[jira] [Commented] (SLING-8641) Onboard sling-feature-converter-maven-plugin to SonarCloud

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8641?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16916972#comment-16916972 ] Fabrice Bellingard commented on SLING-8641: --- I can't find it, is it this one? =>

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of the Sling Packager tool, SLING-8584

+1 regards, Karl On Monday, August 26, 2019, Robert Munteanu wrote: > Hi, > > Please vote to accept the donation of the Sling Packager module > described in SLING-8584 [1]. > > This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours. > > Thanks, > > Robert > > [1]:

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of the Sling Packager tool, SLING-8584

Hi all , Being a fresh committee to Jackrabbit I certainly can’t speak for the rest but historically we seperated out as much as possible concerning the http communication. Toby being the main developer behind vault also spent a significant time to decouple the whole ‚frontend‘ & communication

[jira] [Resolved] (SLING-8662) Migrate the Apache Sling Scripting Bundle Tracker to sling-bundle-parent 35

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Radu Cotescu resolved SLING-8662. - Resolution: Fixed Fixed in [commit

[jira] [Created] (SLING-8662) Migrate the Apache Sling Scripting Bundle Tracker to sling-bundle-parent 35

Radu Cotescu created SLING-8662: --- Summary: Migrate the Apache Sling Scripting Bundle Tracker to sling-bundle-parent 35 Key: SLING-8662 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8662 Project:

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of the Sling Packager tool, SLING-8584

Hi Konrad, On Tue, 2019-08-27 at 14:55 +0200, Konrad Windszus wrote: > For me the situation looks a bit slightly different: I raised a > concern in > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/7699b02a090d0397d661721f47a6d70b72fb83ff372fafb7d45e6f5e@%3Cdev.sling.apache.org%3E >

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Sling Health Check Core 2.0.0, Sling Health Check Web Console 2.0.0

Hi, The vote has passed with the following result : +1 (binding): Stefan Seifert, Radu Cotescu, Konrad Windszus, Georg Henzler +1 (non binding): Andreas Schaefer I will copy this release to the Sling dist directory and promote the artifacts to the central Maven repository. -Georg On

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Health Check Core 2.0.0, Sling Health Check Web Console 2.0.0

Makes sense. Thanks for the answer. Here is my +1. > On 26. Aug 2019, at 18:12, Georg Henzler wrote: > > Interesting thought - I didn't think about using [1]. > > I think it is fine though, since those two bundles should > never be referenced via maven directly - rather they are > part of a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Health Check Core 2.0.0, Sling Health Check Web Console 2.0.0

+1 On 2019-08-23 15:48, Andreas Schaefer wrote: +1 (non-binding) - Andy On Aug 23, 2019, at 2:35 AM, Radu Cotescu wrote: +1 On 22 Aug 2019, at 19:34, Georg Henzler wrote: Please vote to approve this release: [ ] +1 Approve the release [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Don't release, because

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of the Sling Packager tool, SLING-8584

(pressed the wrong button, sorry) So I wanted to add that even that the discussion now is a bit late, looking rationally at where to put it, it just think it make sense to put it to Jackrabbit (@Ruben: both AEM and Composum are just UI Layers to the FileVault API, see e.g. [1]). -Georg [1]

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of the Sling Packager tool, SLING-8584

On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 3:10 PM Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > ...I think the tool should land at the community that cares the most about > it. Tbh, I think this is Sling at this point +1 and that's also where it has been offered so makes sense to me. -Bertrand

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of the Sling Packager tool, SLING-8584

Thanks Konrad and Georg, I somehow also didn't really realize that it was summer holiday at that time :) I think the tool should land at the community that cares the most about it. Tbh, I think this is Sling at this point. And yes, we can move it to Jackrabbit later on if that turns out to

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of the Sling Packager tool, SLING-8584

Hi Carsten, sorry for the late comment/bad timing (somehow the message in July slipped). Also I think we all agree that the contribution itself is a great addition. On 2019-08-27 14:33, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: TBH I find this conversation a little bit strange. We have a contribution, this

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of the Sling Packager tool, SLING-8584

For me the situation looks a bit slightly different: I raised a concern in https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/7699b02a090d0397d661721f47a6d70b72fb83ff372fafb7d45e6f5e@%3Cdev.sling.apache.org%3E

[Jenkins] Sling » sling-org-apache-sling-launchpad-testing » master #289 is FIXED

Please see https://builds.apache.org/job/Sling/job/sling-org-apache-sling-launchpad-testing/job/master/289/ for details. No further emails will be sent until the status of the build is changed.

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of the Sling Packager tool, SLING-8584

TBH I find this conversation a little bit strange. We have a contribution, this contribution has been made to us, the Apache Sling project. The suggestion with contributing to Jackrabbit has been discussed over a month ago and it seemed no one had an issue with accepting this contribution in

[Jenkins] Sling » sling-org-apache-sling-launchpad-testing » master #290 is BROKEN

/withMaven2255c05f/maven-spy-20190827-122306-291776247942159333258.log [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-failsafe-plugin:2.21.0:verify (default) on project org.apache.sling.launchpad.testing: There are test failures. [ERROR] [ERROR] Please refer to /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of the Sling Packager tool, SLING-8584

the slingpackager is meant to work against content management systems built on sling. It currently supports package managers by - Composum - AEM If there are other package managers in the future I'd love to add support for them as well. We interact with sling to install packages, not with

[jira] [Commented] (SLING-8655) Add an Annotation to Sling Model to mark a property to be Externalized

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16916636#comment-16916636 ] Ruben Reusser commented on SLING-8655: -- [~vladb] [~sseifert] [~radu.cotescu] we are mostly looking

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of the Sling Packager tool, SLING-8584

I fully agree with that statement. Actually there is already a task at FileVault to have an installation endpoint (accompanied by a branch): https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-151 For all those reasons I would also rather like to see

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of the Sling Packager tool, SLING-8584

Hi, I also have my doubts... reasoning to have it in Sling from [2]: since the tool packages and deploys it is dependent Jackrabbit-Vault for the package format and on Apache Sling and Composum for the upload/install/list/uninstall/delete endpoint. I'd honestly much prefer for it to be an

RE: [VOTE] Accept the donation of the Sling Packager tool, SLING-8584

ah, ok - then +1 stean >-Original Message- >From: Robert Munteanu >Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2019 11:05 AM >To: dev@sling.apache.org >Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of the Sling Packager tool, SLING- >8584 > >Hi Stefan, > >On Tue, 2019-08-27 at 08:49 +, Stefan Seifert

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of the Sling Packager tool, SLING-8584

Hi Stefan, On Tue, 2019-08-27 at 08:49 +, Stefan Seifert wrote: > i'm not against adding it to sling, but maybe the jackrabbit project > would also be a good place for it? alongside with [1]? This was (summarily) discussed at [2]. Don't have a strong opinion either way, just relaying the

RE: [VOTE] Accept the donation of the Sling Packager tool, SLING-8584

i'm not against adding it to sling, but maybe the jackrabbit project would also be a good place for it? alongside with [1]? stefan [1] http://jackrabbit.apache.org/filevault-package-maven-plugin/ >-Original Message- >From: Robert Munteanu >Sent: Monday, August 26, 2019 4:43 PM >To:

[jira] [Commented] (SLING-8655) Add an Annotation to Sling Model to mark a property to be Externalized

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16916523#comment-16916523 ] Stefan Seifert commented on SLING-8655: --- yes, i'm also unsure if a PR like this does not fall too

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Starter Content 1.0.6, Apache Sling Dynamic Include 3.1.6, Apache Sling Form Based Authentication 1.0.16

On Mon, 2019-08-26 at 15:24 +, Robert Munteanu wrote: > Please vote to approve this release: +1 Robert signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of the Sling Packager tool, SLING-8584

On Mon, 2019-08-26 at 16:42 +0200, Robert Munteanu wrote: > Please vote to accept the donation of the Sling Packager module > described in SLING-8584 [1]. +1 Robert signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[jira] [Commented] (SLING-8655) Add an Annotation to Sling Model to mark a property to be Externalized

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16916506#comment-16916506 ] Vlad Bailescu commented on SLING-8655: -- Since externalization is mostly related to the view part (of

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SLING-8655) Add an Annotation to Sling Model to mark a property to be Externalized

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16916503#comment-16916503 ] Radu Cotescu edited comment on SLING-8655 at 8/27/19 8:10 AM: -- [~schaefa], I

[jira] [Commented] (SLING-8655) Add an Annotation to Sling Model to mark a property to be Externalized

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16916503#comment-16916503 ] Radu Cotescu commented on SLING-8655: - [~schaefa], I quickly reviewed the PRs and I'm not really

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Starter Content 1.0.6, Apache Sling Dynamic Include 3.1.6, Apache Sling Form Based Authentication 1.0.16

+1 > On 26 Aug 2019, at 17:24, Robert Munteanu wrote: > > Please vote to approve this release: > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > [ ] 0 Don't care > [ ] -1 Don't release, because ... > > This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours.

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of the Sling Packager tool, SLING-8584

+1 > On 26 Aug 2019, at 16:42, Robert Munteanu wrote: > > Please vote to accept the donation of the Sling Packager module > described in SLING-8584 [1].

Re: Release Validator Docker Image

Hi Daniel, > On 23 Aug 2019, at 14:59, Daniel Klco wrote: > > I'm just not convinced of the > value re-implementing in Java brings vs a few simple bash commands. Sure, it’s more work to do, but you’d benefit from a nice command line menu and we would unify the tooling. Here are a few