Re: Maven Sling Plugin - fsmount

2017-12-14 Thread Julian Sedding
ect setups), then it should work. >> >> yes, it would make sense to have an optional configuration property in the >> maven-sling-plugin to support this use case. >> >> stefan >> >>>-Original Message- >>>From: Julian Sedding [mailto:jsedd...

Re: Maven Sling Plugin - fsmount

2017-12-14 Thread Julian Sedding
have an optional configuration property in the > maven-sling-plugin to support this use case. > > stefan > >>-Original Message- >>From: Julian Sedding [mailto:jsedd...@gmail.com] >>Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 9:35 AM >>To: Sling Developers List >>Subject

RE: Maven Sling Plugin - fsmount

2017-12-14 Thread Stefan Seifert
Julian Sedding [mailto:jsedd...@gmail.com] >Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 9:35 AM >To: Sling Developers List >Subject: Re: Maven Sling Plugin - fsmount > >Hi Stefan > >Thanks again for your reply. However, I still don't understand why you >think I need to use "

Re: Maven Sling Plugin - fsmount

2017-12-14 Thread Julian Sedding
gt; stefan > > >>-Original Message- >>From: Julian Sedding [mailto:jsedd...@gmail.com] >>Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 2:32 PM >>To: Sling Developers List >>Subject: Re: Maven Sling Plugin - fsmount >> >>Hi Stefan >> >>Thanks

RE: Maven Sling Plugin - fsmount

2017-12-13 Thread Stefan Seifert
fsresource implementation; i'm not sure if it makes sense to integrate this special usecase also in the logic of the sling:fsmount goal. stefan >-Original Message- >From: Julian Sedding [mailto:jsedd...@gmail.com] >Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 2:32 PM >To: Sling Develo

Re: Maven Sling Plugin - fsmount

2017-12-13 Thread Julian Sedding
Hi Stefan Thanks for your reply. I was hoping that we could avoid generating build artifacts inside the "src" folder. It just doesn't feel quite right. Also, I would like to locate the respective "*.ts" and "*.scss" files in the location where the compiled "*.js" and "*.css" files end up. I

RE: Maven Sling Plugin - fsmount

2017-12-13 Thread Stefan Seifert
hello julian. yes, i think your assumptions are right. in case of filevault project there is currently no way to add some "custom additional mappings" (although you could of course add an additional mapping with only "files and folders" only for your target dir, when there are no content