I don't think we need to change anything.
* I see no reference to GPL/LGPL on the original page.
* We have an email from the original author asserting BSD license.
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Han Nguyen hn...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Thanks Chris and Paul for helping. According to Shindig
Hi All,
I just saw the new ActivityStream implementation and I am willing to use
that since it matches more what I would expect from an activity.
When Designing my Database I wanted to use attributes like target ,
object , verb etc.
I wanted to know if you think I will be wrong trying to get rid
Thank you very much!
From: Paul Lindner plind...@linkedin.com
To: dev@shindig.apache.org
Cc: chrispcampb...@gmail.com
Date: 05/29/2010 05:20 AM
Subject:Re: Is ImageUtils.getSacledInstance() LGPL license?
Sent by:lind...@inuus.com
I don't think we need to change
Hi Ilya:
This was fixed a while back in the mainline of Shindig, by explicitly
casting params to Strings (in setAuthToken), then doing an exact comparison
in process().
@see
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shindig/trunk/features/src/main/javascript/features/rpc/rpc.js
