The vote to release Apache Sling Auth Core 1.1.4 passed with
+1 votes from Oliver Lietz, Amit Gupta, Daniel Klco, Ian Boston (*), Justin
Edelson (*), Carsten Ziegeler (*)
+- 0 votes : -
-1 votes -
(votes marked with * are binding)
Thanks everyone for voting
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege
Hi, we currently have three open votes going on (three different mail
threads) and are missing pmc votes.
It would really be great if someone of the pmc members could have a look.
Thanks
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
The release vote for Apache Sling Commons Scheduler 2.4.0 passed with three
binding +1 votes from Karl Pauls, Ian Boston, and Carsten Ziegeler. No
other votes have been cast.
Thanks everyone for voting
Regards
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
The release vote for Apache Sling Resource Inventory 0.5.0 passed with
three binding +1 votes from Karl Pauls, Ian Boston, and Carsten Ziegeler
and one +1 vote from Daniel Klco. No other votes have been cast.
Thanks everyone for voting
Regards
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
The release vote for Apache Sling JMX Provider 0.5.0 passed with three
binding +1 votes from Karl Pauls, Ian Boston, and Carsten Ziegeler and one
+1 vote from Daniel Klco. No other votes have been cast.
Thanks everyone for voting
Regards
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
Thanks Karl and welcome "back" :)
Regards
Carsten
2013/10/7 Karl Pauls
> There.
>
> regards,
>
> Karl
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Carsten Ziegeler >wrote:
>
> > Hi, we currently have three open votes going on (three different mail
>
hours.
Regards
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
+1
Carsten
2013/10/8 Carsten Ziegeler
> Hi,
>
> it's time for a new engine release:
>
> Sling Engine 2.2.10
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING/fixforversion/12324111
>
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
/downloads.cgi)<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=680950&view=rev>
Credit: This issue was reported by Antonio Sanso of Adobe Systems
Incorporated.
References: http://sling.apache.org/project-information/security.html
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2913
Regards
Carsten Ziegeler
On
yepp, we once decided to directly references all modules from the root pom
and get rid of intermediate reactor poms
2013/10/9 Bertrand Delacretaz
> Hi,
>
> The installer modules are listed in the main pom but there's also an
> installer/pom.xml, can we remove it?
>
> -Be
l.
> - org.apache.sling.osgi.log.*
>
> It seems like the have been changed as follows:
>
> sling.install. -> org.apache.osgi.bundles
> org.apache.sling.osgi.log.* -> org.apache.sling.commons.log.*
>
> Does that sound right? Or am I missing something?
>
> Thanks,
> Dan
>
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
We need another binding vote, anyone?
Thanks
2013/10/8 Karl Pauls
> +1
>
> regards,
>
> Karl
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Carsten Ziegeler >wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > it's time for a new engine release:
> >
> > Sl
vice and is
> thus guaranteed to be stable/persistent. So the API is somewhat
> inconsistent regarding the ClusterView.getId.
>
> I thus suggest getting rid of ClusterView.getId – ie marking it as
> deprecated. (Or, an alternative would be to come up with a stable,
> persistent clu
). And once my use cases are more concrete than
ideas, we can see how to fulfil them.
Carsten
2013/10/11 Stefan Egli
> On 10/11/13 1:35 PM, "Carsten Ziegeler" wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >yes, I totally agree either we have the id stable or its of no use - I
>
The vote passed with three binding +1 votes from Justin Edelson, Karl
Pauls, and Carsten Ziegeler and one +1 vote from Daniel Klco.
Thanks everyone for voting.
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
Exactly, thats what I wrote :)
Carsten
2013/10/11 Felix Meschberger
> Hi
>
> Am 11.10.2013 um 05:45 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler:
>
> > Rethink this, I guess my use cases call more for a cluster name or
> cluster
> > description - which is a user created information.
&g
milliseconds
>
> Tests run: 18, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0
> <<<
>
> the other integration tests are running, but take quite a lot of time to
> complete.
>
> stefan
>
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
llable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
> at
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:44)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.FailOnTimeout$StatementThre
) did not work in 2
> of 3 tries.
>
> Seems to be related to
>
> SLING-2969: IT failure: ClassloadingTest.testSimpleClassloading fails
> intermitently
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2969
>
> Robert
>
> >
> > stefan
> >
> >>-Orig
---Original Message-
> >From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
> >Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 4:50 PM
> >To: dev@sling.apache.org
> >Subject: Re: failure running sling.extensions.event unit/integraiton
> tests on
> >windows?
> >
>
Hi,
I'm wondering what the status of the logback integration is, can we create
a release of it?
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
rs.
Regards
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
staged_release.sh
Usage:
sh check_staged_release.sh 003 /tmp/sling-staging
Please vote to approve this release:
[ ] +1 Approve the release
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
This vote will be open for 72 hours.
Regards
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
Raphael Wegmueller of Adobe Systems
Incorporated.
References: http://sling.apache.org/project-information/security.html
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-3141
Regards
Carsten Ziegeler
On Behalf of the Apache Sling Project Management Committee
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
+1
Carsten
2013/10/20 Carsten Ziegeler
> Hi,
>
> it's time for some new releases, I've combined these three as they are
> related. They contain some important bug fixed and minor improvements
>
> Sling Health Check Core 1.0.6
> https://issues.apache.org/
+1
Carsten
2013/10/20 Carsten Ziegeler
> Hi,
>
> it's time for some new releases, I've combined these three as they are
> related. They contain some important bug fixes and new features
>
> Sling Commons Scheduler 2.4.2
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/brow
] -1 Don't release, because ...
This vote will be open for 72 hours.
Regards
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
+1
Carsten
2013/10/21 Bertrand Delacretaz
> Hi,
>
> On Monday, October 21, 2013, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> > ...Please vote to approve this release..
>
> +1 - checked signatures, svn tag consistency and build of the followin
up with ClusterView's with the
> >>same
> >> ID..
> >>
> >> Re 4: This could either be seen as:
> >>
> >> a bug: the id would no longer be unique (in a topology)
> >> a feature: it would allow to detect a network partitioning!
o "health check execution
should be fast and not expensive". In that case we might add black listing.
Things like a progress bar etc. have to be done through whatever mechanism
is used to execute the hc asynchronously.
WDYT?
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
rsten
2013/10/22 Bertrand Delacretaz
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Carsten Ziegeler
> wrote:
> > ...According to the API health checks are considered to execute quickly -
> > which is fine. However there is no prevention against it. I'm not sure if
&
about the usage to identify how finegrained a potential
> registrationlogic with paths/properties might need to be.
>
> Best regards
> Dominik
>
> [0] http://markmail.org/message/n5vllhjoawypteck
>
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
So you mean instead of doing observation, doing a query periodically?
This would mean that we basically say, one of the main features of JCR,
observation, is not usable.
Carsten
2013/10/23 Bertrand Delacretaz
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Carsten Ziegeler
> wrote
I get this with global observation, but we're now talking about observation
usage patterns and replacing them with queries. And these usage patterns
are usually only observing partial parts of the repository.
Carsten
2013/10/23 Ian Boston
> On 23 October 2013 11:25, Carsten Ziegele
we have in the resource
resolver for the mapping and the i18n one.
Is there more?
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
sound
right to me.
We need to have a look at the whole system - it doesn't help if we talk
about fixing one part of it for such scenarios while completely neglecting
other parts. Therefore, (I know I repeat myself) I'm really looking forward
to numbers showing the bottlenecks.
Thanks
Cars
The vote to release:
Sling Commons Scheduler 2.4.2
Sling Commons Threads 3.2.0
Sling Eventing 3.3.0
passed with three binding +1 votes from Mike Müller, Bertrand Delacretaz,
and Carsten Ziegeler. No other votes have been cast.
Thanks everyone
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
The vote to release:
Sling Health Check Core 1.0.6
Sling Health Check JMX 1.0.6
Sling JMX Resource Provider 0.6.0
passed with three binding +1 votes from Mike Müller, Bertrand Delacretaz,
and Carsten Ziegeler. No other votes have been cast.
Thanks everyone
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege
Anyone else?
Thanks
Carsten
2013/10/21 Carsten Ziegeler
> +1
>
> Carsten
>
>
> 2013/10/21 Bertrand Delacretaz
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Monday, October 21, 2013, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>> > ...Please vote to approve this release..
>>
>> +
I think these are different issues. Im not against the service per se (need
to think about it), but getting an attribute of an bmean should not alter
its state.
Carsten
Am 28.10.2013 10:11 schrieb "Bertrand Delacretaz" :
> Hi,
>
> Looking at SLING-3207 I think this deserves a bit more discussion:
The vote passed with three binding +1 votes from Mike Müller, Carsten
Ziegeler, and Bertrand Delacretaz.
Thanks everyone for voting
Carsten
2013/10/28 Mike Müller
> 1+
> sorry for being late...
>
> best regards
> Mike
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: C
s concurrent execution of a given health
> check
> >
> > This is very similar to how an HTTP cache works, except that in 2) we
> > return an old result instead of waiting.
> >
> > With this we can drop the "execute() method must be fast" requirement
> > (within reasonable bounds) which can simplify the actual health check
> > implementations.
> >
> > WDYT?
> > -Bertrand
>
>
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
re but maybe it's worth having it among the extensions or
> either in a sandbox space.
>
> I can create a Jira issue and add the code as a patch / zip file if there's
> interest.
> Looking forward to hear what you think,
> Regards,
> Tommaso
>
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
lutely fantastic, and I look forward to make it even
> better.
>
> Thanks,
> Amit
>
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
self what impact it has or you actually ask for a resource
>>> resolver with special feature flags in the first place (or not, getting a
>>> standard one).
>>>
>>> Also, I mentioned observation: it's a JCR level thing that wouldn't be
>>> affected by Sling resource resolver feature flags.
>>>
>>> Just thinking out loud here, not sure what the cleanest approach would
>>> be...
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Alex
>>>
>>
>
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
s/orgapachesling-013/
> > >>
> > >> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
> > >>signatures:
> > >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sling/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
> > >>
> > >> Usage:
> > >> sh check_staged_release.sh 013 /tmp/sling-staging
> > >>
> > >> Please vote to approve this release:
> > >>
> > >> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> > >> [ ] 0 Don't care
> > >> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
> > >>
> > >> This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours.
> > >>
> > >> Cheers,
> > >>
> > >> Stefan
>
>
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
specially useful in the context of templating languages
> >>> like Sightly [1] that want to avoid code in rendering templates.
> >>>
> >>> The setup script can also play the role of a mini-controller, as it
> >>> can redirect, fail or forward the current request.
> >>>
> >>> My prototype doesn't require any changes to the Sling code, so we can
> >>> very keep that as an experimental extension for now, if we want to
> >>> move it out of the whiteboard.
> >>>
> >>> Feedback is welcome as usual.
> >>>
> >>> -Bertrand
> >>>
> >>> [1]
> http://www.pro-vision.de/content/medialib/pro-vision/production/adaptto/2013/adaptto2013-sightly-gabriel-walt-honwai-wong-senol-tas-pdf/_jcr_content/renditions/rendition.file/adaptto2013-sightly-gabriel-walt-honwai-wong-senol-tas.pdf
> >>>
> >>> [2]
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sling/whiteboard/bdelacretaz/request-context/src/main/resources/SLING-CONTENT/apps/requestcontext
> >
>
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
Hi,
I've created a draft for the December Board Report (due on Wednesday).
Please have a look and update/correct.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SLING/Status+Report+December+2013
Thanks
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
Good idea - do we have a wiki page where we collect real use cases for
feature flags?
Carsten
2013/12/10 Bertrand Delacretaz
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 6:04 AM, Carsten Ziegeler
> wrote:
> > ...I can see how we can implement a global feature flag within the
>
Thanks Bertrand - I'll file the report today
Carsten
2013/12/9 Bertrand Delacretaz
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 4:06 AM, Carsten Ziegeler
> wrote:
> ...
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SLING/Status+Report+December+2013
>
> Looks good t
tead of the other in general?
> >
> >Thanks in advance for your help,
> >Regards,
> >Tommaso
> >
> >[1] :
> >
> http://sling.apache.org/documentation/the-sling-engine/eventing-and-jobs.h
> >tml
> >[2] :
> >
> http://sling.apache.org/documentation/bundles/apache-sling-eventing-and-jo
> >b-handling.html
>
>
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
pen for 72 hours.
Regards
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
+1
Carsten
2013/12/10 Carsten Ziegeler
> Hi,
>
> its time for a new maven plugin release, we fixed one issue
>
> Sling Maven JSPC Plugin 2.0.8
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2730
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repo
e, Dec 10, 2013 at 5:40 AM, Carsten Ziegeler (JIRA)
> wrote:
> > Carsten Ziegeler created SLING-3272:
> ...
> > The security provider 2 which uses Sling for authentication should only
> be registered, if the startup is finished -
> > usually all content should be installed
AccessGate does exactly what
is needed for handling frags on resources - it filters and allows to return
null (deny access) based on some implementation. So why aren't we using
this?
Carsten
2013/12/10 Bertrand Delacretaz
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Carsten Ziegele
returns a
resource which has a different resource type. This would require zero
changes to the script handling.
Carsten
2013/12/10 Felix Meschberger
> Hi
>
> Am 10.12.2013 um 12:04 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz >:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Carsten Ziegeler
> w
So can we agree to continue with these two appraches:
- global ResourceAccessSecurity for hidding resources
- Decorator for changing rendering
?
Carsten
2013/12/11 Bertrand Delacretaz
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Carsten Ziegeler
> wrote:
> > ...it pays back that w
;
> I assume it's just an issue with the markup language.
>
> [0]
> http://sling.apache.org/documentation/the-sling-engine/request-parameters.html
>
> Cheers,
> Alex
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
t :-) )
>
> As for changing the rendering, I would assume you primarily mean changing
> the resource type (or may be the resource super type), I agree
> ResourceDecorator is the way to go.
>
> Regards
> Felix
>
> Am 11.12.2013 um 01:00 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler :
>
> >
ment too many methods to
> express that.
>
> Maybe a ResourceAccessVeto service, with a single vetoResourceAccess()
> method?
>
Yepp, thanks that was actually my initial idea (though I didn't bring it
across...) - we define this extra service for flags, but implementation
wise this is wr
ing them for
> now, but just turning them off.
>
> -Bertrand
>
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
without having a communication
between the instances.
> 3. If an instance dies then MaintenanceTask on leader takes of
> reassigning all its job. Is this the correct understanding?
>
> Yes, that's right
Regards
Carsten
> Thanks,
> Amit
>
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
+1
2013/12/12 Carsten Ziegeler
> Hi,
>
> its time for a new release of the security provider
>
> Sling Web Console Security Provider 1.1.2
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING/fixforversion/12325305
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apac
This vote will be open for 72 hours.
Regards
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
source super type), I agree ResourceDecorator is the
> way to go.
>
> I guess the feature flags need to do more... although it would be nice if
> you can reduce the use case to this and replace with a resource type that
> e.g. returns a 404 or does nothing (in case of an included resource).
>
> Cheers,
> Alex
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
Hmpf, it looks correct in the preview...ok, but now it should really be
fixed :)
Thanks
Carsten
2013/12/12 Alexander Klimetschek
> From: Carsten Ziegeler
> > Thanks Alex - should be fixed now
>
> No, now it's in italic, which makes sense if this is Markdown, as
> under
tes it
has. The implementation of that api can do all kinds of stuff like using
thread locals to access the current request etc.
Carsten
2013/12/13 Alexander Klimetschek
> On 11.12.2013, at 19:10, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>
> > I think we're pretty clear now how we coul
The vote passes with three binding +1 votes from Justin Edelson, Felix
Meschberger, and Carsten Ziegeler. No other votes have been cast.
Thanks
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
Anyone?
2013/12/12 Carsten Ziegeler
> +1
>
>
> 2013/12/12 Carsten Ziegeler
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> its time for a new release of the security provider
>>
>> Sling Web Console Security Provider 1.1.2
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SL
Hi,
I'm wondering if we need the hasXXXRestrictions(ResourceResolver) in the
access gate interface? Isn't this basically the same information as the
OPERATIONS property?
Regards
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
Hi,
while looking at the ResourceAccessSecurity implementation I noticed that
it returns a NonExistingResource if read access is denied. I think it
simply should return null.
Thoughts?
Regards
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
this release, have commits
> but are unresolved. Is this an omission are they really incomplete ?
>
> Thanks
> Felix
>
> Am 15.12.2013 um 22:46 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler :
>
> > Anyone?
> >
> >
> > 2013/12/12 Carsten Ziegeler
> >
> >> +1
&
tc. that requires to replicate Sling's
> resolution behavior.
>
> (*) yes, getNode() throws an exception, but that's similar to returning
> null compared to returning a special NonExistingResource object
>
> Cheers,
> Alex
>
>
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
The vote to release Apache Sling Web Console Security Provider 1.1.2 passed
with four binding +1 votes from Karl Pauls, Mike Müller, Felix Meschberger,
and Carsten Ziegeler
Thanks everyone for voting
Regards
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
be done fairly easily in a content migration script
> for applications. The benefits are not having to care about the future of
> this flag and a simpler implementation.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Cheers,
> Alex
>
>
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
again on startup (which would do the
> same slower query and thus not really gain performance)?
>
> Cheers,
> Alex
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
toh, applications that use compact dicts probably don't have many.
> and adding a new sling:Dictionary mixin to those 5-10 nodes is no big
> effort.
> Regards, Toby
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Carsten Ziegeler
> wrote:
> > The bundle can either set a ma
shop=ship
2013/12/19 Carsten Ziegeler
> Ok, but I don't want to shop a new i18n implementation which is
> incompatible and would require manual changes to the content before it can
> be installed.
> So either, it automatically updates content or is able to detect which
>
r
whatever to define features.
All constructive feedback welcome - and as I said, let's first define the
API
Everything can be found at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sling/whiteboard/feature-flags/
Regards
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
Name, final Resource
> resource)
>
> Is it the caller's responsibility to first check isEnabled(featureName,
> context), before calling hideResource?
>
> Thanks,
> -Amit
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
> Sent: 19
new API it's better to fix
> it now than later.
>
> -Bertrand
>
> [1]
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sling/trunk/bundles/extensions/healthcheck/core/src/main/java/org/apache/sling/hc/api/HealthCheckExecutor.java
>
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
If no one complains I'll move this stuff into the contrib section - we can
change it there anyway
Thanks
Carsten
2013/12/19 Carsten Ziegeler
> Hi Amit
>
> thanks for the feedback - yes, good point with active vs available. I'll
> change that.
>
> Yes, as th
ecutor
interface that allows us to get the above mentioned features. And as
pointed out below, if we simplify the executor service to a single method,
we don't need to make any changes to Result or add any additional
information.
Carsten
What do others think?
>
> -Bertrand
>
> [1
ure from this provider might not be active
Regards
Carsten
> -Bertrand
>
> (*) Except for troubleshooting, but that's covered by
> RequestProgressTracker which is accessible via
> ProviderContext.getRequest()
>
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
rence. It's just one line
more code, but this would completely remove the need to add meta
information about the HC in the result and make the whole implementation
easier.
WDYT?
Carsten
2013/12/30 Carsten Ziegeler
> 2013/12/27 Bertrand Delacretaz
>
>> Hi Carsten and Georg,
&g
> -Georg
>
>
> Am 30.12.2013 11:30, schrieb Carsten Ziegeler:
>
> The more I think about it, the more I get the feeling that if we can't
>> away
>> with execute(ServiceReference) in the executor api, this should be the
>> only
>> method of that service
ore generic and have an
adaptTo method on the Feature class instead and each functionality
(resource type mapping, hiding resources) gets an own interface and either
the feature can be adapted to this or now. So calling adaptTo would be the
equivalent of hasXXX or canXXX.
WDYT?
Regards
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
e is used to retrieve the
> corresponding wrapper and all is well - the wrapper can then take care
> of Futures, cache management etc.
>
> What's the problem with that?
>
> -Bertrand
>
> [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12619079/SLING-3278-bertrand.patch
>
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
Yes, sure - name and description are good
Carsten
2013/12/31 Bertrand Delacretaz
> Hi Carsten,
>
> On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Carsten Ziegeler
> wrote:
> > ...I thought about making this more generic and have an
> > adaptTo method on the Feature class instea
I've updated the implementation as discussed, however I'm not that happy
with the new service interface names. I came up with ResourceHiding and
ResourceTypeMapper...I hope someone can come up with better names :)
Carsten
2013/12/31 Carsten Ziegeler
> Yes, sure - name and descrip
really a longer timeout is needed, it is always possible to configure
> a higher timeout in the OSGi config of the HealthCheckExecutor (this is
> always possible in DEV/TEST envs)
>
> -Georg
>
>
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
Yes, only a single execute method with the tags.
Carsten
2014/1/3 Bertrand Delacretaz
> Hi Carsten,
>
> On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Carsten Ziegeler
> wrote:
> > ...I think it makes sense to move the
> > jmx stuff into the core, this keeps the executor ser
+1 :)
2014/1/3 Bertrand Delacretaz
> Hi,
>
> Can we use Metadata instead of MetaData in names?
>
> That's consistent with our ResourceMetadata, and the only current uses
> of MetaData seem accidental.
>
> -Bertrand (and yes I volunteer to do the changes in the hc
tion timeouts specified by the caller, to cope with various
> types of health checks and clients
>
> Both are easy to add later however, so if you guys don't want to add
> them now I'm fine.
>
> -Bertrand
>
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
2014/1/3 Bertrand Delacretaz
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Carsten Ziegeler
> wrote:
> > ...I'm not so sure about timeouts by the caller - I would assume that the
> > configured timeout for the executor is a sensible value. If you want to
> > sp
I've moved the implementation to trunk.
I'm wondering if we still need the FeatureProvider? A Feature could be an
OSGi service by itself.
Carsten
2013/12/31 Carsten Ziegeler
> I've updated the implementation as discussed, however I'm not that happy
> with the new
Yes, I would prefer a separate state, parsing the log is too error prone.
Carsten
2014/1/3 Bertrand Delacretaz
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Carsten Ziegeler
> wrote:
> > Bertrand wrote:
> >> As is you can compute the age of a result, that should alr
for discussion:
>
> Am 09.07.2013 um 05:51 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler (JIRA) :
>
> >
> > [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2956?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel]
> >
> > Carsten Ziegeler resolved SLING-2956.
>
ontext is available, a descriptive
> Exception is thrown.
>
> b) If ClientContext hasn't been setup, getCurrentClientContext()
> returns a NullClientContext that throws descriptive Exceptions when
> used.
> If we assume code that almost all calls to getCurrentClientContext()
>
hetan Mehrotra
> [1]
> http://sling.apache.org/apidocs/sling6/org/apache/sling/commons/classloader/DynamicClassLoaderManager.html
> [2]
> https://github.com/apache/sling/blob/trunk/bundles/commons/classloader/src/main/java/org/apache/sling/commons/classloader/impl/Activator.java#L110-L127
>
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
101 - 200 of 16757 matches
Mail list logo
