POMs cruft

2006-12-27 Thread Rahul Akolkar
Few thoughts: 1) Why is the dependencies section in the parent pom commented out? Tempted to remove it. 2) We probably want to move designtime into a profile (can wait post 1.0.4). 3) There is some other cruft in the parent and remoting poms that I intend to remove. Objections to 1 or 3?

Re: POMs cruft

2006-12-27 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 12/27/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12/27/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip/ 2) We probably want to move designtime into a profile (can wait post 1.0.4). It should probably go back into the sandbox at the moment ... it's on my list to work on in 2007,

Re: POMs cruft

2006-12-27 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 12/27/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12/27/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12/27/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip/ 2) We probably want to move designtime into a profile (can wait post 1.0.4). It should probably go back into the sandbox