http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157
--- Comment #4 from Pete Muir pm...@redhat.com 2009-10-29 11:21:48 ---
Roger Kitain confirmed this fix works.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158
Summary: Placeholder resolution for logger method varargs
Product: SLF4J
Version: 1.5.x
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158
--- Comment #1 from Ceki Gulcu lis...@qos.ch 2009-10-29 12:32:03 ---
Hello Marci,
Try the following syntax:
logger.debug(Bla bla {}, new Object[] {stringArray});
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158
--- Comment #2 from Marco Behler m...@bwso.de 2009-10-29 13:21:57 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Hello Marci,
Try the following syntax:
logger.debug(Bla bla {}, new Object[] {stringArray});
Hi Ceki,
this works almost as expected. Just a
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156
--- Comment #2 from Pete Muir pm...@redhat.com 2009-10-29 13:34:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=62)
-- (http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/attachment.cgi?id=62)
Fix exports, add import on cal10n, use property in POM
I believe that slf4j-ext should be
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156
Pete Muir pm...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #62|Fix exports, add import on |Add export on org.slf4j.ext
The branch, master has been updated
via 43350ca4edfec8580aed98e997f4309b0bb137ac (commit)
from e967f5135e1bd2eb0d3165ec08cdb7a35bd1b200 (commit)
Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have
not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156
--- Comment #4 from Ceki Gulcu lis...@qos.ch 2009-10-29 14:55:39 ---
Patch applied [1]. The export and import clauses now actually makes sense.
Sorry about the 0.7 version declaration instead of ${cal10n.version}.
[1]
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156
--- Comment #5 from Pete Muir pm...@redhat.com 2009-10-29 15:00:42 ---
The applied patch appears to be missing the export
org.slf4j.ext;version=${project.version} which allows people to use XLogger
Here is a patch.
diff --git
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156
--- Comment #6 from Ceki Gulcu lis...@qos.ch 2009-10-29 15:10:58 ---
applied
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
The branch, master has been updated
via 58e6b11530ab61312326b4d5f4bf43900797d650 (commit)
from c59183879909e17776206f7fa30fb32bda75b468 (commit)
Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have
not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156
--- Comment #7 from Ceki Gulcu lis...@qos.ch 2009-10-29 15:15:55 ---
removed cruft. should be fine now:
http://git.qos.ch/gitweb/?p=slf4j.git;a=commit;h=58e6b11530ab61312326b4d5f4bf43900797d650
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156
--- Comment #8 from Pete Muir pm...@redhat.com 2009-10-29 19:21:57 ---
Roger Kitain has verified these fixes in GlassFish.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because:
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156
--- Comment #9 from Ceki Gulcu lis...@qos.ch 2009-10-29 19:24:31 ---
Does this mean we are go for a public release of 1.5.9RC1 and cal10n 0.7.2?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156
--- Comment #10 from Pete Muir pm...@redhat.com 2009-10-29 19:25:39 ---
Yes, we have verified slf4j 156 and 157 and CAL-8 and CAL-9 are all fixed.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
The annotated tag, v1.5.9.RC1 has been created
at f9313e23a501190219702233f34442dffdbdec7e (tag)
tagging 58e6b11530ab61312326b4d5f4bf43900797d650 (commit)
replaces v1.5.9-RC0
tagged by Ceki Gulcu
on Thu Oct 29 19:34:57 2009 +0100
- Log
Why are you doing a release of a release candidate?
Ralph
On Oct 29, 2009, at 11:47 AM, Ceki Gulcu wrote:
October 29th, 2009 - Release of SLF4J 1.5.9.RC1
Hello all,
I am happy to announce the immediate availability of SLF4J version
1.5.9.RC1, consisting of bug fixes and minor enhancements.
On Oct 29, 2009, at 1:21 PM, Ceki Gulcu wrote:
Hi there,
If the question is why a release candidate and not just 1.5.9, then
the answer is that I wanted to get input on the cal10n api and slf4j
use of it before making an official release. This made sense for
1.5.9-rc0. For 1.5.9.rc1,
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158
Joern Huxhorn jo...@huxhorn.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jo...@huxhorn.de
---
Hi guys,
I'm just a bit confused about the started work on version 1.5.10
part in the tag description.
Are you planning to skip .9, going straight to .10?
Regards,
Joern.
On 29.10.2009, at 21:21, Ceki Gulcu wrote:
Hi there,
If the question is why a release candidate and not just 1.5.9,
On Oct 29, 2009, at 4:14 PM, Joern Huxhorn wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm just a bit confused about the started work on version 1.5.10
part in the tag description.
Are you planning to skip .9, going straight to .10?
Regards,
Joern.
That is the impression I got since this was a formal release
21 matches
Mail list logo
