Hi
I think this comes along nicely. Thanks for your efforts. I have added a few
more nitpicks to the issue.
Regards
Felix
Am 03.05.2013 um 14:49 schrieb Amit.. Gupta.:
Hi Devs,
Please vote for [0]. This is a proposal for Adding ResourceCollection to
Sling. There is a patch [1] attached
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org wrote:
...One thing we imho should discuss is whether this should be using the api
package, like o.a.s.api.resource.collection; We could leave it in the
separate bundle as is right now, and once we consider it stable, move
Hi
Am 06.05.2013 um 08:54 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz:
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org
wrote:
...One thing we imho should discuss is whether this should be using the api
package, like o.a.s.api.resource.collection; We could leave it in the
separate
Hi
I have just committed the latest patch. Thanks for that so far.
I am sure the discussion and fine-tuning will continue. So I invite to continue
such discussions and create follow-up issues for implementation/fixes/etc.
As for the last comment by AlexK: Yes, the jcr:content/sling:members
[mailto:fmesc...@adobe.com]
Sent: 06 May 2013 13:13
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: Re: Please vote for SLING-2853
Hi
I have just committed the latest patch. Thanks for that so far.
I am sure the discussion and fine-tuning will continue. So I invite to continue
such discussions and create follow
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Amit.. Gupta. amitg...@adobe.com wrote:
I am in favour of keeping both jcr:content and sling:members...
If this looks fine to everyone, I can work on a patch..
Works for me as long as it's covered by tests...otherwise the risk of
changing behavior without
to everyone, I can work on a patch..
Thanks,
-Amit
-Original Message-
From: Felix Meschberger [mailto:fmesc...@adobe.com]
Sent: 06 May 2013 13:13
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: Re: Please vote for SLING-2853
Hi
I have just committed the latest patch. Thanks for that so far
On 06.05.2013, at 14:45, Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org wrote:
Sorry to ask, but what is jcr:content for?
Same here - sling:members as intermediary node solves the issue of reducing
conflicts already. Introducing yet another intermediary doesn't bring anything
new to the table. Any
Hi
Am 06.05.2013 um 15:37 schrieb Alexander Klimetschek:
On 06.05.2013, at 14:45, Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org wrote:
Sorry to ask, but what is jcr:content for?
Same here - sling:members as intermediary node solves the issue of reducing
conflicts already. Introducing yet
-Original Message-
From: Felix Meschberger [mailto:fmesc...@adobe.com]
Sent: 06 May 2013 13:13
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: Re: Please vote for SLING-2853
Hi
I have just committed the latest patch. Thanks for that so far.
I am sure the discussion and fine-tuning will continue. So I
: 06 May 2013 13:13
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: Re: Please vote for SLING-2853
Hi
I have just committed the latest patch. Thanks for that so far.
I am sure the discussion and fine-tuning will continue. So I invite to
continue such discussions and create follow-up issues
That does not seem to be a use case so far for collections..
-Amit
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
Sent: 06 May 2013 23:49
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: Re: Please vote for SLING-2853 (content Structure)
The only potential reason I see
-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
Sent: 06 May 2013 23:49
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: Re: Please vote for SLING-2853 (content Structure)
The only potential reason I see for jcr:content is if we allow a hierarchy of
collections, so /a/b points to collection B
+1, this looks really good to me;
One thing we imho should discuss is whether this should be using the api
package, like o.a.s.api.resource.collection; We could leave it in the
separate bundle as is right now, and once we consider it stable, move the
package to the official API package.
Carsten
Hi Devs,
Please vote for [0]. This is a proposal for Adding ResourceCollection to Sling.
There is a patch [1] attached as well, as a first cut implementation.
Summary:
This proposal is to add a ResourceCollection interface and implementation that
allows creation of collection of resources.
15 matches
Mail list logo
