Re: Do we have a mechanism to retire modules?

Ignore my answer...I should have read your readme before replying :) Carsten Carsten Ziegeler wrote > Hi Bertrand, > > the attic folder already exists, it is at: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sling/attic/ > > so its not in trunk, which I think makes sense and we have been using it > for

Re: Do we have a mechanism to retire modules?

Hi Bertrand, the attic folder already exists, it is at: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sling/attic/ so its not in trunk, which I think makes sense and we have been using it for quiet some time :) Regards Carsten Bertrand Delacretaz wrote > Hi, > > Thanks Carsten and Robert for the info! >

Re: Do we have a mechanism to retire modules?

Hi, Thanks Carsten and Robert for the info! I have now created https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sling/trunk/attic with just a README that has those pointers, to hopefully make it easier to find our retired modules. -Bertrand On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 6:23 PM, Robert Munteanu

Re: Do we have a mechanism to retire modules?

On Wed, 2017-03-22 at 17:48 +0100, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sling/attic/ And a bit more context at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/vie wpage.action?pageId=65873121 Robert > > Bertrand Delacretaz wrote > > Hi, > > > > In SLING-6686 I'm suggesting

Re: Do we have a mechanism to retire modules?

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sling/attic/ Bertrand Delacretaz wrote > Hi, > > In SLING-6686 I'm suggesting retiring the o.a.s.servlets.compat > module, I don't think we are planning to release more versions of it. > > Do we already a mechanism for retiring modules? I forgot. > > We might

Do we have a mechanism to retire modules?

Hi, In SLING-6686 I'm suggesting retiring the o.a.s.servlets.compat module, I don't think we are planning to release more versions of it. Do we already a mechanism for retiring modules? I forgot. We might just move them under a new "retired" top-level folder. I wouldn't want to delete their