Re: [JENKINS] Solr-main-Linux (64bit/hotspot/jdk-16.0.2) - Build # 10630 - Still Unstable!

2023-03-07 Thread Kevin Risden
This is most likely related to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16676 Kevin Risden On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 8:06 PM Policeman Jenkins Server wrote: > Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Solr-main-Linux/10630/ > Java: 64bit/hotspot/jdk-16.0.2 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC

[DISCUSS] Future of SolrCell in Solr

2023-03-07 Thread Jan Høydahl
Hi, This has been a recurring topic, and there have been many suggestions for what to do with "Solr Cell" aka Extracting Request Handler aka Tika. Most agree it's a bad idea to parse huge PDFs in Solr's JVM process like we do. Proposals over the years have been * Move SolrCell to a package,

Re: Welcome Andy Webb as Solr committer

2023-03-07 Thread Tomás Fernández Löbbe
Welcome Andy! On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 7:53 AM Gus Heck wrote: > Welcome :) > > On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 10:37 AM Michael Gibney > wrote: > > > Welcome, and congrats! > > > > On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 6:19 AM Ilan Ginzburg wrote: > > > > > > Welcome Andy and congrats! > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 7, 2023

Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release

2023-03-07 Thread Houston Putman
I'll cut the branch in a few days, so go for it and merge tomorrow. Please do add 9.2 as the Fix Version so that we can track this correctly. - Houston On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 1:06 PM Andy Webb wrote: > hi Houston, > > I have https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16643 in progress - >

Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release

2023-03-07 Thread Andy Webb
hi Houston, I have https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16643 in progress - would like that to go into 9.2 if possible, but it's not critical. I'm away so won't be in a position to merge that until this time tomorrow at the earliest. It'll also be my first commit, and I want to make sure

Re: Google Java Style: shall we declare intent to follow?

2023-03-07 Thread Anshum Gupta
I like the idea, David. Overall it makes for code that is easier to read and understand, specially for new contributors. On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 5:46 PM David Smiley wrote: > I wish to standardize our use of casing in names/symbols. And perhaps to > align with GJS more broadly. > > We use the

Re: Google Java Style: shall we declare intent to follow?

2023-03-07 Thread Jan Høydahl
+1, good idea. Jan > 2. mar. 2023 kl. 02:45 skrev David Smiley : > > I wish to standardize our use of casing in names/symbols. And perhaps to > align with GJS more broadly. > > We use the google-java-format build plugin, which is obviously tightly > correlated with the Google Java Style. I

Re: Search timeouts; recent Lucene changes

2023-03-07 Thread David Smiley
On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 10:44 AM Houston Putman wrote: > The only issue I see is that the IndexSearcher timeout isn't per-query, its > a setting on the searcher itself. > Since timeAllowed is a query param, this seems like an issue. > Am I reading that incorrectly? > Yes but we can override:

[Operator] [Discuss] v0.7.0 Release and future plans

2023-03-07 Thread Houston Putman
Hey everyone, It's been quite a while since the last operator release, and it's probably time to get all of the small bug fixes and new features out there. Before release I'm going to finish out a few tickets (namely upgrading dependencies and adding an opt-out for the new PodDisruptionBudget).

Re: Welcome Andy Webb as Solr committer

2023-03-07 Thread Gus Heck
Welcome :) On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 10:37 AM Michael Gibney wrote: > Welcome, and congrats! > > On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 6:19 AM Ilan Ginzburg wrote: > > > > Welcome Andy and congrats! > > > > On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 7:52 AM Mikhail Khludnev wrote: > > > > > Welcome, Andy! > > > > > > On Mon, Mar

Re: Google Java Style: shall we declare intent to follow?

2023-03-07 Thread Houston Putman
I am always +1 for standardization, especially across a project as big as this. On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 9:09 AM Eric Pugh wrote: > I often find myself bike shedding names of classes and variables…. > > I also see contributions from folks who haven’t been in the Solr codebase > for a long period

Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release

2023-03-07 Thread Ishan Chattopadhyaya
Hi Houston, We're actively working on SOLR-16653. Since it is a bug fix, hoping it won't delay the release. +1 to branch cutting. Regards, Ishan On Tue, 7 Mar, 2023, 8:48 pm Houston Putman, wrote: > Hey everyone, > > I am officially back and ready to begin the process for 9.2. How are we >

Re: Search timeouts; recent Lucene changes

2023-03-07 Thread Houston Putman
Thanks for bringing this up David! I think doing this should block Solr 9.2 using Lucene 9.5. Agreed I'm not sure TimeLimitingCollector offers much value to using TLBS other than additional precision on timeAllowed at some cost to > unselective queries. It's probably not offering much

Re: Welcome Andy Webb as Solr committer

2023-03-07 Thread Michael Gibney
Welcome, and congrats! On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 6:19 AM Ilan Ginzburg wrote: > > Welcome Andy and congrats! > > On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 7:52 AM Mikhail Khludnev wrote: > > > Welcome, Andy! > > > > On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 10:54 PM Andy Webb wrote: > > > > > hi all, thank you for the invitation and

Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release

2023-03-07 Thread Houston Putman
Hey everyone, I am officially back and ready to begin the process for 9.2. How are we doing with regards to blockers right now? So I see 4 tickets that are tagged to 9.2 in JIRA but not completed. Do we have updates for these items? - SOLR-16653

Re: [DISCUSS] Language detection in Solr

2023-03-07 Thread Eric Pugh
+1 agreed for Tika and deprecating langdetect. I was surprised to see how hold langdetect was! > On Mar 6, 2023, at 4:43 PM, Alessandro Benedetti wrote: > > +1 for delegating to Tika which is a much better place for that (and that > they are actively evolving). > > +1 for deprecating the

Re: Welcome Andy Webb as Solr committer

2023-03-07 Thread Ilan Ginzburg
Welcome Andy and congrats! On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 7:52 AM Mikhail Khludnev wrote: > Welcome, Andy! > > On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 10:54 PM Andy Webb wrote: > > > hi all, thank you for the invitation and welcome messages - this has been > > an unexpected honour! > > > > I'm currently Technical

Result Grouping on alias collection

2023-03-07 Thread Vinayak Hegde
Hello everyone, I hope this email finds you well. I am reaching out to discuss a strange situation we are facing with result grouping. We currently have two collections, CollectionA and CollectionB, both of which contain an identical document, document1. We have created a new alias collection that