Default Mapping for ChainProcessor

2006-12-04 Thread Bernhard Slominski
Hi, I was playing the the ChainProcessor and found out that there is no default mapping. So I suggest that like the default mapping for the other build-in processors there should be the following default mapping: context-param param-name org.apache.shale.remoting.CHAIN_RESOURCES

Re: Default Mapping for ChainProcessor

2006-12-04 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 12/4/06, Bernhard Slominski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I was playing the the ChainProcessor and found out that there is no default mapping. So I suggest that like the default mapping for the other build-in processors there should be the following default mapping: context-param

Re: svn commit: r482364 - in /shale/framework/trunk: shale-dialog-basic/src/main/java/org/apache/shale/dialog/basic/ shale-dialog-scxml/src/main/java/org/apache/shale/dialog/scxml/ shale-dialog/src/ma

2006-12-04 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 12/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: craigmcc Date: Mon Dec 4 13:25:07 2006 New Revision: 482364 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=482364 Log: First round of supporting events when DialogContextManager.create() or DialogContextManager.remove() is called.

Re: svn commit: r482449 - in /shale/framework/trunk: shale-dialog-basic/src/main/java/org/apache/shale/dialog/basic/ shale-dialog-scxml/src/main/java/org/apache/shale/dialog/scxml/ shale-dialog/src/ma

2006-12-04 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 12/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Have the base classes implement Serializable where applicable Sorry ... I should have discussed this on the list before making these changes. It comes out of having been badly bit in cases where a subclass of the base class *cannot*

Re: svn commit: r482364 - in /shale/framework/trunk: shale-dialog-basic/src/main/java/org/apache/shale/dialog/basic/ shale-dialog-scxml/src/main/java/org/apache/shale/dialog/scxml/ shale-dialog/src/ma

2006-12-04 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 12/4/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: craigmcc Date: Mon Dec 4 13:25:07 2006 New Revision: 482364 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=482364 Log: First round of supporting events when

Re: svn commit: r482418 - in /shale/framework/trunk: shale-apps/shale-test-dialog-basic/src/main/java/org/apache/shale/examples/test/dialog/basic/ shale-apps/shale-test-dialog-basic/src/main/webapp/WE

2006-12-04 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 12/4/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The events I associate with either ends of a lifecycle (in the context of web apps) are init and destroy. Do you think the callback names onInit and onDestroy would be better (though I see onInstall and onRemove making sense in the