Is anyone reading this? L
Lilianne E. Blaze wrote: > Hello, > Could you please reconsider adding FATAL level? > I read and understand the argument at > http://www.slf4j.org/faq.html#fatal , but actually there are scenarios > where the two levels are different - for example, inconsistencies in a > database might be classified as ERROR, but failing hardware or > inconsistencies suggesting unauthorized access are need immediate > attention are FATAL. > Application saying "I'm out of memory, I'm quitting in hope that os will > restart me soon as defined in cron" is error. > Same application saying "I think I'm being hacked now, help me" is fatal. > Also, it's reasonable to configure logging system to forward error > situations to admin's mail, and fatal ones to admin's cell phone. > > Greetings, Lilianne E. Blaze > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > dev@slf4j.org > http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev > > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@slf4j.org http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
