>Carsten Ziegeler wrote>
>
>> Thanks for the pointer Stefan. We should definitely support this, I'll
>> update the code.
>> For some reason we have based the provisioning model and therefore the
>> feature model on
>> https://ops4j1.jira.com/wiki/spaces/paxurl/pages/3833866/Mvn+Protocol
>>
>
>I
Carsten Ziegeler wrote>
> Thanks for the pointer Stefan. We should definitely support this, I'll
> update the code.
> For some reason we have based the provisioning model and therefore the
> feature model on
> https://ops4j1.jira.com/wiki/spaces/paxurl/pages/3833866/Mvn+Protocol
>
I think the
Stefan Seifert wrote>
>> One minor thing, the current proposal uses the Maven coordinates to
>> describe artifacts. It's using the path part of a maven url, so
>> basically group id, artifact id, version are separated by a slash. It
>> seems that the notation of separating these things by a colon
>One minor thing, the current proposal uses the Maven coordinates to
>describe artifacts. It's using the path part of a maven url, so
>basically group id, artifact id, version are separated by a slash. It
>seems that the notation of separating these things by a colon is more
>common/natural. And
