Hello,
I quoted from two messages regarding the same point, sorry, but
they belong together:
> Given that you already have this code in X4JuliLoggerFactory class, there
> is no benefit in replicating it in JDK14LoggerFactory.
>From http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.slf4j.devel/437
> Altho
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
At 10:17 PM 1/5/2006, Boris Unckel wrote:
I hope to release x4juli 0.7 soon. Can you estimate a timeframe when the
next slf4j version will arrive? Can you give me a hint whether you accept
the patch in Bugzilla #10 or not?
Although a benign refactorization, I tend to decline the patch for th
Author: ceki
Date: Mon Jan 9 18:44:39 2006
New Revision: 498
Removed:
slf4j/trunk/tests/lib/nlog4j-1.2.20.jar
Log:
typo fix
___
dev mailing list
dev@slf4j.org
http://slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Author: ceki
Date: Mon Jan 9 18:41:06 2006
New Revision: 495
Added:
slf4j/tags/SLF4J_1.0RC5/
- copied from r494, slf4j/trunk/
Log:
___
dev mailing list
dev@slf4j.org
http://slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Author: ceki
Date: Mon Jan 9 18:19:53 2006
New Revision: 491
Added:
slf4j/trunk/tests/lib/nlog4j-1.2.21.jar (contents, props changed)
Log:
updated nlog4j version
Added: slf4j/trunk/tests/lib/nlog4j-1.2.21.jar
==
Bin
Author: ceki
Date: Mon Jan 9 18:19:08 2006
New Revision: 490
Removed:
nlog4j/trunk/src/xdocs/lf5/
Log:
removed lf5 dir
___
nlog4j-dev mailing list
nlog4j-dev@slf4j.org
http://slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/nlog4j-dev
Author: ceki
Date: Mon Jan 9 18:18:09 2006
New Revision: 489
Modified:
nlog4j/trunk/src/xdocs/changes.xml
nlog4j/trunk/src/xdocs/download.xml
Log:
preparing 1.2.21
Modified: nlog4j/trunk/src/xdocs/changes.xml
==
--
Author: ceki
Date: Mon Jan 9 18:17:32 2006
New Revision: 488
Modified:
nlog4j/trunk/build.properties
Log:
preparing 1.2.21
Modified: nlog4j/trunk/build.properties
==
--- nlog4j/trunk/build.properties (original)
Author: ceki
Date: Mon Jan 9 18:14:35 2006
New Revision: 487
Modified:
nlog4j/trunk/src/java/org/apache/log4j/Category.java
Log:
improved resiliance to null input
Modified: nlog4j/trunk/src/java/org/apache/log4j/Category.java
===
Author: ceki
Date: Mon Jan 9 18:14:02 2006
New Revision: 486
Modified:
slf4j/trunk/build.properties
Log:
preparing RC5
Modified: slf4j/trunk/build.properties
==
--- slf4j/trunk/build.properties(original)
+++ s
Author: ceki
Date: Mon Jan 9 18:13:42 2006
New Revision: 485
Modified:
slf4j/trunk/tests/src/java/org/slf4j/InvokingSLF4J.java
Log:
more tests for null input
Modified: slf4j/trunk/tests/src/java/org/slf4j/InvokingSLF4J.java
=
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-09 18:02 ---
Recent test cases showed that SimpleLogger and JDK14LoggerAdapter contained
vulnerability points to null input. These vulnerability points have removed in
1.0-
RC5.
--
Author: ceki
Date: Mon Jan 9 17:56:25 2006
New Revision: 484
Modified:
slf4j/trunk/src/java/org/slf4j/impl/JDK14LoggerAdapter.java
Log:
Remove superflous message.toString() calls which made JDK14LoggerAdapter
vulnerable to null input.
Modified: slf4j/trunk/src/java/org/slf4j/impl/JDK14Logg
Author: ceki
Date: Mon Jan 9 17:52:59 2006
New Revision: 483
Modified:
slf4j/trunk/src/java/org/slf4j/impl/SimpleLogger.java
Log:
Remove superflous message.toString() call which made SimpleLogger vulnerable to
null input.
Modified: slf4j/trunk/src/java/org/slf4j/impl/SimpleLogger.java
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Author: ceki
Date: Mon Jan 9 17:30:57 2006
New Revision: 482
Modified:
slf4j/trunk/tests/src/java/org/slf4j/impl/MessageFormatterTest.java
Log:
Testing null input parameters.
Modified: slf4j/trunk/tests/src/java/org/slf4j/impl/MessageFormatterTest.java
===
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-09 17:21 ---
Hello Boris,
Thank you for your valuable input to this report.
Based on http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38174, it seems that
you
advocate an approach
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Author: ceki
Date: Mon Jan 9 17:02:32 2006
New Revision: 481
Modified:
slf4j/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/impl/SLF4JLog.java
slf4j/trunk/tests/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/InvokeJCLTest.java
Log:
Fix in case message is null.
See bug #12 for more details http://bugzilla
20 matches
Mail list logo