Hi Julian,
You're right, we should also wrap the returned resources. I've just replied
on JIRA a couple of minutes ago.
Thanks,
Radu
On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 at 19:15 Julian Sedding wrote:
> Hi Radu
>
> I would argue that this implementation is incorrect.
>
> Consider that with
Hi Radu
I would argue that this implementation is incorrect.
Consider that with this implementation resolver !=
resolver.getResource("/foo").getResourceResolver(), which should be
the case IMHO.
I commented on the issue with two tickets, where the same feature was
previously discussed. The