Ok, now that the SGA is filed, I'm +1 on this. Thanks for chasing this
down.
Alan.
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 2:36 AM Beng Chin OOI wrote:
>
> A number have joined Alibaba, Kyoto University, Zhejiang University and
> other companies in
> various countries, and some still continue to contribute.
The PPMC reached a conclusion on the discussion [1] that there is no need
for SGA.
Please let me know if there is anything else required. Otherwise, we start
the vote.
Thank you,
Moaz
[1]
Hi -
I see the discussion that an SGA is not needed about 4/2/2015. [1]
I don’t necessarily see the there was a conclusion to that discussion on
private@singa. I certainly don’t see anything related to Singapore in the
grants index in the foundation records. There are plenty of other sgas
Yes, I saw that, but I can't find those papers. They should have been
filed by the Apache secretary on the page I referenced. Either they were
properly transferred and we need to find them so that they are properly
posted in case anyone ever needs them, or, if they weren't sent, then we
need to
Dear Alan,
The copyright section in the project page [1] has the following item :
Date: 2015-03-31
Item: Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to the ASF
been received. It is only necessary to transfer rights for the package, the
core code, and any new code produced by the
Sorry, I brought this up earlier on the dev list but didn't follow up. I
can't find a copy of the code grant for the code that Singa brought into
the Incubator. When I look at the Secretary's page[1] that lists all of
the code grants I don't see one for Singa. Per the initial proposal[2]
there
Hi all,
In the four and a half years that Apache SINGA (incubating) has
been a part of the Apache incubator, the community has grown, diversified,
and adapted to the Apache Way. We believe that the project is ready to
graduate to a TLP.
As a community, we have discussed [1] and voted [2] to
