show_bug.cgi?id=36
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-29 12:18 ---
Hello Dov,
Thanks for the report, I've corrected the date :)
Sébastien
--
Configure bugmail: userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the
show_bug.cgi?id=36
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution||FIXED
show_bug.cgi?id=36
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
Configure bugmail: userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
show_bug.cgi?id=37
Summary: please compile using java 1.3
Product: SLF4J
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: blocker
Priority: P1
Component: Core API
Author: ceki
Date: Mon Jan 29 22:16:43 2007
New Revision: 697
Modified:
slf4j/trunk/pom.xml
slf4j/trunk/slf4j-jdk14/pom.xml
Log:
target JDK 1.3 as requested in bug report 37.
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37
Modified: slf4j/trunk/pom.xml
show_bug.cgi?id=35
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-29 23:03 ---
Sebastian,
Would it be acceptable if instead of adding a new method to ILoggerFactory
(e.g. getRootLogger()), the currently existing method, namely
getLogger(String), was modified to return the root logger
show_bug.cgi?id=35
--- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-30 01:19 ---
Between , root, and ROOT my preference is a public constant named
ROOT_LOGGER or ROOT_NAME with the value .
This would be compatible w/ java.util.logging, x4juli and Log4J.
Implementors of
