On 2/24/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
what do you guys think to change the method to return null, incase of
there is no dialog with the desired name ?
snip/
Change isn't source compatible, so hard to justify, I think.
-Rahul
P.S.- IMO, we should be porting things
Change isn't source compatible, so hard to justify, I think.
perhaps for 1.1.x ?
-Rahul
P.S.- IMO, we should be porting things like typos you fixed today
(thanks for that) to the 1_0_X branch as well.
tomorrow
-M
-M
--
Matthias Wessendorf
http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
further stuff:
On 2/24/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
what do you guys think to change the method to return null, incase of
there is no dialog with the desired name ?
While you can find a lot of APIs that do this sort of thing, the
current design represents my biases on the topic
On 2/24/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Change isn't source compatible, so hard to justify, I think.
perhaps for 1.1.x ?
Breaking backwards compatibility on a commonly used API like this
would normally be something I'd only want to contemplate on a major
version change.
