Jörn Huxhorn wrote:
Are you serious?
I was.
I once heard a lecture on logging and the prof said that the main objective
of any logging framework must be to not break the application it is logging.
Absolutely.
From this point of view - that I absolutely share - the quality of the slf4j
Hi Ceki.
You forgot the double[] in your last commit.
Regards, Joern.
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 10:51 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: ceki
Date: Thu Jul 31 22:51:04 2008
New Revision: 1086
Modified:
slf4j/trunk/slf4j-api/src/main/java/org/slf4j/helpers/MessageFormatter.java
Hi Jörn,
At least someone is watching over the code. Cool.
I just realized that toString(primitive[]) methods in Arrays class were
introduced in JDK 1.5. SLF4J needs to work on JDK 1.4 if not 1.3. Yikes.
Jörn Huxhorn wrote:
Hi Ceki.
You forgot the double[] in your last commit.
Jörn Huxhorn wrote:
And I just found out that it would be more appropriate to use
Arrays.deepToString((Object[]) o); in case of Object[].
Right, except that deepToString is JDK 1.5. Double yikes.
--
Ceki Gülcü
QOS.ch is looking to hire talented developers located in Switzerland
to work on
Damn, you are right!
I'm not watching out for 1.5 since I have a =1.5 requirement for Lilith.
There's still a problem with your deeplyAppendParameter method: It's not
handling recursive arrays yet.
While this isn't a terribly realistic case it would cause a stack overflow
at the moment. Take a
Jörn Huxhorn wrote:
Damn, you are right!
There's still a problem with your deeplyAppendParameter method: It's not
handling recursive arrays yet.
Yes, indeed.
While this isn't a terribly realistic case it would cause a stack overflow
at the moment. Take a look at the 1.5 implementation of
Author: ceki
Date: Thu Jul 31 22:51:04 2008
New Revision: 1086
Modified:
slf4j/trunk/slf4j-api/src/main/java/org/slf4j/helpers/MessageFormatter.java
slf4j/trunk/slf4j-api/src/test/java/org/slf4j/helpers/MessageFormatterTest.java
Log:
- add support for array values in parameters
For
