Re: [DISCUSS] Community Virtual Meetup, September 2023

2023-09-21 Thread Houston Putman
2 On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 11:11 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: > (1) or (2) > > > 21. sep. 2023 kl. 14:35 skrev raghavan m : > > > > Hello everyone, > > I am following up on this thread. > > We have approximately 9 more days in september 2023. What is a good time > > for all (or most) of us to meet? > >

Re: [JENKINS] Solr » Solr-Check-main - Build # 7785 - Still Failing!

2023-09-21 Thread David Smiley
Alternatively we simply migrate these to Crave.io based on containerized (thus isolated) builds? I can do this. ~ David On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 11:27 AM Houston Putman wrote: > Made a new ticket instead, > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-25002 > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 10:31 AM

Re: Sitemap to get latest reference manual to rank in Google/Bing?

2023-09-21 Thread Walter Underwood
I would also prefer to have the old versions in web search. Antora can build a sitemap.xml file, so the right place to do this work is probably in the ref guide part of the Solr build. URLs that are not in the sitemap will still get indexed, so we can use the sitemap to hint that the latest

Re: Sitemap to get latest reference manual to rank in Google/Bing?

2023-09-21 Thread Arrieta, Alejandro
Hello, Please don't remove the indexing of older Solr guides. It helps to search for "Solr X.Y what_to_search" and get the link to the corresponding guide. Thumbs up to give higher priority to the latest guide. Kind Regards, Alejandro Arrieta On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 3:42 PM Walter Underwood

Re: Sitemap to get latest reference manual to rank in Google/Bing?

2023-09-21 Thread Walter Underwood
Actually, the robots.txt file should also disallow the 9.x guides. That won’t touch guide/latest. User-agent: * Disallow: /guide/9* Disallow: /guide/8* Disallow: /guide/7* Disallow: /guide/6* wunder > On Sep 21, 2023, at 2:38 PM, Walter Underwood wrote: > > I’m actually OK with them being

Re: Sitemap to get latest reference manual to rank in Google/Bing?

2023-09-21 Thread Walter Underwood
I’m actually OK with them being indexed. It could be helpful to search for “Solr 8.11 aliases” or something like that. The priority attribute in sitemap.xml should boost the default, latest manual and that shouldn’t require any web server config. I’m glad to craft a static sitemap.xml file.

Re: Sitemap to get latest reference manual to rank in Google/Bing?

2023-09-21 Thread Jan Høydahl
Yea, it's a pain. Have you asked Infra whether mod_headers is activated and allowed from .htaccess? Can we ask them to check error logs? Jan > 21. sep. 2023 kl. 18:08 skrev Houston Putman : > > I've been trying to get this working for the last year. Basically our issue > is that the htaccess

Re: Sitemap to get latest reference manual to rank in Google/Bing?

2023-09-21 Thread Houston Putman
I've been trying to get this working for the last year. Basically our issue is that the htaccess files do not add the right X-Robots-Tag header for old ref guide pages. https://github.com/apache/solr-site/blob/main/themes/solr/templates/htaccess.ref-guide-old#L1 This works locally, but in the

Sitemap to get latest reference manual to rank in Google/Bing?

2023-09-21 Thread Walter Underwood
When I get web search results that include the Solr Reference Guide, I often get older versions (6.6, 7.4) in the results. I would prefer to always get the latest reference (https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/latest/index.html). I think we can list the URLs for that in a sitemap.xml file with a

Re: [DISCUSS] Community Virtual Meetup, September 2023

2023-09-21 Thread Jan Høydahl
(1) or (2) > 21. sep. 2023 kl. 14:35 skrev raghavan m : > > Hello everyone, > I am following up on this thread. > We have approximately 9 more days in september 2023. What is a good time > for all (or most) of us to meet? > Please reply to this email by voting for one of the following options :

Re: [DISCUSS] Community Virtual Meetup, September 2023

2023-09-21 Thread Jason Gerlowski
I'll vote for option 2. On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 1:35 AM raghavan m wrote: > > Hello everyone, > I am following up on this thread. > We have approximately 9 more days in september 2023. What is a good time > for all (or most) of us to meet? > Please reply to this email by voting for one of the