I'm seeing intermittent failures if I run this test in the IDE, but this
seed reproduces reliably
./gradlew :solr:core:test --tests
"org.apache.solr.cloud.api.collections.CollectionReloadTest.testCreateReloadDeletePull
{seed=[5034E25078269F40:AA23984EFF0D7295]}" -Ptests.jvms=12
"-Ptests.jvmargs=-X
@Kevin, Cool, I think with 4-5 people volunteering this is a go, and
perhaps the working group can do a quick kick off (30 min) online call
somewhere around the 15th?
@Marcus Please don't hesitate to suggest improvements (or implement them!)
Also feel 100% free to suggest improvements to my list o
This test seems quite grumpy. Any1 know why?
http://fucit.org/solr-jenkins-reports/failure-report.html
--
http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
http://www.the111shift.com (play)
Also happy to contribute from the outside, or one foot in rather :-)
Security is my motivation for most of the work that I have done in the
project to date.
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 3:51 PM Kevin Risden wrote:
> I'm happy to contribute.
>
> Kevin Risden
>
>
> On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 3:47 PM Arrie
HI all,
I have done a lot of research and there is not really a path forward with a
modern UI that does not require a NodeJS server process. Given the push
back from the last Committer meeting,* I'd like to propose that I move
forward with work on the new Solr UI as a plugin that works with the ne
I'm happy to contribute.
Kevin Risden
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 3:47 PM Arrieta, Alejandro <
aarri...@perrinsoftware.com> wrote:
> Hi Gus,
>
> thx 4 clarification.
> Well I need to work on those 2 requirements then :-)
>
> Thanks
> Alejandro Arrieta
>
>
> On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 3:40 PM Gus Heck w
Hi Gus,
thx 4 clarification.
Well I need to work on those 2 requirements then :-)
Thanks
Alejandro Arrieta
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 3:40 PM Gus Heck wrote:
> Unfortunately, since part of the duties will be responding to the queries
> sent to secur...@solr.apache.org, one must be both a committe
Unfortunately, since part of the duties will be responding to the queries
sent to secur...@solr.apache.org, one must be both a committer and a PMC
member. However, I expect that this group will make suggestions about
anything unrelated to un-announced security issues to the wider list for a
typical
Hello Team,
Do you need to be a committer to join the group?
Kind Regards,
Alejandro Arrieta
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 3:23 PM Gus Heck wrote:
> Cool that means so far we have:
>
>1. Me (Gus Heck)
>2. Jason Gerlowski
>3. Mike Drob
>4. (maybe?) David Smiley
>
>
> On Tue, May 2, 20
Cool that means so far we have:
1. Me (Gus Heck)
2. Jason Gerlowski
3. Mike Drob
4. (maybe?) David Smiley
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 3:02 PM Mike Drob wrote:
> Howdy folks. I'd be happy to step into this working group.
>
> On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 12:34 PM Gus Heck wrote:
>
> > Awesome,
Howdy folks. I'd be happy to step into this working group.
On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 12:34 PM Gus Heck wrote:
> Awesome, glad to have you Jason, I in the end feel the same way about my
> spot. Mostly I qualify as "concerned citizen", possibly with "who thought
> about it some and has ideas" added.
What is the best way to fix this? I went into branch_9x and checked, and yeah, I totally goofed it somehow….. Can I commit the attached patch directly to branch_9x?
patch.patch
Description: Binary data
On May 2, 2023, at 3:53 AM, Jan Høydahl wrote:Last successful jenkins "check" on branch_9x w
Last successful jenkins "check" on branch_9x was 26 days ago:
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Check-9.x/
Errors like this
1. ERROR in
/tmp/src/solr/solr/solrj/src/java/org/apache/solr/client/solrj/impl/ConcurrentUpdateSolrClient.java
(at line 119)
this.pollQueueTimeMill
13 matches
Mail list logo
