Hi Ralph,
I really like the changes you have made. JCL bashing is or was, as you correctly
point out, mostly unhelpful. I am currently going through the manual making
changes on my own. These changes will be committed shortly.
Cheers,
r...@slf4j.org wrote:
Author: ravn
Date: Thu Apr 16
Author: ceki
Date: Fri Apr 17 11:29:28 2009
New Revision: 1307
Modified:
slf4j/trunk/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/download.html
slf4j/trunk/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/manual.html
Log:
- changes of my own to manual.html (kept most of Ralph's changes)
One notable exception is that the logger
Author: ceki
Date: Fri Apr 17 14:38:06 2009
New Revision: 1308
Modified:
slf4j/trunk/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/legacy.html
slf4j/trunk/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/manual.html
Log:
- minor editing
Modified: slf4j/trunk/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/legacy.html
Author: ceki
Date: Fri Apr 17 14:39:13 2009
New Revision: 1309
Modified:
slf4j/trunk/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/legacy.html
Log:
with NOT switch
Modified: slf4j/trunk/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/legacy.html
==
---
Hello all,
With impetus given by Ralph Goers, the SLF4J documentation has been simplified
and improved. The updated documentation should be especially helpful for new
SLF4J users. If you find any part of the documentation unclear, please let us know.
TIA,
--
Ceki Gülcü
Logback: The
c...@slf4j.org skrev:
One notable exception is that the logger field is not static.
I thought it was by mistake, but apparently it is deliberate. I thought
the official stance was that logger fields should be static to avoid
having to reinitialize for each new instance of the containing
See http://slf4j.org/faq.html#declared_static
The official stance is that there is no official stance. :-)
Thorbjoern Ravn Andersen wrote:
c...@slf4j.org skrev:
One notable exception is that the logger field is not static.
I thought it was by mistake, but apparently it is deliberate. I
Author: ceki
Date: Fri Apr 17 15:05:40 2009
New Revision: 1310
Added:
slf4j/trunk/slf4j-ext/slf4j-ext/
Log:
Share project slf4j-ext into
https://svn.slf4j.org/repos/slf4j/trunk/slf4j-ext;
___
dev mailing list
dev@slf4j.org
Author: ceki
Date: Fri Apr 17 15:09:01 2009
New Revision: 1311
Added:
slf4j/trunk/slf4j-ext/jul-to-slf4j/
Log:
Share project jul-to-slf4j into
https://svn.slf4j.org/repos/slf4j/trunk/slf4j-ext;
___
dev mailing list
dev@slf4j.org
WTF?
c...@slf4j.org wrote:
Author: ceki
Date: Fri Apr 17 15:05:40 2009
New Revision: 1310
Added:
slf4j/trunk/slf4j-ext/slf4j-ext/
Log:
Share project slf4j-ext into
https://svn.slf4j.org/repos/slf4j/trunk/slf4j-ext;
--
Ceki Gülcü
Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging
Ceki Gulcu skrev:
See http://slf4j.org/faq.html#declared_static
The official stance is that there is no official stance. :-)
If I understand the link correctly the primary reason for recommending
not static is to allow repository selectors to work with logback?
Do you have benchmark figures
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108
Ceki Gulcu lis...@qos.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lis...@qos.ch
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108
Ceki Gulcu lis...@qos.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
Ceki Gulcu skrev:
See http://slf4j.org/faq.html#declared_static
The official stance is that there is no official stance. :-)
If I understand the link correctly the primary reason for
recommending not static is to allow repository selectors to work
with logback?
Hmm, I would not word it
Thorbjoern Ravn Andersen wrote:
Is there any scenario to your knowledge where the logger lookup
mechanism may be slow?
No, it's never slow. However, some implementations are better than others.
Am I right in assuming that the logback mechanism for looking up
loggers is faster than in
Ceki,
As much as I would like to take credit for this, r...@slf4j.org isn't
me.
Ralph
On Apr 17, 2009, at 1:37 AM, Ceki Gulcu wrote:
Hi Ralph,
I really like the changes you have made. JCL bashing is or was, as
you correctly point out, mostly unhelpful. I am currently going
through
Ralph Goers wrote:
Ceki,
As much as I would like to take credit for this, r...@slf4j.org isn't me.
No it isn't. I had user ids 'ravn' and 'rgoers' confused.
--
Ceki Gülcü
Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for Java.
http://logback.qos.ch
It was actually Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen and not Ralph who started the work on
the documentation. Sorry for the confusion.
Ceki Gulcu wrote:
Hello all,
With impetus given by Ralph Goers, the SLF4J documentation has been
simplified and improved. The updated documentation should be
Author: ceki
Date: Fri Apr 17 18:42:18 2009
New Revision: 1313
Added:
slf4j/trunk/log4j-over-slf4j/src/test/java/
slf4j/trunk/log4j-over-slf4j/src/test/java/org/
slf4j/trunk/log4j-over-slf4j/src/test/java/org/apache/
slf4j/trunk/log4j-over-slf4j/src/test/java/org/apache/log4j/
Author: ceki
Date: Fri Apr 17 18:43:29 2009
New Revision: 1314
Modified:
slf4j/trunk/pom.xml
Log:
Added dependencyManagement entry for slf4j-jdk14
Modified: slf4j/trunk/pom.xml
==
--- slf4j/trunk/pom.xml (original)
Author: ceki
Date: Fri Apr 17 18:49:35 2009
New Revision: 1315
Modified:
slf4j/trunk/log4j-over-slf4j/src/main/java/org/apache/log4j/Category.java
slf4j/trunk/log4j-over-slf4j/src/main/java/org/apache/log4j/Logger.java
Log:
better method name
Modified:
Author: ceki
Date: Fri Apr 17 20:02:59 2009
New Revision: 1316
Modified:
slf4j/trunk/jcl-over-slf4j/pom.xml
slf4j/trunk/jcl-over-slf4j/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/logging/impl/SLF4JLocationAwareLog.java
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79
Ceki Gulcu lis...@qos.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75
Ceki Gulcu lis...@qos.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lis...@qos.ch
--- Comment #7
24 matches
Mail list logo
