Hello Thorbjoern,
It's a nice read. I'd like to link to it from the Articles section of
http://slf4j.org/docs.html asap. Please let me know when you are ready.
Thorbjoern Ravn Andersen wrote:
Joern Huxhorn skrev:
Thorbjoern Ravn Andersen wrote:
Would your friend be interested in
Joern Huxhorn skrev:
Thorbjoern Ravn Andersen wrote:
Would your friend be interested in reviewing such documentation,
perhaps even with the intent of providing it to the students?
Yes, he'd be interested in both ;)
I got around to finish the first draft :)
I'd appreciate your
Joern Huxhorn skrev:
Would your friend be interested in reviewing such documentation,
perhaps even with the intent of providing it to the students?
I'll ask him and let you know,
I have pondered a bit on this and started writing today. It is still
very early but I thought you might want
Thorbjoern Ravn Andersen wrote:
Would your friend be interested in reviewing such documentation,
perhaps even with the intent of providing it to the students?
Yes, he'd be interested in both ;)
Joern.
___
dev mailing list
dev@slf4j.org
Joern Huxhorn skrev:
A friend of mine is a tutor at TU Darmstadt, teaching very fresh
computer science students the very first steps of Java.
He thinks, and I agree, that it's a good idea to show them a proper
logging framework right ahead so they don't even start putting
System.out into their
On 06.05.2009, at 21:52, Thorbjoern Ravn Andersen wrote:
Joern Huxhorn skrev:
A friend of mine is a tutor at TU Darmstadt, teaching very fresh
computer science students the very first steps of Java.
He thinks, and I agree, that it's a good idea to show them a proper
logging framework right
Hi Ceki and Thorbjoern,
On 27.04.2009, at 21:56, Ceki Gulcu wrote:
Thorbjoern Ravn Andersen wrote:
You may notice on re-reading it, that it isn't. The intended
audience is people who happen to know about logging frameworks
ALREADY, and the document tries to convince the audience that
Ceki Gulcu skrev:
Thorbjoern Ravn Andersen wrote:
For people who come to slf4j and do not already know about the
subject it is a steep learning curve. Apparently even intentionally...
The intention is obviously not to annoy users on purpose.
Obviously? Not to me, sorry.
Thank you for
Thorbjoern Ravn Andersen wrote:
For people who come to slf4j and do not already know about the subject
it is a steep learning curve. Apparently even intentionally...
The intention is obviously not to annoy users on purpose.
--
Ceki Gülcü
Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible
Author: ceki
Date: Mon Apr 27 15:29:32 2009
New Revision: 1331
Modified:
slf4j/trunk/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/manual.html
Log:
- reverted 1330
Mentioning authorship stuck out and seems like a regression over previous
versions
- partially reverted 1329
Note on log levels needlessly
Ceki Gulcu skrev:
- partially reverted 1329
Note on log levels needlessly clutters the text
Have you considered *discussing* this before just deleting it?
There is a VERY good reason for me writing this text.
I am sorry for not discussing this particular item. Would you please
11 matches
Mail list logo
