[slf4j-dev] [Bug 15] SLF4JLog 'logger' field nulled by Tomcat 5.5.15

http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Additional Comments

[slf4j-dev] [Bug 16] New: nlog4j compile fails with jdk1.5

http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16 Summary: nlog4j compile fails with jdk1.5 Product: NLOG4J Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component:

[slf4j-dev] [Bug 17] New: Update to NewVsSetLen

http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17 Summary: Update to NewVsSetLen Product: NLOG4J Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component:

[slf4j-dev] [Bug 17] Update to NewVsSetLen

http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-08 15:17 --- Created an attachment (id=9) -- (http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/attachment.cgi?id=9action=view) javadoc patch wrt. sun jdk 1.5.0 test -- Configure bugmail:

[slf4j-dev] [Bug 17] Update to NewVsSetLen

http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-08 15:28 --- Hello Jens, Thanks for the report. If it is not too much trouble, can you reproduce the table in text form here? Otherwise, I will apply your patch to see the results.

[slf4j-dev] [Bug 18] New: javadoc - example files not coppied

http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18 Summary: javadoc - example files not coppied Product: NLOG4J Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5

[slf4j-dev] [Bug 15] SLF4JLog 'logger' field nulled by Tomcat 5.5.15

http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-08 17:06 --- Hello, and thanks for the quick response! Sure enough, Tomcat does limit its thrashing to fields that are static AND final. Good catch. I totally missed that. I will

[slf4j-dev] [Bug 15] SLF4JLog 'logger' field nulled by Tomcat 5.5.15

http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-08 19:49 --- Considering that SLF4J does not keep track of class loaders, our reaction to invoking release(ClassLoader) by Tomcat would necessarily involve checking all SLF4JLog

[slf4j-dev] [Bug 15] SLF4JLog 'logger' field nulled by Tomcat 5.5.15

http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-08 21:41 --- I have reported the bug on Tomcat Bugzilla. We'll see what they have to say about it. I did think of another possible fix on SLF4J's end, but I'm not sure how

[slf4j-dev] [Bug 15] SLF4JLog 'logger' field nulled by Tomcat 5.5.15

http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-08 21:58 --- Thank you very much for filing a report with Tomcat. As for your suggestion about moving the level of references one level down, there are two points that should be