Re: [slf4j-dev] FATAL level

2007-06-18 Thread Ceki Gulcu
Hello Lilianne, Sorry for not replying earlier. I don't believe there is strong demand for this level. Moreover, each level requires ten new methods to be added to the Logger interface which in turn need to be implemented in each binding which I am not too keen on doing. If you were using

Re: [slf4j-dev] FATAL level

2007-06-17 Thread Lilianne E. Blaze
Is anyone reading this? L Lilianne E. Blaze wrote: Hello, Could you please reconsider adding FATAL level? I read and understand the argument at http://www.slf4j.org/faq.html#fatal , but actually there are scenarios where the two levels are different - for example, inconsistencies in a

[slf4j-dev] FATAL level

2007-06-04 Thread Lilianne E. Blaze
Hello, Could you please reconsider adding FATAL level? I read and understand the argument at http://www.slf4j.org/faq.html#fatal , but actually there are scenarios where the two levels are different - for example, inconsistencies in a database might be classified as ERROR, but failing hardware or