Hi,
this is another set of new releases for SLING-6. These releases fix some
important issues.
This vote is about the release of:
- Apache Sling JCR Installer 3.0.4 [1]
- Apache Sling Installer Core 3.1.2 [2]
- Apache Sling Eventing 3.0.2 [3]
[1]
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org wrote:
This vote is about the release of:
- Apache Sling JCR Installer 3.0.4 [1]
- Apache Sling Installer Core 3.1.2 [2]
- Apache Sling Eventing 3.0.2 [3]
+1 to all three, checked signatures and that the contents of
+1
Carsten
Carsten Ziegeler wrote
Hi,
this is another set of new releases for SLING-6. These releases fix some
important issues.
This vote is about the release of:
- Apache Sling JCR Installer 3.0.4 [1]
- Apache Sling Installer Core 3.1.2 [2]
- Apache Sling Eventing 3.0.2 [3]
See
https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/sling-trunk-1.6/org.apache.sling$org.apache.sling.launchpad.testing/745/
See https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/sling-trunk-1.6/changes
See https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/sling-trunk-1.5/1059/changes
See
https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/sling-trunk-1.5/org.apache.sling$org.apache.sling.launchpad.testing/1059/
See
https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/sling-trunk-1.5/org.apache.sling$org.apache.sling.launchpad.testing/1060/
See https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/sling-trunk-1.5/changes
See
https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/sling-trunk-1.6/org.apache.sling$org.apache.sling.launchpad.testing/746/
See https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/sling-trunk-1.6/changes
Hi again,
could I assume silent agreement to this feature? ;-)
Regards,
Alex
--
Alexander Klimetschek
Developer // Adobe (Day) // Berlin - Basel
+1
Regards
Felix
Am Montag, den 31.01.2011, 09:17 + schrieb Carsten Ziegeler:
Hi,
this is another set of new releases for SLING-6. These releases fix some
important issues.
This vote is about the release of:
- Apache Sling JCR Installer 3.0.4 [1]
- Apache Sling Installer Core
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Alexander Klimetschek
aklim...@adobe.com wrote:
Hi again,
could I assume silent agreement to this feature? ;-)
No. I agree loudly :)
--
Vidar S. Ramdal vi...@idium.no - http://www.idium.no
Sommerrogata 13-15, N-0255 Oslo, Norway
+ 47 22 00 84 00
Quando omni
Hi,
Am Montag, den 31.01.2011, 13:19 + schrieb Alexander Klimetschek:
Hi again,
could I assume silent agreement to this feature? ;-)
Sorry, to not have spoken up till now -- consider this silent
disagreement ;-)
Point is, as Bertrand pointed out, the proposal results in fragile
See
https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/sling-trunk-1.6/org.apache.sling$org.apache.sling.launchpad.testing/747/
See https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/sling-trunk-1.6/changes
Hi all
I generated the Sling JavaDoc for the current trunk and published them
at [1]. Once we have a Sling 6 tag to prepare for the Sling 6 release, I
will generate the docs again for publication on the Site.
Please crosscheck and report/fix any missing pieces.
See also The JavaDoc section on
See
https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/sling-trunk-1.5/org.apache.sling$org.apache.sling.launchpad.testing/1061/
See https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/sling-trunk-1.5/1061/changes
On 31.01.11 14:57, Felix Meschberger fmesc...@adobe.com wrote:
Point is, as Bertrand pointed out, the proposal results in fragile
behavior.
In addition the values of a multi-value property is not a set of value
but an array of values, which means there can be duplicates and the
values are
What about taking up the discussion about a PreProcessor interface as
a hook into the post servlet? This was considered and discarded in
SLING-594. This seems to be a use-case, which could be solved using a
PreProcessor (essentially, this would allow the @Patch feature to be
implemented outside of
Support for server-side JUnit tests, injected in a running Sling instance
-
Key: SLING-1963
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-1963
Project: Sling
Issue
On 31.01.11 18:13, Julian Sedding jsedd...@gmail.com wrote:
What about taking up the discussion about a PreProcessor interface as
a hook into the post servlet? This was considered and discarded in
SLING-594. This seems to be a use-case, which could be solved using a
PreProcessor (essentially,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-1963?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12988803#comment-12988803
]
Bertrand Delacretaz commented on SLING-1963:
And BTW if would be easy to
See
https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/sling-contrib-1.5/org.apache.sling$org.apache.sling.launchpad.contrib-testing/659/
See https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/sling-contrib-1.5/659/
On Jan 31, 2011, at 12:27 PM, Alexander Klimetschek aklim...@adobe.com wrote:
The latter is not really possible... one must be able to remove certain
parameters from the request or from the RequestProperty list to do so.
Maybe the collecting of the RequestProperty map is done before the
28 matches
Mail list logo