-li Please create a Sedona PR to
fix Sedona R tests when you have time. Thank you again for your help!
--
This is an automat
801 - 900 of 1498 matches
Mail list logo
