[slf4j-dev] [Bug 110] Create a bridge between System.out/System.err and SLF4J

2009-04-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110 --- Comment #4 from Ceki Gulcu lis...@qos.ch 2009-04-21 19:25:45 --- (In reply to comment #3) The problem I cannot solve is how to work out when the stack trace has ended and hence when it is time to flush the aggregated stack trace lines to

[slf4j-dev] [Bug 110] Create a bridge between System.out/System.err and SLF4J

2009-04-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110 --- Comment #5 from Robert Elliot rob...@teviotia.co.uk 2009-04-21 21:01:33 --- (In reply to comment #4) Unfortunately, you have to wait for a new log statement to determine the end of the throwable which introduces a new latency, which may

[slf4j-dev] svn commit: r1322 - slf4j/trunk/slf4j-site/src/site/pages

2009-04-21 Thread ceki
Author: ceki Date: Tue Apr 21 22:13:07 2009 New Revision: 1322 Modified: slf4j/trunk/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/manual.html Log: - added a section on logging consolidation via SLF4J As Thorbjørn pointed out in revision 1319 as, the section on gradual migration to JCL stuck out like a sore

Re: [slf4j-dev] svn commit: r1321 - slf4j/trunk/slf4j-site/src/site/pages

2009-04-21 Thread Ceki Gulcu
Hello Thorbjørn, Do you intend to pursue this effort on coloring? As this revision stands, I don't see the point... Put differently, it looks like a lot of effort for a meager result. WDYT? r...@slf4j.org wrote: Author: ravn Date: Sun Apr 19 02:23:53 2009 New Revision: 1321 Modified:

Re: [slf4j-dev] svn commit: r1318 - slf4j/trunk/slf4j-site/src/site/pages

2009-04-21 Thread Ceki Gulcu
Hi Thorbjørn, Would you please elaborate on why you removed the section on built-in support in logback? Was it for reasons of principal or readability? r...@slf4j.org wrote: Author: ravn Date: Sat Apr 18 21:20:52 2009 New Revision: 1318 Modified:

[slf4j-dev] svn commit: r1324 - slf4j/trunk/slf4j-site/src/site/pages

2009-04-21 Thread ceki
Author: ceki Date: Tue Apr 21 22:30:30 2009 New Revision: 1324 Modified: slf4j/trunk/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/manual.html Log: - removed the words depressingly and highly. Modified: slf4j/trunk/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/manual.html

Re: [slf4j-dev] svn commit: r1318 - slf4j/trunk/slf4j-site/src/site/pages

2009-04-21 Thread Thorbjoern Ravn Andersen
Ceki Gulcu skrev: Hi Thorbjørn, Would you please elaborate on why you removed the section on built-in support in logback? Was it for reasons of principal or readability? r...@slf4j.org wrote: Author: ravn Date: Sat Apr 18 21:20:52 2009 New Revision: 1318 Modified:

Re: [slf4j-dev] svn commit: r1318 - slf4j/trunk/slf4j-site/src/site/pages

2009-04-21 Thread Ceki Gulcu
Thorbjoern Ravn Andersen wrote: The praise for logback sticked out as much as the putting down of JCL, as this is in the context of a platform neutral logging framework facade. I have to agree, having a separate section on logback stuck out. -- Ceki Gülcü Logback: The reliable, generic,

[slf4j-dev] svn commit: r1325 - slf4j/trunk/slf4j-site/src/site/pages

2009-04-21 Thread ceki
Author: ceki Date: Tue Apr 21 23:05:49 2009 New Revision: 1325 Modified: slf4j/trunk/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/manual.html Log: - added a sentence on using SLF4J in conjunction with logback Modified: slf4j/trunk/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/manual.html